Transcription factor nucleocytoplasmic dynamics play a key role in developmental gene regulation. In Dictyostelium, the transcription factor GtaC exhibits nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, but how its dynamics change during development at endogenous expression levels remains unclear. Here, using an endogenously tagged knock-in strain, we tracked GtaC localization from starvation through aggregation and quantified developmental changes in shuttling period, amplitude, and synchrony. We found that shuttling amplitude decreased during aggregation, and this reduction was reproduced by brief-pulse optogenetic activation of cAMP, mimicking higher-frequency cAMP input. These results indicate that endogenous GtaC dynamics are modulated in a frequency-dependent manner during development.
","acknowledgements":"We thank the NBRP-Nenkin and the Dicty Stock Center for providing various resources.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Toho University"],"departments":["Department of Biology, Faculty of Science"],"credit":["conceptualization","investigation","fundingAcquisition","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"7223002y@st.toho-u.ac.jp","firstName":"Kensuke","lastName":"Yamashita","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0005-4711-0500"},{"affiliations":["Toho University"],"departments":["Department of Biology, Faculty of Science"],"credit":["conceptualization","fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"tetsuya.muramoto@sci.toho-u.ac.jp","firstName":"Tetsuya","lastName":"Muramoto","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-9624-8577"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":null,"extendedData":[{"description":"Time-lapse movie of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic shuttling dynamics from early starvation responses through the streaming stage. Images were acquired every 30 s for 30 min at each developmental time point. Scale bars: 50 µm.","doi":"10.22002/yag9s-rjd92","resourceType":"Audiovisual","name":"20260127Yamashita_et_al_microPub_ExtendedData.mp4","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/d625860499c9ed5c3dac14990bc70874.mp4"}],"funding":"This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [23K05785 to T.M.]; and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science DC1 [23KJ1977 to K.Y.].
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/c2c9e31fcbfca2fc0e8d47a24b8e4131.png"},"imageCaption":"A) Subcellular localization of endogenously tagged mNG-GtaC during early developmental stages. Developmental time after starvation is indicated above each image. Representative images are shown. Scale bars: 50 µm. See Movie 1 for time-lapse imaging. B) Time-series analysis of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic dynamics. The nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) fluorescence ratio was quantified for individual cells aligned according to developmental time. Solid lines represent the mean N/C ratios across cells within the representative field of view shown, and the shaded areas indicate ± SD (n = 60–85 cells). In total, 12–16 fields of view from at least three independent experiments were analyzed for each developmental time point. C) Quantification of oscillatory properties of endogenous GtaC dynamics during development. Period and amplitude were calculated from time-series data of the N/C ratio using wavelet-based analysis, and a synchrony index was quantified using the Kuramoto order parameter. Box plots show the distribution of per-field means at each developmental time point, with individual fields overlaid as colored points. Data were obtained from 12–16 fields of view per time point. D) Modulation of GtaC shuttling dynamics by optogenetic control of the cAMP oscillation frequency. Cells expressing endogenously tagged mScarlet-I-GtaC and the photoactivated adenylyl cyclase mPAC were stimulated with brief 8-s pulses of blue light at 3–4 h of development. The stimulation period was modulated from 5 min to 2 min in 1-min increments, and N/C dynamics were quantified. Solid red lines represent mean N/C ratios and error bars indicate ± SD. Data were collected from 128–144 cells under constant 5-min stimulation and from 154–317 cells under frequency-modulated stimulation conditions. For each condition, three independent experiments were performed, and a representative dataset is shown.
","imageTitle":"Developmental dynamics of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic shuttling.
","methods":"Cell lines and growth conditions
Dictyostelium discoideum AX3–derived knock-in (KI) strains were maintained at 22°C in HL5 medium (Formedium) supplemented with streptomycin. mNeonGreen-tagged GtaC knock-in cells (mNG-GtaC KI; dTM1588) were used for live imaging (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025). For optogenetic experiments, the photoactivatable adenylyl cyclase mPAC was introduced into mScarlet-I-tagged GtaC knock-in cells (mScaI-GtaC KI; dTM2135) to generate mScaI-GtaC KI/mPAC cells (dTM2151) (Yamashita et al. 2025). To minimize physiological variability, cultures were used within 2 weeks after thawing from frozen stocks.
Cell preparation for live imaging and optogenetic manipulation
Cells were harvested during log-phase growth (1–4×106 cells/mL), washed in KK2 phosphate buffer (16.5 mM KH2PO4, 3.9 mM K2HPO4), and starved to initiate development. The time of washing was defined as 0 h of development. Cells were plated on agar at a density of 2.6×105 cells/cm2 in plastic dishes containing 1.5% agar (Difco Bacto-agar) prepared in KK2 buffer. After 10 min of incubation, excess KK2 buffer was carefully removed, and dishes were incubated at 22°C until the desired developmental time point. Approximately 30 min prior to imaging, agar was cut into 1-cm squares, and the agar surface with adherent cells was placed face down in glass-bottomed dishes (Delta T Culture Dishes, Bioptechs). Mineral oil (M8410, Sigma-Aldrich) was layered over the agar to prevent drying.
Imaging and optogenetic conditions
Live-cell imaging was performed on an inverted confocal microscope (Eclipse Ti-A1R, Nikon) equipped with a Plan Apo λ 60×/1.40 NA oil-immersion objective. Fluorescent tags were excited using solid-state lasers at 488 nm (mNeonGreen), 561 nm (mScarlet-I and mCherry), and 640 nm (miRFP670). mCherry- and miRFP670-tagged H2Bv3 signals were acquired for nuclear segmentation and cell tracking. To visualize GtaC shuttling, time-lapse images were acquired every 30 s as Z-stacks of 7 planes spaced 2 µm apart to capture nuclear and cytoplasmic signals, using the resonant scanner and a piezo Z stage (Nano-Drive, Mad City Labs). Each 30-min session included four fields of view per agar square. During optogenetic experiments, imaging was performed with a galvanometric scanner, and 488-nm light pulses were delivered between image acquisitions. A square region covering the entire field (0.21 mm × 0.21 mm) was illuminated at an intensity of 36.3 µW/µm2, and each light pulse lasted 8 s. For frequency-modulation experiments, the stimulation period was stepped from 5 to 2 min in 1-min increments, whereas control experiments used 8-s pulses at a constant 5-min period.
Imaging analysis
Time-lapse images were analyzed in Volocity (version 6.3, PerkinElmer) to quantify single-cell GtaC localization dynamics. Nuclear masks were segmented from the nuclear-marker channel, and the cytoplasmic regions were defined by isotropic expansion of each nuclear mask followed by subtraction of the nuclear region. Nuclear and cytoplasmic fluorescence intensities were measured over time to compute N/C ratio traces, and cells that left the field of view or could not be reliably tracked were excluded. Instantaneous period, amplitude, and phase were extracted by wavelet analysis using pyBOAT v0.9.8 (Schmal et al. 2022) running in Anaconda Navigator v2.2.0, enabling analysis of non-stationary oscillatory dynamics. Before the wavelet transform, trends were removed using a sinc filter implemented in pyBOAT. Because wavelet estimates near the edges of the time series are unreliable, time points overlapping the cone of influence (COI) were excluded from downstream quantification. Accordingly, the first and last 7.5 min (15 frames each) of each 30-min time-lapse were discarded from quantitative analyses. To quantify synchrony across cells within each field of view, a synchrony index was calculated based on the Kuramoto order parameter, which ranges from 0 (no synchrony) to 1 (perfect synchrony), using instantaneous phase information (Acebrón et al. 2005). Calculations were performed in R (v4.3.0) with the circular package by computing the mean resultant length at each time point with rho.circular function, followed by time-averaging across the imaging period.
