This present study uses C. elegans as a model to investigate how sex differences can influence sensory behavior and decision-making when encountering conflicting cues. We use a multi-sensory behavioral assay to characterize the differences between hermaphrodites and male worms when escaping from a food lawn during exposure to repulsive odors, such as, 2-nonanone. We find that male worms show a delayed food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodite worms, and this is observed across multiple repulsive cues (undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde) and multiple food types (E. coli OP50 and Comamonas sp). Overall, providing a platform to investigate how nervous systems differ across sexes, and how this influences sensory-dependent decision-making behavior.
","acknowledgements":"We thank biology undergraduate lab members of the Harris lab for reading and critical discussion manuscript and with analyzing the data generated in each experiment with Dr. Harris. This project was planned and executed by undergraduate researchers under supervision of the principal investigator of the lab(Dr. Gareth Harris). We also thank the Zhang Lab(Dr. Yun Zhang, Harvard University) for initial discussion for this project. We thank CGC for strains for this project. We also thank Biology program Instructional Support technicians, Catherine Hutchinson and Mike Mahoney for their diligent efforts with reagent ordering and help with other aspects of our lab. ","authors":[{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"Duncan.tanner@csuci.edu","firstName":"Duncan","lastName":"Tanner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"denise.carigo144@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Denise ","lastName":"Carigo","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","fundingAcquisition","formalAnalysis","methodology","project","supervision","validation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"Chane.Sevilla592@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Chane ","lastName":"Sevilla","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"madison.lewis960@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"Lewis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","project","resources","software","supervision","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","validation","fundingAcquisition","dataCuration","conceptualization"],"email":"Gareth.harris@csuci.edu","firstName":"Gareth","lastName":"Harris","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":null}],"awards":null,"conflictsOfInterest":null,"dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided through laboratory start-up funds (2017-2020, PI: Dr. Gareth Harris, CSUCI). Funds were also provided through CSUCI mini grant award for 2020 - 2021(Dr. Gareth Harris). For select students who were included in authorship, this material is based upon work supported by the HSI-STEM Model for Research and Teaching program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant HRD-1928693 (Fall/Spring 2020/2021).","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/f05dbaf58ff7cbb934994add290be28a.jpg"},"imageCaption":"A-G
A) Schematic of assay that measures wild type hermaphrodite and male worms in a multi-sensory behavior on E. coli OP50 during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone repellent (See Methods, Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). All assays ranging from 45 - 60 minutes per assay for hermaphrodite compared to male worms.
B) Wild type hermaphrodite worms show normal food leaving during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone odor (n=4 repeated days tested for wild type hermaphrodite worms) (0-45 minutes assayed). Wild type worms leaving food patch across 45 minutes (as described in Harris et al., 2019). E. coli OP50 food lawn. 2-nonanone used.
C) i) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms versus wild type N2 male worms examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on E. coli OP50 (n=8 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms). (0 - 60 minutes assayed), Males show delayed food leaving during 2-nonanone exposure, males were compared to hermaphrodite worms. Hermaphrodites, (Black line), Males, (Red line), ii) Images showing wild type N2 male worms in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay (N2 males shown on E. coli OP50 food patch just after 2-nonanone addition and after 10 minutes of 2-nonanone exposure (both images taken in the same experiment on the same day).
D) Males were examined for food leaving during exposure to the repellent, undiluted benzaldehyde (100%) compared to hermaphrodite worms, (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=4 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms), Hermaphrodites, (Black line), Males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. E. coli OP50 food lawn. Benzaldehyde used.
E) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms compared to N2 male worms were examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on a Comamonas sp food patch, (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type male versus hermaphrodite worms), males were compared to hermaphrodite worms under identical conditions tested, Hermaphrodites, (Black line), Males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. Comamonas sp bacterial food lawn used. 2-nonanone used.
F) Male worms were examined for their ability to reach the edge of the food patch during 2-nonanone exposure (measuring 90% of worms that reach the edge of the food patch) (Harris et al., 2019) (n=3 repeated days), n.s=not statistically significant when comparing hermaphrodites and male worms tested on same day. Hermaphrodites, (White column), Males, (Black column).
G) Wild type N2 male worms were examined for their ability to repel from 2-nonanone (100%, undiluted) when compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay. No food was present on the plate during this assay (See Methods, Troemel et al., 1997). n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type hermaphrodites versus male worms. Hermaphrodites, (White column), Males, (Black column). Avoidance Index ranging from (0 to -1.0).
We analyzed the Mean ± SEM, Student’s t-test, * p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001. All male worms were examined in parallel to wild type hermaphrodite worms tested on the same day under identical assay conditions. Each 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay for hermaphrodites or males used between 20-25 worms per assay. n=number of repeated days tested for each behavioral assay from A-G.
","imageTitle":"Male and hermaphrodite C. elegans show different food leaving behavior during exposure to undiluted repulsive odor cues
","methods":"C. elegans strains were cultivated under the standard conditions (Brenner et al., 1974). Wild type N2 hermaphrodite young adults, and wild type male adults were used in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving experiment for this study.
Worm culturing, plate preparation and multi-sensory assay. All hermaphrodite and male worms were grown to young adult under E. coli OP50 well-fed conditions prior to performing behavior assay (Brenner et al., 1974, Harris et al., 2019).
Multi-sensory assay to analyze male vs hermaphrodite adult worms. For the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay. Wild Type worms (N2) were assayed as previously described (Harris et al., 2019). For all worms, E.coli OP50 was used as the food source. For the preparation of assay plates, the NGM (Nematode Growth Medium) agar was made and poured into small assay plates (6 cm) and then allowed to cool and solidify (using standard NGM plate preparation protocols). After two days, a liquid suspension of E. coli OP50 was prepared; consisting of 40 mL of NGM media and E. coli OP50 colonies added to the NGM media, this media was then placed at 26°C overnight. The next morning, the E. coli OP50 culture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. 35 mL of the NGM was removed and discarded. The E. coli OP50 pellet was then re-suspended in 5 mL of NGM through mixing, and then 55 µL of this E. coli OP50 culture was then added to the center of an NGM agar assay plate (as seen in Fig. 1A, Schematic of behavioral assay). All worms were grown at 20-23°C on NGM plates that contained a lawn of E. coli OP50. Next 20-25 young adult worms (either hermaphrodite or male worms) are placed onto the 1 cm diameter food lawn and are allowed to acclimate for one hour. After 1 hour, a drop of 2-nonanone repellent (1 µL) is placed approximately two worm lengths away from the food lawn. The number of worms on the lawn was counted every 5 minutes for a total of 60 minutes, and the number of hermaphrodite or male worms that left the food lawn was determined. Food leaving is analyzed during exposure to the repellent 2-nonanone (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Worms present on the food at each 5-minute time-point is counted. For each male plate of worms tested, there was a separate hermaphrodite assay plate examined in parallel. No males were mixed with hermaphrodite adults worms during the behavioral assay. For all 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assays on Comamonas sp food lawn, the assay was prepared and tested using identical conditions to E. coli OP50 assays tested above. For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 adult hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male adult worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. n = number of repeated days tested across A - G.
Assay to measure the ability to reach the edge of a food patch during 2-nonanone exposure
Wild type hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for their ability (Time to reach the edge) to reach the furthest edge of the food patch during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone. 20-25 hermaphrodites and males were examined per replicate. Wild type N2 hermaphrodites and wild type N2 males were examined for the time taken for 90% of the worms to reach the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone drop placement (last sector of the food patch). Time was determined as time taken (sec) for worms to reach the edge of the food from the point of 2-nonanone addition next to the E. coli OP50 food patch. The 1 cm food patch was divided into 5 sectors (0.2 cm each). Sectors A on food patch being closest to the 2-nonanone, Sector E on food patch being furthest away from 2-nonanone drop (As previously described in Harris et al., 2019). Wild type N2 male worms were measured and compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodites tested in parallel on separate behavior assay plates. Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms and male worms were not mixed on behavioral assay plates. Mean±SEM, student’s t-test, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. n=number of repeated days tested for hermaphrodite and male worms.
2-nonanone avoidance assay
To examine the avoidance of 2-nonanone in hermaphrodites and males, chemotaxis assays were performed essentially as previously described (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of a square plate that was divided into sectors A, B, C, D, E and F and 2 drops of 1 µl of undiluted 2-nonanone was added to one side and 2 drops of 1 µl ethanol was added to the opposite side of the plate as a control. Approximately 75-100 hermaphrodite or male worms were used in each assay. 2-nonanone avoidance was analyzed by counting the number of worms in the sectors A-B, C-D, and E-F with E-F being furthest away from the 2-nonanone point sources. The avoidance index was calculated as the number of animals in sectors A and B (at 2-nonanone) minus the number of animals in the sectors E and F (at control) and normalized with the total number of animals in all 6 sectors on plate (Avoidance Index between 0 and -1.0). For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05*, p≤0.01**, p≤0.001***.
","reagents":"List of worm and bacterial strains used in experiments in present study
1) Wild type N2 Bristol hermaphrodite C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
2) N2 wild type male C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
3) E. coli OP50 bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
4) DA1877 Comamonas sp bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
All strains were provided by the CGC (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center) at the University of Minnesota, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
This project was funded through lab start-up (Harris G), California State University Channel Islands and Mini-Grant awarded, California State University Channel Islands, 2020 - 2021.
Chemicals used in study. All chemicals used in this study, including, 2-nonanone (Cas # 821-55-6) and Benzaldehyde (Cas # 100-52-7) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
","patternDescription":"Sex differences across organisms has been an intense area of research over the last 50 years. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms underlying many behavioral differences, including sensation, perception of sensory cues and decision-making and how this occurs at the level of the brain is still not understood. Sex differences have been identified from humans to worms. A number of studies have demonstrated differences between males and females in processes, including, olfaction, thermoregulation, aggression, learning and mood (Bjorkqvist et al., 1994; Doty et al., 1985, Berger-Sweeney et al., 1995, Halpern et al., 2000, Kaciuba-Uscilko et al., 2001; Bielsky et al., 2020). Animal studies have suggested that human behavioral sex biases might have biological underpinnings. The understanding of these differences in neural mechanisms that result in variation in decision-making processes across female and male systems is not fully understood. The Hermaphrodite nematode C. elegans in different contexts are able to sense and perform either attraction or avoidance to an array of environmental cues (Bargmann et al.,1991; Troemel et al., 1997; Debono and Maricq, 2004; review; Chao et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2005; Ghosh et al., 2017, review). In addition, hermaphrodites are able to generate decisions when encountering conflicting cues that are presented simultaneously (Ishihara et al., 2002; Ghosh et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2019). Male C. elegans have been shown to sense a number of chemicals, including pheromones, food cues, diacetyl and salt (White et al., 2006; Sakai et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Wexler et al., 2020; Loxterkamp et al., 2021). To address sex specific differences in behavior, we used C. elegans to understand whether wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently when exposed to conflicting cues, such as, food and the repulsive odor cue, 2-nonanone (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). We have examined the behavioral differences between hermaphrodites and males in a “multi-sensory behavioral paradigm” examined in C. elegans comparing hermaphrodites and male worms for their decision to leave a food lawn when exposed to the repulsive cue, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1A, See Schematic diagram, Harris et al., 2019). We examined any differences between males and hermaphrodite adults in our multi-sensory behavioral assay, where both hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone. A number of genes and neurons have been previously identified for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving in hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Wild type hermaphrodites leave the E. coli(OP50) food patch within 10-15 minutes as normally observed after 2-nonanone addition (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, when examining male worms we observed males showing a significantly delayed food-leaving during exposure to the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1Ci(graph) and 1Cii(images showing N2 males with reduced food leaving after 10 minutes). Suggesting, males leave a food patch slower than hermaphrodites when stimulated by the presence of a repulsive odor. To address if N2 male worms were smelling 2-nonanone similar to hermaphrodites, we used multiple approaches. We analyzed male worm avoidance behavior to 2-nonanone using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay (Troemel et al., 1997). We found that N2 male worms avoided 2-nonanone the same as wild type N2 hermaphrodites (Fig. 1G). This was evident by N2 males avoiding 2-nonanone as strongly as wild type hermaphrodites tested in parallel. We also analyzed the male worms during the exposure to 2-nonanone while on the food patch. This was done by analyzing male behavior during the assay (See Fig. 1Cii Image of N2 males during repulsion) and measuring the time to reach the edge of the food patch after 2-nonanone stimuli was added next to the food patch (See Schematic Fig. 1a). Male worms crawled to the edge of the food and remained at the furthest edge away from the 2-nonanone repellent like wild-type hermaphrodite animals, suggesting N2 males could sense and perform a repulsive response to 2-nonanone (measured time taken for 90% of worms to reach the edge of the food) (Fig. 1F). This suggests that there is a difference in the decision to leave food during repulsive odor exposure, based on actual decision to leave food and not a difference in the general sensation of the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1F). To further understand how general or specific these male differences to hermaphrodite worms are, we next varied two conditions. First, we used a second volatile repellent, benzaldehyde (undiluted) and measured benzaldehyde-dependent food leaving in males versus hermaphrodites (Yoshida et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2019). Interestingly, males also showed delayed food leaving in response to undiluted benzaldehyde when compared to wild type hermaphrodite animals (Fig. 1D). In addition, we changed the food patch type to assess any effect on male worm food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms (See Fig. 1C). Wild type hermaphrodite worms have been shown to exhibit a variety of behavioral outputs in response to food and food associated cues, including, showing varied feeding rates, sensory-dependent locomotory behavior, behavioral preference and food leaving dynamics (Zhang et al., 2005; Shtonda and Avery, 2006; Meisel et al., 2013; Olofsson et al., 2015). We chose to use Comamonas sp food lawns and assess male food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodites. Wild type hermaphrodite worms also leave Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone, as previously described for wild-type hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Upon examining male worms for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms, male worms are also significantly delayed food leavers on Comamonas sp, suggesting male worms show this general delayed food leaving across multiple foods, including at least, the regular tested food source, E. coli OP50 and also Comamonas sp during exposure to the 2-nonanone repellent (Fig. 1E). Overall, this suggests that wild type N2 male worms show decreased food leaving when compared to N2 hermaphrodites during exposure to different chemical repellents, including, undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde and across different food types. Wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently in sensory responses to odors, locomotion dynamics, conditioning in salt chemotaxis (Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2013). This provides an avenue for further investigation of the neural mechanisms that influence behavioral differences observed between sexes in a multi sensory behavior.
","references":[{"reference":"Berger-Sweeney, J., Arnold, A., Gabeau, D., & Mills, J. (1995). Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: Effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 859–873.
","pubmedId":"8554711","doi":""},{"reference":"Brenner, S. (1974). The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1): 71-94.
","pubmedId":"4366476","doi":""},{"reference":"Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., and Lagerspetz, K.M.J. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior 20: 27-33.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q."},{"reference":"Doty, R.L., Applebaum, S., Zusho, H., Settle, R.G. (1985). Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Europsychologia 23(5): 667-72.
","pubmedId":"4058710","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh, D.D., Nitabach, M.N., Zhang, Y., Harris, G. (2017). Multisensory integration in C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43: 110-118. Review.
","pubmedId":"28273525","doi":""},{"reference":"Halpern, D.F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605290."},{"reference":"Harris, G., Linfield, G., Wu, T., Choi, M.K, Liu, H., Zhang, Y. (2019). Molecular and Cellular modulators for multisensory integration in C. elegans. PloS Genetics 15(3): (e1007706).
","pubmedId":"30849079","doi":""},{"reference":"Portman, D.S. (2017). Sexual modulation of sex-shared neurons and circuits in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Res 95(1-2): 527-538.
","pubmedId":"27870393","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryan, D.A., Miller, R.M., Lee, K., Neal, S.J., Fagan, K.A., Sengupta, P. (2014). Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr Biol 24: 2509–2517.
","pubmedId":"25438941","doi":""},{"reference":"Troemel, E.R., Kimmel, B.E., Bargmann, C.I. (1997). Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91(2): 161-9.
","pubmedId":"9346234","doi":""},{"reference":"Wexler, L.R., Miller, R.M., Portman, D.S. (2020). C. elegans Males Integrate Food Signals and Biological Sex to Modulate State-Dependent Chemosensation and Behavioral Prioritization. Curr Biol 28: S0960-9822(20)30645-X.
","pubmedId":"32531276","doi":""},{"reference":"Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Bargmann, C.I. (2005). Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438(7065): 179-84.
","pubmedId":"16281027","doi":""},{"reference":"Ishihara, T., Iino, Y., Mohri, A., Mori, I., Gengyo-Ando, K., Mitani, S., Katsura, I. (2002). HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 109: 639-49.
","pubmedId":"12062106","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh, D.D., Sanders, T., Hong, S., McCurdy, L.Y., Chase, D.L., Cohen, N., Koelle, M.R., Nitabach, M.N. (2016). Neural Architecture of Hunger-Dependent Multisensory Decision Making in C. elegans. Neuron 92: 1049-1062.
","pubmedId":"27866800","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai., N, Iwata., R, Yokoi, S., Butcher, R.A., Clardy, J., Tomioka, M., Iino, Y. (2013). A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8(7): e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Bielsky, I.F., Hu, S.B. & Young, L.J. (2005). Sexual dimorphism in the vasopressin system: lack of an altered behavioral phenotype in female V1a receptor knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res 164: 132–136.
","pubmedId":"16046007","doi":""},{"reference":"Yoshida, K., Hirotsu, T., Tagawa, T., Oda, S., Wakabayashi, T., Iino, Y., Ishihara, T. (2012). Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3: 739. 10.1038/ncomms1750.
","pubmedId":"22415830","doi":""},{"reference":"Loxterkamp, E., Cha, J., Wu, K., Sullivan, J., Holbrook, O., Ghaith, H., Srun, L., Bauer, D.E. (2021). Behavioral Differences between Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans. microPublication Biology 10.17912/micropub.biology.000431.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai, N., Iwata, R., Yokoi, S., Butcher, R.A., Clardy, J., Tomioka, M., Iino, Y. (2013). A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8: e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""}],"title":"Sex differences in decision-making: Identifying multisensory behavioral differences in males and hermaphrodites
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"KJ Yook"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"e51cbe3a-01a0-457b-a204-4c84e0437495","decision":"revise","abstract":"This present study uses C. elegans as a model to investigate how sex differences can influence sensory behavior and decision-making when encountering conflicting cues. We use a multi-sensory behavioral assay to characterize the differences between hermaphrodites and male worms when escaping from a food lawn during exposure to repulsive odors, such as, 2-nonanone. We find that male worms show a delayed food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodite worms, and this is observed across multiple repulsive cues (undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde) and multiple food types (E. coli OP50 and Comamonas sp). Overall, providing a platform to investigate how nervous systems differ across sexes, and how this influences sensory-dependent decision-making behavior.
","acknowledgements":"We thank biology undergraduate lab members of the Harris lab for reading and critical discussion manuscript and with analyzing the data generated in each experiment with Dr. Harris. This project was planned and executed by undergraduate researchers under supervision of the principal investigator of the lab(Dr. Gareth Harris). We also thank the Zhang Lab(Dr. Yun Zhang, Harvard University) for initial discussion for this project. We thank CGC for strains for this project. We also thank Biology program Instructional Support technicians, Catherine Hutchinson and Mike Mahoney for their diligent efforts with reagent ordering and help with other aspects of our lab. ","authors":[{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"duncan.tanner490@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Duncan","lastName":"Tanner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"denise.carigo144@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Denise ","lastName":"Carigo","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","fundingAcquisition","formalAnalysis","methodology","project","supervision","validation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"Chane.Sevilla592@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Chane ","lastName":"Sevilla","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"madison.lewis960@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"Lewis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","project","resources","software","supervision","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","validation","fundingAcquisition","dataCuration","conceptualization"],"email":"Gareth.harris@csuci.edu","firstName":"Gareth","lastName":"Harris","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":null}],"awards":null,"conflictsOfInterest":null,"dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided through laboratory start-up funds (2017-2020, PI: Dr. Gareth Harris, CSUCI). Funds were also provided through CSUCI mini grant award for 2020 - 2021(Dr. Gareth Harris). For select students who were included in authorship, this material is based upon work supported by the HSI-STEM Model for Research and Teaching program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant HRD-1928693 (Fall/Spring 2020/2021).","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/c1f686255e6239e5eab7463998ecddf8.jpg"},"imageCaption":"A-G
A) Schematic of assay that measures wild type hermaphrodite and male worms in a multi-sensory behavior on E. coli OP50 during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone repellent (See Methods, Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). All assays ranging from 45 - 60 minutes per assay for hermaphrodite compared to male worms.
B) Wild type hermaphrodite worms show normal food leaving during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone odor (n=4 repeated days tested for wild type hermaphrodite worms) (0-45 minutes assayed). Wild type worms leaving food patch across 45 minutes (as described in Harris et al., 2019). E. coli OP50 food lawn. 2-nonanone used.
C) i) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms versus wild type N2 male worms examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on E. coli OP50 (n=8 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms). (0 - 60 minutes assayed), Males show delayed food leaving during 2-nonanone exposure, males were compared to hermaphrodite worms. Hermaphrodites, (Black line), Males, (Red line), ii) Images showing wild type N2 male worms in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay (N2 males shown on E. coli OP50 food patch just after 2-nonanone addition and after 10 minutes of 2-nonanone exposure (both images taken in the same experiment on the same day).
D) Males were examined for food leaving during exposure to the repellent, undiluted benzaldehyde (100%) compared to hermaphrodite worms, (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=4 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms), Hermaphrodites, (Black line), Males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. E. coli OP50 food lawn. Benzaldehyde used.
E) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms compared to N2 male worms were examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on a Comamonas sp food patch, (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type male versus hermaphrodite worms), males were compared to hermaphrodite worms under identical conditions tested, Hermaphrodites, (Black line), Males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. Comamonas sp bacterial food lawn used. 2-nonanone used.
F) Male worms were examined for their ability to reach the edge of the food patch during 2-nonanone exposure (measuring 90% of worms that reach the edge of the food patch) (Harris et al., 2019) (n=3 repeated days), n.s=not statistically significant when comparing hermaphrodites and male worms tested on same day. Hermaphrodites, (White column), Males, (Black column).
G) Wild type N2 male worms were examined for their ability to repel from 2-nonanone (100%, undiluted) when compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay. No food was present on the plate during this assay (See Methods, Troemel et al., 1997). n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type hermaphrodites versus male worms. Hermaphrodites, (White column), Males, (Black column). Avoidance Index ranging from (0 to -1.0).
We analyzed the Mean ± SEM, Student’s t-test, * p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001. All male worms were examined in parallel to wild type hermaphrodite worms tested on the same day under identical assay conditions. Each 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay for hermaphrodites or males used between 20-25 worms per assay. n=number of repeated days tested for each behavioral assay from A-G.
","imageTitle":"Male and hermaphrodite C. elegans show different food leaving behavior during exposure to undiluted repulsive odor cues
","methods":"C. elegans strains were cultivated under the standard conditions (Brenner et al., 1974). Wild type N2 hermaphrodite young adults, and wild type male adults were used in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving experiment for this study.
Worm culturing, plate preparation and multi-sensory assay. All hermaphrodite and male worms were grown to young adult under E. coli OP50 well-fed conditions prior to performing behavior assay (Brenner et al., 1974, Harris et al., 2019).
Multi-sensory assay to analyze male vs hermaphrodite adult worms. For the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay. Wild Type worms (N2) were assayed as previously described (Harris et al., 2019). For all worms, E.coli OP50 was used as the food source. For the preparation of assay plates, the NGM (Nematode Growth Medium) agar was made and poured into small assay plates (6 cm) and then allowed to cool and solidify (using standard NGM plate preparation protocols). After two days, a liquid suspension of E. coli OP50 was prepared; consisting of 40 mL of NGM media and E. coli OP50 colonies added to the NGM media, this media was then placed at 26°C overnight. The next morning, the E. coli OP50 culture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. 35 mL of the NGM was removed and discarded. The E. coli OP50 pellet was then re-suspended in 5 mL of NGM through mixing, and then 55 µL of this E. coli OP50 culture was then added to the center of an NGM agar assay plate (as seen in Fig. 1A, Schematic of behavioral assay). All worms were grown at 20-23°C on NGM plates that contained a lawn of E. coli OP50. Next 20-25 young adult worms (either hermaphrodite or male worms) are placed onto the 1 cm diameter food lawn and are allowed to acclimate for one hour. After 1 hour, a drop of 2-nonanone repellent (1 µL) is placed approximately two worm lengths away from the food lawn. The number of worms on the lawn was counted every 5 minutes for a total of 60 minutes, and the number of hermaphrodite or male worms that left the food lawn was determined. Food leaving is analyzed during exposure to the repellent 2-nonanone (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Worms present on the food at each 5-minute time-point is counted. For each male plate of worms tested, there was a separate hermaphrodite assay plate examined in parallel. No males were mixed with hermaphrodite adults worms during the behavioral assay. For all 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assays on Comamonas sp food lawn, the assay was prepared and tested using identical conditions to E. coli OP50 assays tested above. For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 adult hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male adult worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. n = number of repeated days tested across A - G.
Assay to measure the ability to reach the edge of a food patch during 2-nonanone exposure
Wild type hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for their ability (Time to reach the edge) to reach the furthest edge of the food patch during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone. 20-25 hermaphrodites and males were examined per replicate. Wild type N2 hermaphrodites and wild type N2 males were examined for the time taken for 90% of the worms to reach the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone drop placement (last sector of the food patch). Time was determined as time taken (sec) for worms to reach the edge of the food from the point of 2-nonanone addition next to the E. coli OP50 food patch. The 1 cm food patch was divided into 5 sectors (0.2 cm each). Sectors A on food patch being closest to the 2-nonanone, Sector E on food patch being furthest away from 2-nonanone drop (As previously described in Harris et al., 2019). Wild type N2 male worms were measured and compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodites tested in parallel on separate behavior assay plates. Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms and male worms were not mixed on behavioral assay plates. Mean±SEM, student’s t-test, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. n=number of repeated days tested for hermaphrodite and male worms.
2-nonanone avoidance assay
To examine the avoidance of 2-nonanone in hermaphrodites and males, chemotaxis assays were performed essentially as previously described (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of a square plate that was divided into sectors A, B, C, D, E and F and 2 drops of 1 µl of undiluted 2-nonanone was added to one side and 2 drops of 1 µl ethanol was added to the opposite side of the plate as a control. Approximately 75-100 hermaphrodite or male worms were used in each assay. 2-nonanone avoidance was analyzed by counting the number of worms in the sectors A-B, C-D, and E-F with E-F being furthest away from the 2-nonanone point sources. The avoidance index was calculated as the number of animals in sectors A and B (at 2-nonanone) minus the number of animals in the sectors E and F (at control) and normalized with the total number of animals in all 6 sectors on plate (Avoidance Index between 0 and -1.0). For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05*, p≤0.01**, p≤0.001***.
","reagents":"List of worm and bacterial strains used in experiments in present study
1) Wild type N2 Bristol hermaphrodite C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
2) N2 wild type male C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
3) E. coli OP50 bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
4) DA1877 Comamonas sp bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
All strains were provided by the CGC (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center) at the University of Minnesota, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
This project was funded through lab start-up (Harris G), California State University Channel Islands and Mini-Grant awarded, California State University Channel Islands, 2020 - 2021.
Chemicals used in study. All chemicals used in this study, including, 2-nonanone (Cas # 821-55-6) and Benzaldehyde (Cas # 100-52-7) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
","patternDescription":"Sex differences across organisms has been an intense area of research over the last 50 years. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms underlying many behavioral differences, including sensation, perception of sensory cues and decision-making and how this occurs at the level of the brain is still not understood. Sex differences have been identified from humans to worms. A number of studies have demonstrated differences between males and females in processes, including, olfaction, thermoregulation, aggression, learning and mood (Bjorkqvist et al., 1994; Doty et al., 1985, Berger-Sweeney et al., 1995, Halpern et al., 2000, Kaciuba-Uscilko et al., 2001; Bielsky et al., 2020). Animal studies have suggested that human behavioral sex biases might have biological underpinnings. The understanding of these differences in neural mechanisms that result in variation in decision-making processes across female and male systems is not fully understood. The Hermaphrodite nematode C. elegans in different contexts are able to sense and perform either attraction or avoidance to an array of environmental cues (Bargmann et al.,1991; Troemel et al., 1997; Debono and Maricq, 2004; review; Chao et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2005; Ghosh et al., 2017, review). In addition, hermaphrodites are able to generate decisions when encountering conflicting cues that are presented simultaneously (Ishihara et al., 2002; Ghosh et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2019). Male C. elegans have been shown to sense a number of chemicals, including pheromones, food cues, diacetyl and salt (White et al., 2006; Sakai et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Wexler et al., 2020; Loxterkamp et al., 2021). To address sex specific differences in behavior, we used C. elegans to understand whether wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently when exposed to conflicting cues, such as, food and the repulsive odor cue, 2-nonanone (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). We have examined the behavioral differences between hermaphrodites and males in a “multi-sensory behavioral paradigm” examined in C. elegans comparing hermaphrodites and male worms for their decision to leave a food lawn when exposed to the repulsive cue, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1A, See Schematic diagram, Harris et al., 2019). We examined any differences between males and hermaphrodite adults in our multi-sensory behavioral assay, where both hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone. A number of genes and neurons have been previously identified for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving in hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Wild type hermaphrodites leave the E. coli(OP50) food patch within 10-15 minutes as normally observed after 2-nonanone addition (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, when examining male worms we observed males showing a significantly delayed food-leaving during exposure to the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1Ci(graph) and 1Cii(images showing N2 males with reduced food leaving after 10 minutes). Suggesting, males leave a food patch slower than hermaphrodites when stimulated by the presence of a repulsive odor. To address if N2 male worms were smelling 2-nonanone similar to hermaphrodites, we used multiple approaches. We analyzed male worm avoidance behavior to 2-nonanone using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay (Troemel et al., 1997). We found that N2 male worms avoided 2-nonanone the same as wild type N2 hermaphrodites (Fig. 1G). This was evident by N2 males avoiding 2-nonanone as strongly as wild type hermaphrodites tested in parallel. We also analyzed the male worms during the exposure to 2-nonanone while on the food patch. This was done by analyzing male behavior during the assay (See Fig. 1Cii Image of N2 males during repulsion) and measuring the time to reach the edge of the food patch after 2-nonanone stimuli was added next to the food patch (See Schematic Fig. 1a). Male worms crawled to the edge of the food and remained at the furthest edge away from the 2-nonanone repellent like wild-type hermaphrodite animals, suggesting N2 males could sense and perform a repulsive response to 2-nonanone (measured time taken for 90% of worms to reach the edge of the food) (Fig. 1F). This suggests that there is a difference in the decision to leave food during repulsive odor exposure, based on actual decision to leave food and not a difference in the general sensation of the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1F). To further understand how general or specific these male differences to hermaphrodite worms are, we next varied two conditions. First, we used a second volatile repellent, benzaldehyde (undiluted) and measured benzaldehyde-dependent food leaving in males versus hermaphrodites (Yoshida et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2019). Interestingly, males also showed delayed food leaving in response to undiluted benzaldehyde when compared to wild type hermaphrodite animals (Fig. 1D). In addition, we changed the food patch type to assess any effect on male worm food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms (See Fig. 1C). Wild type hermaphrodite worms have been shown to exhibit a variety of behavioral outputs in response to food and food associated cues, including, showing varied feeding rates, sensory-dependent locomotory behavior, behavioral preference and food leaving dynamics (Zhang et al., 2005; Shtonda and Avery, 2006; Meisel et al., 2013; Olofsson et al., 2015). We chose to use Comamonas sp food lawns and assess male food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodites. Wild type hermaphrodite worms also leave Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone, as previously described for wild-type hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Upon examining male worms for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms, male worms are also significantly delayed food leavers on Comamonas sp, suggesting male worms show this general delayed food leaving across multiple foods, including at least, the regular tested food source, E. coli OP50 and also Comamonas sp during exposure to the 2-nonanone repellent (Fig. 1E). Overall, this suggests that wild type N2 male worms show decreased food leaving when compared to N2 hermaphrodites during exposure to different chemical repellents, including, undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde and across different food types. Wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently in sensory responses to odors, locomotion dynamics, conditioning in salt chemotaxis (Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2013). This provides an avenue for further investigation of the neural mechanisms that influence behavioral differences observed between sexes in a multi sensory behavior.
","references":[{"reference":"Berger-Sweeney, J., Arnold, A., Gabeau, D., & Mills, J. (1995). Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: Effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 859–873.
","pubmedId":"8554711","doi":""},{"reference":"Brenner, S. (1974). The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1): 71-94.
","pubmedId":"4366476","doi":""},{"reference":"Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., and Lagerspetz, K.M.J. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior 20: 27-33.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q."},{"reference":"Doty, R.L., Applebaum, S., Zusho, H., Settle, R.G. (1985). Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Europsychologia 23(5): 667-72.
","pubmedId":"4058710","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh, D.D., Nitabach, M.N., Zhang, Y., Harris, G. (2017). Multisensory integration in C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43: 110-118. Review.
","pubmedId":"28273525","doi":""},{"reference":"Halpern, D.F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605290."},{"reference":"Harris, G., Linfield, G., Wu, T., Choi, M.K, Liu, H., Zhang, Y. (2019). Molecular and Cellular modulators for multisensory integration in C. elegans. PloS Genetics 15(3): (e1007706).
","pubmedId":"30849079","doi":""},{"reference":"Portman, D.S. (2017). Sexual modulation of sex-shared neurons and circuits in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Res 95(1-2): 527-538.
","pubmedId":"27870393","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryan, D.A., Miller, R.M., Lee, K., Neal, S.J., Fagan, K.A., Sengupta, P. (2014). Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr Biol 24: 2509–2517.
","pubmedId":"25438941","doi":""},{"reference":"Troemel, E.R., Kimmel, B.E., Bargmann, C.I. (1997). Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91(2): 161-9.
","pubmedId":"9346234","doi":""},{"reference":"Wexler, L.R., Miller, R.M., Portman, D.S. (2020). C. elegans Males Integrate Food Signals and Biological Sex to Modulate State-Dependent Chemosensation and Behavioral Prioritization. Curr Biol 28: S0960-9822(20)30645-X.
","pubmedId":"32531276","doi":""},{"reference":"Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Bargmann, C.I. (2005). Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438(7065): 179-84.
","pubmedId":"16281027","doi":""},{"reference":"Ishihara, T., Iino, Y., Mohri, A., Mori, I., Gengyo-Ando, K., Mitani, S., Katsura, I. (2002). HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 109: 639-49.
","pubmedId":"12062106","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh, D.D., Sanders, T., Hong, S., McCurdy, L.Y., Chase, D.L., Cohen, N., Koelle, M.R., Nitabach, M.N. (2016). Neural Architecture of Hunger-Dependent Multisensory Decision Making in C. elegans. Neuron 92: 1049-1062.
","pubmedId":"27866800","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai., N, Iwata., R, Yokoi, S., Butcher, R.A., Clardy, J., Tomioka, M., Iino, Y. (2013). A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8(7): e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Bielsky, I.F., Hu, S.B. & Young, L.J. (2005). Sexual dimorphism in the vasopressin system: lack of an altered behavioral phenotype in female V1a receptor knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res 164: 132–136.
","pubmedId":"16046007","doi":""},{"reference":"Yoshida, K., Hirotsu, T., Tagawa, T., Oda, S., Wakabayashi, T., Iino, Y., Ishihara, T. (2012). Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3: 739. 10.1038/ncomms1750.
","pubmedId":"22415830","doi":""},{"reference":"Loxterkamp, E., Cha, J., Wu, K., Sullivan, J., Holbrook, O., Ghaith, H., Srun, L., Bauer, D.E. (2021). Behavioral Differences between Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans. microPublication Biology 10.17912/micropub.biology.000431.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai, N., Iwata, R., Yokoi, S., Butcher, R.A., Clardy, J., Tomioka, M., Iino, Y. (2013). A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8: e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""}],"title":"Sex differences in decision-making: Identifying multisensory behavioral differences in males and hermaphrodites
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"KJ Yook"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"1a56609b-d540-4bb1-b9d9-0c401c802103","decision":"revise","abstract":"This present study uses C. elegans as a model to investigate how sex differences can influence sensory behavior and decision-making when encountering conflicting cues. We use a multi-sensory behavioral assay to characterize the differences between hermaphrodites and male worms when escaping from a food lawn during exposure to repulsive odors, such as, 2-nonanone. We find that male worms show a delayed food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodite worms, and this is observed across multiple repulsive cues (undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde) and multiple food types (E. coli OP50 and Comamonas sp). Overall, providing a platform to investigate how nervous systems differ across sexes, and how this influences sensory-dependent decision-making behavior.
","acknowledgements":"We thank biology undergraduate lab members of the Harris lab for reading and critical discussion manuscript and with analyzing the data generated in each experiment with Dr. Harris. This project was planned and executed by undergraduate researchers under supervision of the principal investigator of the lab(Dr. Gareth Harris). We also thank the Zhang Lab(Dr. Yun Zhang, Harvard University) for initial discussion for this project. We thank CGC for strains for this project. We also thank Biology program Instructional Support technicians, Catherine Hutchinson and Mike Mahoney for their diligent efforts with reagent ordering and help with other aspects of our lab. ","authors":[{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"duncan.tanner490@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Duncan","lastName":"Tanner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"denise.carigo144@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Denise ","lastName":"Carigo","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","fundingAcquisition","formalAnalysis","methodology","project","supervision","validation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"Chane.Sevilla592@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Chane ","lastName":"Sevilla","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"madison.lewis960@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"Lewis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","project","resources","software","supervision","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","validation","fundingAcquisition","dataCuration","conceptualization"],"email":"Gareth.harris@csuci.edu","firstName":"Gareth","lastName":"Harris","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":null}],"awards":null,"conflictsOfInterest":null,"dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided through laboratory start-up funds (2017-2020, PI: Dr. Gareth Harris, CSUCI). Funds were also provided through CSUCI mini grant award for 2020 - 2021(Dr. Gareth Harris). For select students who were included in authorship, this material is based upon work supported by the HSI-STEM Model for Research and Teaching program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant HRD-1928693 (Fall/Spring 2020/2021).","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/a0e961bde2cf3b898880e58f4094cbcf.jpg"},"imageCaption":"A-G
A) Schematic of assay that measures wild type hermaphrodite and male worms in a multi-sensory behavior on E. coli OP50 during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone repellent (See Methods, Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). All assays ranging from 45 - 60 minutes per assay for hermaphrodite compared to male worms.
B) Wild type hermaphrodite worms show normal food leaving during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone odor (n=4 repeated days tested for wild type hermaphrodite worms) (0-45 minutes assayed). Wild type worms leaving food patch across 45 minutes (as described in Harris et al., 2019). E. coli OP50 food lawn. 2-nonanone used.
C) i) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms versus wild type N2 male worms examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on E. coli OP50 (n=8 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms). (0 - 60 minutes assayed), Males show delayed food leaving during 2-nonanone exposure, males were compared to hermaphrodite worms. Hermaphrodites, (Black line), Males, (Red line), ii) Images showing wild type N2 male worms in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay (N2 males shown on E. coli OP50 food patch just after 2-nonanone addition and after 10 minutes of 2-nonanone exposure (both images taken in the same experiment on the same day).
D) Males were examined for food leaving during exposure to the repellent, undiluted benzaldehyde (100%) compared to hermaphrodite worms, (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=4 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms), Hermaphrodites, (Black line), Males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. E. coli OP50 food lawn. Benzaldehyde used.
E) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms compared to N2 male worms were examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on a Comamonas sp food patch, (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type male versus hermaphrodite worms), males were compared to hermaphrodite worms under identical conditions tested, Hermaphrodites, (Black line), Males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. Comamonas sp bacterial food lawn used. 2-nonanone used.
F) Male worms were examined for their ability to reach the edge of the food patch during 2-nonanone exposure (measuring 90% of worms that reach the edge of the food patch) (Harris et al., 2019) (n=3 repeated days), n.s=not statistically significant when comparing hermaphrodites and male worms tested on same day. Hermaphrodites, (White column), Males, (Black column).
G) Wild type N2 male worms were examined for their ability to repel from 2-nonanone (100%, undiluted) when compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay. No food was present on the plate during this assay (See Methods, Troemel et al., 1997). n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type hermaphrodites versus male worms. Hermaphrodites, (White column), Males, (Black column). Avoidance Index ranging from (0 to -1.0).
We analyzed the Mean ± SEM, Student’s t-test, * p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001. All male worms were examined in parallel to wild type hermaphrodite worms tested on the same day under identical assay conditions. Each 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay for hermaphrodites or males used between 20-25 worms per assay. n=number of repeated days tested for each behavioral assay from A-G.
","imageTitle":"Male and hermaphrodite C. elegans show different food leaving behavior during exposure to undiluted repulsive odor cues
","methods":"C. elegans strains were cultivated under the standard conditions (Brenner et al., 1974). Wild type N2 hermaphrodite young adults, and wild type male adults were used in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving experiment for this study.
Worm culturing, plate preparation and multi-sensory assay. All hermaphrodite and male worms were grown to young adult under E. coli OP50 well-fed conditions prior to performing behavior assay (Brenner et al., 1974, Harris et al., 2019).
Multi-sensory assay to analyze male vs hermaphrodite adult worms. For the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay. Wild Type worms (N2) were assayed as previously described (Harris et al., 2019). For all worms, E.coli OP50 was used as the food source. For the preparation of assay plates, the NGM (Nematode Growth Medium) agar was made and poured into small assay plates (6 cm) and then allowed to cool and solidify (using standard NGM plate preparation protocols). After two days, a liquid suspension of E. coli OP50 was prepared; consisting of 40 mL of NGM media and E. coli OP50 colonies added to the NGM media, this media was then placed at 26°C overnight. The next morning, the E. coli OP50 culture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. 35 mL of the NGM was removed and discarded. The E. coli OP50 pellet was then re-suspended in 5 mL of NGM through mixing, and then 55 µL of this E. coli OP50 culture was then added to the center of an NGM agar assay plate (as seen in Fig. 1A, Schematic of behavioral assay). All worms were grown at 20-23°C on NGM plates that contained a lawn of E. coli OP50. Next 20-25 young adult worms (either hermaphrodite or male worms) are placed onto the 1 cm diameter food lawn and are allowed to acclimate for one hour. After 1 hour, a drop of 2-nonanone repellent (1 µL) is placed approximately two worm lengths away from the food lawn. The number of worms on the lawn was counted every 5 minutes for a total of 60 minutes, and the number of hermaphrodite or male worms that left the food lawn was determined. Food leaving is analyzed during exposure to the repellent 2-nonanone (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Worms present on the food at each 5-minute time-point is counted. For each male plate of worms tested, there was a separate hermaphrodite assay plate examined in parallel. No males were mixed with hermaphrodite adults worms during the behavioral assay. For all 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assays on Comamonas sp food lawn, the assay was prepared and tested using identical conditions to E. coli OP50 assays tested above. For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 adult hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male adult worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. n = number of repeated days tested across A - G.
Assay to measure the ability to reach the edge of a food patch during 2-nonanone exposure
Wild type hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for their ability (Time to reach the edge) to reach the furthest edge of the food patch during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone. 20-25 hermaphrodites and males were examined per replicate. Wild type N2 hermaphrodites and wild type N2 males were examined for the time taken for 90% of the worms to reach the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone drop placement (last sector of the food patch). Time was determined as time taken (sec) for worms to reach the edge of the food from the point of 2-nonanone addition next to the E. coli OP50 food patch. The 1 cm food patch was divided into 5 sectors (0.2 cm each). Sectors A on food patch being closest to the 2-nonanone, Sector E on food patch being furthest away from 2-nonanone drop (As previously described in Harris et al., 2019). Wild type N2 male worms were measured and compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodites tested in parallel on separate behavior assay plates. Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms and male worms were not mixed on behavioral assay plates. Mean±SEM, student’s t-test, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. n=number of repeated days tested for hermaphrodite and male worms.
2-nonanone avoidance assay
To examine the avoidance of 2-nonanone in hermaphrodites and males, chemotaxis assays were performed essentially as previously described (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of a square plate that was divided into sectors A, B, C, D, E and F and 2 drops of 1 µl of undiluted 2-nonanone was added to one side and 2 drops of 1 µl ethanol was added to the opposite side of the plate as a control. Approximately 75-100 hermaphrodite or male worms were used in each assay. 2-nonanone avoidance was analyzed by counting the number of worms in the sectors A-B, C-D, and E-F with E-F being furthest away from the 2-nonanone point sources. The avoidance index was calculated as the number of animals in sectors A and B (at 2-nonanone) minus the number of animals in the sectors E and F (at control) and normalized with the total number of animals in all 6 sectors on plate (Avoidance Index between 0 and -1.0). For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05*, p≤0.01**, p≤0.001***.
","reagents":"List of worm and bacterial strains used in experiments in present study
1) Wild type N2 Bristol hermaphrodite C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
2) N2 wild type male C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
3) E. coli OP50 bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
4) DA1877 Comamonas sp bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
All strains were provided by the CGC (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center) at the University of Minnesota, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
This project was funded through lab start-up (Harris G), California State University Channel Islands and Mini-Grant awarded, California State University Channel Islands, 2020 - 2021.
Chemicals used in study. All chemicals used in this study, including, 2-nonanone (Cas # 821-55-6) and Benzaldehyde (Cas # 100-52-7) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
","patternDescription":"Sex differences across organisms has been an intense area of research over the last 50 years. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms underlying many behavioral differences, including sensation, perception of sensory cues and decision-making and how this occurs at the level of the brain is still not understood. Sex differences have been identified from humans to worms. A number of studies have demonstrated differences between males and females in processes, including, olfaction, thermoregulation, aggression, learning and mood (Bjorkqvist et al., 1994; Doty et al., 1985, Berger-Sweeney et al., 1995, Halpern et al., 2000, Kaciuba-Uscilko et al., 2001; Bielsky et al., 2020). Animal studies have suggested that human behavioral sex biases might have biological underpinnings. The understanding of these differences in neural mechanisms that result in variation in decision-making processes across female and male systems is not fully understood. The Hermaphrodite nematode C. elegans in different contexts are able to sense and perform either attraction or avoidance to an array of environmental cues (Bargmann et al.,1991; Troemel et al., 1997; Debono and Maricq, 2004; review; Chao et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2005; Ghosh et al., 2017, review). In addition, hermaphrodites are able to generate decisions when encountering conflicting cues that are presented simultaneously (Ishihara et al., 2002; Ghosh et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2019). Male C. elegans have been shown to sense a number of chemicals, including pheromones, food cues, diacetyl and salt (White et al., 2006; Sakai et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Wexler et al., 2020; Loxterkamp et al., 2021). To address sex specific differences in behavior, we used C. elegans to understand whether wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently when exposed to conflicting cues, such as, food and the repulsive odor cue, 2-nonanone (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). We have examined the behavioral differences between hermaphrodites and males in a “multi-sensory behavioral paradigm” examined in C. elegans comparing hermaphrodites and male worms for their decision to leave a food lawn when exposed to the repulsive cue, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1A, See Schematic diagram, Harris et al., 2019). We examined any differences between males and hermaphrodite adults in our multi-sensory behavioral assay, where both hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone. A number of genes and neurons have been previously identified for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving in hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Wild type hermaphrodites leave the E. coli(OP50) food patch within 10-15 minutes as normally observed after 2-nonanone addition (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, when examining male worms we observed males showing a significantly delayed food-leaving during exposure to the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1Ci(graph) and 1Cii(images showing N2 males with reduced food leaving after 10 minutes). Suggesting, males leave a food patch slower than hermaphrodites when stimulated by the presence of a repulsive odor. To address if N2 male worms were smelling 2-nonanone similar to hermaphrodites, we used multiple approaches. We analyzed male worm avoidance behavior to 2-nonanone using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay (Troemel et al., 1997). We found that N2 male worms avoided 2-nonanone the same as wild type N2 hermaphrodites (Fig. 1G). This was evident by N2 males avoiding 2-nonanone as strongly as wild type hermaphrodites tested in parallel. We also analyzed the male worms during the exposure to 2-nonanone while on the food patch. This was done by analyzing male behavior during the assay (See Fig. 1Cii Image of N2 males during repulsion) and measuring the time to reach the edge of the food patch after 2-nonanone stimuli was added next to the food patch (See Schematic Fig. 1a). Male worms crawled to the edge of the food and remained at the furthest edge away from the 2-nonanone repellent like wild-type hermaphrodite animals, suggesting N2 males could sense and perform a repulsive response to 2-nonanone (measured time taken for 90% of worms to reach the edge of the food) (Fig. 1F). This suggests that there is a difference in the decision to leave food during repulsive odor exposure, based on actual decision to leave food and not a difference in the general sensation of the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1F). To further understand how general or specific these male differences to hermaphrodite worms are, we next varied two conditions. First, we used a second volatile repellent, benzaldehyde (undiluted) and measured benzaldehyde-dependent food leaving in males versus hermaphrodites (Yoshida et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2019). Interestingly, males also showed delayed food leaving in response to undiluted benzaldehyde when compared to wild type hermaphrodite animals (Fig. 1D). In addition, we changed the food patch type to assess any effect on male worm food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms (See Fig. 1C). Wild type hermaphrodite worms have been shown to exhibit a variety of behavioral outputs in response to food and food associated cues, including, showing varied feeding rates, sensory-dependent locomotory behavior, behavioral preference and food leaving dynamics (Zhang et al., 2005; Shtonda and Avery, 2006; Meisel et al., 2013; Olofsson et al., 2015). We chose to use Comamonas sp food lawns and assess male food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodites. Wild type hermaphrodite worms also leave Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone, as previously described for wild-type hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Upon examining male worms for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms, male worms are also significantly delayed food leavers on Comamonas sp, suggesting male worms show this general delayed food leaving across multiple foods, including at least, the regular tested food source, E. coli OP50 and also Comamonas sp during exposure to the 2-nonanone repellent (Fig. 1E). Overall, this suggests that wild type N2 male worms show decreased food leaving when compared to N2 hermaphrodites during exposure to different chemical repellents, including, undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde and across different food types. Wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently in sensory responses to odors, locomotion dynamics, conditioning in salt chemotaxis (Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2013). This provides an avenue for further investigation of the neural mechanisms that influence behavioral differences observed between sexes in a multi sensory behavior.
","references":[{"reference":"Berger-Sweeney, J., Arnold, A., Gabeau, D., & Mills, J. (1995). Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: Effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 859–873.
","pubmedId":"8554711","doi":""},{"reference":"Brenner, S. (1974). The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1): 71-94.
","pubmedId":"4366476","doi":""},{"reference":"Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., and Lagerspetz, K.M.J. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior 20: 27-33.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q."},{"reference":"Doty, R.L., Applebaum, S., Zusho, H., Settle, R.G. (1985). Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Europsychologia 23(5): 667-72.
","pubmedId":"4058710","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh, D.D., Nitabach, M.N., Zhang, Y., Harris, G. (2017). Multisensory integration in C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43: 110-118. Review.
","pubmedId":"28273525","doi":""},{"reference":"Halpern, D.F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605290."},{"reference":"Harris, G., Linfield, G., Wu, T., Choi, M.K, Liu, H., Zhang, Y. (2019). Molecular and Cellular modulators for multisensory integration in C. elegans. PloS Genetics 15(3): (e1007706).
","pubmedId":"30849079","doi":""},{"reference":"Portman, D.S. (2017). Sexual modulation of sex-shared neurons and circuits in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Res 95(1-2): 527-538.
","pubmedId":"27870393","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryan, D.A., Miller, R.M., Lee, K., Neal, S.J., Fagan, K.A., Sengupta, P. (2014). Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr Biol 24: 2509–2517.
","pubmedId":"25438941","doi":""},{"reference":"Troemel, E.R., Kimmel, B.E., Bargmann, C.I. (1997). Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91(2): 161-9.
","pubmedId":"9346234","doi":""},{"reference":"Wexler, L.R., Miller, R.M., Portman, D.S. (2020). C. elegans Males Integrate Food Signals and Biological Sex to Modulate State-Dependent Chemosensation and Behavioral Prioritization. Curr Biol 28: S0960-9822(20)30645-X.
","pubmedId":"32531276","doi":""},{"reference":"Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Bargmann, C.I. (2005). Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438(7065): 179-84.
","pubmedId":"16281027","doi":""},{"reference":"Ishihara, T., Iino, Y., Mohri, A., Mori, I., Gengyo-Ando, K., Mitani, S., Katsura, I. (2002). HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 109: 639-49.
","pubmedId":"12062106","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh, D.D., Sanders, T., Hong, S., McCurdy, L.Y., Chase, D.L., Cohen, N., Koelle, M.R., Nitabach, M.N. (2016). Neural Architecture of Hunger-Dependent Multisensory Decision Making in C. elegans. Neuron 92: 1049-1062.
","pubmedId":"27866800","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai., N, Iwata., R, Yokoi, S., Butcher, R.A., Clardy, J., Tomioka, M., Iino, Y. (2013). A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8(7): e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Bielsky, I.F., Hu, S.B. & Young, L.J. (2005). Sexual dimorphism in the vasopressin system: lack of an altered behavioral phenotype in female V1a receptor knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res 164: 132–136.
","pubmedId":"16046007","doi":""},{"reference":"Yoshida, K., Hirotsu, T., Tagawa, T., Oda, S., Wakabayashi, T., Iino, Y., Ishihara, T. (2012). Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3: 739. 10.1038/ncomms1750.
","pubmedId":"22415830","doi":""},{"reference":"Loxterkamp, E., Cha, J., Wu, K., Sullivan, J., Holbrook, O., Ghaith, H., Srun, L., Bauer, D.E. (2021). Behavioral Differences between Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans. microPublication Biology 10.17912/micropub.biology.000431.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai, N., Iwata, R., Yokoi, S., Butcher, R.A., Clardy, J., Tomioka, M., Iino, Y. (2013). A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8: e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""}],"title":"Sex differences in decision-making: Identifying multisensory behavioral differences in males and hermaphrodites
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Michael Koelle"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"KJ Yook"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":"1651510705828"}]},{"id":"a419afd1-fabd-4cec-aa46-47ca74af3552","decision":"revise","abstract":"This present study uses C. elegans as a model to investigate how sex differences can influence sensory behavior and decision-making when encountering conflicting cues. We use a multi-sensory behavioral assay to characterize the differences between hermaphrodites and male worms when escaping from a food lawn during exposure to repulsive odors, such as, 2-nonanone. We find that male worms show a delayed food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodite worms, and this is observed across multiple repulsive cues (2-nonanone and undiluted benzaldehyde) and multiple food types (E. coli OP50 and Comamonas sp). Overall, this study provides a platform to further investigate how sensory-dependent decision-making behavior differs between sexes.