","reagents":"Plasmids
Plasmid ID | Plasmid name | Description | Drug Resistance | Reference |
pTM2559 | [coaA]: mPAC | Extrachromosomal vector for mPAC expression under the coaA promoter | Hygromycin B | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
Cell lines
Strain ID | Description | Parental Strain | Reference |
dTM1482 | mCherry-H2B Knock-in | Ax3 | (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025) |
dTM1588 | mNeonGreen-GtaC Knock-in | dTM1482 | (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025) |
dTM2015 | miRFP670-H2B Knock-in | Ax3 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
dTM2135 | mScarlet-I-GtaC Knock-in | dTM2015 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
dTM2151 | mScarlet-I-GtaC Knock-in/mPAC | dTM2135 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
Cells encode extracellular cues as temporal patterns of signaling activity that are reflected in time-varying dynamics of downstream effectors, thereby guiding cellular decision-making (Behar and Hoffmann 2010; Bonsignore et al. 2025; Purvis and Lahav 2013). Stimulus identity and context can be embedded in these dynamics and mapped to distinct outcomes, as shown for ERK/MAPK activity patterns (Ram et al. 2023; Ryu et al. 2015; Wilson et al. 2017) and for NF-κB nuclear localization programs that shape gene regulation (Maity and Wollman 2020; Martin et al. 2020; Wibisana and Okada 2022). Such dynamics are commonly quantified by tracking post-translationally regulated changes in subcellular localization and summarizing trajectories with features such as duration, frequency, amplitude, and delay (Cai et al. 2008; Regot et al. 2014; Shrum et al. 2009). Combined measurements and perturbations enable quantitative comparison of dynamic features across signaling conditions (Bennett et al. 2024; Kamino et al. 2017; Micali et al. 2015; Rosen et al. 2026).
In Dictyostelium discoideum, the transition from unicellular to multicellular development following nutrient deprivation involves the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the transcription factor GtaC, which plays a role in developmental gene expression (Cai et al. 2014). The shuttling of GtaC is responsive to the temporal structure of cAMP signaling, including pulsatile inputs, and is driven by phosphorylation of GtaC by the atypical MAPK Erk2 (Hadwiger et al. 2022). Furthermore, live imaging has revealed developmental changes in cAMP wave dynamics, including shifts in wave frequency and propagation patterns (Ford et al. 2023; Gregor et al. 2010; Hashimura et al. 2019; Singer et al. 2019). However, corresponding developmental changes in quantitative features of GtaC shuttling, such as period, amplitude, and synchrony, have not been systematically measured. A major limitation has been the reliance on overexpression-based reporters, which can perturb development and introduce localization artifacts, thereby obscuring endogenous GtaC dynamics over extended time windows. Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing enable knock-in strategies to visualize endogenous GtaC (Yamashita et al. 2021; Yamashita and Muramoto 2025). Nonetheless, previous observations of endogenous GtaC have been restricted to a narrow developmental window. In this study, we measured GtaC shuttling over an extended developmental timeframe, from early starvation responses through streaming, and quantified how its dynamic features change during development. Using these shuttling trajectories as a quantitative readout, we defined stimulation conditions that enabled more precise, stepwise optogenetic tuning of cAMP oscillation frequency than previously demonstrated (Yamashita et al. 2025).
To extend the developmental time course examined for GtaC localization, we performed time-lapse imaging of endogenously expressed, fluorescently tagged GtaC in knock-in cells from 2 to 7 h post-starvation (Fig. 1A). This imaging period covers early development through the initiation of collective migration and subsequent streaming, allowing for direct comparison of GtaC localization states across distinct developmental stages under consistent imaging conditions. We quantified GtaC nuclear localization using the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio and observed a developmental shift in population-level synchrony (Fig. 1B). At 2 h, only a few cells exhibited sustained nuclear GtaC, and coherent periodic shuttling was not evident. In contrast, beginning at 3 h, population-level synchrony of oscillatory shuttling emerged, indicating the onset of coordinated GtaC dynamics across cells. The characteristics of these oscillations were strongly stage-dependent (Fig. 1C). Oscillatory behavior was most prominent at 5 h, when shuttling amplitude and synchrony were maximal. As development progressed to 6 h, coinciding with the onset of collective migration, oscillation amplitude decreased markedly. By 7 h, when cell–cell adhesion increased and streaming structures formed, oscillatory GtaC shuttling was strongly attenuated and biased toward the cytoplasmic state. These stage-dependent changes were consistently supported by quantitative analysis of oscillation period, amplitude, and synchrony across independent observations (Fig. 1C).
To investigate how gradual changes in GtaC shuttling characteristics reflect the temporal structure of upstream inputs, we used optogenetic manipulation of cAMP signaling. Conventional approaches for modulating cAMP signaling, such as microinjection, caged compounds, and microfluidic systems, have provided important insights but are difficult to apply for continuous, within-sample modulation of oscillation frequency (Nakajima et al. 2014; Rietdorf et al. 1998; Westendorf et al. 2013). In prior optogenetic studies, frequency modulation was implemented only coarsely, for example by changing the stimulation period from 6 to 4 min, a limitation often arising from protocols that maintain a 50% duty cycle to equalize total light exposure across periods (Yamashita et al. 2025). In this study, to more closely mimic physiological brief cAMP pulses while enabling seamless within-experiment frequency adjustments, we implemented an input design in which a single fixed 8 s light pulse was delivered once per cycle. This protocol reliably elicited a localization response at 3–4 h of development while minimizing unnecessary light exposure, phototoxicity, and baseline elevation. Under a constant 5 min stimulation period, GtaC exhibited robust, stimulus-locked periodic shuttling (Fig. 1D). Reducing the stimulation period in 1 min increments decreased shuttling amplitude at a 4 min period and disrupted shuttling at a 3 min period, enabling analysis of responses to progressively higher-frequency cAMP inputs.
A key technical advance of this study is the ability to monitor endogenously expressed GtaC, rather than relying on overexpression, which facilitated accurate and reproducible quantification of nucleocytoplasmic shuttling across an extended developmental window. Using knock-in measurements, we identified stage-dependent variations in the period, amplitude, and synchrony of transcription factor shuttling, which correspond to population states ranging from localized coordination to collective migration and streaming. Brief-pulse optogenetic stimulation expanded established frequency-control schemes (Yamashita et al. 2025) by enabling continuous, precise modulation of input-frequency and reproduced the decrease in shuttling amplitude observed at higher developmental frequencies. Beyond GtaC, the capacity to monitor endogenous nucleocytoplasmic dynamics over prolonged developmental timescales provides an opportunity for comparative analysis of multiple transcription factors, including Hbx5 (Brimson et al. 2025; Hao et al. 2024), which display developmentally regulated localization dynamics. Such comparisons may help clarify how distinct transcription factors interpret temporal features of cAMP signaling and coordinate gene expression programs across successive developmental stages. Collectively, these findings link endogenous GtaC dynamics across an extended developmental window to defined cAMP input patterns and provide a quantitative basis for understanding how transcription factor response trajectories change across collective developmental states.
Rietdorf J, Siegert F, Weijer CJ. 1998. Induction of optical density waves and chemotactic cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum by microinjection of cAMP pulses. Dev Biol 204(2): 525-36.
","pubmedId":"9882487","doi":""},{"reference":"Acebrón JA, Bonilla LL, Pérez Vicente CJ, Ritort Fl, Spigler R. 2005. The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Reviews of Modern Physics 77: 137-185.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1103/RevModPhys.77.137"},{"reference":"Cai L, Dalal CK, Elowitz MB. 2008. Frequency-modulated nuclear localization bursts coordinate gene regulation. Nature 455(7212): 485-90.
","pubmedId":"18818649","doi":""},{"reference":"Shrum CK, Defrancisco D, Meffert MK. 2009. Stimulated nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB and shuttling differentially depend on dynein and the dynactin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(8): 2647-52.
","pubmedId":"19196984","doi":""},{"reference":"Behar M, Hoffmann A. 2010. Understanding the temporal codes of intra-cellular signals. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20(6): 684-93.
","pubmedId":"20956081","doi":""},{"reference":"Gregor T, Fujimoto K, Masaki N, Sawai S. 2010. The onset of collective behavior in social amoebae. Science 328(5981): 1021-5.
","pubmedId":"20413456","doi":""},{"reference":"Purvis JE, Lahav G. 2013. Encoding and decoding cellular information through signaling dynamics. Cell 152(5): 945-56.
","pubmedId":"23452846","doi":""},{"reference":"Westendorf C, Negrete J Jr, Bae AJ, Sandmann R, Bodenschatz E, Beta C. 2013. Actin cytoskeleton of chemotactic amoebae operates close to the onset of oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(10): 3853-8.
","pubmedId":"23431176","doi":""},{"reference":"Cai H, Katoh-Kurasawa M, Muramoto T, Santhanam B, Long Y, Li L, et al., Devreotes PN. 2014. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of a GATA transcription factor functions as a development timer. Science 343(6177): 1249531.
","pubmedId":"24653039","doi":""},{"reference":"Nakajima A, Ishihara S, Imoto D, Sawai S. 2014. Rectified directional sensing in long-range cell migration. Nat Commun 5: 5367.
","pubmedId":"25373620","doi":""},{"reference":"Regot S, Hughey JJ, Bajar BT, Carrasco S, Covert MW. 2014. High-sensitivity measurements of multiple kinase activities in live single cells. Cell 157(7): 1724-34.
","pubmedId":"24949979","doi":""},{"reference":"Micali G, Aquino G, Richards DM, Endres RG. 2015. Accurate encoding and decoding by single cells: amplitude versus frequency modulation. PLoS Comput Biol 11(6): e1004222.
","pubmedId":"26030820","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryu H, Chung M, Dobrzyński M, Fey D, Blum Y, Lee SS, et al., Pertz O. 2015. Frequency modulation of ERK activation dynamics rewires cell fate. Mol Syst Biol 11(11): 838.
","pubmedId":"26613961","doi":""},{"reference":"Kamino K, Kondo Y, Nakajima A, Honda-Kitahara M, Kaneko K, Sawai S. 2017. Fold-change detection and scale invariance of cell-cell signaling in social amoeba. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(21): E4149-E4157.
","pubmedId":"28495969","doi":""},{"reference":"Wilson MZ, Ravindran PT, Lim WA, Toettcher JE. 2017. Tracing Information Flow from Erk to Target Gene Induction Reveals Mechanisms of Dynamic and Combinatorial Control. Mol Cell 67(5): 757-769.e5.
","pubmedId":"28826673","doi":""},{"reference":"Hashimura H, Morimoto YV, Yasui M, Ueda M. 2019. Collective cell migration of Dictyostelium without cAMP oscillations at multicellular stages. Commun Biol 2: 34.
","pubmedId":"30701199","doi":""},{"reference":"Singer G, Araki T, Weijer CJ. 2019. Oscillatory cAMP cell-cell signalling persists during multicellular Dictyostelium development. Commun Biol 2: 139.
","pubmedId":"31044164","doi":""},{"reference":"Maity A, Wollman R. 2020. Information transmission from NFkB signaling dynamics to gene expression. PLoS Comput Biol 16(8): e1008011.
","pubmedId":"32797040","doi":""},{"reference":"Martin EW, Pacholewska A, Patel H, Dashora H, Sung MH. 2020. Integrative analysis suggests cell type-specific decoding of NF-κB dynamics. Sci Signal 13(620): 10.1126/scisignal.aax7195.
","pubmedId":"32098801","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Iriki H, Kamimura Y, Muramoto T. 2021. CRISPR Toolbox for Genome Editing in Dictyostelium. Front Cell Dev Biol 9: 721630.
","pubmedId":"34485304","doi":""},{"reference":"Hadwiger JA, Cai H, Aranda RG, Fatima S. 2022. An atypical MAPK regulates translocation of a GATA transcription factor in response to chemoattractant stimulation. J Cell Sci 135(16): 10.1242/jcs.260148.
","pubmedId":"35916164","doi":""},{"reference":"Schmal C, Mönke G, Granada AE. 2022. Analysis of Complex Circadian Time Series Data Using Wavelets. Methods Mol Biol 2482: 35-54.
","pubmedId":"35610418","doi":""},{"reference":"Wibisana JN, Okada M. 2022. Encoding and decoding NF-κB nuclear dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol 77: 102103.
","pubmedId":"35636375","doi":""},{"reference":"Ford HZ, Manhart A, Chubb JR. 2023. Controlling periodic long-range signalling to drive a morphogenetic transition. Elife 12: 10.7554/eLife.83796.
","pubmedId":"36856269","doi":""},{"reference":"Ram A, Murphy D, DeCuzzi N, Patankar M, Hu J, Pargett M, Albeck JG. 2023. A guide to ERK dynamics, part 2: downstream decoding. Biochem J 480(23): 1909-1928.
","pubmedId":"38038975","doi":""},{"reference":"Bennett JJR, Stern AD, Zhang X, Birtwistle MR, Pandey G. 2024. Low-frequency ERK and Akt activity dynamics are predictive of stochastic cell division events. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 10(1): 65.
","pubmedId":"38834572","doi":""},{"reference":"Hao Y, Yang Y, Tu H, Guo Z, Chen P, Chao X, et al., Cai H. 2024. A transcription factor complex in Dictyostelium enables adaptive changes in macropinocytosis during the growth-to-development transition. Dev Cell 59(5): 645-660.e8.
","pubmedId":"38325371","doi":""},{"reference":"Bonsignore F, Pozzi S, Aloi E, Mazza D, Zambrano S. 2025. Linking signaling dynamics and cell fate decisions through single-cell imaging: evidence and challenges. Front Cell Dev Biol 13: 1656051.
","pubmedId":"41210254","doi":""},{"reference":"Brimson CA, Baines R, Sams-Dodd E, Stefanescu I, Evans B, Kuwana S, et al., Thompson CRL. 2025. Collective oscillatory signaling in Dictyostelium discoideum acts as a developmental timer initiated by weak coupling of a noisy pulsatile signal. Dev Cell 60(6): 918-933.e4.
","pubmedId":"39672161","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Muramoto T. 2025. Efficient endogenous protein labelling in Dictyostelium using CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in and split fluorescent proteins. PLoS One 20(6): e0326577.
","pubmedId":"40540504","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Shimane K, Muramoto T. 2025. Optogenetic control of cAMP oscillations reveals frequency-selective transcription factor dynamics in Dictyostelium. Development 152(1): 10.1242/dev.204403.
","pubmedId":"39775856","doi":""},{"reference":"Rosen SJ, Witteveen O, Baxter N, Lach RS, Hopkins E, Bauer M, Wilson MZ. 2026. Anti-resonance in developmental signaling regulates cell fate decisions. Elife 14: 10.7554/eLife.107794.
","pubmedId":"41562431","doi":""}],"title":"Frequency-dependent nucleocytoplasmic dynamics of endogenous GtaC during Dictyostelium development
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Satoshi Sawai"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"6910f29a-979a-441f-89f2-01e2d7bedaa2","decision":"accept","abstract":"Transcription factor nucleocytoplasmic dynamics play a key role in developmental gene regulation. In Dictyostelium, the transcription factor GtaC exhibits nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, but its shuttling trajectory across multicellular aggregation has not been systematically quantified. Using a knock-in strain, we tracked GtaC dynamics from starvation through aggregation and quantified developmental changes in shuttling period, amplitude, and synchrony. Notably, brief-pulse optogenetic activation of cAMP at higher input frequencies reproduced the reported attenuation of GtaC shuttling amplitude with high temporal precision and minimal phototoxicity. Together, long-term quantification and brief-pulse optogenetic cAMP perturbation show that GtaC nucleocytoplasmic shuttling is developmentally tuned in a frequency-dependent manner.