","acknowledgements":"We thank biology undergraduate lab members of the Harris lab for reading and critical discussion manuscript and with analyzing the data generated in each experiment with Dr. Harris. This project was planned and executed by undergraduate researchers under supervision of the principal investigator of the lab(Dr. Gareth Harris). We also thank the Zhang Lab(Dr. Yun Zhang, Harvard University) for initial discussion for this project. We thank CGC for strains for this project. We also thank Biology program Instructional Support technicians, Catherine Hutchinson, Mike Mahoney and Jessica Dalton for their diligent efforts with reagent ordering and help with other aspects of our lab. ","authors":[{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"duncan.tanner490@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Duncan","lastName":"Tanner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"denise.carigo144@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Denise ","lastName":"Carigo","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","fundingAcquisition","formalAnalysis","methodology","project","supervision","validation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"Chane.Sevilla592@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Chane ","lastName":"Sevilla","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"madison.lewis960@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"Lewis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","project","resources","software","supervision","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","validation","fundingAcquisition","dataCuration","conceptualization"],"email":"Gareth.harris@csuci.edu","firstName":"Gareth","lastName":"Harris","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":null}],"awards":null,"conflictsOfInterest":null,"dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided through laboratory start-up funds (2017-2020, PI: Dr. Gareth Harris, CSUCI). Funds were also provided through CSUCI mini grant award for 2020 - 2021(Dr. Gareth Harris). For select students who were included in authorship, this material is based upon work supported by the HSI-STEM Model for Research and Teaching program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant HRD-1928693 (Fall/Spring 2020/2021).","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/ed779d9faca81699f8238cab59b91a40.jpg"},"imageCaption":"A-G
A) Schematic of behavioral assay is shown that measures wild type hermaphrodite and male worms in a multi-sensory behavior. Assaying food leaving (E.coli OP50) during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone repellent (See Methods, Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). All assays ranged from 45 - 60 minutes per assay for hermaphrodite worms being compared to male worms. B) Wild type hermaphrodite worms show normal food leaving during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone odor (n=4 repeated days tested for wild type hermaphrodite worms) (0-45 minutes assayed). Wild type worms leaving food patch across 45 minutes (as described in Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). E. coli OP50 food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. Mean number of worms that left the food at each 5 minute time point is represented, C) i) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms versus wild type N2 male worms examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on E. coli OP50 (n=8 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms). (0 - 60 minutes assayed), males show delayed food leaving during 2-nonanone exposure, males were compared to hermaphrodite worms. Hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line), ii) Images showing wild type N2 male worms in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay (N2 males shown on E. coli OP50 food patch just after 2-nonanone addition and after 10 minutes of 2-nonanone exposure (both images taken in the same experiment on the same day). D) Males were examined for food leaving during exposure to the repellent, undiluted benzaldehyde (100%) compared to hermaphrodite worms, (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=4 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms), hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. E. coli OP50 food lawn. Benzaldehyde used. E) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms compared to N2 male worms were examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on a Comamonas sp food patch, (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type male versus hermaphrodite worms), males were compared to hermaphrodite worms under identical conditions tested, hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. Comamonas sp bacterial food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. F) Male worms were examined for their ability to reach the edge of the food patch during 2-nonanone exposure (measuring 90% of worms that reach the edge of the food patch) (Harris et al., 2019) (n=3 repeated days), n.s=not statistically significant when comparing hermaphrodite and male worms tested on same day. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). G) Wild type N2 male worms were examined for their ability to repel from 2-nonanone (100%, undiluted) when compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay. No food was present on the plate during this assay (See Methods, Troemel et al., 1997). n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type hermaphrodites versus male worms. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). Avoidance Index ranging from (0 to -1.0). We analyzed the Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, * p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001. All male worms were examined in parallel to wild type hermaphrodite worms tested on the same day under identical assay conditions. Each 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay for hermaphrodites or males used 20-25 worms per assay. n=number of repeated days tested for each behavioral assay from A-G.
","imageTitle":"Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans show different food leaving behavior during exposure to undiluted repulsive odor cues
","methods":"C. elegans strains were cultivated under the standard conditions (Brenner et al., 1974). Wild type N2 hermaphrodite young adults, and wild type male adults were used in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving experiment for this study.
Worm culturing, plate preparation and multi-sensory assay. All hermaphrodite and male worms were grown to young adult under E. coli OP50 well-fed conditions prior to performing behavior assay (Brenner et al., 1974, Harris et al., 2019).
Multi-sensory assay to analyze male vs hermaphrodite adult worms. For the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay. Wild Type worms (N2) were assayed as previously described (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). For all worms, E.coli OP50 was used as the food source (Brenner et al., 1974). For the preparation of assay plates, the NGM (Nematode Growth Medium) agar was made and poured into small assay plates (6 cm) and then allowed to cool and solidify (using standard NGM plate preparation protocols). After two days, a liquid suspension of E. coli OP50 was prepared; consisting of 40 mL of NGM media and E. coli OP50 colonies added to the NGM media, this media was then placed at 26°C overnight. The next morning, the E. coli OP50 culture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. 35 mL of the NGM was removed and discarded(Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). The E. coli OP50 pellet was then re-suspended in 5 mL of NGM through mixing, and then 55 µL of this E. coli OP50 culture was then added to the center of an NGM agar assay plate (as seen in Fig. 1A, Schematic of behavioral assay). All worms were grown at 20-23°C on NGM plates that contained a lawn of E. coli OP50. Next 20-25 young adult worms (either hermaphrodite or male worms) are placed onto the 1 cm diameter food lawn and are allowed to acclimate for 60 minutes. After 1 hour, a drop of 2-nonanone repellent (1 µL) is placed approximately two worm lengths away from the food lawn. The number of worms on the lawn was counted every 5 minutes for a total of 45-60 minutes, and the number of hermaphrodite or male worms that left the food lawn was determined. Food leaving is analyzed during exposure to the repellent 2-nonanone (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Worms present on the food at each 5-minute time-point is counted (represented in y-axis). For each plate of male worms tested, there was a separate hermaphrodite assay plate examined in parallel. No males were mixed with hermaphrodite adult worms during the behavioral assay. For all 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assays on Comamonas sp food lawn, the assay was prepared and tested using identical conditions to E. coli OP50 assays tested above. For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 adult hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male adult worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. n = number of repeated days tested across 1A - G.
Assay to measure the ability to reach the edge of a food patch during 2-nonanone exposure
Wild type hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for their ability (Time to reach the edge) to reach the furthest edge of the food patch during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone. 20-25 hermaphrodites and males were examined per replicate. Wild type N2 hermaphrodites and wild type N2 males were examined for the time taken for 90% of the worms to reach the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone drop placement (last sector of the food patch). Time was determined as time taken (sec) for worms to reach the edge of the food from the point of 2-nonanone addition next to the E. coli OP50 food patch. The 1 cm food patch was divided into 5 sectors (0.2 cm each). Sectors A on food patch being closest to the 2-nonanone, Sector E on food patch being furthest away from 2-nonanone drop (As previously described in Harris et al., 2019). Wild type N2 male worms were measured and compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodites tested in parallel on separate behavior assay plates. Wild type N2 hermaphrodite and male worms were not mixed on behavioral assay plates. Mean±SEM, student’s t-test, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. n=number of repeated days tested for hermaphrodite and male worms.
2-nonanone avoidance assay
To examine the avoidance of 2-nonanone in hermaphrodites and males, chemotaxis assays were performed essentially as previously described (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of a square plate that was divided into sectors A, B, C, D, E and F and 2 drops of 1 µl of undiluted 2-nonanone was added to one side and 2 drops of 1 µl ethanol was added to the opposite side of the plate as a control. Approximately 75-100 hermaphrodite or male worms were used in each assay. 2-nonanone avoidance was analyzed by counting the number of worms in the sectors A-B, C-D, and E-F with E-F being furthest away from the 2-nonanone point sources. The avoidance index was calculated as the number of animals in sectors A and B (at 2-nonanone) minus the number of animals in the sectors E and F (at control) and normalized with the total number of animals in all 6 sectors on plate (Avoidance Index between 0 and -1.0). For all data analysis, a Student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male worms tested on the same day in parallel identical conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05*, p≤0.01**, p≤0.001***.
","reagents":"List of worm and bacterial strains used in experiments in the present study
1) Wild type N2 Bristol hermaphrodite C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
2) N2 wild type male C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
3) E. coli OP50 bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
4) DA1877 Comamonas sp bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
All strains were provided by the CGC (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center) at the University of Minnesota, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
This project was funded through lab start-up (Harris G), California State University Channel Islands and Mini-Grant awarded, California State University Channel Islands, 2020 - 2021.
Chemicals used in study. All chemicals used in this study, including, 2-nonanone (Cas # 821-55-6) and Benzaldehyde (Cas # 100-52-7) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
","patternDescription":"Sex differences across organisms have been an intense area of research over the last 50 years. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms underlying many behavioral differences, including sensation, perception of sensory cues and decision-making and how this occurs at the level of the brain is still not understood. Sex differences have been identified from humans to worms. A number of studies have demonstrated differences between males and females in processes, including, olfaction, thermoregulation, aggression, learning and mood (Bjorkqvist et al., 1994; Doty et al., 1985, Berger-Sweeney et al., 1995, Halpern et al., 2000, Kaciuba-Uscilko et al., 2001; Bielsky et al., 2020). Animal studies have suggested that human behavioral sex biases might have biological underpinnings. The understanding of the differences in neural mechanism's that result in the variation in decision-making processes across female and male systems is not fully understood.
The hermaphrodite nematode C. elegans is attracted to or repelled by an array of volatile odorants (Bargmann et al.,1991; Troemel et al., 1997; Debono and Maricq, 2004; review; Chao et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2005; Ghosh et al., 2017, review). In addition, hermaphrodites are able to generate decisions when encountering conflicting cues that are presented simultaneously (Ishihara et al., 2002; Ghosh et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2022). Male C. elegans are able to sense a number of chemicals, including, pheromones, food associated cues, diacetyl and salt(NaCl) (White et al., 2006; Sakai et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Wexler et al., 2020; Loxterkamp et al., 2021). To address sex specific differences in worm behavior, we used C. elegans to understand whether wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently when exposed to conflicting cues, such as, food and the repulsive odor cue, 2-nonanone (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019, Ellis et al., 2020).
We examined the behavioral differences between hermaphrodites and males using a “multi-sensory behavioral paradigm”, where we compare wild type C. elegans hermaphrodites and males in a food leaving assay when exposed to a repulsive cue, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1A, See schematic diagram, Harris et al., 2019). We examined any differences between males and hermaphrodite adults in a multi-sensory behavioral assay, where both hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone. A number of genes and neurons have previously been identified for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving in hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Wild type hermaphrodites typically leave the E. coli(OP50) food patch within 10-15 minutes as normally observed after 2-nonanone addition next to the food patch (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, when examining male worms we observe that males show a significantly delayed food-leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1Ci(graph) and 1Cii(images showing an example of N2 males with reduced food leaving after 10 minutes). Suggesting, males leave a food patch significantly slower than hermaphrodites when stimulated by the presence of a repulsive odor. In addition, we observe that when N2 males leave the food patch during this period it is significantly delayed, and many of the males do not leave the food patch at all during our assay period of 45-60 minutes, despite positioning at the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone (Fig. 1). Interestingly, wild type male worms have been shown to spontaneously leave a food patch, multiple hours later after being introduced to a food patch. But in the first hour of incubation of males on new food patch prior to adding 2-nonanone we do not see this increased leaving (Lipton et al., 2004).
To address if N2 male worms were smelling 2-nonanone similar to hermaphrodites, or showing an actual difference in decision-making to leave the food, we used multiple approaches to do this. We analyzed male worm avoidance behavior to 2-nonanone using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay (Troemel et al., 1997). We examine wild type males versus hermaphrodites in multiple ways. We found that N2 male worms avoid 2-nonanone the same as wild type N2 hermaphrodites (Fig. 1G). This was evident by N2 males avoiding 2-nonanone as strongly as wild type hermaphrodites tested in parallel. We also analyzed the male worms during the exposure to 2-nonanone while on the assay food patch. This was done by analyzing male behavior during the assay (See Fig. 1Cii Image of N2 males during repulsion) and measuring the time to reach the edge of the food patch after 2-nonanone was added next to the E.coli OP50 food patch (see schematic diagram, Fig. 1a). Male worms crawled to the edge of the food and remained at the furthest edge away from the 2-nonanone repellent like wild-type hermaphrodite animals, suggesting N2 males could sense and perform a repulsive response to 2-nonanone (measured time taken for 90% of worms to reach the edge of the food) (Fig. 1F). This suggests that there is a difference in the decision to leave food during repulsive odor exposure, based on actual decision to leave food and not a difference in the general sensation of the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1F).
To further understand how general or specific these male differences to hermaphrodite worms are, we next varied two assay conditions. First, we used a second volatile repellent, benzaldehyde (undiluted) and measured benzaldehyde-dependent food leaving in males versus hermaphrodites (Yoshida et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2019). Interestingly, males also showed delayed food leaving in response to undiluted benzaldehyde when compared to wild type hermaphrodite animals (Fig. 1D). In addition, we changed the food patch type to assess any effect on male worm food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms (See Fig. 1C). Wild type hermaphrodite worms have been shown to exhibit a variety of behavioral outputs in response to food and food associated cues, including, showing varied feeding rates, sensory-dependent locomotory behavior, behavioral preference and food leaving dynamics (Zhang et al., 2005; Shtonda and Avery, 2006; Meisel et al., 2013; Olofsson et al., 2015). We chose Comamonas sp food lawns and assessed male food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodites. Wild type hermaphrodite worms also leave Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone, as previously described for wild-type hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019, Ellis et al., 2020). Upon examining male worms for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms, male worms are also significantly delayed food leavers on Comamonas sp, suggesting male worms show this general delayed food leaving across multiple foods, including at least, the regular tested food source, E. coli OP50 and also Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1E).
Overall, this suggests that wild type N2 male worms show decreased food leaving when compared to N2 hermaphrodites when exposed to different volatile repellents, including, undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde, and across different food types. Wild type hermaphrodites and males are known to behave differently in specific odor-guided behavior, locomotory dynamics and conditioning associated with salt chemotaxis (Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2013). This provides an avenue for further investigation of the neural mechanisms that influence behavioral differences observed between sexes in a multi sensory behavior.
","references":[{"reference":"Berger-Sweeney, J., Arnold, A., Gabeau, D., & Mills, J. (1995). Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: Effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 859–873.
","pubmedId":"8554711","doi":""},{"reference":"Brenner, S. (1974). The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1): 71-94.
","pubmedId":"4366476","doi":""},{"reference":"Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., and Lagerspetz, K.M.J. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior 20: 27-33.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q."},{"reference":"Doty, R.L., Applebaum, S., Zusho, H., Settle, R.G. (1985). Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Europsychologia 23(5): 667-72.
","pubmedId":"4058710","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh, D.D., Nitabach, M.N., Zhang, Y., Harris, G. (2017). Multisensory integration in C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43: 110-118. Review.
","pubmedId":"28273525","doi":""},{"reference":"Halpern, D.F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605290."},{"reference":"Harris, G., Linfield, G., Wu, T., Choi, M.K, Liu, H., Zhang, Y. (2019). Molecular and Cellular modulators for multisensory integration in C. elegans. PloS Genetics 15(3): (e1007706).
","pubmedId":"30849079","doi":""},{"reference":"Portman, D.S. (2017). Sexual modulation of sex-shared neurons and circuits in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Res 95(1-2): 527-538.
","pubmedId":"27870393","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryan, D.A., Miller, R.M., Lee, K., Neal, S.J., Fagan, K.A., Sengupta, P. (2014). Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr Biol 24: 2509–2517.
","pubmedId":"25438941","doi":""},{"reference":"Troemel, E.R., Kimmel, B.E., Bargmann, C.I. (1997). Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91(2): 161-9.
","pubmedId":"9346234","doi":""},{"reference":"Wexler, L.R., Miller, R.M., Portman, D.S. (2020). C. elegans Males Integrate Food Signals and Biological Sex to Modulate State-Dependent Chemosensation and Behavioral Prioritization. Curr Biol 28: S0960-9822(20)30645-X.
","pubmedId":"32531276","doi":""},{"reference":"Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Bargmann, C.I. (2005). Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438(7065): 179-84.
","pubmedId":"16281027","doi":""},{"reference":"Ishihara, T., Iino, Y., Mohri, A., Mori, I., Gengyo-Ando, K., Mitani, S., Katsura, I. (2002). HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 109: 639-49.
","pubmedId":"12062106","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh, D.D., Sanders, T., Hong, S., McCurdy, L.Y., Chase, D.L., Cohen, N., Koelle, M.R., Nitabach, M.N. (2016). Neural Architecture of Hunger-Dependent Multisensory Decision Making in C. elegans. Neuron 92: 1049-1062.
","pubmedId":"27866800","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai., N, Iwata., R, Yokoi, S., Butcher, R.A., Clardy, J., Tomioka, M., Iino, Y. (2013). A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8(7): e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Bielsky, I.F., Hu, S.B. & Young, L.J. (2005). Sexual dimorphism in the vasopressin system: lack of an altered behavioral phenotype in female V1a receptor knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res 164: 132–136.
","pubmedId":"16046007","doi":""},{"reference":"Yoshida, K., Hirotsu, T., Tagawa, T., Oda, S., Wakabayashi, T., Iino, Y., Ishihara, T. (2012). Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3: 739. 10.1038/ncomms1750.
","pubmedId":"22415830","doi":""},{"reference":"Loxterkamp, E., Cha, J., Wu, K., Sullivan, J., Holbrook, O., Ghaith, H., Srun, L., Bauer, D.E. (2021). Behavioral Differences between Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans. microPublication Biology 10.17912/micropub.biology.000431.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai, N., Iwata, R., Yokoi, S., Butcher, R.A., Clardy, J., Tomioka, M., Iino, Y. (2013). A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8: e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Lipton, J., Kleemann, G., Ghosh, R., Lints, R., Emmons, S.W.(2004). Mate searching in Caenorhabditis elegans: a genetic model for sex drive in a simple invertebrate. J Neurosci 24: 7427-34.
","pubmedId":"15329389","doi":""},{"reference":"Yang, W., Wu, T., Tu, S., Qin, Y., Shen, C., Li, J., et al.; Zhang, Y. (2022). Redundant neural circuits regulate olfactory integration. PLoS Genet 18: e1010029.
","pubmedId":"35100258","doi":""}],"title":"Sex differences in decision-making: Identifying multisensory behavioral differences in males and hermaphrodites
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"KJ Yook"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":"1652466881925"}]},{"id":"4fb7d0f6-753e-4672-9fb8-013f1ec93bf7","decision":"accept","abstract":"This present study uses C. elegans as a model to investigate how sex differences can influence sensory behavior and decision-making when encountering conflicting cues. We use a multi-sensory behavioral assay to characterize the differences between hermaphrodites and male worms when escaping from a food lawn during exposure to repulsive odors, such as, 2-nonanone. We find that male worms show a delayed food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodite worms, and this is observed across multiple repulsive cues (2-nonanone and undiluted benzaldehyde) and multiple food types (E. coli OP50 and Comamonas sp). Overall, this study provides a platform to further investigate how sensory-dependent decision-making behavior differs between sexes.
","acknowledgements":"We thank biology undergraduate lab members of the Harris lab for reading and critical discussion manuscript and with analyzing the data generated in each experiment with Dr. Harris. This project was planned and executed by undergraduate researchers under supervision of the principal investigator of the lab(Dr. Gareth Harris). We also thank the Zhang Lab (Dr. Yun Zhang, Harvard University) for initial discussion for this project. We thank CGC for strains for this project. We also thank Biology program Instructional Support technicians, Catherine Hutchinson, Mike Mahoney and Jessica Dalton for their diligent efforts with reagent ordering and help with other aspects of our lab. ","authors":[{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"duncan.tanner490@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Duncan","lastName":"Tanner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"denise.carigo144@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Denise ","lastName":"Carigo","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","fundingAcquisition","formalAnalysis","methodology","project","supervision","validation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"Chane.Sevilla592@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Chane ","lastName":"Sevilla","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"madison.lewis960@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"Lewis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","project","resources","software","supervision","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","validation","fundingAcquisition","dataCuration","conceptualization"],"email":"Gareth.harris@csuci.edu","firstName":"Gareth","lastName":"Harris","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":null}],"awards":null,"conflictsOfInterest":null,"dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided through laboratory start-up funds (2017-2020, PI: Dr. Gareth Harris, CSUCI). Funds were also provided through CSUCI mini grant award for 2020 - 2021 (Dr. Gareth Harris). For select students who were included in authorship, this material is based upon work supported by the HSI-STEM Model for Research and Teaching program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant HRD-1928693 (Fall/Spring 2020/2021).","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/ed779d9faca81699f8238cab59b91a40.jpg"},"imageCaption":"A-G
A) Schematic of behavioral assay is shown that measures wild type hermaphrodite and male worms in a multi-sensory behavior. Assaying food leaving (E.coli OP50) during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone repellent (See Methods, Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). All assays ranged from 45 - 60 minutes per assay for hermaphrodite worms being compared to male worms. B) Wild type hermaphrodite worms show normal food leaving during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone odor (n=4 repeated days tested for wild type hermaphrodite worms) (0-45 minutes assayed). Wild type worms leaving food patch across 45 minutes (as described in Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). E. coli OP50 food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. Mean number of worms that left the food at each 5 minute time point is represented, C) i) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms versus wild type N2 male worms examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on E. coli OP50 (n=8 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms). (0 - 60 minutes assayed), males show delayed food leaving during 2-nonanone exposure, males were compared to hermaphrodite worms. Hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line), ii) Images showing wild type N2 male worms in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay (N2 males shown on E. coli OP50 food patch just after 2-nonanone addition and after 10 minutes of 2-nonanone exposure (both images taken in the same experiment on the same day). D) Males were examined for food leaving during exposure to the repellent, undiluted benzaldehyde (100%) compared to hermaphrodite worms, (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=4 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms), hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. E. coli OP50 food lawn. Benzaldehyde used. E) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms compared to N2 male worms were examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on a Comamonas sp food patch, (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type male versus hermaphrodite worms), males were compared to hermaphrodite worms under identical conditions tested, hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. Comamonas sp bacterial food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. F) Male worms were examined for their ability to reach the edge of the food patch during 2-nonanone exposure (measuring 90% of worms that reach the edge of the food patch) (Harris et al., 2019) (n=3 repeated days), n.s=not statistically significant when comparing hermaphrodite and male worms tested on same day. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). G) Wild type N2 male worms were examined for their ability to repel from 2-nonanone (100%, undiluted) when compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay. No food was present on the plate during this assay (See Methods, Troemel et al., 1997). n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type hermaphrodites versus male worms. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). Avoidance Index ranging from (0 to -1.0). We analyzed the Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, * p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001. All male worms were examined in parallel to wild type hermaphrodite worms tested on the same day under identical assay conditions. Each 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay for hermaphrodites or males used 20-25 worms per assay. n=number of repeated days tested for each behavioral assay from A-G.
","imageTitle":"Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans show different food leaving behavior during exposure to undiluted repulsive odor cues
","methods":"C. elegans strains were cultivated under the standard conditions (Brenner et al., 1974). Wild type N2 hermaphrodite young adults, and wild type male adults were used in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving experiment for this study.
Worm culturing, plate preparation and multi-sensory assay. All hermaphrodite and male worms were grown to young adult under E. coli OP50 well-fed conditions prior to performing behavior assay (Brenner et al., 1974, Harris et al., 2019).
Multi-sensory assay to analyze male vs hermaphrodite adult worms. For the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay. Wild Type worms (N2) were assayed as previously described (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). For all worms, E.coli OP50 was used as the food source (Brenner et al., 1974). For the preparation of assay plates, the NGM (Nematode Growth Medium) agar was made and poured into small assay plates (6 cm) and then allowed to cool and solidify (using standard NGM plate preparation protocols). After two days, a liquid suspension of E. coli OP50 was prepared; consisting of 40 mL of NGM media and E. coli OP50 colonies added to the NGM media, this media was then placed at 26°C overnight. The next morning, the E. coli OP50 culture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. 35 mL of the NGM was removed and discarded (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). The E. coli OP50 pellet was then re-suspended in 5 mL of NGM through mixing, and then 55 µL of this E. coli OP50 culture was then added to the center of an NGM agar assay plate (as seen in Fig. 1A, Schematic of behavioral assay). All worms were grown at 20-23°C on NGM plates that contained a lawn of E. coli OP50. Next 20-25 young adult worms (either hermaphrodite or male worms) are placed onto the 1 cm diameter food lawn and are allowed to acclimate for 60 minutes. After 1 hour, a drop of 2-nonanone repellent (1 µL) is placed approximately two worm lengths away from the food lawn. The number of worms on the lawn was counted every 5 minutes for a total of 45-60 minutes, and the number of hermaphrodite or male worms that left the food lawn was determined. Food leaving is analyzed during exposure to the repellent 2-nonanone (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Worms present on the food at each 5-minute time-point is counted (represented in y-axis). For each plate of male worms tested, there was a separate hermaphrodite assay plate examined in parallel. No males were mixed with hermaphrodite adult worms during the behavioral assay. For all 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assays on Comamonas sp food lawn, the assay was prepared and tested using identical conditions to E. coli OP50 assays tested above. For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 adult hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male adult worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. n = number of repeated days tested across 1A - G.
Assay to measure the ability to reach the edge of a food patch during 2-nonanone exposure
Wild type hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for their ability (Time to reach the edge) to reach the furthest edge of the food patch during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone. 20-25 hermaphrodites and males were examined per replicate. Wild type N2 hermaphrodites and wild type N2 males were examined for the time taken for 90% of the worms to reach the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone drop placement (last sector of the food patch). Time was determined as time taken (sec) for worms to reach the edge of the food from the point of 2-nonanone addition next to the E. coli OP50 food patch. The 1 cm food patch was divided into 5 sectors (0.2 cm each). Sectors A on food patch being closest to the 2-nonanone, Sector E on food patch being furthest away from 2-nonanone drop (As previously described in Harris et al., 2019). Wild type N2 male worms were measured and compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodites tested in parallel on separate behavior assay plates. Wild type N2 hermaphrodite and male worms were not mixed on behavioral assay plates. Mean±SEM, student’s t-test, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. n=number of repeated days tested for hermaphrodite and male worms.