","acknowledgements":"We thank the NBRP-Nenkin and the Dicty Stock Center for providing various resources.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Toho University"],"departments":["Department of Biology, Faculty of Science"],"credit":["conceptualization","investigation","fundingAcquisition","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"7223002y@st.toho-u.ac.jp","firstName":"Kensuke","lastName":"Yamashita","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0005-4711-0500"},{"affiliations":["Toho University"],"departments":["Department of Biology, Faculty of Science"],"credit":["conceptualization","fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"tetsuya.muramoto@sci.toho-u.ac.jp","firstName":"Tetsuya","lastName":"Muramoto","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-9624-8577"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":null,"extendedData":[{"description":"Time-lapse movie of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic shuttling dynamics from early starvation responses through the streaming stage. Images were acquired every 30 s for 30 min at each developmental time point. Scale bars: 50 µm.","doi":"10.22002/yag9s-rjd92","resourceType":"Audiovisual","name":"20260127Yamashita_et_al_microPub_ExtendedData.mp4","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/d625860499c9ed5c3dac14990bc70874.mp4"}],"funding":"This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [23K05785 to T.M.]; and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science DC1 [23KJ1977 to K.Y.].
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/c2c9e31fcbfca2fc0e8d47a24b8e4131.png"},"imageCaption":"A) Subcellular localization of endogenously tagged mNG-GtaC during early developmental stages. Developmental time after starvation is indicated above each image. Representative images are shown. Scale bars: 50 µm. See Movie 1 for time-lapse imaging. B) Time-series analysis of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic dynamics. The nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) fluorescence ratio was quantified for individual cells aligned according to developmental time. Solid lines represent the mean N/C ratios across cells within the representative field of view shown, and the shaded areas indicate ± SD (n = 60–85 cells). In total, 12–16 fields of view from at least three independent experiments were analyzed for each developmental time point. C) Quantification of oscillatory properties of endogenous GtaC dynamics during development. Period and amplitude were calculated from time-series data of the N/C ratio using wavelet-based analysis, and a synchrony index was quantified using the Kuramoto order parameter. Box plots show the distribution of per-field means at each developmental time point, with individual fields overlaid as colored points. Data were obtained from 12–16 fields of view per time point. D) Modulation of GtaC shuttling dynamics by optogenetic control of the cAMP oscillation frequency. Cells expressing endogenously tagged mScarlet-I-GtaC and the photoactivated adenylyl cyclase mPAC were stimulated with brief 8-s pulses of blue light at 3–4 h of development. The stimulation period was modulated from 5 min to 2 min in 1-min increments, and N/C dynamics were quantified. Solid red lines represent mean N/C ratios and error bars indicate ± SD. Data were collected from 128–144 cells under constant 5-min stimulation and from 154–317 cells under frequency-modulated stimulation conditions. For each condition, three independent experiments were performed, and a representative dataset is shown.
","imageTitle":"Developmental dynamics of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic shuttling
","methods":"Cell lines and growth conditions
Dictyostelium discoideum AX3–derived knock-in (KI) strains were maintained at 22°C in HL5 medium (Formedium) supplemented with streptomycin. mNeonGreen-tagged GtaC knock-in cells (mNG-GtaC KI; dTM1588) were used for live imaging (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025). For optogenetic experiments, the photoactivatable adenylyl cyclase mPAC was introduced into mScarlet-I-tagged GtaC knock-in cells (mScaI-GtaC KI; dTM2135) to generate mScaI-GtaC KI/mPAC cells (dTM2151) (Yamashita et al. 2025). To minimize physiological variability, cultures were used within 2 weeks after thawing from frozen stocks.
Cell preparation for live imaging and optogenetic manipulation
Cells were harvested during log-phase growth (1–4×106 cells/mL), washed in KK2 phosphate buffer (16.5 mM KH2PO4, 3.9 mM K2HPO4), and starved to initiate development. The time of washing was defined as 0 h of development. Cells were plated on agar at a density of 2.6×105 cells/cm2 in plastic dishes containing 1.5% agar (Difco Bacto-agar) prepared in KK2 buffer. After 10 min of incubation, excess KK2 buffer was carefully removed, and dishes were incubated at 22°C until the desired developmental time point. Approximately 30 min prior to imaging, agar was cut into 1-cm squares, and the agar surface with adherent cells was placed face down in glass-bottomed dishes (Delta T Culture Dishes, Bioptechs). Mineral oil (M8410, Sigma-Aldrich) was layered over the agar to prevent drying.
Imaging and optogenetic conditions
Live-cell imaging was performed on an inverted confocal microscope (Eclipse Ti-A1R, Nikon) equipped with a Plan Apo λ 60×/1.40 NA oil-immersion objective. Fluorescent tags were excited using solid-state lasers at 488 nm (mNeonGreen), 561 nm (mScarlet-I and mCherry), and 640 nm (miRFP670). mCherry- and miRFP670-tagged H2Bv3 signals were acquired for nuclear segmentation and cell tracking. To visualize GtaC shuttling, time-lapse images were acquired every 30 s as Z-stacks of 7 planes spaced 2 µm apart to capture nuclear and cytoplasmic signals, using the resonant scanner and a piezo Z stage (Nano-Drive, Mad City Labs). Each 30-min session included four fields of view per agar square. During optogenetic experiments, imaging was performed with a galvanometric scanner, and 488-nm light pulses were delivered between image acquisitions. A square region covering the entire field (0.21 mm × 0.21 mm) was illuminated at an intensity of 36.3 µW/µm2, and each light pulse lasted 8 s. For frequency-modulation experiments, the stimulation period was stepped from 5 to 2 min in 1-min increments, whereas control experiments used 8-s pulses at a constant 5-min period.
Imaging analysis
Time-lapse images were analyzed in Volocity (version 6.3, PerkinElmer) to quantify single-cell GtaC localization dynamics. Nuclear masks were segmented from the nuclear-marker channel, and the cytoplasmic regions were defined by isotropic expansion of each nuclear mask followed by subtraction of the nuclear region. Nuclear and cytoplasmic fluorescence intensities were measured over time to compute N/C ratio traces, and cells that left the field of view or could not be reliably tracked were excluded. Instantaneous period, amplitude, and phase were extracted by wavelet analysis using pyBOAT v0.9.8 (Schmal et al. 2022) running in Anaconda Navigator v2.2.0, enabling analysis of non-stationary oscillatory dynamics. Before the wavelet transform, trends were removed using a sinc filter implemented in pyBOAT. Because wavelet estimates near the edges of the time series are unreliable, time points overlapping the cone of influence (COI) were excluded from downstream quantification. Accordingly, the first and last 7.5 min (15 frames each) of each 30-min time-lapse were discarded from quantitative analyses. To quantify synchrony across cells within each field of view, a synchrony index was calculated based on the Kuramoto order parameter, which ranges from 0 (no synchrony) to 1 (perfect synchrony), using instantaneous phase information (Acebrón et al. 2005). Calculations were performed in R (v4.3.0) with the circular package by computing the mean resultant length at each time point with rho.circular function, followed by time-averaging across the imaging period.
","reagents":"Plasmids
Plasmid ID | Plasmid name | Description | Drug Resistance | Reference |
pTM2559 | [coaA]: mPAC | Extrachromosomal vector for mPAC expression under the coaA promoter | Hygromycin B | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
Cell lines
Strain ID | Description | Parental Strain | Reference |
dTM1482 | mCherry-H2B Knock-in | Ax3 | (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025) |
dTM1588 | mNeonGreen-GtaC Knock-in | dTM1482 | (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025) |
dTM2015 | miRFP670-H2B Knock-in | Ax3 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
dTM2135 | mScarlet-I-GtaC Knock-in | dTM2015 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
dTM2151 | mScarlet-I-GtaC Knock-in/mPAC | dTM2135 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
Cells can encode extracellular cues as temporal patterns of signaling activity that downstream effectors decode through time-varying dynamics to guide cellular decision-making (Behar and Hoffmann 2010; Bonsignore et al. 2025; Purvis and Lahav 2013). Stimulus identity and context can be embedded in these dynamics and mapped to distinct outcomes, as shown for ERK/MAPK activity patterns (Ram et al. 2023; Ryu et al. 2015; Wilson et al. 2017) and for NF-κB nuclear localization programs that shape gene regulation (Maity and Wollman 2020; Martin et al. 2020; Wibisana and Okada 2022). Such dynamics are commonly quantified by tracking post-translationally regulated changes in subcellular localization and summarizing trajectories with features such as duration, frequency, amplitude, and delay (Cai et al. 2008; Regot et al. 2014; Shrum et al. 2009). Combined measurements and targeted perturbations, together with quantitative and computational frameworks, enable systematic extraction, comparison, and interpretation of dynamic features across signaling conditions (Bennett et al. 2024; Kamino et al. 2017; Micali et al. 2015; Rosen et al. 2026).
In Dictyostelium discoideum, the transition from unicellular to multicellular development following nutrient deprivation involves the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the transcription factor GtaC, which plays a role in developmental gene expression (Cai et al. 2014). The shuttling of GtaC is responsive to the temporal structure of cAMP signaling, including pulsatile inputs, and is driven by phosphorylation of GtaC by the atypical MAPK Erk2 (Hadwiger et al. 2022). Furthermore, live imaging has quantified developmental changes in cAMP wave dynamics, particularly shifts in wave frequency and propagation patterns (Ford et al. 2023; Gregor et al. 2010; Hashimura et al. 2019; Singer et al. 2019). However, corresponding changes in the quantitative features of GtaC shuttling, such as period, amplitude, and synchrony, have not been systematically measured. A significant challenge has been the reliance on overexpression-based reporters, which can disrupt development and introduce localization artifacts, thereby obscuring endogenous GtaC dynamics over extended time periods. Recent advancements in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing now facilitate knock-in strategies to visualize endogenous GtaC (Yamashita et al. 2021; Yamashita and Muramoto 2025). Despite these advances, previous analyses of endogenous GtaC focused on developmental stages when shuttling is prominent (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025), and therefore did not systematically define its onset. Meanwhile, attenuation during later stages was measured (Yamashita et al. 2025), but a unified quantification of the GtaC shuttling trajectory during multicellular aggregation using the same experimental and analytical framework has not been reported. In this study, we perform long-term measurements of GtaC dynamics from early starvation responses through streaming to map the onset-to-termination trajectory of shuttling and quantify how its dynamics evolve over time. Utilizing these shuttling dynamics as a quantitative readout, we optimized stimulation conditions for our established optogenetic perturbation (Yamashita et al. 2025), enabling more precise, stepwise tuning of cAMP oscillation frequency while minimizing cellular phototoxicity.
To extend the developmental time course examined for GtaC localization, we performed time-lapse imaging of endogenously expressed, fluorescently tagged GtaC in knock-in cells from 2 to 7 hours post-starvation (Fig. 1A). This imaging period encompasses early development through the initiation of collective migration and subsequent streaming, allowing for direct comparison of GtaC localization states across distinct developmental stages under consistent imaging conditions. We quantified GtaC nuclear localization using the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio and observed a developmental shift in population-level coordination (Fig. 1B). At 2 hours, only a few cells exhibited sustained nuclear GtaC, and coherent periodic shuttling was not evident. In contrast, beginning at 3 hours, synchronized oscillatory shuttling emerged across the population, indicating the onset of coordinated, collective GtaC dynamics. The characteristics of these oscillations were strongly stage-dependent (Fig. 1C). Oscillatory behavior became most prominent at 5 hours, when shuttling amplitude and synchrony were maximal. As development progressed to 6 hours, coinciding with the onset of collective migration, oscillation amplitude decreased markedly. By 7 hours, when cell–cell adhesion increased and streaming structures formed, GtaC localization dynamics were significantly reduced and became biased toward the cytoplasmic state. These stage-dependent changes were consistently supported by quantitative analysis of oscillation period, amplitude, and synchrony across independent observations (Fig. 1C).
To investigate how gradual changes in GtaC shuttling characteristics interpret the temporal structure of upstream inputs, we used optogenetic manipulation of cAMP signaling. Conventional methods for modulating cAMP signaling, such as microinjection, caged compounds, and microfluidic systems, have yielded valuable insights but offer limited flexibility for continuous, within-experiment modulation of oscillation frequency (Nakajima et al. 2014; Rietdorf et al. 1998; Westendorf et al. 2013). In prior optogenetic studies, frequency modulation was achieved only coarsely, for example by changing the stimulation period from 6 to 4 min, a limitation often associated with 50% duty-cycle square-wave protocols intended to equalize total light exposure across periods (Yamashita et al. 2025). Moreover, under a fixed 50% duty cycle, stimulation duration necessarily scales with cycle length, leading to prolonged stimulation at longer periods and deviating from pulsatile cAMP signaling observed under physiological conditions. This prolonged stimulation could also trigger excessive or sustained cAMP production via endogenous ACA activity, complicating the interpretation of frequency-dependent responses. In this study, we therefore used a pulse-like input design in which a single fixed 8 s light pulse was delivered once per cycle, enabling seamless within-experiment frequency adjustments. In our previous work, we confirmed that intracellular cAMP increased to detectable levels with a 1-s light pulse and exceeded physiological synthesis levels with a 10-s pulse (Yamashita et al. 2025). Based on these results, we adopted an 8-s brief pulse as the shortest stimulus duration that reliably elicits a sufficient cAMP response. This protocol consistently elicited a localization response across independent experiments at 3–4 h of development, while avoiding prolonged stimulation within each cycle and thereby minimizing unnecessary light exposure, phototoxicity, and baseline elevation. As a reference, under a constant 5 min stimulation period, GtaC exhibited robust, stimulus-locked periodic shuttling (Fig. 1D). Reducing the stimulation period in 1 min increments decreased shuttling amplitude at a 4 min period and disrupted shuttling at a 3 min period, consistent with our previous findings (Yamashita et al. 2025). This stepwise fine-tuning of stimulation timing enabled frequency modulation of the optogenetically driven cAMP input at higher temporal resolution and long-term quantification of GtaC responses.
A significant advance of this study is the systematic quantification of GtaC shuttling across an extensive developmental window, rather than focusing only on stages where shuttling is prominent. This approach enabled accurate and reproducible measurements of stage-dependent variations in the period, amplitude, and synchrony of endogenous GtaC shuttling, which corresponded to population states ranging from localized coordination to collective migration and streaming. Additionally, brief-pulse optogenetic perturbation, implemented with high temporal precision, confirmed the frequency-dependent decrease in GtaC shuttling amplitude with minimal phototoxicity, consistent with our previous findings (Yamashita et al. 2025). Beyond GtaC, the capacity to measure and manipulate endogenous nucleocytoplasmic dynamics over prolonged developmental timescales offers a framework for comparative analysis of multiple transcription factors, including those such as Hbx5 (Brimson et al. 2025; Hao et al. 2024) that display developmentally regulated localization dynamics. Such comparisons may elucidate how distinct transcription factors interpret temporal features of cAMP signaling and coordinate gene expression programs across successive developmental stages. Collectively, these approaches connect endogenous GtaC dynamics across an extended developmental window to defined cAMP input patterns and provide a quantitative foundation for understanding how transcription factor response trajectories evolve across collective developmental states.
","references":[{"reference":"Rietdorf J, Siegert F, Weijer CJ. 1998. Induction of optical density waves and chemotactic cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum by microinjection of cAMP pulses. Dev Biol 204(2): 525-36.
","pubmedId":"9882487","doi":""},{"reference":"Acebrón JA, Bonilla LL, Pérez Vicente CJ, Ritort Fl, Spigler R. 2005. The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Reviews of Modern Physics 77: 137-185.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1103/RevModPhys.77.137"},{"reference":"Cai L, Dalal CK, Elowitz MB. 2008. Frequency-modulated nuclear localization bursts coordinate gene regulation. Nature 455(7212): 485-90.
","pubmedId":"18818649","doi":""},{"reference":"Shrum CK, Defrancisco D, Meffert MK. 2009. Stimulated nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB and shuttling differentially depend on dynein and the dynactin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(8): 2647-52.