2-nonanone avoidance assay
To examine the avoidance of 2-nonanone in hermaphrodites and males, chemotaxis assays were performed essentially as previously described (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of a square plate that was divided into sectors A, B, C, D, E and F and 2 drops of 1 µl of undiluted 2-nonanone was added to one side and 2 drops of 1 µl ethanol was added to the opposite side of the plate as a control. Approximately 75-100 hermaphrodite or male worms were used in each assay. 2-nonanone avoidance was analyzed by counting the number of worms in the sectors A-B, C-D, and E-F with E-F being furthest away from the 2-nonanone point sources. The avoidance index was calculated as the number of animals in sectors A and B (at 2-nonanone) minus the number of animals in the sectors E and F (at control) and normalized with the total number of animals in all 6 sectors on plate (Avoidance Index between 0 and -1.0). For all data analysis, a Student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male worms tested on the same day in parallel identical conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05*, p≤0.01**, p≤0.001***.
","reagents":"List of worm and bacterial strains used in experiments in the present study
1) Wild type N2 Bristol hermaphrodite C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
2) N2 wild type male C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
3) E. coli OP50 bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
4) DA1877 Comamonas sp bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
All strains were provided by the CGC (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center) at the University of Minnesota, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
This project was funded through lab start-up (Harris G), California State University Channel Islands and Mini-Grant awarded, California State University Channel Islands, 2020 - 2021.
Chemicals used in study. All chemicals used in this study, including, 2-nonanone (Cas # 821-55-6) and Benzaldehyde (Cas # 100-52-7) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
","patternDescription":"Sex differences across organisms have been an intense area of research over the last 50 years. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms underlying many behavioral differences, including sensation, perception of sensory cues and decision-making and how this occurs at the level of the brain is still not understood. Sex differences have been identified from humans to worms. A number of studies have demonstrated differences between males and females in processes, including, olfaction, thermoregulation, aggression, learning and mood (Bjorkqvist et al., 1994; Doty et al., 1985, Berger-Sweeney et al., 1995, Halpern et al., 2000, Kaciuba-Uscilko et al., 2001; Bielsky et al., 2005). Animal studies have suggested that human behavioral sex biases might have biological underpinnings. The understanding of the differences in neural signals and circuit function, that result in the variation in decision-making processes across female and male systems is not fully understood.
The hermaphrodite nematode C. elegans is attracted to or repelled by an array of volatile odorants (Bargmann et al.,1991; Troemel et al., 1997; Debono and Maricq, 2004; Chao et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2005; Ghosh et al., 2017). In addition, hermaphrodites are able to generate decisions when encountering conflicting cues that are presented simultaneously (Ishihara et al., 2002; Ghosh et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2022). Male C. elegans are able to sense a number of chemicals, including, pheromones, food associated cues, diacetyl and salt (NaCl) (White et al., 2006; Sakai et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Wexler et al., 2020; Loxterkamp et al., 2021, Portman et al., 2017). To address sex specific differences in worm behavior, we used C. elegans to understand whether wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently when exposed to conflicting cues, such as, food and the repulsive odor cue, 2-nonanone (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019, Ellis et al., 2020).
We examined the behavioral differences between hermaphrodites and males using a “multi-sensory behavioral paradigm”, where we compare wild type C. elegans hermaphrodites and males in a food leaving assay when exposed to a repulsive cue, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1A, See schematic diagram, Harris et al., 2019). We examined any differences between males and hermaphrodite adults in a multi-sensory behavioral assay, where both hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone. A number of genes and neurons have previously been identified for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving in hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Wild type hermaphrodites typically leave the E. coli (OP50) food patch within 10-15 minutes as normally observed after 2-nonanone addition next to the food patch (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, when examining male worms we observe that males show a significantly delayed food-leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1Ci (graph) and 1Cii (images showing an example of N2 males with reduced food leaving after 10 minutes). Suggesting, males leave a food patch significantly slower than hermaphrodites when stimulated by the presence of a repulsive odor. In addition, we observe that when N2 males leave the food patch during this period it is significantly delayed, and many of the males do not leave the food patch at all during our assay period of 45-60 minutes, despite positioning at the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone (Fig. 1). Interestingly, wild type male worms have been shown to spontaneously leave a food patch, multiple hours later after being introduced to a food patch. But in the first hour of incubation of males on new food patch prior to adding 2-nonanone we do not see this increased leaving (Lipton et al., 2004).
To address if N2 male worms were sensing 2-nonanone similar to hermaphrodites, or showing an actual difference in decision-making to leave the food, we used multiple approaches to do this. We analyzed male worm avoidance behavior to 2-nonanone using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay (Troemel et al., 1997). We examine wild type males versus hermaphrodites in multiple ways. We found that N2 male worms avoid 2-nonanone the same as wild type N2 hermaphrodites (Fig. 1G). This was evident by N2 males avoiding 2-nonanone as strongly as wild type hermaphrodites tested in parallel. We also analyzed the male worms during the exposure to 2-nonanone while on the assay food patch. This was done by analyzing male behavior during the assay (See Fig. 1Cii Image of N2 males during repulsion) and measuring the time to reach the edge of the food patch after 2-nonanone was added next to the E.coli OP50 food patch (see schematic diagram, Fig. 1a). Male worms crawled to the edge of the food and remained at the furthest edge away from the 2-nonanone repellent like wild-type hermaphrodite animals, suggesting N2 males could sense and perform a repulsive response to 2-nonanone (measured time taken for 90% of worms to reach the edge of the food) (Fig. 1F). This suggests that there is a difference in the decision to leave food during repulsive odor exposure, based on actual decision to leave food and not a difference in the general sensation of the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1F).
To further understand how general or specific these male differences to hermaphrodite worms are, we next varied two assay conditions. First, we used a second volatile repellent, benzaldehyde (undiluted) and measured benzaldehyde-dependent food leaving in males versus hermaphrodites (Yoshida et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2019). Interestingly, males also showed delayed food leaving in response to undiluted benzaldehyde when compared to wild type hermaphrodite animals (Fig. 1D). In addition, we changed the food patch type to assess any effect on male worm food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms (See Fig. 1C). Wild type hermaphrodite worms have been shown to exhibit a variety of behavioral outputs in response to food and food associated cues, including, showing varied feeding rates, sensory-dependent locomotory behavior, behavioral preference and food leaving dynamics (Zhang et al., 2005; Shtonda and Avery, 2006; Meisel et al., 2013; Olofsson et al., 2015). We chose Comamonas sp food lawns and assessed male food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodites. Wild type hermaphrodite worms also leave Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone, as previously described for wild-type hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019, Ellis et al., 2020). Upon examining male worms for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms, male worms are also significantly delayed food leavers on Comamonas sp, suggesting male worms show this general delayed food leaving across multiple foods, including at least, the regular tested food source, E. coli OP50 and also Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1E).
Overall, this suggests that wild type N2 male worms show decreased food leaving when compared to N2 hermaphrodites when exposed to different volatile repellents, including, undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde, and across different food types. Wild type hermaphrodites and males are known to behave differently in specific odor-guided behavior, locomotory dynamics and conditioning associated with salt chemotaxis (Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2013). This provides an avenue for further investigation of the neural mechanisms that influence behavioral differences observed between sexes in a multi sensory behavior.
","references":[{"reference":"Berger-Sweeney, J., Arnold, A., Gabeau, D., & Mills, J. (1995). Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: Effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 859–873.
","pubmedId":"8554711","doi":""},{"reference":"Bielsky, I.F., Hu, S.B. & Young, L.J. (2005). Sexual dimorphism in the vasopressin system: lack of an altered behavioral phenotype in female V1a receptor knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res 164: 132–136.
","pubmedId":"16046007","doi":""},{"reference":"Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., and Lagerspetz, K.M.J. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior 20: 27-33.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q."},{"reference":"Brenner, S. (1974). The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1): 71-94.
","pubmedId":"4366476","doi":""},{"reference":"Doty, R.L., Applebaum, S., Zusho, H., Settle, R.G. (1985). Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Europsychologia 23(5): 667-72.
","pubmedId":"4058710","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh, D.D., Nitabach, M.N., Zhang, Y., Harris, G. (2017). Multisensory integration in C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43: 110-118.
","pubmedId":"28273525","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh, D.D., Sanders, T., Hong, S., McCurdy, L.Y., Chase, D.L., Cohen, N., Koelle, M.R., Nitabach, M.N. (2016). Neural Architecture of Hunger-Dependent Multisensory Decision Making in C. elegans. Neuron 92: 1049-1062.
","pubmedId":"27866800","doi":""},{"reference":"Halpern, D.F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605290."},{"reference":"Harris, G., Linfield, G., Wu, T., Choi, M.K, Liu, H., Zhang, Y. (2019). Molecular and Cellular modulators for multisensory integration in C. elegans. PloS Genetics 15(3): (e1007706).
","pubmedId":"30849079","doi":""},{"reference":"Ishihara, T., Iino, Y., Mohri, A., Mori, I., Gengyo-Ando, K., Mitani, S., Katsura, I. (2002). HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 109: 639-49.
","pubmedId":"12062106","doi":""},{"reference":"Lipton, J., Kleemann, G., Ghosh, R., Lints, R., Emmons, S.W.(2004). Mate searching in Caenorhabditis elegans: a genetic model for sex drive in a simple invertebrate. J Neurosci 24: 7427-34.
","pubmedId":"15329389","doi":""},{"reference":"Loxterkamp, E., Cha, J., Wu, K., Sullivan, J., Holbrook, O., Ghaith, H., Srun, L., Bauer, D.E. (2021). Behavioral Differences between Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans. microPublication Biology 10.17912/micropub.biology.000431.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Portman, D.S. (2017). Sexual modulation of sex-shared neurons and circuits in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Res 95(1-2): 527-538.
","pubmedId":"27870393","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryan, D.A., Miller, R.M., Lee, K., Neal, S.J., Fagan, K.A., Sengupta, P. (2014). Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr Biol 24: 2509–2517.
","pubmedId":"25438941","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai., N, Iwata., R, Yokoi, S., Butcher, R.A., Clardy, J., Tomioka, M., Iino, Y. (2013). A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8(7): e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Troemel, E.R., Kimmel, B.E., Bargmann, C.I. (1997). Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91(2): 161-9.
","pubmedId":"9346234","doi":""},{"reference":"Wexler, L.R., Miller, R.M., Portman, D.S. (2020). C. elegans Males Integrate Food Signals and Biological Sex to Modulate State-Dependent Chemosensation and Behavioral Prioritization. Curr Biol 28: S0960-9822(20)30645-X.
","pubmedId":"32531276","doi":""},{"reference":"Yang, W., Wu, T., Tu, S., Qin, Y., Shen, C., Li, J., et al.; Zhang, Y. (2022). Redundant neural circuits regulate olfactory integration. PLoS Genet 18: e1010029.
","pubmedId":"35100258","doi":""},{"reference":"Yoshida, K., Hirotsu, T., Tagawa, T., Oda, S., Wakabayashi, T., Iino, Y., Ishihara, T. (2012). Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3: 739. 10.1038/ncomms1750.
","pubmedId":"22415830","doi":""},{"reference":"Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Bargmann, C.I. (2005). Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438(7065): 179-84.
","pubmedId":"16281027","doi":""}],"title":"Sex differences in decision-making: Identifying multisensory behavioral differences in males and hermaphrodites
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"KJ Yook"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"0b4c545c-c2a1-4421-abc7-1f75090c6728","decision":"accept","abstract":"This present study uses C. elegans as a model to investigate how sex differences can influence sensory behavior and decision-making when encountering conflicting cues. We use a multi-sensory behavioral assay to characterize the differences between hermaphrodites and male worms when escaping from a food lawn during exposure to repulsive odors, such as, 2-nonanone. We find that male worms show a delayed food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodite worms, and this is observed across multiple repulsive cues (2-nonanone and undiluted benzaldehyde) and multiple food types (E. coli OP50 and Comamonas sp). Overall, this study provides a platform to further investigate how sensory-dependent decision-making behavior differs between sexes.
","acknowledgements":"We thank biology undergraduate lab members of the Harris lab for reading and critical discussion manuscript and with analyzing the data generated in each experiment with Dr. Harris. This project was planned and executed by undergraduate researchers under supervision of the principal investigator of the lab(Dr. Gareth Harris). We also thank the Zhang Lab (Dr. Yun Zhang, Harvard University) for initial discussion for this project. We thank CGC for strains for this project. We also thank Biology program Instructional Support technicians, Catherine Hutchinson, Mike Mahoney and Jessica Dalton for their diligent efforts with reagent ordering and help with other aspects of our lab. ","authors":[{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"duncan.tanner490@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Duncan","lastName":"Tanner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"denise.carigo144@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Denise ","lastName":"Carigo","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"Chane.Sevilla592@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Chane ","lastName":"Sevilla","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"madison.lewis960@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"Lewis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, Ca, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","project","resources","software","supervision","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","validation","fundingAcquisition","dataCuration","conceptualization"],"email":"Gareth.harris@csuci.edu","firstName":"Gareth","lastName":"Harris","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":null}],"awards":null,"conflictsOfInterest":null,"dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided through laboratory start-up funds (2017-2020, PI: Dr. Gareth Harris, CSUCI). Funds were also provided through CSUCI mini grant award for 2020 - 2021 (Dr. Gareth Harris). For select students who were included in authorship, this material is based upon work supported by the HSI-STEM Model for Research and Teaching program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant HRD-1928693 (Fall/Spring 2020/2021).","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/ed779d9faca81699f8238cab59b91a40.jpg"},"imageCaption":"A-G
A) Schematic of behavioral assay is shown that measures wild type hermaphrodite and male worms in a multi-sensory behavior. Assaying food leaving on E.coli (OP50) during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone repellent (See Methods, Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). All assays ranged from 45 - 60 minutes per assay for hermaphrodite worms being compared to male worms. B) Wild type hermaphrodite worms show normal food leaving during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone odor (n=4 repeated days tested for wild type hermaphrodite worms) (0-45 minutes assayed). Wild type worms leaving food patch across 45 minutes (as described in Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). E. coli OP50 food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. Mean number of worms that left the food at each 5 minute time point is represented, C) i) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms versus wild type N2 male worms examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on E. coli OP50 (n=8 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms). (0 - 60 minutes assayed), males show delayed food leaving during 2-nonanone exposure, males were compared to hermaphrodite worms. Hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line), ii) Images showing wild type N2 male worms in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay (N2 males shown on E. coli OP50 food patch just after 2-nonanone addition and after 10 minutes of 2-nonanone exposure (both images taken in the same experiment on the same day). D) Males were examined for food leaving during exposure to the repellent, undiluted benzaldehyde (100%) compared to hermaphrodite worms (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=4 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms), hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. E. coli OP50 food lawn. Benzaldehyde used. E) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms compared to N2 male worms were examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on a Comamonas sp food patch (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type male versus hermaphrodite worms), males were compared to hermaphrodite worms under identical conditions tested, hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. Comamonas sp bacterial food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. F) Male worms were examined for their ability to reach the edge of the food patch during 2-nonanone exposure (measuring 90% of worms that reach the edge of the food patch) (Harris et al., 2019) (n=3 repeated days), n.s=not statistically significant when comparing hermaphrodite and male worms tested on same day. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). G) Wild type N2 male worms were examined for their ability to repel from 2-nonanone (100%, undiluted) when compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay No food was present on the plate during this assay (See Methods, Troemel et al., 1997). n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type hermaphrodites versus male worms. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). Avoidance Index ranging from (0 to -1.0). We analyzed the Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, * p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001. All male worms were examined in parallel to wild type hermaphrodite worms tested on the same day under identical assay conditions. Each 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay for hermaphrodites or males used 20-25 worms per assay. n=number of repeated days tested for each behavioral assay from A-G.
","imageTitle":"Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans show different food leaving behavior during exposure to undiluted repulsive odor cues
","methods":"C. elegans strains were cultivated under the standard conditions (Brenner et al., 1974). Wild type N2 hermaphrodite young adults, and wild type male adults were used in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving experiment for this study.
Worm culturing, plate preparation and multi-sensory assay. All hermaphrodite and male worms were grown to young adult under E. coli OP50 well-fed conditions prior to performing behavior assay (Brenner et al., 1974; Harris et al., 2019).
Multi-sensory assay to analyze male vs hermaphrodite adult worms. For the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay. Wild Type worms (N2) were assayed as previously described (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). For all worms, E.coli (OP50) was used as the food source (Brenner et al., 1974). For the preparation of assay plates, the NGM (Nematode Growth Medium) agar was made and poured into small assay plates (6 cm) and then allowed to cool and solidify (using standard NGM plate preparation protocols). After two days, a liquid suspension of E. coli (OP50) was prepared; consisting of 40 mL of NGM media and E. coli OP50 colonies added to the NGM media, this media was then placed at 26°C overnight. The next morning, the E. coli OP50 culture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. 35 mL of the NGM was removed and discarded (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). The E. coli (OP50) pellet was then re-suspended in 5 mL of NGM through mixing, and then 55 µL of this E. coli (OP50) culture was then added to the center of an NGM agar assay plate (as seen in Fig. 1A, Schematic of behavioral assay). All worms were grown at 20-23°C on NGM plates that contained a lawn of E. coli (OP50). Next 20-25 young adult worms (either hermaphrodite or male worms) are placed onto the 1 cm diameter food lawn and are allowed to acclimate for 60 minutes. After 1 hour, a drop of 2-nonanone repellent (1 µL) is placed approximately two worm lengths away from the food lawn. The number of worms on the lawn was counted every 5 minutes for a total of 45-60 minutes, and the number of hermaphrodite or male worms that left the food lawn was determined. Food leaving is analyzed during exposure to the repellent 2-nonanone (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Worms present on the food at each 5-minute time-point is counted (represented in y-axis). For each plate of male worms tested, there was a separate hermaphrodite assay plate examined in parallel. No males were mixed with hermaphrodite adult worms during the behavioral assay. For all 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assays on Comamonas sp food lawn, the assay was prepared and tested using identical conditions to E. coli (OP50) assays tested above. For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 adult hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male adult worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. n = number of repeated days tested across 1A - G.
Assay to measure the ability to reach the edge of a food patch during 2-nonanone exposure
Wild type hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for their ability (Time to reach the edge) to reach the furthest edge of the food patch during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone. 20-25 hermaphrodites and males were examined per replicate. Wild type N2 hermaphrodites and wild type N2 males were examined for the time taken for 90% of the worms to reach the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone drop placement (last sector of the food patch). Time was determined as time taken (sec) for worms to reach the edge of the food from the point of 2-nonanone addition next to the E. coli OP50 food patch. The 1 cm food patch was divided into 5 sectors (0.2 cm each). Sectors A on food patch being closest to the 2-nonanone, Sector E on food patch being furthest away from 2-nonanone drop (As previously described in Harris et al., 2019). Wild type N2 male worms were measured and compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodites tested in parallel on separate behavior assay plates. Wild type N2 hermaphrodite and male worms were not mixed on behavioral assay plates. Mean±SEM, student’s t-test, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. n=number of repeated days tested for hermaphrodite and male worms.
2-nonanone avoidance assay
To examine the avoidance of 2-nonanone in hermaphrodites and males, chemotaxis assays were performed essentially as previously described (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of a square plate that was divided into sectors A, B, C, D, E and F and 2 drops of 1 µl of undiluted 2-nonanone was added to one side and 2 drops of 1 µl ethanol was added to the opposite side of the plate as a control. Approximately 75-100 hermaphrodite or male worms were used in each assay. 2-nonanone avoidance was analyzed by counting the number of worms in the sectors A-B, C-D, and E-F with E-F being furthest away from the 2-nonanone point sources. The avoidance index was calculated as the number of animals in sectors A and B (at 2-nonanone) minus the number of animals in the sectors E and F (at control) and normalized with the total number of animals in all 6 sectors on plate (Avoidance Index between 0 and -1.0). For all data analysis, a Student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male worms tested on the same day in parallel identical conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, p ≤0.05*, p≤0.01**, p≤0.001***.
","reagents":"List of worm and bacterial strains used in experiments in the present study
1) Wild type N2 Bristol hermaphrodite C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
2) N2 wild type male C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
3) E. coli OP50 bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
4) DA1877 Comamonas sp bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
All strains were provided by the CGC (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center) at the University of Minnesota, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
This project was funded through lab start-up (Harris G), California State University Channel Islands and Mini-Grant awarded, California State University Channel Islands, 2020 - 2021.
Chemicals used in study. All chemicals used in this study, including, 2-nonanone (Cas # 821-55-6) and Benzaldehyde (Cas # 100-52-7) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
","patternDescription":"Sex differences across organisms have been an intense area of research over the last 50 years. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms underlying many behavioral differences, including sensation, perception of sensory cues and decision-making and how this occurs at the level of the brain is still not understood. Sex differences have been identified from humans to worms. A number of studies have demonstrated differences between males and females in processes, including, olfaction, thermoregulation, aggression, learning and mood (Bjorkqvist et al., 1994; Doty et al., 1985; Berger-Sweeney et al., 1995; Halpern et al., 2000; Kaciuba-Uscilko et al., 2001; Bielsky et al., 2005). Behavioral studies in vertebrates and invertebrates have suggested that behavioral sex biases might have biological underpinnings. The understanding of the differences in neural signals and circuit function, that result in the variation in decision-making processes across female and male systems is not fully understood.
The hermaphrodite nematode C. elegans is attracted to or repelled by an array of volatile odorants (Bargmann and Horvitz, 1991; Troemel et al., 1997; Debono and Maricq, 2005; Chao et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005; Ghosh et al., 2017). In addition, hermaphrodites are able to generate decisions when encountering conflicting cues that are presented simultaneously (Ishihara et al., 2002; Ghosh et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2022). Male C. elegans are able to sense a number of chemicals, including, pheromones, food associated cues, diacetyl and salt (NaCl) (White et al., 2007; Sakai et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Wexler et al., 2020; Loxterkamp et al., 2021, Portman et al., 2017). To address sex specific differences in worm behavior, we used C. elegans to understand whether wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently when exposed to conflicting cues, such as, food and the repulsive odor cue, 2-nonanone (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019, Ellis et al., 2020).
We examined the behavioral differences between hermaphrodites and males using a “multi-sensory behavioral paradigm”, where we compare wild type C. elegans hermaphrodites and males in a food leaving assay when exposed to a repulsive cue, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1A, See schematic diagram, Harris et al., 2019). We examined any differences between males and hermaphrodite adults in a multi-sensory behavioral assay, where both hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone. A number of genes and neurons have previously been identified for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving in hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Wild type hermaphrodites typically leave the E.coli (OP50) food patch within 10-15 minutes as normally observed after 2-nonanone addition next to the food patch (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, when examining male worms we observe that males show a significantly delayed food-leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1Ci (graph) and 1Cii (images showing an example of N2 males with reduced food leaving after 10 minutes). Suggesting, males leave a food patch significantly slower than hermaphrodites when stimulated by the presence of a repulsive odor. In addition, we observe that when N2 males leave the food patch during this period it is significantly delayed, and many of the males do not leave the food patch at all during our assay period of 45-60 minutes, despite positioning at the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone (Fig. 1). Interestingly, wild type male worms have been shown to spontaneously leave a food patch, multiple hours later after being introduced to a food patch. But in the first hour of incubation of males on new food patch prior to adding 2-nonanone we do not see this increased leaving (Lipton et al., 2004).
To address if N2 male worms were sensing 2-nonanone similar to hermaphrodites, or showing an actual difference in decision-making to leave the food, we used multiple approaches to do this. We analyzed male worm avoidance behavior to 2-nonanone using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay (Troemel et al., 1997). We examine wild type males versus hermaphrodites in multiple ways. We found that N2 male worms avoid 2-nonanone the same as wild type N2 hermaphrodites (Fig. 1G). This was evident by N2 males avoiding 2-nonanone as strongly as wild type hermaphrodites tested in parallel. We also analyzed the male worms during the exposure to 2-nonanone while on the assay food patch. This was done by analyzing male behavior during the assay (See Fig. 1Cii Image of N2 males during repulsion) and measuring the time to reach the edge of the food patch after 2-nonanone was added next to the E.coli (OP50) food patch (see schematic diagram, Fig. 1a). Male worms crawled to the edge of the food and remained at the furthest edge away from the 2-nonanone repellent like wild-type hermaphrodite animals, suggesting N2 males could sense and perform a repulsive response to 2-nonanone (measured time taken for 90% of worms to reach the edge of the food) (Fig. 1F). This suggests that there is a difference in the decision to leave food during repulsive odor exposure, based on actual decision to leave food and not a difference in the general sensation of the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1F).
To further understand how general or specific these male differences to hermaphrodite worms are, we next varied two assay conditions. First, we used a second volatile repellent, benzaldehyde (undiluted) and measured benzaldehyde-dependent food leaving in males versus hermaphrodites (Yoshida et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2019). Interestingly, males also showed delayed food leaving in response to undiluted benzaldehyde when compared to wild type hermaphrodite animals (Fig. 1D). In addition, we changed the food patch type to assess any effect on male worm food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms (See Fig. 1C). Wild type hermaphrodite worms have been shown to exhibit a variety of behavioral outputs in response to food and food associated cues, including, showing varied feeding rates, sensory-dependent locomotory behavior, behavioral preference and food leaving dynamics (Zhang et al., 2005; Shtonda and Avery, 2006; Meisel et al., 2014; Olofsson et al., 2014). We chose Comamonas sp food lawns and assessed male food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodites. Wild type hermaphrodite worms also leave Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone, as previously described for wild-type hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019, Ellis et al., 2020). Upon examining male worms for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms, male worms are also significantly delayed food leavers on Comamonas sp, suggesting male worms show this general delayed food leaving across multiple foods, including at least, the regular tested food source, E. coli OP50 and also Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1E).
Overall, this suggests that wild type N2 male worms show decreased food leaving when compared to N2 hermaphrodites when exposed to different volatile repellents, including, undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde, and across different food types. Wild type hermaphrodites and males are known to behave differently in specific odor-guided behavior, locomotory dynamics and conditioning associated with salt chemotaxis (Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2013). This provides an avenue for further investigation of the neural mechanisms that influence behavioral differences observed between sexes in a multi sensory behavior.
","references":[{"reference":"Bargmann CI, Horvitz HR (1991). Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron 7: 729-42.
","pubmedId":"1660283","doi":""},{"reference":"Berger-Sweeney J, Arnold A, Gabeau D, & Mills J (1995). Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: Effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 859–873.
","pubmedId":"8554711","doi":""},{"reference":"Bielsky IF, Hu SB & Young LJ (2005). Sexual dimorphism in the vasopressin system: lack of an altered behavioral phenotype in female V1a receptor knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res 164: 132–136.
","pubmedId":"16046007","doi":""},{"reference":"Björkqvist K, Österman K, and Lagerspetz KMJ (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior 20: 27-33.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q"},{"reference":"Brenner S (1974). The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1): 71-94.
","pubmedId":"4366476","doi":""},{"reference":"Chao MY, Komatsu H, Fukuto HS, Dionne HM, Hart AC (2004). Feeding status and serotonin rapidly and reversibly modulate a Caenorhabditis elegans chemosensory circuit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101(43): 15512-7.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0403369101"},{"reference":"de Bono M, Maricq AV (2005). Neuronal substrates of complex behaviors in C. elegans. Annu Rev Neurosci 28: 451-501.
","pubmedId":"16022603","doi":""},{"reference":"Doty RL, Applebaum S, Zusho H, Settle RG (1985). Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Europsychologia 23(5): 667-72.