","pubmedId":"19196984","doi":""},{"reference":"Behar M, Hoffmann A. 2010. Understanding the temporal codes of intra-cellular signals. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20(6): 684-93.
","pubmedId":"20956081","doi":""},{"reference":"Gregor T, Fujimoto K, Masaki N, Sawai S. 2010. The onset of collective behavior in social amoebae. Science 328(5981): 1021-5.
","pubmedId":"20413456","doi":""},{"reference":"Purvis JE, Lahav G. 2013. Encoding and decoding cellular information through signaling dynamics. Cell 152(5): 945-56.
","pubmedId":"23452846","doi":""},{"reference":"Westendorf C, Negrete J Jr, Bae AJ, Sandmann R, Bodenschatz E, Beta C. 2013. Actin cytoskeleton of chemotactic amoebae operates close to the onset of oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(10): 3853-8.
","pubmedId":"23431176","doi":""},{"reference":"Cai H, Katoh-Kurasawa M, Muramoto T, Santhanam B, Long Y, Li L, et al., Devreotes PN. 2014. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of a GATA transcription factor functions as a development timer. Science 343(6177): 1249531.
","pubmedId":"24653039","doi":""},{"reference":"Nakajima A, Ishihara S, Imoto D, Sawai S. 2014. Rectified directional sensing in long-range cell migration. Nat Commun 5: 5367.
","pubmedId":"25373620","doi":""},{"reference":"Regot S, Hughey JJ, Bajar BT, Carrasco S, Covert MW. 2014. High-sensitivity measurements of multiple kinase activities in live single cells. Cell 157(7): 1724-34.
","pubmedId":"24949979","doi":""},{"reference":"Micali G, Aquino G, Richards DM, Endres RG. 2015. Accurate encoding and decoding by single cells: amplitude versus frequency modulation. PLoS Comput Biol 11(6): e1004222.
","pubmedId":"26030820","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryu H, Chung M, Dobrzyński M, Fey D, Blum Y, Lee SS, et al., Pertz O. 2015. Frequency modulation of ERK activation dynamics rewires cell fate. Mol Syst Biol 11(11): 838.
","pubmedId":"26613961","doi":""},{"reference":"Kamino K, Kondo Y, Nakajima A, Honda-Kitahara M, Kaneko K, Sawai S. 2017. Fold-change detection and scale invariance of cell-cell signaling in social amoeba. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(21): E4149-E4157.
","pubmedId":"28495969","doi":""},{"reference":"Wilson MZ, Ravindran PT, Lim WA, Toettcher JE. 2017. Tracing Information Flow from Erk to Target Gene Induction Reveals Mechanisms of Dynamic and Combinatorial Control. Mol Cell 67(5): 757-769.e5.
","pubmedId":"28826673","doi":""},{"reference":"Hashimura H, Morimoto YV, Yasui M, Ueda M. 2019. Collective cell migration of Dictyostelium without cAMP oscillations at multicellular stages. Commun Biol 2: 34.
","pubmedId":"30701199","doi":""},{"reference":"Singer G, Araki T, Weijer CJ. 2019. Oscillatory cAMP cell-cell signalling persists during multicellular Dictyostelium development. Commun Biol 2: 139.
","pubmedId":"31044164","doi":""},{"reference":"Maity A, Wollman R. 2020. Information transmission from NFkB signaling dynamics to gene expression. PLoS Comput Biol 16(8): e1008011.
","pubmedId":"32797040","doi":""},{"reference":"Martin EW, Pacholewska A, Patel H, Dashora H, Sung MH. 2020. Integrative analysis suggests cell type-specific decoding of NF-κB dynamics. Sci Signal 13(620): 10.1126/scisignal.aax7195.
","pubmedId":"32098801","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Iriki H, Kamimura Y, Muramoto T. 2021. CRISPR Toolbox for Genome Editing in Dictyostelium. Front Cell Dev Biol 9: 721630.
","pubmedId":"34485304","doi":""},{"reference":"Hadwiger JA, Cai H, Aranda RG, Fatima S. 2022. An atypical MAPK regulates translocation of a GATA transcription factor in response to chemoattractant stimulation. J Cell Sci 135(16): 10.1242/jcs.260148.
","pubmedId":"35916164","doi":""},{"reference":"Schmal C, Mönke G, Granada AE. 2022. Analysis of Complex Circadian Time Series Data Using Wavelets. Methods Mol Biol 2482: 35-54.
","pubmedId":"35610418","doi":""},{"reference":"Wibisana JN, Okada M. 2022. Encoding and decoding NF-κB nuclear dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol 77: 102103.
","pubmedId":"35636375","doi":""},{"reference":"Ford HZ, Manhart A, Chubb JR. 2023. Controlling periodic long-range signalling to drive a morphogenetic transition. Elife 12: 10.7554/eLife.83796.
","pubmedId":"36856269","doi":""},{"reference":"Ram A, Murphy D, DeCuzzi N, Patankar M, Hu J, Pargett M, Albeck JG. 2023. A guide to ERK dynamics, part 2: downstream decoding. Biochem J 480(23): 1909-1928.
","pubmedId":"38038975","doi":""},{"reference":"Bennett JJR, Stern AD, Zhang X, Birtwistle MR, Pandey G. 2024. Low-frequency ERK and Akt activity dynamics are predictive of stochastic cell division events. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 10(1): 65.
","pubmedId":"38834572","doi":""},{"reference":"Hao Y, Yang Y, Tu H, Guo Z, Chen P, Chao X, et al., Cai H. 2024. A transcription factor complex in Dictyostelium enables adaptive changes in macropinocytosis during the growth-to-development transition. Dev Cell 59(5): 645-660.e8.
","pubmedId":"38325371","doi":""},{"reference":"Bonsignore F, Pozzi S, Aloi E, Mazza D, Zambrano S. 2025. Linking signaling dynamics and cell fate decisions through single-cell imaging: evidence and challenges. Front Cell Dev Biol 13: 1656051.
","pubmedId":"41210254","doi":""},{"reference":"Brimson CA, Baines R, Sams-Dodd E, Stefanescu I, Evans B, Kuwana S, et al., Thompson CRL. 2025. Collective oscillatory signaling in Dictyostelium discoideum acts as a developmental timer initiated by weak coupling of a noisy pulsatile signal. Dev Cell 60(6): 918-933.e4.
","pubmedId":"39672161","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Muramoto T. 2025. Efficient endogenous protein labelling in Dictyostelium using CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in and split fluorescent proteins. PLoS One 20(6): e0326577.
","pubmedId":"40540504","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Shimane K, Muramoto T. 2025. Optogenetic control of cAMP oscillations reveals frequency-selective transcription factor dynamics in Dictyostelium. Development 152(1): 10.1242/dev.204403.
","pubmedId":"39775856","doi":""},{"reference":"Rosen SJ, Witteveen O, Baxter N, Lach RS, Hopkins E, Bauer M, Wilson MZ. 2026. Anti-resonance in developmental signaling regulates cell fate decisions. Elife 14: 10.7554/eLife.107794.
","pubmedId":"41562431","doi":""}],"title":"Long-term quantification and brief-pulse optogenetic perturbation of nucleocytoplasmic GtaC dynamics during Dictyostelium development
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"271e4d3c-1963-443f-8c6c-7a05043c18a5","decision":"edit","abstract":"Transcription factor nucleocytoplasmic dynamics play a key role in developmental gene regulation. In Dictyostelium, the transcription factor GtaC exhibits nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, but its shuttling trajectory across multicellular aggregation has not been systematically quantified. Using a knock-in strain, we tracked GtaC dynamics from starvation through aggregation and quantified developmental changes in shuttling period, amplitude, and synchrony. Notably, brief-pulse optogenetic activation of cAMP at higher input frequencies reproduced the reported attenuation of GtaC shuttling amplitude with high temporal precision and minimal phototoxicity. Together, long-term quantification and brief-pulse optogenetic cAMP perturbation show that GtaC nucleocytoplasmic shuttling is developmentally tuned in a frequency-dependent manner.
","acknowledgements":"We thank the NBRP-Nenkin and the Dicty Stock Center for providing various resources.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Toho University"],"departments":["Department of Biology, Faculty of Science"],"credit":["conceptualization","investigation","fundingAcquisition","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"7223002y@st.toho-u.ac.jp","firstName":"Kensuke","lastName":"Yamashita","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0005-4711-0500"},{"affiliations":["Toho University"],"departments":["Department of Biology, Faculty of Science"],"credit":["conceptualization","fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"tetsuya.muramoto@sci.toho-u.ac.jp","firstName":"Tetsuya","lastName":"Muramoto","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-9624-8577"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[{"description":"Time-lapse movie of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic shuttling dynamics from early starvation responses through the streaming stage. Images were acquired every 30 s for 30 min at each developmental time point. Scale bars: 50 µm.
","doi":"10.22002/yag9s-rjd92","resourceType":"Audiovisual","name":"20260127Yamashita_et_al_microPub_ExtendedData.mp4","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/d625860499c9ed5c3dac14990bc70874.mp4"}],"funding":"This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [23K05785 to T.M.]; and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science DC1 [23KJ1977 to K.Y.].
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/dc6ddbc3496695f7308e89e642937c9e.png"},"imageCaption":"A) Subcellular localization of endogenously tagged mNG-GtaC during early developmental stages. Developmental time after starvation is indicated above each image. Representative images are shown. Scale bars: 50 µm. See Movie 1 for time-lapse imaging. B) Time-series analysis of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic dynamics. The nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) fluorescence ratio was quantified for individual cells aligned according to developmental time. Solid lines represent the mean N/C ratios across cells within the representative field of view shown, and the shaded areas indicate ± SD (n = 60–85 cells). In total, 12–16 fields of view from at least three independent experiments were analyzed for each developmental time point. C) Quantification of oscillatory properties of endogenous GtaC dynamics during development. Period and amplitude were calculated from time-series data of the N/C ratio using wavelet-based analysis, and a synchrony index was quantified using the Kuramoto order parameter. Box plots show the distribution of per-field means at each developmental time point, with individual fields overlaid as colored points. Data were obtained from 12–16 fields of view per time point. D) Modulation of GtaC shuttling dynamics by optogenetic control of the cAMP oscillation frequency. Cells expressing endogenously tagged mScarlet-I-GtaC and the photoactivated adenylyl cyclase mPAC were stimulated with brief 8-s pulses of blue light at 3–4 h of development. The stimulation period was modulated from 5 min to 2 min in 1-min increments, and N/C dynamics were quantified. Solid red lines represent mean N/C ratios and error bars indicate ± SD. Data were collected from 128–144 cells under constant 5-min stimulation and from 154–317 cells under frequency-modulated stimulation conditions. For each condition, three independent experiments were performed, and a representative dataset is shown.
","imageTitle":"Developmental dynamics of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic shuttling
","methods":"Cell lines and growth conditions
Dictyostelium discoideum AX3–derived knock-in (KI) strains were maintained at 22°C in HL5 medium (Formedium) supplemented with streptomycin. mNeonGreen-tagged GtaC knock-in cells (mNG-GtaC KI; dTM1588) were used for live imaging (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025). For optogenetic experiments, the photoactivatable adenylyl cyclase mPAC was introduced into mScarlet-I-tagged GtaC knock-in cells (mScaI-GtaC KI; dTM2135) to generate mScaI-GtaC KI/mPAC cells (dTM2151) (Yamashita et al. 2025). To minimize physiological variability, cultures were used within 2 weeks after thawing from frozen stocks.
Cell preparation for live imaging and optogenetic manipulation
Cells were harvested during log-phase growth (1–4×106 cells/mL), washed in KK2 phosphate buffer (16.5 mM KH2PO4, 3.9 mM K2HPO4), and starved to initiate development. The time of washing was defined as 0 h of development. Cells were plated on agar at a density of 2.6×105 cells/cm2 in plastic dishes containing 1.5% agar (Difco Bacto-agar) prepared in KK2 buffer. After 10 min of incubation, excess KK2 buffer was carefully removed, and dishes were incubated at 22°C until the desired developmental time point. Approximately 30 min prior to imaging, agar was cut into 1-cm squares, and the agar surface with adherent cells was placed face down in glass-bottomed dishes (Delta T Culture Dishes, Bioptechs). Mineral oil (M8410, Sigma-Aldrich) was layered over the agar to prevent drying.
Imaging and optogenetic conditions
Live-cell imaging was performed on an inverted confocal microscope (Eclipse Ti-A1R, Nikon) equipped with a Plan Apo λ 60×/1.40 NA oil-immersion objective. Fluorescent tags were excited using solid-state lasers at 488 nm (mNeonGreen), 561 nm (mScarlet-I and mCherry), and 640 nm (miRFP670). mCherry- and miRFP670-tagged H2Bv3 signals were acquired for nuclear segmentation and cell tracking. To visualize GtaC shuttling, time-lapse images were acquired every 30 s as Z-stacks of 7 planes spaced 2 µm apart to capture nuclear and cytoplasmic signals, using the resonant scanner and a piezo Z stage (Nano-Drive, Mad City Labs). Each 30-min session included four fields of view per agar square. During optogenetic experiments, imaging was performed with a galvanometric scanner, and 488-nm light pulses were delivered between image acquisitions. A square region covering the entire field (0.21 mm × 0.21 mm) was illuminated at an intensity of 36.3 µW/µm2, and each light pulse lasted 8 s. For frequency-modulation experiments, the stimulation period was stepped from 5 to 2 min in 1-min increments, whereas control experiments used 8-s pulses at a constant 5-min period.
Imaging analysis
Time-lapse images were analyzed in Volocity (version 6.3, PerkinElmer) to quantify single-cell GtaC localization dynamics. Nuclear masks were segmented from the nuclear-marker channel, and the cytoplasmic regions were defined by isotropic expansion of each nuclear mask followed by subtraction of the nuclear region. Nuclear and cytoplasmic fluorescence intensities were measured over time to compute N/C ratio traces, and cells that left the field of view or could not be reliably tracked were excluded. Instantaneous period, amplitude, and phase were extracted by wavelet analysis using pyBOAT v0.9.8 (Schmal et al. 2022) running in Anaconda Navigator v2.2.0, enabling analysis of non-stationary oscillatory dynamics. Before the wavelet transform, trends were removed using a sinc filter implemented in pyBOAT. Because wavelet estimates near the edges of the time series are unreliable, time points overlapping the cone of influence (COI) were excluded from downstream quantification. Accordingly, the first and last 7.5 min (15 frames each) of each 30-min time-lapse were discarded from quantitative analyses. To quantify synchrony across cells within each field of view, a synchrony index was calculated based on the Kuramoto order parameter, which ranges from 0 (no synchrony) to 1 (perfect synchrony), using instantaneous phase information (Acebrón et al. 2005). Calculations were performed in R (v4.3.0) with the circular package by computing the mean resultant length at each time point with rho.circular function, followed by time-averaging across the imaging period.
","reagents":"Plasmids
Plasmid ID | Plasmid name | Description | Drug Resistance | Reference |
pTM2559 | [coaA]: mPAC | Extrachromosomal vector for mPAC expression under the coaA promoter | Hygromycin B | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
Cell lines
Strain ID | Description | Parental Strain | Reference |
dTM1482 | mCherry-H2B Knock-in | Ax3 | (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025) |
dTM1588 | mNeonGreen-GtaC Knock-in | dTM1482 | (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025) |
dTM2015 | miRFP670-H2B Knock-in | Ax3 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
dTM2135 | mScarlet-I-GtaC Knock-in | dTM2015 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
dTM2151 | mScarlet-I-GtaC Knock-in/mPAC | dTM2135 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
Cells can encode extracellular cues as temporal patterns of signaling activity that downstream effectors decode through time-varying dynamics to guide cellular decision-making (Behar and Hoffmann 2010; Bonsignore et al. 2025; Purvis and Lahav 2013). Stimulus identity and context can be embedded in these dynamics and mapped to distinct outcomes, as shown for ERK/MAPK activity patterns (Ram et al. 2023; Ryu et al. 2015; Wilson et al. 2017) and for NF-κB nuclear localization programs that shape gene regulation (Maity and Wollman 2020; Martin et al. 2020; Wibisana and Okada 2022). Such dynamics are commonly quantified by tracking post-translationally regulated changes in subcellular localization and summarizing trajectories with features such as duration, frequency, amplitude, and delay (Cai et al. 2008; Regot et al. 2014; Shrum et al. 2009). Combined measurements and targeted perturbations, together with quantitative and computational frameworks, enable systematic extraction, comparison, and interpretation of dynamic features across signaling conditions (Bennett et al. 2024; Kamino et al. 2017; Micali et al. 2015; Rosen et al. 2026).