","pubmedId":"4058710","doi":""},{"reference":"Ellis R, Harris G (2020). Variation between nematodes in a multi-sensory behavioral assay. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000330.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Sanders T, Hong S, McCurdy LY, Chase DL, Cohen N, Koelle MR, Nitabach MN (2016). Neural Architecture of Hunger-Dependent Multisensory Decision Making in C. elegans. Neuron 92: 1049-1062.
","pubmedId":"27866800","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Nitabach MN, Zhang Y, Harris G (2017). Multisensory integration in C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43: 110-118.
","pubmedId":"28273525","doi":""},{"reference":"Halpern DF (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. 3rd Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605290"},{"reference":"Harris G, Linfield G, Wu T, Choi MK, Liu H, Zhang Y (2019). Molecular and Cellular modulators for multisensory integration in C. elegans. PloS Genetics 15(3): (e1007706).
","pubmedId":"30849079","doi":""},{"reference":"Ishihara T, Iino Y, Mohri A, Mori I, Gengyo-Ando K, Mitani S, Katsura I (2002). HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 109: 639-49.
","pubmedId":"12062106","doi":""},{"reference":"Kaciuba-Uscilko H, and Grucza R (2001). Gender Differences in Thermoregulation. Medical Research Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw. pp. 553-556.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Lipton J, Kleemann G, Ghosh R, Lints R, Emmons, SW (2004). Mate searching in Caenorhabditis elegans: a genetic model for sex drive in a simple invertebrate. J Neurosci 24: 7427-34.
","pubmedId":"15329389","doi":""},{"reference":"Loxterkamp E, Cha J, Wu K, Sullivan J, Holbrook O, Ghaith H, Srun L, Bauer DE (2021). Behavioral Differences between Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans. microPublication Biology 10.17912/micropub.biology.000431.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Meisel JD, Panda O, Mahanti P, Schroeder FC, Kim DH (2014). Chemosensation of bacterial secondary metabolites modulates neuroendocrine signaling and behavior of C. elegans. Cell 159: 267-80.
","pubmedId":"25303524","doi":""},{"reference":"Olofsson B (2014). The olfactory neuron AWC promotes avoidance of normally palatable food following chronic dietary restriction. J Exp Biol 217: 1790-8.
","pubmedId":"24577446","doi":""},{"reference":"Portman DS (2017). Sexual modulation of sex-shared neurons and circuits in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Res 95(1-2): 527-538.
","pubmedId":"27870393","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryan DA, Miller RM, Lee K, Neal SJ, Fagan KA, Sengupta P (2014). Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr Biol 24: 2509–2517.
","pubmedId":"25438941","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai N, Iwata R, Yokoi S, Butcher RA, Clardy J, Tomioka M, Iino Y (2013). A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8(7): e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Shtonda BB, Avery L (2006). Dietary choice behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Biol 209: 89-102.
","pubmedId":"16354781","doi":""},{"reference":"Troemel ER, Kimmel BE, Bargmann CI (1997). Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91(2): 161-9.
","pubmedId":"9346234","doi":""},{"reference":"Wexler LR, Miller RM, Portman DS (2020). C. elegans Males Integrate Food Signals and Biological Sex to Modulate State-Dependent Chemosensation and Behavioral Prioritization. Curr Biol 28: S0960-9822(20)30645-X.
","pubmedId":"32531276","doi":""},{"reference":"White JQ, Nicholas TJ, Gritton J, Truong L, Davidson ER, Jorgensen EM (2007). The sensory circuitry for sexual attraction in C. elegans males. Curr Biol 17: 1847-57.
","pubmedId":"17964166","doi":""},{"reference":"Yang W, Wu T, Tu S, Qin Y, Shen C, Li J, et al.; Zhang Y (2022). Redundant neural circuits regulate olfactory integration. PLoS Genet 18: e1010029.
","pubmedId":"35100258","doi":""},{"reference":"Yoshida K, Hirotsu T, Tagawa T, Oda S, Wakabayashi T, Iino Y, Ishihara T (2012). Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3: 739. 10.1038/ncomms1750.
","pubmedId":"22415830","doi":""},{"reference":"Zhang Y, Lu H, Bargmann CI (2005). Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438(7065): 179-84.
","pubmedId":"16281027","doi":""}],"title":"Sex differences in decision-making: Identifying multisensory behavioral differences in males and hermaphrodites
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"KJ Yook"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"c0ad9dee-ba7a-4bd1-9177-d224898dd91c","decision":"accept","abstract":"This present study uses C. elegans as a model to investigate how sex differences can influence sensory behavior and decision-making when encountering conflicting cues. We use a multi-sensory behavioral assay to characterize the differences between hermaphrodites and male worms when escaping from a food lawn during exposure to repulsive odors, such as, 2-nonanone. We find that male worms show a delayed food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodite worms, and this is observed across multiple repulsive cues (2-nonanone and undiluted benzaldehyde) and multiple food types (E. coli (OP50) and Comamonas sp). Overall, this study provides a platform to further investigate how sensory-dependent decision-making behavior differs between sexes.
","acknowledgements":"We thank biology undergraduate lab members of the Harris lab for reading and critical discussion manuscript and with analyzing the data generated in each experiment with Dr. Harris. This project was planned and executed by undergraduate researchers under supervision of the principal investigator of the lab(Dr. Gareth Harris). We also thank the Zhang Lab (Dr. Yun Zhang, Harvard University) for initial discussion for this project. We thank CGC for strains for this project. We also thank Biology program Instructional Support technicians, Catherine Hutchinson, Mike Mahoney and Jessica Dalton for their diligent efforts with reagent ordering and help with other aspects of our lab. ","authors":[{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"duncan.tanner490@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Duncan","lastName":"Tanner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"denise.carigo144@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Denise ","lastName":"Carigo","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"Chane.Sevilla592@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Chane ","lastName":"Sevilla","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"madison.lewis960@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"Lewis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","project","resources","software","supervision","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","validation","fundingAcquisition","dataCuration","conceptualization"],"email":"Gareth.harris@csuci.edu","firstName":"Gareth","lastName":"Harris","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":null}],"awards":null,"conflictsOfInterest":null,"dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided through laboratory start-up funds (2017-2020, PI: Dr. Gareth Harris, CSUCI). Funds were also provided through CSUCI mini grant award for 2020 - 2021 (Dr. Gareth Harris). For select students who were included in authorship, this material is based upon work supported by the HSI-STEM Model for Research and Teaching program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant HRD-1928693 (Fall/Spring 2020/2021).","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/ed779d9faca81699f8238cab59b91a40.jpg"},"imageCaption":"A-G
A) Schematic of behavioral assay is shown that measures wild type hermaphrodite and male worms in a multi-sensory behavior. Assaying food leaving on E. coli (OP50) during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone repellent (See Methods, Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). All assays ranged from 45 - 60 minutes per assay for hermaphrodite worms being compared to male worms. B) Wild type hermaphrodite worms show normal food leaving during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone odor (n=4 repeated days tested for wild type hermaphrodite worms) (0-45 minutes assayed). Wild type worms leaving food patch across 45 minutes (as described in Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). E. coli OP50 food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. Mean number of worms that left the food at each 5 minute time point is represented, C) i) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms versus wild type N2 male worms examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on E. coli (OP50) (n=8 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms). (0 - 60 minutes assayed), males show delayed food leaving during 2-nonanone exposure, males were compared to hermaphrodite worms. Hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line), ii) Images showing wild type N2 male worms in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay (N2 males shown on E. coli (OP50) food patch just after 2-nonanone addition and after 10 minutes of 2-nonanone exposure (both images taken in the same experiment on the same day). D) Males were examined for food leaving during exposure to the repellent, undiluted benzaldehyde (100%) compared to hermaphrodite worms (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=4 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms), hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. E. coli (OP50) food lawn. Benzaldehyde used. E) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms compared to N2 male worms were examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on a Comamonas sp food patch (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type male versus hermaphrodite worms), males were compared to hermaphrodite worms under identical conditions tested, hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. Comamonas sp bacterial food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. F) Male worms were examined for their ability to reach the edge of the food patch during 2-nonanone exposure (measuring 90% of worms that reach the edge of the food patch) (Harris et al., 2019) (n=3 repeated days), n.s=not statistically significant when comparing hermaphrodite and male worms tested on same day. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). G) Wild type N2 male worms were examined for their ability to repel from 2-nonanone (100%, undiluted) when compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay No food was present on the plate during this assay (See Methods, Troemel et al., 1997). n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type hermaphrodites versus male worms. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). Avoidance Index ranging from (0 to -1.0). We analyzed the Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, * p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001. All male worms were examined in parallel to wild type hermaphrodite worms tested on the same day under identical assay conditions. Each 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay for hermaphrodites or males used 20-25 worms per assay. n=number of repeated days tested for each behavioral assay from A-G.
","imageTitle":"Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans show different food leaving behavior during exposure to undiluted repulsive odor cues
","methods":"C. elegans strains were cultivated under the standard conditions (Brenner et al., 1974). Wild type N2 hermaphrodite young adults, and wild type male adults were used in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving experiment for this study.
Worm culturing, plate preparation and multi-sensory assay. All hermaphrodite and male worms were grown to young adult under E. coli (OP50) well-fed conditions prior to performing behavior assay (Brenner et al., 1974; Harris et al., 2019).
Multi-sensory assay to analyze male vs hermaphrodite adult worms. For the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay. Wild Type worms (N2) were assayed as previously described (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). For all worms, E. coli (OP50) was used as the food source (Brenner et al., 1974). For the preparation of assay plates, the NGM (Nematode Growth Medium) agar was made and poured into small assay plates (6 cm) and then allowed to cool and solidify (using standard NGM plate preparation protocols). After two days, a liquid suspension of E. coli (OP50) was prepared; consisting of 40 mL of NGM media and E. coli (OP50) colonies added to the NGM media, this media was then placed at 26°C overnight. The next morning, the E. coli (OP50) culture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. 35 mL of the NGM was removed and discarded (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). The E. coli (OP50) pellet was then re-suspended in 5 mL of NGM through mixing, and then 55 µL of this E. coli (OP50) culture was then added to the center of an NGM agar assay plate (as seen in Fig. 1A, Schematic of behavioral assay). All worms were grown at 20-23°C on NGM plates that contained a lawn of E. coli (OP50). Next 20-25 young adult worms (either hermaphrodite or male worms) are placed onto the 1 cm diameter food lawn and are allowed to acclimate for 60 minutes. After 1 hour, a drop of 2-nonanone repellent (1 µL) is placed approximately two worm lengths away from the food lawn. The number of worms on the lawn was counted every 5 minutes for a total of 45-60 minutes, and the number of hermaphrodite or male worms that left the food lawn was determined. Food leaving is analyzed during exposure to the repellent 2-nonanone (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Worms present on the food at each 5-minute time-point are counted (represented in y-axis). For each plate of male worms tested, there was a separate hermaphrodite assay plate examined in parallel. No males were mixed with hermaphrodite adult worms during the behavioral assay. For all 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assays on Comamonas sp food lawn, the assay was prepared and tested using identical conditions to E. coli (OP50) assays tested above. For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 adult hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male adult worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. n = number of repeated days tested across 1A - G.
Assay to measure the ability to reach the edge of a food patch during 2-nonanone exposure
Wild type hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for their ability (Time to reach the edge) to reach the furthest edge of the food patch during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone. 20-25 hermaphrodites and males were examined per replicate. Wild type N2 hermaphrodites and wild type N2 males were examined for the time taken for 90% of the worms to reach the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone drop placement (last sector of the food patch). Time was determined as time taken (sec) for worms to reach the edge of the food from the point of 2-nonanone addition next to the E. coli (OP50) food patch. The 1 cm food patch was divided into 5 sectors (0.2 cm each). Sectors A on food patch being closest to the 2-nonanone, Sector E on food patch being furthest away from 2-nonanone drop (As previously described in Harris et al., 2019). Wild type N2 male worms were measured and compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodites tested in parallel on separate behavior assay plates. Wild type N2 hermaphrodite and male worms were not mixed on behavioral assay plates. Mean±SEM, student’s t-test, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. n=number of repeated days tested for hermaphrodite and male worms.
2-nonanone avoidance assay
To examine the avoidance of 2-nonanone in hermaphrodites and males, chemotaxis assays were performed essentially as previously described (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of a square plate that was divided into sectors A, B, C, D, E and F and 2 drops of 1 µl of undiluted 2-nonanone was added to one side and 2 drops of 1 µl ethanol was added to the opposite side of the plate as a control. Approximately 75-100 hermaphrodite or male worms were used in each assay. 2-nonanone avoidance was analyzed by counting the number of worms in the sectors A-B, C-D, and E-F with E-F being furthest away from the 2-nonanone point sources. The avoidance index was calculated as the number of animals in sectors A and B (at 2-nonanone) minus the number of animals in the sectors E and F (at control) and normalized with the total number of animals in all 6 sectors on plate (Avoidance Index between 0 and -1.0). For all data analysis, a Student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male worms tested on the same day in parallel identical conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, p ≤0.05*, p≤0.01**, p≤0.001***.
","reagents":"List of worm and bacterial strains used in experiments in the present study
1) Wild type N2 Bristol hermaphrodite C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
2) N2 wild type male C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
3) E. coli (OP50) bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
4) DA1877 Comamonas sp bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
All strains were provided by the CGC (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center) at the University of Minnesota, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
This project was funded through lab start-up (Harris G), California State University Channel Islands and Mini-Grant awarded, California State University Channel Islands, 2020 - 2021.
Chemicals used in study. All chemicals used in this study, including, 2-nonanone (Cas # 821-55-6) and Benzaldehyde (Cas # 100-52-7) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
","patternDescription":"Sex differences across organisms have been an intense area of research over the last 50 years. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms underlying many behavioral differences, including sensation, perception of sensory cues and decision-making and how this occurs at the level of the brain is still not understood. Sex differences have been identified from humans to worms. A number of studies have demonstrated differences between males and females in processes, including, olfaction, thermoregulation, aggression, learning and mood (Bjorkqvist et al., 1994; Doty et al., 1985; Berger-Sweeney et al., 1995; Halpern et al., 2000; Kaciuba-Uscilko et al., 2001; Bielsky et al., 2005). Behavioral studies in vertebrates and invertebrates have suggested that behavioral sex biases might have biological underpinnings. The understanding of the differences in neural signals and circuit function, that result in the variation in decision-making processes across female and male systems is not fully understood.
The hermaphrodite nematode C. elegans is attracted to or repelled by an array of volatile odorants (Bargmann and Horvitz, 1991; Troemel et al., 1997; Debono and Maricq, 2005; Chao et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005; Ghosh et al., 2017). In addition, hermaphrodites are able to generate decisions when encountering conflicting cues that are presented simultaneously (Ishihara et al., 2002; Ghosh et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2022). Male C. elegans are able to sense a number of chemicals, including, pheromones, food associated cues, diacetyl and salt (NaCl) (White et al., 2007; Sakai et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Wexler et al., 2020; Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Portman et al., 2017). To address sex specific differences in worm behavior, we used C. elegans to understand whether wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently when exposed to conflicting cues, such as, food and the repulsive odor cue, 2-nonanone (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020).
We examined the behavioral differences between hermaphrodites and males using a “multi-sensory behavioral paradigm”, where we compare wild type C. elegans hermaphrodites and males in a food leaving assay when exposed to a repulsive cue, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1A, See schematic diagram, Harris et al., 2019). We examined any differences between males and hermaphrodite adults in a multi-sensory behavioral assay, where both hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone. A number of genes and neurons have previously been identified for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving in hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Wild type hermaphrodites typically leave the E.coli (OP50) food patch within 10-15 minutes as normally observed after 2-nonanone addition next to the food patch (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, when examining male worms we observe that males show a significantly delayed food-leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1Ci (graph) and 1Cii (images)) showing an example of N2 males with reduced food leaving after 10 minutes). Suggesting, males leave a food patch significantly slower than hermaphrodites when stimulated by the presence of a repulsive odor. In addition, we observe that when N2 males leave the food patch during this period it is significantly delayed, and many of the males do not leave the food patch at all during our assay period of 45-60 minutes, despite positioning at the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone (Fig. 1). Interestingly, wild type male worms have been shown to spontaneously leave a food patch, multiple hours later after being introduced to a food patch. But in the first hour of incubation of males on new food patch prior to adding 2-nonanone we do not see this increased leaving (Lipton et al., 2004).
To address if N2 male worms were sensing 2-nonanone similar to hermaphrodites, or showing an actual difference in decision-making to leave the food, we used multiple approaches to do this. We analyzed male worm avoidance behavior to 2-nonanone using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay (Troemel et al., 1997). We examine wild type males versus hermaphrodites in multiple ways. We found that N2 male worms avoid 2-nonanone the same as wild type N2 hermaphrodites (Fig. 1G). This was evident by N2 males avoiding 2-nonanone as strongly as wild type hermaphrodites tested in parallel. We also analyzed the male worms during the exposure to 2-nonanone while on the assay food patch. This was done by analyzing male behavior during the assay (See Fig. 1Cii Image of N2 males during repulsion) and measuring the time to reach the edge of the food patch after 2-nonanone was added next to the E. coli (OP50) food patch (see schematic diagram, Fig. 1a). Male worms crawled to the edge of the food and remained at the furthest edge away from the 2-nonanone repellent like wild-type hermaphrodite animals, suggesting N2 males could sense and perform a repulsive response to 2-nonanone (measured time taken for 90% of worms to reach the edge of the food) (Fig. 1F). This suggests that there is a difference in the decision to leave food during repulsive odor exposure, based on actual decision to leave food and not a difference in the general sensation of the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1F).
To further understand how general or specific these male differences to hermaphrodite worms are, we next varied two assay conditions. First, we used a second volatile repellent, benzaldehyde (undiluted) and measured benzaldehyde-dependent food leaving in males versus hermaphrodites (Yoshida et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2019). Interestingly, males also showed delayed food leaving in response to undiluted benzaldehyde when compared to wild type hermaphrodite animals (Fig. 1D). In addition, we changed the food patch type to assess any effect on male worm food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms (See Fig. 1C). Wild type hermaphrodite worms have been shown to exhibit a variety of behavioral outputs in response to food and food associated cues, including, showing varied feeding rates, sensory-dependent locomotory behavior, behavioral preference and food leaving dynamics (Zhang et al., 2005; Shtonda and Avery, 2006; Meisel et al., 2014; Olofsson et al., 2014). We chose Comamonas sp food lawns and assessed male food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodites. Wild type hermaphrodite worms also leave Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone, as previously described for wild-type hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Upon examining male worms for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms, male worms are also significantly delayed food leavers on Comamonas sp, suggesting male worms show this general delayed food leaving across multiple foods, including at least, the regular tested food source, E. coli (OP50) and also Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1E).
Overall, this suggests that wild type N2 male worms show decreased food leaving when compared to N2 hermaphrodites when exposed to different volatile repellents, including, undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde, and across different food types. Wild type hermaphrodites and males are known to behave differently in specific odor-guided behavior, locomotory dynamics and conditioning associated with salt chemotaxis (Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2013). This provides an avenue for further investigation of the neural mechanisms that influence behavioral differences observed between sexes in a multi sensory behavior.
","references":[{"reference":"Bargmann CI, Horvitz HR. 1991. Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron 7: 729-42.
","pubmedId":"1660283","doi":""},{"reference":"Berger-Sweeney J, Arnold A, Gabeau D, & Mills J. 1995. Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: Effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 859–873.
","pubmedId":"8554711","doi":""},{"reference":"Bielsky IF, Hu SB & Young LJ. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in the vasopressin system: lack of an altered behavioral phenotype in female V1a receptor knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res 164: 132–136.
","pubmedId":"16046007","doi":""},{"reference":"Björkqvist K, Österman K, and Lagerspetz KMJ. 1994. Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior 20: 27-33.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q"},{"reference":"Brenner S (1974). The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1): 71-94.
","pubmedId":"4366476","doi":""},{"reference":"Chao MY, Komatsu H, Fukuto HS, Dionne HM, Hart AC. 2004. Feeding status and serotonin rapidly and reversibly modulate a Caenorhabditis elegans chemosensory circuit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101(43): 15512-7.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0403369101"},{"reference":"de Bono M, Maricq AV. 2005. Neuronal substrates of complex behaviors in C. elegans. Annu Rev Neurosci 28: 451-501.
","pubmedId":"16022603","doi":""},{"reference":"Doty RL, Applebaum S, Zusho H, Settle RG. 1985. Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Europsychologia 23(5): 667-72.
","pubmedId":"4058710","doi":""},{"reference":"Ellis R, Harris G. 2020. Variation between nematodes in a multi-sensory behavioral assay. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000330.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Sanders T, Hong S, McCurdy LY, Chase DL, Cohen N, Koelle MR, Nitabach MN. 2016. Neural Architecture of Hunger-Dependent Multisensory Decision Making in C. elegans. Neuron 92: 1049-1062.
","pubmedId":"27866800","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Nitabach MN, Zhang Y, Harris G. 2017. Multisensory integration in C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43: 110-118.
","pubmedId":"28273525","doi":""},{"reference":"Halpern DF. 2000. Sex differences in cognitive abilities. 3rd Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605290"},{"reference":"Harris G, Linfield G, Wu T, Choi MK, Liu H, Zhang Y. 2019. Molecular and Cellular modulators for multisensory integration in C. elegans. PloS Genetics 15(3): (e1007706).
","pubmedId":"30849079","doi":""},{"reference":"Ishihara T, Iino Y, Mohri A, Mori I, Gengyo-Ando K, Mitani S, Katsura I. 2002. HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 109: 639-49.
","pubmedId":"12062106","doi":""},{"reference":"Kaciuba-Uscilko H, and Grucza R. 2001. Gender Differences in Thermoregulation. Medical Research Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw. pp. 553-556.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Lipton J, Kleemann G, Ghosh R, Lints R, Emmons, SW. 2004. Mate searching in Caenorhabditis elegans: a genetic model for sex drive in a simple invertebrate. J Neurosci 24: 7427-34.
","pubmedId":"15329389","doi":""},{"reference":"Loxterkamp E, Cha J, Wu K, Sullivan J, Holbrook O, Ghaith H, Srun L, Bauer DE. 2021. Behavioral Differences between Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans. microPublication Biology 10.17912/micropub.biology.000431.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Meisel JD, Panda O, Mahanti P, Schroeder FC, Kim DH. 2014. Chemosensation of bacterial secondary metabolites modulates neuroendocrine signaling and behavior of C. elegans. Cell 159: 267-80.
","pubmedId":"25303524","doi":""},{"reference":"Olofsson B. 2014. The olfactory neuron AWC promotes avoidance of normally palatable food following chronic dietary restriction. J Exp Biol 217: 1790-8.
","pubmedId":"24577446","doi":""},{"reference":"Portman DS. 2017. Sexual modulation of sex-shared neurons and circuits in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Res 95(1-2): 527-538.
","pubmedId":"27870393","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryan DA, Miller RM, Lee K, Neal SJ, Fagan KA, Sengupta P. 2014. Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr Biol 24: 2509–2517.
","pubmedId":"25438941","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai N, Iwata R, Yokoi S, Butcher RA, Clardy J, Tomioka M, Iino Y. 2013. A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8(7): e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Shtonda BB, Avery L. 2006. Dietary choice behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Biol 209: 89-102.
","pubmedId":"16354781","doi":""},{"reference":"Troemel ER, Kimmel BE, Bargmann CI. 1997. Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91(2): 161-9.
","pubmedId":"9346234","doi":""},{"reference":"Wexler LR, Miller RM, Portman DS. 2020. C. elegans Males Integrate Food Signals and Biological Sex to Modulate State-Dependent Chemosensation and Behavioral Prioritization. Curr Biol 28: S0960-9822(20)30645-X.
","pubmedId":"32531276","doi":""},{"reference":"White JQ, Nicholas TJ, Gritton J, Truong L, Davidson ER, Jorgensen EM. 2007. The sensory circuitry for sexual attraction in C. elegans males. Curr Biol 17: 1847-57.
","pubmedId":"17964166","doi":""},{"reference":"Yang W, Wu T, Tu S, Qin Y, Shen C, Li J, et al.; Zhang Y. 2022. Redundant neural circuits regulate olfactory integration. PLoS Genet 18: e1010029.
","pubmedId":"35100258","doi":""},{"reference":"Yoshida K, Hirotsu T, Tagawa T, Oda S, Wakabayashi T, Iino Y, Ishihara T. 2012. Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3: 739. 10.1038/ncomms1750.
","pubmedId":"22415830","doi":""},{"reference":"Zhang Y, Lu H, Bargmann CI. 2005. Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438(7065): 179-84.
","pubmedId":"16281027","doi":""}],"title":"Sex differences in decision-making: Identifying multisensory behavioral differences in males and hermaphrodites
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"KJ Yook"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"ae17c22d-f766-4c54-9efa-fd57407bc6b8","decision":"edit","abstract":"This present study uses C. elegans as a model to investigate how sex differences can influence sensory behavior and decision-making when encountering conflicting cues. We use a multi-sensory behavioral assay to characterize the differences between hermaphrodites and male worms when escaping from a food lawn during exposure to repulsive odors, such as, 2-nonanone. We find that male worms show a delayed food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodite worms, and this is observed across multiple repulsive cues (2-nonanone and undiluted benzaldehyde) and multiple food types (E. coli (OP50) and Comamonas sp). Overall, this study provides a platform to further investigate how sensory-dependent decision-making behavior differs between sexes.
","acknowledgements":"We thank biology undergraduate lab members of the Harris lab for reading and critical discussion manuscript and with analyzing the data generated in each experiment with Dr. Harris. This project was planned and executed by undergraduate researchers under supervision of the principal investigator of the lab(Dr. Gareth Harris). We also thank the Zhang Lab (Dr. Yun Zhang, Harvard University) for initial discussion for this project. We thank CGC for strains for this project. We also thank Biology program Instructional Support technicians, Catherine Hutchinson, Mike Mahoney and Jessica Dalton for their diligent efforts with reagent ordering and help with other aspects of our lab. ","authors":[{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"duncan.tanner490@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Duncan","lastName":"Tanner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"denise.carigo144@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Denise ","lastName":"Carigo","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"Chane.Sevilla592@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Chane ","lastName":"Sevilla","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"madison.lewis960@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"Lewis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","project","resources","software","supervision","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","validation","fundingAcquisition","dataCuration","conceptualization"],"email":"Gareth.harris@csuci.edu","firstName":"Gareth","lastName":"Harris","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":null}],"awards":null,"conflictsOfInterest":null,"dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided through laboratory start-up funds (2017-2020, PI: Dr. Gareth Harris, CSUCI). Funds were also provided through CSUCI mini grant award for 2020 - 2021 (Dr. Gareth Harris). For select students who were included in authorship, this material is based upon work supported by the HSI-STEM Model for Research and Teaching program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant HRD-1928693 (Fall/Spring 2020/2021).","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/ed779d9faca81699f8238cab59b91a40.jpg"},"imageCaption":"A-G
A) Schematic of behavioral assay is shown that measures wild type hermaphrodite and male worms in a multi-sensory behavior. Assaying food leaving on E. coli (OP50) during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone repellent (See Methods, Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). All assays ranged from 45 - 60 minutes per assay for hermaphrodite worms being compared to male worms. B) Wild type hermaphrodite worms show normal food leaving during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone odor (n=4 repeated days tested for wild type hermaphrodite worms) (0-45 minutes assayed). Wild type worms leaving food patch across 45 minutes (as described in Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). E. coli (OP50) food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. Mean number of worms that left the food at each 5 minute time point is represented, C) i) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms versus wild type N2 male worms examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on E. coli (OP50) (n=8 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms). (0 - 60 minutes assayed), males show delayed food leaving during 2-nonanone exposure, males were compared to hermaphrodite worms. Hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line), ii) Images showing wild type N2 male worms in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay (N2 males shown on E. coli (OP50) food patch just after 2-nonanone addition and after 10 minutes of 2-nonanone exposure (both images taken in the same experiment on the same day). D) Males were examined for food leaving during exposure to the repellent, undiluted benzaldehyde (100%) compared to hermaphrodite worms (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=4 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms), hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. E. coli (OP50) food lawn. Benzaldehyde used. E) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms compared to N2 male worms were examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on a Comamonas sp food patch (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type male versus hermaphrodite worms), males were compared to hermaphrodite worms under identical conditions tested, hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. Comamonas sp bacterial food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. F) Male worms were examined for their ability to reach the edge of the food patch during 2-nonanone exposure (measuring 90% of worms that reach the edge of the food patch) (Harris et al., 2019) (n=3 repeated days), n.s=not statistically significant when comparing hermaphrodite and male worms tested on same day. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). G) Wild type N2 male worms were examined for their ability to repel from 2-nonanone (100%, undiluted) when compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay No food was present on the plate during this assay (See Methods, Troemel et al., 1997). n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type hermaphrodites versus male worms. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). Avoidance Index ranging from (0 to -1.0). We analyzed the Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, * p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001. All male worms were examined in parallel to wild type hermaphrodite worms tested on the same day under identical assay conditions. Each 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay for hermaphrodites or males used 20-25 worms per assay. n=number of repeated days tested for each behavioral assay from A-G.
","imageTitle":"Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans show different food leaving behavior during exposure to undiluted repulsive odor cues
","methods":"C. elegans strains were cultivated under the standard conditions (Brenner et al., 1974). Wild type N2 hermaphrodite young adults, and wild type male adults were used in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving experiment for this study.
Worm culturing, plate preparation and multi-sensory assay. All hermaphrodite and male worms were grown to young adult under E. coli (OP50) well-fed conditions prior to performing behavior assay (Brenner et al., 1974; Harris et al., 2019).
Multi-sensory assay to analyze male vs hermaphrodite adult worms. For the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay. Wild Type worms (N2) were assayed as previously described (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). For all worms, E. coli (OP50) was used as the food source (Brenner et al., 1974). For the preparation of assay plates, the NGM (Nematode Growth Medium) agar was made and poured into small assay plates (6 cm) and then allowed to cool and solidify (using standard NGM plate preparation protocols). After two days, a liquid suspension of E. coli (OP50) was prepared; consisting of 40 mL of NGM media and E. coli (OP50) colonies added to the NGM media, this media was then placed at 26°C overnight. The next morning, the E. coli (OP50) culture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. 35 mL of the NGM was removed and discarded (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). The E. coli (OP50) pellet was then re-suspended in 5 mL of NGM through mixing, and then 55 µL of this E. coli (OP50) culture was then added to the center of an NGM agar assay plate (as seen in Fig. 1A, Schematic of behavioral assay). All worms were grown at 20-23°C on NGM plates that contained a lawn of E. coli (OP50). Next 20-25 young adult worms (either hermaphrodite or male worms) are placed onto the 1 cm diameter food lawn and are allowed to acclimate for 60 minutes. After 1 hour, a drop of 2-nonanone repellent (1 µL) is placed approximately two worm lengths away from the food lawn. The number of worms on the lawn was counted every 5 minutes for a total of 45-60 minutes, and the number of hermaphrodite or male worms that left the food lawn was determined. Food leaving is analyzed during exposure to the repellent 2-nonanone (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Worms present on the food at each 5-minute time-point are counted (represented in y-axis). For each plate of male worms tested, there was a separate hermaphrodite assay plate examined in parallel. No males were mixed with hermaphrodite adult worms during the behavioral assay. For all 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assays on Comamonas sp food lawn, the assay was prepared and tested using identical conditions to E. coli (OP50) assays tested above. For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 adult hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male adult worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. n = number of repeated days tested across 1A - G.
Assay to measure the ability to reach the edge of a food patch during 2-nonanone exposure
Wild type hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for their ability (Time to reach the edge) to reach the furthest edge of the food patch during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone. 20-25 hermaphrodites and males were examined per replicate. Wild type N2 hermaphrodites and wild type N2 males were examined for the time taken for 90% of the worms to reach the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone drop placement (last sector of the food patch). Time was determined as time taken (sec) for worms to reach the edge of the food from the point of 2-nonanone addition next to the E. coli (OP50) food patch. The 1 cm food patch was divided into 5 sectors (0.2 cm each). Sectors A on food patch being closest to the 2-nonanone, Sector E on food patch being furthest away from 2-nonanone drop (As previously described in Harris et al., 2019). Wild type N2 male worms were measured and compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodites tested in parallel on separate behavior assay plates. Wild type N2 hermaphrodite and male worms were not mixed on behavioral assay plates. Mean±SEM, student’s t-test, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. n=number of repeated days tested for hermaphrodite and male worms.
2-nonanone avoidance assay
To examine the avoidance of 2-nonanone in hermaphrodites and males, chemotaxis assays were performed essentially as previously described (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of a square plate that was divided into sectors A, B, C, D, E and F and 2 drops of 1 µl of undiluted 2-nonanone was added to one side and 2 drops of 1 µl ethanol was added to the opposite side of the plate as a control. Approximately 75-100 hermaphrodite or male worms were used in each assay. 2-nonanone avoidance was analyzed by counting the number of worms in the sectors A-B, C-D, and E-F with E-F being furthest away from the 2-nonanone point sources. The avoidance index was calculated as the number of animals in sectors A and B (at 2-nonanone) minus the number of animals in the sectors E and F (at control) and normalized with the total number of animals in all 6 sectors on plate (Avoidance Index between 0 and -1.0). For all data analysis, a Student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male worms tested on the same day in parallel identical conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, p ≤0.05*, p≤0.01**, p≤0.001***.
","reagents":"List of worm and bacterial strains used in experiments in the present study
1) Wild type N2 Bristol hermaphrodite C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
2) N2 wild type male C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
3) E. coli (OP50) bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
4) DA1877 Comamonas sp bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
All strains were provided by the CGC (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center) at the University of Minnesota, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
This project was funded through lab start-up (Harris G), California State University Channel Islands and Mini-Grant awarded, California State University Channel Islands, 2020 - 2021.
Chemicals used in study. All chemicals used in this study, including, 2-nonanone (Cas # 821-55-6) and Benzaldehyde (Cas # 100-52-7) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
","patternDescription":"Sex differences across organisms have been an intense area of research over the last 50 years. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms underlying many behavioral differences, including sensation, perception of sensory cues and decision-making and how this occurs at the level of the brain is still not understood. Sex differences have been identified from humans to worms. A number of studies have demonstrated differences between males and females in processes, including, olfaction, thermoregulation, aggression, learning and mood (Bjorkqvist et al., 1994; Doty et al., 1985; Berger-Sweeney et al., 1995; Halpern et al., 2000; Kaciuba-Uscilko et al., 2001; Bielsky et al., 2005). Behavioral studies in vertebrates and invertebrates have suggested that behavioral sex biases might have biological underpinnings. The understanding of the differences in neural signals and circuit function, that result in the variation in decision-making processes across female and male systems is not fully understood.
The hermaphrodite nematode C. elegans is attracted to or repelled by an array of volatile odorants (Bargmann and Horvitz, 1991; Troemel et al., 1997; Debono and Maricq, 2005; Chao et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005; Ghosh et al., 2017). In addition, hermaphrodites are able to generate decisions when encountering conflicting cues that are presented simultaneously (Ishihara et al., 2002; Ghosh et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2022). Male C. elegans are able to sense a number of chemicals, including, pheromones, food associated cues, diacetyl and salt (NaCl) (White et al., 2007; Sakai et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Wexler et al., 2020; Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Portman et al., 2017). To address sex specific differences in worm behavior, we used C. elegans to understand whether wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently when exposed to conflicting cues, such as, food and the repulsive odor cue, 2-nonanone (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020).
We examined the behavioral differences between hermaphrodites and males using a “multi-sensory behavioral paradigm”, where we compare wild type C. elegans hermaphrodites and males in a food leaving assay when exposed to a repulsive cue, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1A, See schematic diagram, Harris et al., 2019). We examined any differences between males and hermaphrodite adults in a multi-sensory behavioral assay, where both hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone. A number of genes and neurons have previously been identified for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving in hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Wild type hermaphrodites typically leave the E.coli (OP50) food patch within 10-15 minutes as normally observed after 2-nonanone addition next to the food patch (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, when examining male worms we observe that males show a significantly delayed food-leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1Ci (graph) and 1Cii (images)) showing an example of N2 males with reduced food leaving after 10 minutes). Suggesting, males leave a food patch significantly slower than hermaphrodites when stimulated by the presence of a repulsive odor. In addition, we observe that when N2 males leave the food patch during this period it is significantly delayed, and many of the males do not leave the food patch at all during our assay period of 45-60 minutes, despite positioning at the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone (Fig. 1). Interestingly, wild type male worms have been shown to spontaneously leave a food patch, multiple hours later after being introduced to a food patch. But in the first hour of incubation of males on new food patch prior to adding 2-nonanone we do not see this increased leaving (Lipton et al., 2004).
To address if N2 male worms were sensing 2-nonanone similar to hermaphrodites, or showing an actual difference in decision-making to leave the food, we used multiple approaches to do this. We analyzed male worm avoidance behavior to 2-nonanone using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay (Troemel et al., 1997). We examine wild type males versus hermaphrodites in multiple ways. We found that N2 male worms avoid 2-nonanone the same as wild type N2 hermaphrodites (Fig. 1G). This was evident by N2 males avoiding 2-nonanone as strongly as wild type hermaphrodites tested in parallel. We also analyzed the male worms during the exposure to 2-nonanone while on the assay food patch. This was done by analyzing male behavior during the assay (See Fig. 1Cii Image of N2 males during repulsion) and measuring the time to reach the edge of the food patch after 2-nonanone was added next to the E. coli (OP50) food patch (see schematic diagram, Fig. 1a). Male worms crawled to the edge of the food and remained at the furthest edge away from the 2-nonanone repellent like wild-type hermaphrodite animals, suggesting N2 males could sense and perform a repulsive response to 2-nonanone (measured time taken for 90% of worms to reach the edge of the food) (Fig. 1F). This suggests that there is a difference in the decision to leave food during repulsive odor exposure, based on actual decision to leave food and not a difference in the general sensation of the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1F).
To further understand how general or specific these male differences to hermaphrodite worms are, we next varied two assay conditions. First, we used a second volatile repellent, benzaldehyde (undiluted) and measured benzaldehyde-dependent food leaving in males versus hermaphrodites (Yoshida et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2019). Interestingly, males also showed delayed food leaving in response to undiluted benzaldehyde when compared to wild type hermaphrodite animals (Fig. 1D). In addition, we changed the food patch type to assess any effect on male worm food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms (See Fig. 1C). Wild type hermaphrodite worms have been shown to exhibit a variety of behavioral outputs in response to food and food associated cues, including, showing varied feeding rates, sensory-dependent locomotory behavior, behavioral preference and food leaving dynamics (Zhang et al., 2005; Shtonda and Avery, 2006; Meisel et al., 2014; Olofsson et al., 2014). We chose Comamonas sp food lawns and assessed male food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodites. Wild type hermaphrodite worms also leave Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone, as previously described for wild-type hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Upon examining male worms for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms, male worms are also significantly delayed food leavers on Comamonas sp, suggesting male worms show this general delayed food leaving across multiple foods, including at least, the regular tested food source, E. coli (OP50) and also Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1E).
Overall, this suggests that wild type N2 male worms show decreased food leaving when compared to N2 hermaphrodites when exposed to different volatile repellents, including, undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde, and across different food types. Wild type hermaphrodites and males are known to behave differently in specific odor-guided behavior, locomotory dynamics and conditioning associated with salt chemotaxis (Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2013). This provides an avenue for further investigation of the neural mechanisms that influence behavioral differences observed between sexes in a multi sensory behavior.
","references":[{"reference":"Bargmann CI, Horvitz HR. 1991. Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron 7: 729-42.
","pubmedId":"1660283","doi":""},{"reference":"Berger-Sweeney J, Arnold A, Gabeau D, & Mills J. 1995. Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: Effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 859–873.
","pubmedId":"8554711","doi":""},{"reference":"Bielsky IF, Hu SB & Young LJ. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in the vasopressin system: lack of an altered behavioral phenotype in female V1a receptor knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res 164: 132–136.
","pubmedId":"16046007","doi":""},{"reference":"Björkqvist K, Österman K, and Lagerspetz KMJ. 1994. Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior 20: 27-33.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q"},{"reference":"Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1): 71-94.
","pubmedId":"4366476","doi":""},{"reference":"Chao MY, Komatsu H, Fukuto HS, Dionne HM, Hart AC. 2004. Feeding status and serotonin rapidly and reversibly modulate a Caenorhabditis elegans chemosensory circuit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101(43): 15512-7.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0403369101"},{"reference":"de Bono M, Maricq AV. 2005. Neuronal substrates of complex behaviors in C. elegans. Annu Rev Neurosci 28: 451-501.
","pubmedId":"16022603","doi":""},{"reference":"Doty RL, Applebaum S, Zusho H, Settle RG. 1985. Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Europsychologia 23(5): 667-72.
","pubmedId":"4058710","doi":""},{"reference":"Ellis R, Harris G. 2020. Variation between nematodes in a multi-sensory behavioral assay. MicroPubl Biol 2020: .
","pubmedId":"33274334","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Sanders T, Hong S, McCurdy LY, Chase DL, Cohen N, Koelle MR, Nitabach MN. 2016. Neural Architecture of Hunger-Dependent Multisensory Decision Making in C. elegans. Neuron 92: 1049-1062.
","pubmedId":"27866800","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Nitabach MN, Zhang Y, Harris G. 2017. Multisensory integration in C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43: 110-118.
","pubmedId":"28273525","doi":""},{"reference":"Halpern DF. 2000. Sex differences in cognitive abilities. 3rd Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605290"},{"reference":"Harris G, Linfield G, Wu T, Choi MK, Liu H, Zhang Y. 2019. Molecular and Cellular modulators for multisensory integration in C. elegans. PloS Genetics 15(3): (e1007706).
","pubmedId":"30849079","doi":""},{"reference":"Ishihara T, Iino Y, Mohri A, Mori I, Gengyo-Ando K, Mitani S, Katsura I. 2002. HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 109: 639-49.
","pubmedId":"12062106","doi":""},{"reference":"Kaciuba-Uscilko H, Grucza R. 2001. Gender differences in thermoregulation. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 4: 533-6.
","pubmedId":"11706289","doi":""},{"reference":"Lipton J, Kleemann G, Ghosh R, Lints R, Emmons, SW. 2004. Mate searching in Caenorhabditis elegans: a genetic model for sex drive in a simple invertebrate. J Neurosci 24: 7427-34.
","pubmedId":"15329389","doi":""},{"reference":"Loxterkamp E, Cha J, Wu K, Sullivan J, Holbrook O, Ghaith H, Srun L, Bauer DE. 2021. Behavioral Differences between Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans. microPublication Biology 10.17912/micropub.biology.000431.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Meisel JD, Panda O, Mahanti P, Schroeder FC, Kim DH. 2014. Chemosensation of bacterial secondary metabolites modulates neuroendocrine signaling and behavior of C. elegans. Cell 159: 267-80.
","pubmedId":"25303524","doi":""},{"reference":"Olofsson B. 2014. The olfactory neuron AWC promotes avoidance of normally palatable food following chronic dietary restriction. J Exp Biol 217: 1790-8.
","pubmedId":"24577446","doi":""},{"reference":"Portman DS. 2017. Sexual modulation of sex-shared neurons and circuits in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Res 95(1-2): 527-538.
","pubmedId":"27870393","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryan DA, Miller RM, Lee K, Neal SJ, Fagan KA, Sengupta P. 2014. Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr Biol 24: 2509–2517.
","pubmedId":"25438941","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai N, Iwata R, Yokoi S, Butcher RA, Clardy J, Tomioka M, Iino Y. 2013. A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8(7): e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Shtonda BB, Avery L. 2006. Dietary choice behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Biol 209: 89-102.
","pubmedId":"16354781","doi":""},{"reference":"Troemel ER, Kimmel BE, Bargmann CI. 1997. Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91(2): 161-9.
","pubmedId":"9346234","doi":""},{"reference":"Wexler LR, Miller RM, Portman DS. 2020. C. elegans Males Integrate Food Signals and Biological Sex to Modulate State-Dependent Chemosensation and Behavioral Prioritization. Curr Biol 28: S0960-9822(20)30645-X.
","pubmedId":"32531276","doi":""},{"reference":"White JQ, Nicholas TJ, Gritton J, Truong L, Davidson ER, Jorgensen EM. 2007. The sensory circuitry for sexual attraction in C. elegans males. Curr Biol 17: 1847-57.
","pubmedId":"17964166","doi":""},{"reference":"Yang W, Wu T, Tu S, Qin Y, Shen C, Li J, et al.; Zhang Y. 2022. Redundant neural circuits regulate olfactory integration. PLoS Genet 18: e1010029.
","pubmedId":"35100258","doi":""},{"reference":"Yoshida K, Hirotsu T, Tagawa T, Oda S, Wakabayashi T, Iino Y, Ishihara T. 2012. Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3: 739. 10.1038/ncomms1750.
","pubmedId":"22415830","doi":""},{"reference":"Zhang Y, Lu H, Bargmann CI. 2005. Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438(7065): 179-84.
","pubmedId":"16281027","doi":""}],"title":"Sex differences in decision-making: Identifying multisensory behavioral differences in males and hermaphrodites
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"KJ Yook"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"5fed2811-2f1d-4d7b-8361-6a7d22942e59","decision":"edit","abstract":"This present study uses C. elegans as a model to investigate how sex differences can influence sensory behavior and decision-making when encountering conflicting cues. We use a multi-sensory behavioral assay to characterize the differences between hermaphrodites and male worms when escaping from a food lawn during exposure to repulsive odors, such as, 2-nonanone. We find that male worms show a delayed food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodite worms, and this is observed across multiple repulsive cues (2-nonanone and undiluted benzaldehyde) and multiple food types (E. coli (OP50) and Comamonas sp). Overall, this study provides a platform to further investigate how sensory-dependent decision-making behavior differs between sexes.
","acknowledgements":"We thank biology undergraduate lab members of the Harris lab for reading and critical discussion manuscript and with analyzing the data generated in each experiment with Dr. Harris. This project was planned and executed by undergraduate researchers under supervision of the principal investigator of the lab(Dr. Gareth Harris). We also thank the Zhang Lab (Dr. Yun Zhang, Harvard University) for initial discussion for this project. We thank CGC for strains for this project. We also thank Biology program Instructional Support technicians, Catherine Hutchinson, Mike Mahoney and Jessica Dalton for their diligent efforts with reagent ordering and help with other aspects of our lab. ","authors":[{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"duncan.tanner490@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Duncan","lastName":"Tanner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"denise.carigo144@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Denise ","lastName":"Carigo","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"Chane.Sevilla592@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Chane ","lastName":"Sevilla","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"madison.lewis960@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"Lewis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","project","resources","software","supervision","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","validation","fundingAcquisition","dataCuration","conceptualization"],"email":"Gareth.harris@csuci.edu","firstName":"Gareth","lastName":"Harris","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":null}],"awards":null,"conflictsOfInterest":null,"dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided through laboratory start-up funds (2017-2020, PI: Dr. Gareth Harris, CSUCI). Funds were also provided through CSUCI mini grant award for 2020 - 2021 (Dr. Gareth Harris). For select students who were included in authorship, this material is based upon work supported by the HSI-STEM Model for Research and Teaching program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant HRD-1928693 (Fall/Spring 2020/2021).","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/ed779d9faca81699f8238cab59b91a40.jpg"},"imageCaption":"A-G
A) Schematic of behavioral assay is shown that measures wild type hermaphrodite and male worms in a multi-sensory behavior. Assaying food leaving on E. coli (OP50) during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone repellent (See Methods, Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). All assays ranged from 45 - 60 minutes per assay for hermaphrodite worms being compared to male worms. B) Wild type hermaphrodite worms show normal food leaving during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone odor (n=4 repeated days tested for wild type hermaphrodite worms) (0-45 minutes assayed). Wild type worms leaving food patch across 45 minutes (as described in Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). E. coli (OP50) food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. Mean number of worms that left the food at each 5 minute time point is represented, C) i) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms versus wild type N2 male worms examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on E. coli (OP50) (n=8 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms). (0 - 60 minutes assayed), males show delayed food leaving during 2-nonanone exposure, males were compared to hermaphrodite worms. Hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line), ii) Images showing wild type N2 male worms in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay (N2 males shown on E. coli (OP50) food patch just after 2-nonanone addition and after 10 minutes of 2-nonanone exposure (both images taken in the same experiment on the same day). D) Males were examined for food leaving during exposure to the repellent, undiluted benzaldehyde (100%) compared to hermaphrodite worms (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=4 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms), hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. E. coli (OP50) food lawn. Benzaldehyde used. E) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms compared to N2 male worms were examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on a Comamonas sp food patch (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type male versus hermaphrodite worms), males were compared to hermaphrodite worms under identical conditions tested, hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. Comamonas sp bacterial food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. F) Male worms were examined for their ability to reach the edge of the food patch during 2-nonanone exposure (measuring 90% of worms that reach the edge of the food patch) (Harris et al., 2019) (n=3 repeated days), n.s=not statistically significant when comparing hermaphrodite and male worms tested on same day. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). G) Wild type N2 male worms were examined for their ability to repel from 2-nonanone (100%, undiluted) when compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay No food was present on the plate during this assay (See Methods, Troemel et al., 1997). n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type hermaphrodites versus male worms. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). Avoidance Index ranging from (0 to -1.0). We analyzed the Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, * p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001. All male worms were examined in parallel to wild type hermaphrodite worms tested on the same day under identical assay conditions. Each 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay for hermaphrodites or males used 20-25 worms per assay. n=number of repeated days tested for each behavioral assay from A-G.
","imageTitle":"Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans show different food leaving behavior during exposure to undiluted repulsive odor cues
","methods":"C. elegans strains were cultivated under the standard conditions (Brenner et al., 1974). Wild type N2 hermaphrodite young adults, and wild type male adults were used in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving experiment for this study.
Worm culturing, plate preparation and multi-sensory assay. All hermaphrodite and male worms were grown to young adult under E. coli (OP50) well-fed conditions prior to performing behavior assay (Brenner et al., 1974; Harris et al., 2019).
Multi-sensory assay to analyze male vs hermaphrodite adult worms. For the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay. Wild Type worms (N2) were assayed as previously described (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). For all worms, E. coli (OP50) was used as the food source (Brenner et al., 1974). For the preparation of assay plates, the NGM (Nematode Growth Medium) agar was made and poured into small assay plates (6 cm) and then allowed to cool and solidify (using standard NGM plate preparation protocols). After two days, a liquid suspension of E. coli (OP50) was prepared; consisting of 40 mL of NGM media and E. coli (OP50) colonies added to the NGM media, this media was then placed at 26°C overnight. The next morning, the E. coli (OP50) culture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. 35 mL of the NGM was removed and discarded (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). The E. coli (OP50) pellet was then re-suspended in 5 mL of NGM through mixing, and then 55 µL of this E. coli (OP50) culture was then added to the center of an NGM agar assay plate (as seen in Fig. 1A, Schematic of behavioral assay). All worms were grown at 20-23°C on NGM plates that contained a lawn of E. coli (OP50). Next 20-25 young adult worms (either hermaphrodite or male worms) are placed onto the 1 cm diameter food lawn and are allowed to acclimate for 60 minutes. After 1 hour, a drop of 2-nonanone repellent (1 µL) is placed approximately two worm lengths away from the food lawn. The number of worms on the lawn was counted every 5 minutes for a total of 45-60 minutes, and the number of hermaphrodite or male worms that left the food lawn was determined. Food leaving is analyzed during exposure to the repellent 2-nonanone (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Worms present on the food at each 5-minute time-point are counted (represented in y-axis). For each plate of male worms tested, there was a separate hermaphrodite assay plate examined in parallel. No males were mixed with hermaphrodite adult worms during the behavioral assay. For all 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assays on Comamonas sp food lawn, the assay was prepared and tested using identical conditions to E. coli (OP50) assays tested above. For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 adult hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male adult worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. n = number of repeated days tested across 1A - G.
Assay to measure the ability to reach the edge of a food patch during 2-nonanone exposure
Wild type hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for their ability (Time to reach the edge) to reach the furthest edge of the food patch during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone. 20-25 hermaphrodites and males were examined per replicate. Wild type N2 hermaphrodites and wild type N2 males were examined for the time taken for 90% of the worms to reach the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone drop placement (last sector of the food patch). Time was determined as time taken (sec) for worms to reach the edge of the food from the point of 2-nonanone addition next to the E. coli (OP50) food patch. The 1 cm food patch was divided into 5 sectors (0.2 cm each). Sectors A on food patch being closest to the 2-nonanone, Sector E on food patch being furthest away from 2-nonanone drop (As previously described in Harris et al., 2019). Wild type N2 male worms were measured and compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodites tested in parallel on separate behavior assay plates. Wild type N2 hermaphrodite and male worms were not mixed on behavioral assay plates. Mean±SEM, student’s t-test, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. n=number of repeated days tested for hermaphrodite and male worms.
2-nonanone avoidance assay
To examine the avoidance of 2-nonanone in hermaphrodites and males, chemotaxis assays were performed essentially as previously described (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of a square plate that was divided into sectors A, B, C, D, E and F and 2 drops of 1 µl of undiluted 2-nonanone was added to one side and 2 drops of 1 µl ethanol was added to the opposite side of the plate as a control. Approximately 75-100 hermaphrodite or male worms were used in each assay. 2-nonanone avoidance was analyzed by counting the number of worms in the sectors A-B, C-D, and E-F with E-F being furthest away from the 2-nonanone point sources. The avoidance index was calculated as the number of animals in sectors A and B (at 2-nonanone) minus the number of animals in the sectors E and F (at control) and normalized with the total number of animals in all 6 sectors on plate (Avoidance Index between 0 and -1.0). For all data analysis, a Student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male worms tested on the same day in parallel identical conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, p ≤0.05*, p≤0.01**, p≤0.001***.
","reagents":"List of worm and bacterial strains used in experiments in the present study
1) Wild type N2 Bristol hermaphrodite C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
2) N2 wild type male C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
3) E. coli (OP50) bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
4) DA1877 Comamonas sp bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
All strains were provided by the CGC (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center) at the University of Minnesota, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
This project was funded through lab start-up (Harris G), California State University Channel Islands and Mini-Grant awarded, California State University Channel Islands, 2020 - 2021.
Chemicals used in study. All chemicals used in this study, including, 2-nonanone (Cas # 821-55-6) and Benzaldehyde (Cas # 100-52-7) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
","patternDescription":"Sex differences across organisms have been an intense area of research over the last 50 years. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms underlying many behavioral differences, including sensation, perception of sensory cues and decision-making and how this occurs at the level of the brain is still not understood. Sex differences have been identified from humans to worms. A number of studies have demonstrated differences between males and females in processes, including, olfaction, thermoregulation, aggression, learning and mood (Bjorkqvist et al., 1994; Doty et al., 1985; Berger-Sweeney et al., 1995; Halpern et al., 2000; Kaciuba-Uscilko et al., 2001; Bielsky et al., 2005). Behavioral studies in vertebrates and invertebrates have suggested that behavioral sex biases might have biological underpinnings. The understanding of the differences in neural signals and circuit function, that result in the variation in decision-making processes across female and male systems is not fully understood.
The hermaphrodite nematode C. elegans is attracted to or repelled by an array of volatile odorants (Bargmann and Horvitz, 1991; Troemel et al., 1997; Debono and Maricq, 2005; Chao et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005; Ghosh et al., 2017). In addition, hermaphrodites are able to generate decisions when encountering conflicting cues that are presented simultaneously (Ishihara et al., 2002; Ghosh et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2022). Male C. elegans are able to sense a number of chemicals, including, pheromones, food associated cues, diacetyl and salt (NaCl) (White et al., 2007; Sakai et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Wexler et al., 2020; Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Portman et al., 2017). To address sex specific differences in worm behavior, we used C. elegans to understand whether wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently when exposed to conflicting cues, such as, food and the repulsive odor cue, 2-nonanone (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020).
We examined the behavioral differences between hermaphrodites and males using a “multi-sensory behavioral paradigm”, where we compare wild type C. elegans hermaphrodites and males in a food leaving assay when exposed to a repulsive cue, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1A, See schematic diagram, Harris et al., 2019). We examined any differences between males and hermaphrodite adults in a multi-sensory behavioral assay, where both hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone. A number of genes and neurons have previously been identified for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving in hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Wild type hermaphrodites typically leave the E.coli (OP50) food patch within 10-15 minutes as normally observed after 2-nonanone addition next to the food patch (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, when examining male worms we observe that males show a significantly delayed food-leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1Ci (graph) and 1Cii (images)) showing an example of N2 males with reduced food leaving after 10 minutes). Suggesting, males leave a food patch significantly slower than hermaphrodites when stimulated by the presence of a repulsive odor. In addition, we observe that when N2 males leave the food patch during this period it is significantly delayed, and many of the males do not leave the food patch at all during our assay period of 45-60 minutes, despite positioning at the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone (Fig. 1). Interestingly, wild type male worms have been shown to spontaneously leave a food patch, multiple hours later after being introduced to a food patch. But in the first hour of incubation of males on new food patch prior to adding 2-nonanone we do not see this increased leaving (Lipton et al., 2004).
To address if N2 male worms were sensing 2-nonanone similar to hermaphrodites, or showing an actual difference in decision-making to leave the food, we used multiple approaches to do this. We analyzed male worm avoidance behavior to 2-nonanone using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay (Troemel et al., 1997). We examine wild type males versus hermaphrodites in multiple ways. We found that N2 male worms avoid 2-nonanone the same as wild type N2 hermaphrodites (Fig. 1G). This was evident by N2 males avoiding 2-nonanone as strongly as wild type hermaphrodites tested in parallel. We also analyzed the male worms during the exposure to 2-nonanone while on the assay food patch. This was done by analyzing male behavior during the assay (See Fig. 1Cii Image of N2 males during repulsion) and measuring the time to reach the edge of the food patch after 2-nonanone was added next to the E. coli (OP50) food patch (see schematic diagram, Fig. 1a). Male worms crawled to the edge of the food and remained at the furthest edge away from the 2-nonanone repellent like wild-type hermaphrodite animals, suggesting N2 males could sense and perform a repulsive response to 2-nonanone (measured time taken for 90% of worms to reach the edge of the food) (Fig. 1F). This suggests that there is a difference in the decision to leave food during repulsive odor exposure, based on actual decision to leave food and not a difference in the general sensation of the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1F).
To further understand how general or specific these male differences to hermaphrodite worms are, we next varied two assay conditions. First, we used a second volatile repellent, benzaldehyde (undiluted) and measured benzaldehyde-dependent food leaving in males versus hermaphrodites (Yoshida et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2019). Interestingly, males also showed delayed food leaving in response to undiluted benzaldehyde when compared to wild type hermaphrodite animals (Fig. 1D). In addition, we changed the food patch type to assess any effect on male worm food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms (See Fig. 1C). Wild type hermaphrodite worms have been shown to exhibit a variety of behavioral outputs in response to food and food associated cues, including, showing varied feeding rates, sensory-dependent locomotory behavior, behavioral preference and food leaving dynamics (Zhang et al., 2005; Shtonda and Avery, 2006; Meisel et al., 2014; Olofsson et al., 2014). We chose Comamonas sp food lawns and assessed male food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodites. Wild type hermaphrodite worms also leave Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone, as previously described for wild-type hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Upon examining male worms for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms, male worms are also significantly delayed food leavers on Comamonas sp, suggesting male worms show this general delayed food leaving across multiple foods, including at least, the regular tested food source, E. coli (OP50) and also Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1E).
Overall, this suggests that wild type N2 male worms show decreased food leaving when compared to N2 hermaphrodites when exposed to different volatile repellents, including, undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde, and across different food types. Wild type hermaphrodites and males are known to behave differently in specific odor-guided behavior, locomotory dynamics and conditioning associated with salt chemotaxis (Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2013). This provides an avenue for further investigation of the neural mechanisms that influence behavioral differences observed between sexes in a multi sensory behavior.
","references":[{"reference":"Bargmann CI, Horvitz HR. 1991. Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron 7: 729-42.
","pubmedId":"1660283","doi":""},{"reference":"Berger-Sweeney J, Arnold A, Gabeau D, & Mills J. 1995. Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: Effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 859–873.
","pubmedId":"8554711","doi":""},{"reference":"Bielsky IF, Hu SB & Young LJ. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in the vasopressin system: lack of an altered behavioral phenotype in female V1a receptor knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res 164: 132–136.
","pubmedId":"16046007","doi":""},{"reference":"Björkqvist K, Österman K, and Lagerspetz KMJ. 1994. Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior 20: 27-33.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q"},{"reference":"Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1): 71-94.
","pubmedId":"4366476","doi":""},{"reference":"Chao MY, Komatsu H, Fukuto HS, Dionne HM, Hart AC. 2004. Feeding status and serotonin rapidly and reversibly modulate a Caenorhabditis elegans chemosensory circuit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101(43): 15512-7.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0403369101"},{"reference":"de Bono M, Maricq AV. 2005. Neuronal substrates of complex behaviors in C. elegans. Annu Rev Neurosci 28: 451-501.
","pubmedId":"16022603","doi":""},{"reference":"Doty RL, Applebaum S, Zusho H, Settle RG. 1985. Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Europsychologia 23(5): 667-72.
","pubmedId":"4058710","doi":""},{"reference":"Ellis R, Harris G. 2020. Variation between nematodes in a multi-sensory behavioral assay. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000330.
","pubmedId":"33274334","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Sanders T, Hong S, McCurdy LY, Chase DL, Cohen N, Koelle MR, Nitabach MN. 2016. Neural Architecture of Hunger-Dependent Multisensory Decision Making in C. elegans. Neuron 92: 1049-1062.
","pubmedId":"27866800","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Nitabach MN, Zhang Y, Harris G. 2017. Multisensory integration in C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43: 110-118.
","pubmedId":"28273525","doi":""},{"reference":"Halpern DF. 2000. Sex differences in cognitive abilities. 3rd Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605290"},{"reference":"Harris G, Linfield G, Wu T, Choi MK, Liu H, Zhang Y. 2019. Molecular and Cellular modulators for multisensory integration in C. elegans. PloS Genetics 15(3): (e1007706).
","pubmedId":"30849079","doi":""},{"reference":"Ishihara T, Iino Y, Mohri A, Mori I, Gengyo-Ando K, Mitani S, Katsura I. 2002. HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 109: 639-49.
","pubmedId":"12062106","doi":""},{"reference":"Kaciuba-Uscilko H, Grucza R. 2001. Gender differences in thermoregulation. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 4: 533-6.
","pubmedId":"11706289","doi":""},{"reference":"Lipton J, Kleemann G, Ghosh R, Lints R, Emmons, SW. 2004. Mate searching in Caenorhabditis elegans: a genetic model for sex drive in a simple invertebrate. J Neurosci 24: 7427-34.
","pubmedId":"15329389","doi":""},{"reference":"Loxterkamp E, Cha J, Wu K, Sullivan J, Holbrook O, Ghaith H, Srun L, Bauer DE. 2021. Behavioral Differences between Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans. microPublication Biology 10.17912/micropub.biology.000431.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Meisel JD, Panda O, Mahanti P, Schroeder FC, Kim DH. 2014. Chemosensation of bacterial secondary metabolites modulates neuroendocrine signaling and behavior of C. elegans. Cell 159: 267-80.
","pubmedId":"25303524","doi":""},{"reference":"Olofsson B. 2014. The olfactory neuron AWC promotes avoidance of normally palatable food following chronic dietary restriction. J Exp Biol 217: 1790-8.
","pubmedId":"24577446","doi":""},{"reference":"Portman DS. 2017. Sexual modulation of sex-shared neurons and circuits in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Res 95(1-2): 527-538.
","pubmedId":"27870393","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryan DA, Miller RM, Lee K, Neal SJ, Fagan KA, Sengupta P. 2014. Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr Biol 24: 2509–2517.
","pubmedId":"25438941","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai N, Iwata R, Yokoi S, Butcher RA, Clardy J, Tomioka M, Iino Y. 2013. A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8(7): e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Shtonda BB, Avery L. 2006. Dietary choice behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Biol 209: 89-102.
","pubmedId":"16354781","doi":""},{"reference":"Troemel ER, Kimmel BE, Bargmann CI. 1997. Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91(2): 161-9.
","pubmedId":"9346234","doi":""},{"reference":"Wexler LR, Miller RM, Portman DS. 2020. C. elegans Males Integrate Food Signals and Biological Sex to Modulate State-Dependent Chemosensation and Behavioral Prioritization. Curr Biol 28: S0960-9822(20)30645-X.
","pubmedId":"32531276","doi":""},{"reference":"White JQ, Nicholas TJ, Gritton J, Truong L, Davidson ER, Jorgensen EM. 2007. The sensory circuitry for sexual attraction in C. elegans males. Curr Biol 17: 1847-57.
","pubmedId":"17964166","doi":""},{"reference":"Yang W, Wu T, Tu S, Qin Y, Shen C, Li J, et al.; Zhang Y. 2022. Redundant neural circuits regulate olfactory integration. PLoS Genet 18: e1010029.
","pubmedId":"35100258","doi":""},{"reference":"Yoshida K, Hirotsu T, Tagawa T, Oda S, Wakabayashi T, Iino Y, Ishihara T. 2012. Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3: 739. 10.1038/ncomms1750.
","pubmedId":"22415830","doi":""},{"reference":"Zhang Y, Lu H, Bargmann CI. 2005. Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438(7065): 179-84.
","pubmedId":"16281027","doi":""}],"title":"Sex differences in decision-making: Identifying multisensory behavioral differences in males and hermaphrodites
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"KJ Yook"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"a8ab685b-00c0-4bf0-9d1c-fd0990167891","decision":"edit","abstract":"This present study uses C. elegans as a model to investigate how sex differences can influence sensory behavior and decision-making when encountering conflicting cues. We use a multi-sensory behavioral assay to characterize the differences between hermaphrodites and male worms when escaping from a food lawn during exposure to repulsive odors, such as, 2-nonanone. We find that male worms show a delayed food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodite worms, and this is observed across multiple repulsive cues (2-nonanone and undiluted benzaldehyde) and multiple food types (E. coli (OP50) and Comamonas sp). Overall, this study provides a platform to further investigate how sensory-dependent decision-making behavior differs between sexes.
","acknowledgements":"We thank biology undergraduate lab members of the Harris lab for reading and critical discussion manuscript and with analyzing the data generated in each experiment with Dr. Harris. This project was planned and executed by undergraduate researchers under supervision of the principal investigator of the lab(Dr. Gareth Harris). We also thank the Zhang Lab (Dr. Yun Zhang, Harvard University) for initial discussion for this project. We thank CGC for strains for this project. We also thank Biology program Instructional Support technicians, Catherine Hutchinson, Mike Mahoney and Jessica Dalton for their diligent efforts with reagent ordering and help with other aspects of our lab. ","authors":[{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"duncan.tanner490@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Duncan","lastName":"Tanner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"denise.carigo144@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Denise ","lastName":"Carigo","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"Chane.Sevilla592@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Chane ","lastName":"Sevilla","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"madison.lewis960@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"Lewis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","project","resources","software","supervision","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","validation","fundingAcquisition","dataCuration","conceptualization"],"email":"Gareth.harris@csuci.edu","firstName":"Gareth","lastName":"Harris","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":null}],"awards":null,"conflictsOfInterest":null,"dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided through laboratory start-up funds (2017-2020, PI: Dr. Gareth Harris, CSUCI). Funds were also provided through CSUCI mini grant award for 2020 - 2021 (Dr. Gareth Harris). For select students who were included in authorship, this material is based upon work supported by the HSI-STEM Model for Research and Teaching program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant HRD-1928693 (Fall/Spring 2020/2021).","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/ed779d9faca81699f8238cab59b91a40.jpg"},"imageCaption":"A-G
A) Schematic of behavioral assay is shown that measures wild type hermaphrodite and male worms in a multi-sensory behavior. Assaying food leaving on E. coli (OP50) during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone repellent (See Methods, Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). All assays ranged from 45 - 60 minutes per assay for hermaphrodite worms being compared to male worms. B) Wild type hermaphrodite worms show normal food leaving during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone odor (n=4 repeated days tested for wild type hermaphrodite worms) (0-45 minutes assayed). Wild type worms leaving food patch across 45 minutes (as described in Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). E. coli (OP50) food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. Mean number of worms that left the food at each 5 minute time point is represented, C) i) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms versus wild type N2 male worms examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on E. coli (OP50) (n=8 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms). (0 - 60 minutes assayed), males show delayed food leaving during 2-nonanone exposure, males were compared to hermaphrodite worms. Hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line), ii) Images showing wild type N2 male worms in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay (N2 males shown on E. coli (OP50) food patch just after 2-nonanone addition and after 10 minutes of 2-nonanone exposure (both images taken in the same experiment on the same day). D) Males were examined for food leaving during exposure to the repellent, undiluted benzaldehyde (100%) compared to hermaphrodite worms (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=4 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms), hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. E. coli (OP50) food lawn. Benzaldehyde used. E) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms compared to N2 male worms were examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on a Comamonas sp food patch (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type male versus hermaphrodite worms), males were compared to hermaphrodite worms under identical conditions tested, hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. Comamonas sp bacterial food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. F) Male worms were examined for their ability to reach the edge of the food patch during 2-nonanone exposure (measuring 90% of worms that reach the edge of the food patch) (Harris et al., 2019) (n=3 repeated days), n.s=not statistically significant when comparing hermaphrodite and male worms tested on same day. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). G) Wild type N2 male worms were examined for their ability to repel from 2-nonanone (100%, undiluted) when compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay No food was present on the plate during this assay (See Methods, Troemel et al., 1997). n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type hermaphrodites versus male worms. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). Avoidance Index ranging from (0 to -1.0). We analyzed the Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, * p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001. All male worms were examined in parallel to wild type hermaphrodite worms tested on the same day under identical assay conditions. Each 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay for hermaphrodites or males used 20-25 worms per assay. n=number of repeated days tested for each behavioral assay from A-G.
","imageTitle":"Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans show different food leaving behavior during exposure to undiluted repulsive odor cues
","methods":"C. elegans strains were cultivated under the standard conditions (Brenner et al., 1974). Wild type N2 hermaphrodite young adults, and wild type male adults were used in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving experiment for this study.
Worm culturing, plate preparation and multi-sensory assay. All hermaphrodite and male worms were grown to young adult under E. coli (OP50) well-fed conditions prior to performing behavior assay (Brenner et al., 1974; Harris et al., 2019).
Multi-sensory assay to analyze male vs hermaphrodite adult worms. For the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay. Wild Type worms (N2) were assayed as previously described (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). For all worms, E. coli (OP50) was used as the food source (Brenner et al., 1974). For the preparation of assay plates, the NGM (Nematode Growth Medium) agar was made and poured into small assay plates (6 cm) and then allowed to cool and solidify (using standard NGM plate preparation protocols). After two days, a liquid suspension of E. coli (OP50) was prepared; consisting of 40 mL of NGM media and E. coli (OP50) colonies added to the NGM media, this media was then placed at 26°C overnight. The next morning, the E. coli (OP50) culture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. 35 mL of the NGM was removed and discarded (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). The E. coli (OP50) pellet was then re-suspended in 5 mL of NGM through mixing, and then 55 µL of this E. coli (OP50) culture was then added to the center of an NGM agar assay plate (as seen in Fig. 1A, Schematic of behavioral assay). All worms were grown at 20-23°C on NGM plates that contained a lawn of E. coli (OP50). Next 20-25 young adult worms (either hermaphrodite or male worms) are placed onto the 1 cm diameter food lawn and are allowed to acclimate for 60 minutes. After 1 hour, a drop of 2-nonanone repellent (1 µL) is placed approximately two worm lengths away from the food lawn. The number of worms on the lawn was counted every 5 minutes for a total of 45-60 minutes, and the number of hermaphrodite or male worms that left the food lawn was determined. Food leaving is analyzed during exposure to the repellent 2-nonanone (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Worms present on the food at each 5-minute time-point are counted (represented in y-axis). For each plate of male worms tested, there was a separate hermaphrodite assay plate examined in parallel. No males were mixed with hermaphrodite adult worms during the behavioral assay. For all 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assays on Comamonas sp food lawn, the assay was prepared and tested using identical conditions to E. coli (OP50) assays tested above. For all data analysis, a student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 adult hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male adult worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. n = number of repeated days tested across 1A - G.
Assay to measure the ability to reach the edge of a food patch during 2-nonanone exposure
Wild type hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for their ability (Time to reach the edge) to reach the furthest edge of the food patch during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone. 20-25 hermaphrodites and males were examined per replicate. Wild type N2 hermaphrodites and wild type N2 males were examined for the time taken for 90% of the worms to reach the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone drop placement (last sector of the food patch). Time was determined as time taken (sec) for worms to reach the edge of the food from the point of 2-nonanone addition next to the E. coli (OP50) food patch. The 1 cm food patch was divided into 5 sectors (0.2 cm each). Sectors A on food patch being closest to the 2-nonanone, Sector E on food patch being furthest away from 2-nonanone drop (As previously described in Harris et al., 2019). Wild type N2 male worms were measured and compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodites tested in parallel on separate behavior assay plates. Wild type N2 hermaphrodite and male worms were not mixed on behavioral assay plates. Mean±SEM, student’s t-test, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. n=number of repeated days tested for hermaphrodite and male worms.
2-nonanone avoidance assay
To examine the avoidance of 2-nonanone in hermaphrodites and males, chemotaxis assays were performed essentially as previously described (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of a square plate that was divided into sectors A, B, C, D, E and F and 2 drops of 1 µl of undiluted 2-nonanone was added to one side and 2 drops of 1 µl ethanol was added to the opposite side of the plate as a control. Approximately 75-100 hermaphrodite or male worms were used in each assay. 2-nonanone avoidance was analyzed by counting the number of worms in the sectors A-B, C-D, and E-F with E-F being furthest away from the 2-nonanone point sources. The avoidance index was calculated as the number of animals in sectors A and B (at 2-nonanone) minus the number of animals in the sectors E and F (at control) and normalized with the total number of animals in all 6 sectors on plate (Avoidance Index between 0 and -1.0). For all data analysis, a Student’s t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male worms tested on the same day in parallel identical conditions. Mean±SEM, Student’s t-test, p ≤0.05*, p≤0.01**, p≤0.001***.
","reagents":"List of worm and bacterial strains used in experiments in the present study
1) Wild type N2 Bristol hermaphrodite C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
2) N2 wild type male C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
3) E. coli (OP50) bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
4) DA1877 Comamonas sp bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
All strains were provided by the CGC (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center) at the University of Minnesota, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
This project was funded through lab start-up (Harris G), California State University Channel Islands and Mini-Grant awarded, California State University Channel Islands, 2020 - 2021.
Chemicals used in study. All chemicals used in this study, including, 2-nonanone (Cas # 821-55-6) and Benzaldehyde (Cas # 100-52-7) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
","patternDescription":"Sex differences across organisms have been an intense area of research over the last 50 years. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms underlying many behavioral differences, including sensation, perception of sensory cues and decision-making and how this occurs at the level of the brain is still not understood. Sex differences have been identified from humans to worms. A number of studies have demonstrated differences between males and females in processes, including, olfaction, thermoregulation, aggression, learning and mood (Bjorkqvist et al., 1994; Doty et al., 1985; Berger-Sweeney et al., 1995; Halpern et al., 2000; Kaciuba-Uscilko et al., 2001; Bielsky et al., 2005). Behavioral studies in vertebrates and invertebrates have suggested that behavioral sex biases might have biological underpinnings. The understanding of the differences in neural signals and circuit function, that result in the variation in decision-making processes across female and male systems is not fully understood.
The hermaphrodite nematode C. elegans is attracted to or repelled by an array of volatile odorants (Bargmann and Horvitz, 1991; Troemel et al., 1997; Debono and Maricq, 2005; Chao et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005; Ghosh et al., 2017). In addition, hermaphrodites are able to generate decisions when encountering conflicting cues that are presented simultaneously (Ishihara et al., 2002; Ghosh et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2022). Male C. elegans are able to sense a number of chemicals, including, pheromones, food associated cues, diacetyl and salt (NaCl) (White et al., 2007; Sakai et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Wexler et al., 2020; Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Portman et al., 2017). To address sex specific differences in worm behavior, we used C. elegans to understand whether wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently when exposed to conflicting cues, such as, food and the repulsive odor cue, 2-nonanone (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020).
We examined the behavioral differences between hermaphrodites and males using a “multi-sensory behavioral paradigm”, where we compare wild type C. elegans hermaphrodites and males in a food leaving assay when exposed to a repulsive cue, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1A, See schematic diagram, Harris et al., 2019). We examined any differences between males and hermaphrodite adults in a multi-sensory behavioral assay, where both hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone. A number of genes and neurons have previously been identified for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving in hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Wild type hermaphrodites typically leave the E.coli (OP50) food patch within 10-15 minutes as normally observed after 2-nonanone addition next to the food patch (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, when examining male worms we observe that males show a significantly delayed food-leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1Ci (graph) and 1Cii (images)) showing an example of N2 males with reduced food leaving after 10 minutes). Suggesting, males leave a food patch significantly slower than hermaphrodites when stimulated by the presence of a repulsive odor. In addition, we observe that when N2 males leave the food patch during this period it is significantly delayed, and many of the males do not leave the food patch at all during our assay period of 45-60 minutes, despite positioning at the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone (Fig. 1). Interestingly, wild type male worms have been shown to spontaneously leave a food patch, multiple hours later after being introduced to a food patch. But in the first hour of incubation of males on new food patch prior to adding 2-nonanone we do not see this increased leaving (Lipton et al., 2004).
To address if N2 male worms were sensing 2-nonanone similar to hermaphrodites, or showing an actual difference in decision-making to leave the food, we used multiple approaches to do this. We analyzed male worm avoidance behavior to 2-nonanone using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay (Troemel et al., 1997). We examine wild type males versus hermaphrodites in multiple ways. We found that N2 male worms avoid 2-nonanone the same as wild type N2 hermaphrodites (Fig. 1G). This was evident by N2 males avoiding 2-nonanone as strongly as wild type hermaphrodites tested in parallel. We also analyzed the male worms during the exposure to 2-nonanone while on the assay food patch. This was done by analyzing male behavior during the assay (See Fig. 1Cii Image of N2 males during repulsion) and measuring the time to reach the edge of the food patch after 2-nonanone was added next to the E. coli (OP50) food patch (see schematic diagram, Fig. 1a). Male worms crawled to the edge of the food and remained at the furthest edge away from the 2-nonanone repellent like wild-type hermaphrodite animals, suggesting N2 males could sense and perform a repulsive response to 2-nonanone (measured time taken for 90% of worms to reach the edge of the food) (Fig. 1F). This suggests that there is a difference in the decision to leave food during repulsive odor exposure, based on actual decision to leave food and not a difference in the general sensation of the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1F).
To further understand how general or specific these male differences to hermaphrodite worms are, we next varied two assay conditions. First, we used a second volatile repellent, benzaldehyde (undiluted) and measured benzaldehyde-dependent food leaving in males versus hermaphrodites (Yoshida et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2019). Interestingly, males also showed delayed food leaving in response to undiluted benzaldehyde when compared to wild type hermaphrodite animals (Fig. 1D). In addition, we changed the food patch type to assess any effect on male worm food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms (See Fig. 1C). Wild type hermaphrodite worms have been shown to exhibit a variety of behavioral outputs in response to food and food associated cues, including, showing varied feeding rates, sensory-dependent locomotory behavior, behavioral preference and food leaving dynamics (Zhang et al., 2005; Shtonda and Avery, 2006; Meisel et al., 2014; Olofsson et al., 2014). We chose Comamonas sp food lawns and assessed male food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodites. Wild type hermaphrodite worms also leave Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone, as previously described for wild-type hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Upon examining male worms for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms, male worms are also significantly delayed food leavers on Comamonas sp, suggesting male worms show this general delayed food leaving across multiple foods, including at least, the regular tested food source, E. coli (OP50) and also Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1E).
Overall, this suggests that wild type N2 male worms show decreased food leaving when compared to N2 hermaphrodites when exposed to different volatile repellents, including, undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde, and across different food types. Wild type hermaphrodites and males are known to behave differently in specific odor-guided behavior, locomotory dynamics and conditioning associated with salt chemotaxis (Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2013). This provides an avenue for further investigation of the neural mechanisms that influence behavioral differences observed between sexes in a multi sensory behavior.
","references":[{"reference":"Bargmann CI, Horvitz HR. 1991. Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron 7: 729-42.
","pubmedId":"1660283","doi":""},{"reference":"Berger-Sweeney J, Arnold A, Gabeau D, & Mills J. 1995. Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: Effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 859–873.
","pubmedId":"8554711","doi":""},{"reference":"Bielsky IF, Hu SB & Young LJ. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in the vasopressin system: lack of an altered behavioral phenotype in female V1a receptor knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res 164: 132–136.
","pubmedId":"16046007","doi":""},{"reference":"Björkqvist K, Österman K, and Lagerspetz KMJ. 1994. Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior 20: 27-33.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q"},{"reference":"Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1): 71-94.
","pubmedId":"4366476","doi":""},{"reference":"Chao MY, Komatsu H, Fukuto HS, Dionne HM, Hart AC. 2004. Feeding status and serotonin rapidly and reversibly modulate a Caenorhabditis elegans chemosensory circuit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101(43): 15512-7.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0403369101"},{"reference":"de Bono M, Maricq AV. 2005. Neuronal substrates of complex behaviors in C. elegans. Annu Rev Neurosci 28: 451-501.
","pubmedId":"16022603","doi":""},{"reference":"Doty RL, Applebaum S, Zusho H, Settle RG. 1985. Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Neuropsychologia 23(5): 667-72.
","pubmedId":"4058710","doi":""},{"reference":"Ellis R, Harris G. 2020. Variation between nematodes in a multi-sensory behavioral assay. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000330.
","pubmedId":"33274334","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Sanders T, Hong S, McCurdy LY, Chase DL, Cohen N, Koelle MR, Nitabach MN. 2016. Neural Architecture of Hunger-Dependent Multisensory Decision Making in C. elegans. Neuron 92: 1049-1062.
","pubmedId":"27866800","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Nitabach MN, Zhang Y, Harris G. 2017. Multisensory integration in C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43: 110-118.
","pubmedId":"28273525","doi":""},{"reference":"Halpern DF. 2000. Sex differences in cognitive abilities. 3rd Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605290"},{"reference":"Harris G, Linfield G, Wu T, Choi MK, Liu H, Zhang Y. 2019. Molecular and Cellular modulators for multisensory integration in C. elegans. PloS Genetics 15(3): e1007706.
","pubmedId":"30849079","doi":""},{"reference":"Ishihara T, Iino Y, Mohri A, Mori I, Gengyo-Ando K, Mitani S, Katsura I. 2002. HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 109: 639-49.
","pubmedId":"12062106","doi":""},{"reference":"Kaciuba-Uscilko H, Grucza R. 2001. Gender differences in thermoregulation. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 4: 533-6.
","pubmedId":"11706289","doi":""},{"reference":"Lipton J, Kleemann G, Ghosh R, Lints R, Emmons, SW. 2004. Mate searching in Caenorhabditis elegans: a genetic model for sex drive in a simple invertebrate. J Neurosci 24: 7427-34.
","pubmedId":"15329389","doi":""},{"reference":"Loxterkamp E, Cha J, Wu K, Sullivan J, Holbrook O, Ghaith H, Srun L, Bauer DE. 2021. Behavioral Differences between Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000431
","pubmedId":"34345807","doi":""},{"reference":"Meisel JD, Panda O, Mahanti P, Schroeder FC, Kim DH. 2014. Chemosensation of bacterial secondary metabolites modulates neuroendocrine signaling and behavior of C. elegans. Cell 159: 267-80.
","pubmedId":"25303524","doi":""},{"reference":"Olofsson B. 2014. The olfactory neuron AWC promotes avoidance of normally palatable food following chronic dietary restriction. J Exp Biol 217: 1790-8.
","pubmedId":"24577446","doi":""},{"reference":"Portman DS. 2017. Sexual modulation of sex-shared neurons and circuits in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Res 95(1-2): 527-538.
","pubmedId":"27870393","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryan DA, Miller RM, Lee K, Neal SJ, Fagan KA, Sengupta P. 2014. Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr Biol 24: 2509–2517.
","pubmedId":"25438941","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai N, Iwata R, Yokoi S, Butcher RA, Clardy J, Tomioka M, Iino Y. 2013. A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8(7): e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Shtonda BB, Avery L. 2006. Dietary choice behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Biol 209: 89-102.
","pubmedId":"16354781","doi":""},{"reference":"Troemel ER, Kimmel BE, Bargmann CI. 1997. Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91(2): 161-9.
","pubmedId":"9346234","doi":""},{"reference":"Wexler LR, Miller RM, Portman DS. 2020. C. elegans Males Integrate Food Signals and Biological Sex to Modulate State-Dependent Chemosensation and Behavioral Prioritization. Curr Biol 28: S0960-9822(20)30645-X.
","pubmedId":"32531276","doi":""},{"reference":"White JQ, Nicholas TJ, Gritton J, Truong L, Davidson ER, Jorgensen EM. 2007. The sensory circuitry for sexual attraction in C. elegans males. Curr Biol 17: 1847-57.
","pubmedId":"17964166","doi":""},{"reference":"Yang W, Wu T, Tu S, Qin Y, Shen C, Li J, et al., Zhang Y. 2022. Redundant neural circuits regulate olfactory integration. PLoS Genet 18: e1010029.
","pubmedId":"35100258","doi":""},{"reference":"Yoshida K, Hirotsu T, Tagawa T, Oda S, Wakabayashi T, Iino Y, Ishihara T. 2012. Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3: 739. 10.1038/ncomms1750.
","pubmedId":"22415830","doi":""},{"reference":"Zhang Y, Lu H, Bargmann CI. 2005. Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438(7065): 179-84.
","pubmedId":"16281027","doi":""}],"title":"Sex differences in decision-making: Identifying multisensory behavioral differences in males and hermaphrodites
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"KJ Yook"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"6ca959c5-efaa-45a3-98ed-b225c4cf7de6","decision":"publish","abstract":"This present study uses C. elegans as a model to investigate how sex differences can influence sensory behavior and decision-making when encountering conflicting cues. We use a multi-sensory behavioral assay to characterize the differences between hermaphrodites and male worms when escaping from a food lawn during exposure to repulsive odors, such as, 2-nonanone. We find that male worms show a delayed food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodite worms, and this is observed across multiple repulsive cues (2-nonanone and undiluted benzaldehyde) and multiple food types (E. coli (OP50) and Comamonas sp). Overall, this study provides a platform to further investigate how sensory-dependent decision-making behavior differs between sexes.
","acknowledgements":"We thank biology undergraduate lab members of the Harris lab for reading and critical discussion manuscript and with analyzing the data generated in each experiment with Dr. Harris. This project was planned and executed by undergraduate researchers under supervision of the principal investigator of the lab(Dr. Gareth Harris). We also thank the Zhang Lab (Dr. Yun Zhang, Harvard University) for initial discussion for this project. We thank CGC for strains for this project. We also thank Biology program Instructional Support technicians, Catherine Hutchinson, Mike Mahoney and Jessica Dalton for their diligent efforts with reagent ordering and help with other aspects of our lab. ","authors":[{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"duncan.tanner490@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Duncan","lastName":"Tanner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","investigation","methodology"],"email":"denise.carigo144@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Denise ","lastName":"Carigo","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":null,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"Chane.Sevilla592@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Chane ","lastName":"Sevilla","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","validation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"madison.lewis960@myci.csuci.edu","firstName":"Madison","lastName":"Lewis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":"","orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Biology Program, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","project","resources","software","supervision","methodology","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","validation","fundingAcquisition","dataCuration","conceptualization"],"email":"Gareth.harris@csuci.edu","firstName":"Gareth","lastName":"Harris","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":null}],"awards":null,"conflictsOfInterest":null,"dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided through laboratory start-up funds (2017-2020, PI: Dr. Gareth Harris, CSUCI). Funds were also provided through CSUCI mini grant award for 2020 - 2021 (Dr. Gareth Harris). For select students who were included in authorship, this material is based upon work supported by the HSI-STEM Model for Research and Teaching program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant HRD-1928693 (Fall/Spring 2020/2021).","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/ed779d9faca81699f8238cab59b91a40.jpg"},"imageCaption":"A-G
A) Schematic of behavioral assay is shown that measures wild type hermaphrodite and male worms in a multi-sensory behavior. Assaying food leaving on E. coli (OP50) during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone repellent (See Methods, Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). All assays ranged from 45 - 60 minutes per assay for hermaphrodite worms being compared to male worms. B) Wild type hermaphrodite worms show normal food leaving during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone odor (n=4 repeated days tested for wild type hermaphrodite worms) (0-45 minutes assayed). Wild type worms leaving food patch across 45 minutes (as described in Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). E. coli (OP50) food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. Mean number of worms that left the food at each 5 minute time point is represented, C) i) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms versus wild type N2 male worms examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on E. coli (OP50) (n=8 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms). (0 - 60 minutes assayed), males show delayed food leaving during 2-nonanone exposure, males were compared to hermaphrodite worms. Hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line), ii) Images showing wild type N2 male worms in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay (N2 males shown on E. coli (OP50) food patch just after 2-nonanone addition and after 10 minutes of 2-nonanone exposure (both images taken in the same experiment on the same day). D) Males were examined for food leaving during exposure to the repellent, undiluted benzaldehyde (100%) compared to hermaphrodite worms (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=4 repeated days assayed for male vs hermaphrodite worms), hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. E. coli (OP50) food lawn. Benzaldehyde used. E) Wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms compared to N2 male worms were examined for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving on a Comamonas sp food patch (0 - 60 minutes assayed), (n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type male versus hermaphrodite worms), males were compared to hermaphrodite worms under identical conditions tested, hermaphrodites, (Black line), males, (Red line). Delayed food leaving seen in males. Comamonas sp bacterial food lawn used. 2-nonanone used. F) Male worms were examined for their ability to reach the edge of the food patch during 2-nonanone exposure (measuring 90% of worms that reach the edge of the food patch) (Harris et al., 2019) (n=3 repeated days), n.s=not statistically significant when comparing hermaphrodite and male worms tested on same day. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). G) Wild type N2 male worms were examined for their ability to repel from 2-nonanone (100%, undiluted) when compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay No food was present on the plate during this assay (See Methods, Troemel et al., 1997). n=2 repeated days assayed for wild type hermaphrodites versus male worms. hermaphrodites, (White column), males, (Black column). Avoidance Index ranging from (0 to -1.0). We analyzed the Mean±SEM, Student's t-test, * p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001. All male worms were examined in parallel to wild type hermaphrodite worms tested on the same day under identical assay conditions. Each 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay for hermaphrodites or males used 20-25 worms per assay. n=number of repeated days tested for each behavioral assay from A-G.
","imageTitle":"Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans show different food leaving behavior during exposure to undiluted repulsive odor cues
","methods":"C. elegans strains were cultivated under the standard conditions (Brenner et al., 1974). Wild type N2 hermaphrodite young adults, and wild type male adults were used in the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving experiment for this study.
Worm culturing, plate preparation and multi-sensory assay. All hermaphrodite and male worms were grown to young adult under E. coli (OP50) well-fed conditions prior to performing behavior assay (Brenner et al., 1974; Harris et al., 2019).
Multi-sensory assay to analyze male vs hermaphrodite adult worms. For the 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assay. Wild Type worms (N2) were assayed as previously described (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). For all worms, E. coli (OP50) was used as the food source (Brenner et al., 1974). For the preparation of assay plates, the NGM (Nematode Growth Medium) agar was made and poured into small assay plates (6 cm) and then allowed to cool and solidify (using standard NGM plate preparation protocols). After two days, a liquid suspension of E. coli (OP50) was prepared; consisting of 40 mL of NGM media and E. coli (OP50) colonies added to the NGM media, this media was then placed at 26°C overnight. The next morning, the E. coli (OP50) culture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. 35 mL of the NGM was removed and discarded (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). The E. coli (OP50) pellet was then re-suspended in 5 mL of NGM through mixing, and then 55 µL of this E. coli (OP50) culture was then added to the center of an NGM agar assay plate (as seen in Fig. 1A, Schematic of behavioral assay). All worms were grown at 20-23°C on NGM plates that contained a lawn of E. coli (OP50). Next 20-25 young adult worms (either hermaphrodite or male worms) are placed onto the 1 cm diameter food lawn and are allowed to acclimate for 60 minutes. After 1 hour, a drop of 2-nonanone repellent (1 µL) is placed approximately two worm lengths away from the food lawn. The number of worms on the lawn was counted every 5 minutes for a total of 45-60 minutes, and the number of hermaphrodite or male worms that left the food lawn was determined. Food leaving is analyzed during exposure to the repellent 2-nonanone (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Worms present on the food at each 5-minute time-point are counted (represented in y-axis). For each plate of male worms tested, there was a separate hermaphrodite assay plate examined in parallel. No males were mixed with hermaphrodite adult worms during the behavioral assay. For all 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving assays on Comamonas sp food lawn, the assay was prepared and tested using identical conditions to E. coli (OP50) assays tested above. For all data analysis, a student's t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 adult hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male adult worms tested on the same day in parallel conditions. Mean±SEM, Student's t-test, *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. n = number of repeated days tested across 1A - G.
Assay to measure the ability to reach the edge of a food patch during 2-nonanone exposure
Wild type hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for their ability (Time to reach the edge) to reach the furthest edge of the food patch during exposure to undiluted 2-nonanone. 20-25 hermaphrodites and males were examined per replicate. Wild type N2 hermaphrodites and wild type N2 males were examined for the time taken for 90% of the worms to reach the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone drop placement (last sector of the food patch). Time was determined as time taken (sec) for worms to reach the edge of the food from the point of 2-nonanone addition next to the E. coli (OP50) food patch. The 1 cm food patch was divided into 5 sectors (0.2 cm each). Sectors A on food patch being closest to the 2-nonanone, Sector E on food patch being furthest away from 2-nonanone drop (As previously described in Harris et al., 2019). Wild type N2 male worms were measured and compared to wild type N2 hermaphrodites tested in parallel on separate behavior assay plates. Wild type N2 hermaphrodite and male worms were not mixed on behavioral assay plates. Mean±SEM, student's t-test, *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. n=number of repeated days tested for hermaphrodite and male worms.
2-nonanone avoidance assay
To examine the avoidance of 2-nonanone in hermaphrodites and males, chemotaxis assays were performed essentially as previously described (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of a square plate that was divided into sectors A, B, C, D, E and F and 2 drops of 1 µl of undiluted 2-nonanone was added to one side and 2 drops of 1 µl ethanol was added to the opposite side of the plate as a control. Approximately 75-100 hermaphrodite or male worms were used in each assay. 2-nonanone avoidance was analyzed by counting the number of worms in the sectors A-B, C-D, and E-F with E-F being furthest away from the 2-nonanone point sources. The avoidance index was calculated as the number of animals in sectors A and B (at 2-nonanone) minus the number of animals in the sectors E and F (at control) and normalized with the total number of animals in all 6 sectors on plate (Avoidance Index between 0 and -1.0). For all data analysis, a Student's t test was performed when comparing wild type N2 hermaphrodite worms to wild type N2 male worms tested on the same day in parallel identical conditions. Mean±SEM, Student's t-test, p ≤0.05*, p≤0.01**, p≤0.001***.
","reagents":"List of worm and bacterial strains used in experiments in the present study
1) Wild type N2 Bristol hermaphrodite C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
2) N2 wild type male C. elegans were purchased from CGC,
3) E. coli (OP50) bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
4) DA1877 Comamonas sp bacterial strain was purchased from CGC,
All strains were provided by the CGC (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center) at the University of Minnesota, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
This project was funded through lab start-up (Harris G), California State University Channel Islands and Mini-Grant awarded, California State University Channel Islands, 2020 - 2021.
Chemicals used in study. All chemicals used in this study, including, 2-nonanone (Cas # 821-55-6) and Benzaldehyde (Cas # 100-52-7) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
","patternDescription":"Sex differences across organisms have been an intense area of research over the last 50 years. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms underlying many behavioral differences, including sensation, perception of sensory cues and decision-making and how this occurs at the level of the brain is still not understood. Sex differences have been identified from humans to worms. A number of studies have demonstrated differences between males and females in processes, including, olfaction, thermoregulation, aggression, learning and mood (Bjorkqvist et al., 1994; Doty et al., 1985; Berger-Sweeney et al., 1995; Halpern et al., 2000; Kaciuba-Uscilko et al., 2001; Bielsky et al., 2005). Behavioral studies in vertebrates and invertebrates have suggested that behavioral sex biases might have biological underpinnings. The understanding of the differences in neural signals and circuit function, that result in the variation in decision-making processes across female and male systems is not fully understood.
The hermaphrodite nematode C. elegans is attracted to or repelled by an array of volatile odorants (Bargmann and Horvitz, 1991; Troemel et al., 1997; Debono and Maricq, 2005; Chao et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005; Ghosh et al., 2017). In addition, hermaphrodites are able to generate decisions when encountering conflicting cues that are presented simultaneously (Ishihara et al., 2002; Ghosh et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2022). Male C. elegans are able to sense a number of chemicals, including, pheromones, food associated cues, diacetyl and salt (NaCl) (White et al., 2007; Sakai et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Wexler et al., 2020; Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Portman et al., 2017). To address sex specific differences in worm behavior, we used C. elegans to understand whether wild type hermaphrodites and males behave differently when exposed to conflicting cues, such as, food and the repulsive odor cue, 2-nonanone (Troemel et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020).
We examined the behavioral differences between hermaphrodites and males using a “multi-sensory behavioral paradigm”, where we compare wild type C. elegans hermaphrodites and males in a food leaving assay when exposed to a repulsive cue, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1A, See schematic diagram, Harris et al., 2019). We examined any differences between males and hermaphrodite adults in a multi-sensory behavioral assay, where both hermaphrodites and male worms were examined for food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone. A number of genes and neurons have previously been identified for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving in hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019). Wild type hermaphrodites typically leave the E.coli (OP50) food patch within 10-15 minutes as normally observed after 2-nonanone addition next to the food patch (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, when examining male worms we observe that males show a significantly delayed food-leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1Ci (graph) and 1Cii (images)) showing an example of N2 males with reduced food leaving after 10 minutes). Suggesting, males leave a food patch significantly slower than hermaphrodites when stimulated by the presence of a repulsive odor. In addition, we observe that when N2 males leave the food patch during this period it is significantly delayed, and many of the males do not leave the food patch at all during our assay period of 45-60 minutes, despite positioning at the edge of the food patch furthest from the 2-nonanone (Fig. 1). Interestingly, wild type male worms have been shown to spontaneously leave a food patch, multiple hours later after being introduced to a food patch. But in the first hour of incubation of males on new food patch prior to adding 2-nonanone we do not see this increased leaving (Lipton et al., 2004).
To address if N2 male worms were sensing 2-nonanone similar to hermaphrodites, or showing an actual difference in decision-making to leave the food, we used multiple approaches to do this. We analyzed male worm avoidance behavior to 2-nonanone using the 2-nonanone avoidance assay (Troemel et al., 1997). We examine wild type males versus hermaphrodites in multiple ways. We found that N2 male worms avoid 2-nonanone the same as wild type N2 hermaphrodites (Fig. 1G). This was evident by N2 males avoiding 2-nonanone as strongly as wild type hermaphrodites tested in parallel. We also analyzed the male worms during the exposure to 2-nonanone while on the assay food patch. This was done by analyzing male behavior during the assay (See Fig. 1Cii Image of N2 males during repulsion) and measuring the time to reach the edge of the food patch after 2-nonanone was added next to the E. coli (OP50) food patch (see schematic diagram, Fig. 1a). Male worms crawled to the edge of the food and remained at the furthest edge away from the 2-nonanone repellent like wild-type hermaphrodite animals, suggesting N2 males could sense and perform a repulsive response to 2-nonanone (measured time taken for 90% of worms to reach the edge of the food) (Fig. 1F). This suggests that there is a difference in the decision to leave food during repulsive odor exposure, based on actual decision to leave food and not a difference in the general sensation of the repellent, 2-nonanone (Fig. 1F).
To further understand how general or specific these male differences to hermaphrodite worms are, we next varied two assay conditions. First, we used a second volatile repellent, benzaldehyde (undiluted) and measured benzaldehyde-dependent food leaving in males versus hermaphrodites (Yoshida et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2019). Interestingly, males also showed delayed food leaving in response to undiluted benzaldehyde when compared to wild type hermaphrodite animals (Fig. 1D). In addition, we changed the food patch type to assess any effect on male worm food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms (See Fig. 1C). Wild type hermaphrodite worms have been shown to exhibit a variety of behavioral outputs in response to food and food associated cues, including, showing varied feeding rates, sensory-dependent locomotory behavior, behavioral preference and food leaving dynamics (Zhang et al., 2005; Shtonda and Avery, 2006; Meisel et al., 2014; Olofsson et al., 2014). We chose Comamonas sp food lawns and assessed male food leaving during exposure to 2-nonanone when compared to hermaphrodites. Wild type hermaphrodite worms also leave Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone, as previously described for wild-type hermaphrodites (Harris et al., 2019; Ellis et al., 2020). Upon examining male worms for 2-nonanone-dependent food leaving when compared to hermaphrodite worms, male worms are also significantly delayed food leavers on Comamonas sp, suggesting male worms show this general delayed food leaving across multiple foods, including at least, the regular tested food source, E. coli (OP50) and also Comamonas sp during exposure to 2-nonanone (Fig. 1E).
Overall, this suggests that wild type N2 male worms show decreased food leaving when compared to N2 hermaphrodites when exposed to different volatile repellents, including, undiluted 2-nonanone and benzaldehyde, and across different food types. Wild type hermaphrodites and males are known to behave differently in specific odor-guided behavior, locomotory dynamics and conditioning associated with salt chemotaxis (Loxterkamp et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2013). This provides an avenue for further investigation of the neural mechanisms that influence behavioral differences observed between sexes in a multi sensory behavior.
","references":[{"reference":"Bargmann CI, Horvitz HR. 1991. Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron 7: 729-42.
","pubmedId":"1660283","doi":""},{"reference":"Berger-Sweeney J, Arnold A, Gabeau D, & Mills J. 1995. Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: Effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(5): 859–873.
","pubmedId":"8554711","doi":""},{"reference":"Bielsky IF, Hu SB & Young LJ. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in the vasopressin system: lack of an altered behavioral phenotype in female V1a receptor knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res 164: 132–136.
","pubmedId":"16046007","doi":""},{"reference":"Björkqvist K, Österman K, and Lagerspetz KMJ. 1994. Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior 20: 27-33.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q"},{"reference":"Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77(1): 71-94.
","pubmedId":"4366476","doi":""},{"reference":"Chao MY, Komatsu H, Fukuto HS, Dionne HM, Hart AC. 2004. Feeding status and serotonin rapidly and reversibly modulate a Caenorhabditis elegans chemosensory circuit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101(43): 15512-7.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0403369101"},{"reference":"de Bono M, Maricq AV. 2005. Neuronal substrates of complex behaviors in C. elegans. Annu Rev Neurosci 28: 451-501.
","pubmedId":"16022603","doi":""},{"reference":"Doty RL, Applebaum S, Zusho H, Settle RG. 1985. Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Neuropsychologia 23(5): 667-72.
","pubmedId":"4058710","doi":""},{"reference":"Ellis R, Harris G. 2020. Variation between nematodes in a multi-sensory behavioral assay. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000330.
","pubmedId":"33274334","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Sanders T, Hong S, McCurdy LY, Chase DL, Cohen N, Koelle MR, Nitabach MN. 2016. Neural Architecture of Hunger-Dependent Multisensory Decision Making in C. elegans. Neuron 92: 1049-1062.
","pubmedId":"27866800","doi":""},{"reference":"Ghosh DD, Nitabach MN, Zhang Y, Harris G. 2017. Multisensory integration in C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43: 110-118.
","pubmedId":"28273525","doi":""},{"reference":"Halpern DF. 2000. Sex differences in cognitive abilities. 3rd Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605290"},{"reference":"Harris G, Linfield G, Wu T, Choi MK, Liu H, Zhang Y. 2019. Molecular and Cellular modulators for multisensory integration in C. elegans. PloS Genetics 15(3): e1007706.
","pubmedId":"30849079","doi":""},{"reference":"Ishihara T, Iino Y, Mohri A, Mori I, Gengyo-Ando K, Mitani S, Katsura I. 2002. HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 109: 639-49.
","pubmedId":"12062106","doi":""},{"reference":"Kaciuba-Uscilko H, Grucza R. 2001. Gender differences in thermoregulation. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 4: 533-6.
","pubmedId":"11706289","doi":""},{"reference":"Lipton J, Kleemann G, Ghosh R, Lints R, Emmons, SW. 2004. Mate searching in Caenorhabditis elegans: a genetic model for sex drive in a simple invertebrate. J Neurosci 24: 7427-34.
","pubmedId":"15329389","doi":""},{"reference":"Loxterkamp E, Cha J, Wu K, Sullivan J, Holbrook O, Ghaith H, Srun L, Bauer DE. 2021. Behavioral Differences between Male and Hermaphrodite C. elegans. microPublication Biology. 10.17912/micropub.biology.000431.
","pubmedId":"34345807","doi":""},{"reference":"Meisel JD, Panda O, Mahanti P, Schroeder FC, Kim DH. 2014. Chemosensation of bacterial secondary metabolites modulates neuroendocrine signaling and behavior of C. elegans. Cell 159: 267-80.
","pubmedId":"25303524","doi":""},{"reference":"Olofsson B. 2014. The olfactory neuron AWC promotes avoidance of normally palatable food following chronic dietary restriction. J Exp Biol 217: 1790-8.
","pubmedId":"24577446","doi":""},{"reference":"Portman DS. 2017. Sexual modulation of sex-shared neurons and circuits in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Res 95(1-2): 527-538.
","pubmedId":"27870393","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryan DA, Miller RM, Lee K, Neal SJ, Fagan KA, Sengupta P. 2014. Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr Biol 24: 2509–2517.
","pubmedId":"25438941","doi":""},{"reference":"Sakai N, Iwata R, Yokoi S, Butcher RA, Clardy J, Tomioka M, Iino Y. 2013. A sexually conditioned switch of chemosensory behavior in C. elegans. PLoS One 8(7): e68676.
","pubmedId":"23861933","doi":""},{"reference":"Shtonda BB, Avery L. 2006. Dietary choice behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Biol 209: 89-102.
","pubmedId":"16354781","doi":""},{"reference":"Troemel ER, Kimmel BE, Bargmann CI. 1997. Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91(2): 161-9.
","pubmedId":"9346234","doi":""},{"reference":"Wexler LR, Miller RM, Portman DS. 2020. C. elegans Males Integrate Food Signals and Biological Sex to Modulate State-Dependent Chemosensation and Behavioral Prioritization. Curr Biol 28: S0960-9822(20)30645-X.
","pubmedId":"32531276","doi":""},{"reference":"White JQ, Nicholas TJ, Gritton J, Truong L, Davidson ER, Jorgensen EM. 2007. The sensory circuitry for sexual attraction in C. elegans males. Curr Biol 17: 1847-57.
","pubmedId":"17964166","doi":""},{"reference":"Yang W, Wu T, Tu S, Qin Y, Shen C, Li J, et al., Zhang Y. 2022. Redundant neural circuits regulate olfactory integration. PLoS Genet 18: e1010029.
","pubmedId":"35100258","doi":""},{"reference":"Yoshida K, Hirotsu T, Tagawa T, Oda S, Wakabayashi T, Iino Y, Ishihara T. 2012. Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat Commun 3: 739. 10.1038/ncomms1750.
","pubmedId":"22415830","doi":""},{"reference":"Zhang Y, Lu H, Bargmann CI. 2005. Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438(7065): 179-84.
","pubmedId":"16281027","doi":""}],"title":"Sex differences in decision-making: Identifying multisensory behavioral differences in males and hermaphrodites
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"KJ Yook"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"8cf8abb5-1e24-4caa-83fe-fc770f82e04b","citedBy":[{"title":"Characterization of the Doublesex/MAB-3 transcription factor DMD-9 in Caenorhabditis elegans","url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkac305","journal":"G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics","datePublished":"December 2022","firstAuthor":"Godini, R"},{"title":"Male-specific behavioral and transcriptomic changes in aging C. elegans neurons","url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.109910","journal":"iScience","datePublished":"June 2024","firstAuthor":"Weng, Y"}],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}}, "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}