In Dictyostelium discoideum, the transition from unicellular to multicellular development following nutrient deprivation involves the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the transcription factor GtaC, which plays a role in developmental gene expression (Cai et al. 2014). The shuttling of GtaC is responsive to the temporal structure of cAMP signaling, including pulsatile inputs, and is driven by phosphorylation of GtaC by the atypical MAPK Erk2 (Hadwiger et al. 2022). Furthermore, live imaging has quantified developmental changes in cAMP wave dynamics, particularly shifts in wave frequency and propagation patterns (Ford et al. 2023; Gregor et al. 2010; Hashimura et al. 2019; Singer et al. 2019). However, corresponding changes in the quantitative features of GtaC shuttling, such as period, amplitude, and synchrony, have not been systematically measured. A significant challenge has been the reliance on overexpression-based reporters, which can disrupt development and introduce localization artifacts, thereby obscuring endogenous GtaC dynamics over extended time periods. Recent advancements in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing now facilitate knock-in strategies to visualize endogenous GtaC (Yamashita et al. 2021; Yamashita and Muramoto 2025). Despite these advances, previous analyses of endogenous GtaC focused on developmental stages when shuttling is prominent (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025), and therefore did not systematically define its onset. Meanwhile, attenuation during later stages was measured (Yamashita et al. 2025), but a unified quantification of the GtaC shuttling trajectory during multicellular aggregation using the same experimental and analytical framework has not been reported. In this study, we perform long-term measurements of GtaC dynamics from early starvation responses through streaming to map the onset-to-termination trajectory of shuttling and quantify how its dynamics evolve over time. Utilizing these shuttling dynamics as a quantitative readout, we optimized stimulation conditions for our established optogenetic perturbation (Yamashita et al. 2025), enabling more precise, stepwise tuning of cAMP oscillation frequency while minimizing cellular phototoxicity.
To extend the developmental time course examined for GtaC localization, we performed time-lapse imaging of endogenously expressed, fluorescently tagged GtaC in knock-in cells from 2 to 7 hours post-starvation (Fig. 1A). This imaging period encompasses early development through the initiation of collective migration and subsequent streaming, allowing for direct comparison of GtaC localization states across distinct developmental stages under consistent imaging conditions. We quantified GtaC nuclear localization using the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio and observed a developmental shift in population-level coordination (Fig. 1B). At 2 hours, only a few cells exhibited sustained nuclear GtaC, and coherent periodic shuttling was not evident. In contrast, beginning at 3 hours, synchronized oscillatory shuttling emerged across the population, indicating the onset of coordinated, collective GtaC dynamics. The characteristics of these oscillations were strongly stage-dependent (Fig. 1C). Oscillatory behavior became most prominent at 5 hours, when shuttling amplitude and synchrony were maximal. As development progressed to 6 hours, coinciding with the onset of collective migration, oscillation amplitude decreased markedly. By 7 hours, when cell–cell adhesion increased and streaming structures formed, GtaC localization dynamics were significantly reduced and became biased toward the cytoplasmic state. These stage-dependent changes were consistently supported by quantitative analysis of oscillation period, amplitude, and synchrony across independent observations (Fig. 1C).
To investigate how gradual changes in GtaC shuttling characteristics interpret the temporal structure of upstream inputs, we used optogenetic manipulation of cAMP signaling. Conventional methods for modulating cAMP signaling, such as microinjection, caged compounds, and microfluidic systems, have yielded valuable insights but offer limited flexibility for continuous, within-experiment modulation of oscillation frequency (Nakajima et al. 2014; Rietdorf et al. 1998; Westendorf et al. 2013). In prior optogenetic studies, frequency modulation was achieved only coarsely, for example by changing the stimulation period from 6 to 4 min, a limitation often associated with 50% duty-cycle square-wave protocols intended to equalize total light exposure across periods (Yamashita et al. 2025). Moreover, under a fixed 50% duty cycle, stimulation duration necessarily scales with cycle length, leading to prolonged stimulation at longer periods and deviating from pulsatile cAMP signaling observed under physiological conditions. This prolonged stimulation could also trigger excessive or sustained cAMP production via endogenous ACA activity, complicating the interpretation of frequency-dependent responses. In this study, we therefore used a pulse-like input design in which a single fixed 8 s light pulse was delivered once per cycle, enabling seamless within-experiment frequency adjustments. In our previous work, we confirmed that intracellular cAMP increased to detectable levels with a 1-s light pulse and exceeded physiological synthesis levels with a 10-s pulse (Yamashita et al. 2025). Based on these results, we adopted an 8-s brief pulse as the shortest stimulus duration that reliably elicits a sufficient cAMP response. This protocol consistently elicited a localization response across independent experiments at 3–4 h of development, while avoiding prolonged stimulation within each cycle and thereby minimizing unnecessary light exposure, phototoxicity, and baseline elevation. As a reference, under a constant 5 min stimulation period, GtaC exhibited robust, stimulus-locked periodic shuttling (Fig. 1D). Reducing the stimulation period in 1 min increments decreased shuttling amplitude at a 4 min period and disrupted shuttling at a 3 min period, consistent with our previous findings (Yamashita et al. 2025). This stepwise fine-tuning of stimulation timing enabled frequency modulation of the optogenetically driven cAMP input at higher temporal resolution and long-term quantification of GtaC responses.
A significant advance of this study is the systematic quantification of GtaC shuttling across an extensive developmental window, rather than focusing only on stages where shuttling is prominent. This approach enabled accurate and reproducible measurements of stage-dependent variations in the period, amplitude, and synchrony of endogenous GtaC shuttling, which corresponded to population states ranging from localized coordination to collective migration and streaming. Additionally, brief-pulse optogenetic perturbation, implemented with high temporal precision, confirmed the frequency-dependent decrease in GtaC shuttling amplitude with minimal phototoxicity, consistent with our previous findings (Yamashita et al. 2025). Beyond GtaC, the capacity to measure and manipulate endogenous nucleocytoplasmic dynamics over prolonged developmental timescales offers a framework for comparative analysis of multiple transcription factors, including those such as Hbx5 (Brimson et al. 2025; Hao et al. 2024) that display developmentally regulated localization dynamics. Such comparisons may elucidate how distinct transcription factors interpret temporal features of cAMP signaling and coordinate gene expression programs across successive developmental stages. Collectively, these approaches connect endogenous GtaC dynamics across an extended developmental window to defined cAMP input patterns and provide a quantitative foundation for understanding how transcription factor response trajectories evolve across collective developmental states.
","references":[{"reference":"Rietdorf J, Siegert F, Weijer CJ. 1998. Induction of optical density waves and chemotactic cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum by microinjection of cAMP pulses. Dev Biol 204(2): 525-36.
","pubmedId":"9882487","doi":""},{"reference":"Acebrón JA, Bonilla LL, Pérez Vicente CJ, Ritort F, Spigler R. 2005. The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Reviews of Modern Physics 77: 137-185.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1103/RevModPhys.77.137"},{"reference":"Cai L, Dalal CK, Elowitz MB. 2008. Frequency-modulated nuclear localization bursts coordinate gene regulation. Nature 455(7212): 485-90.
","pubmedId":"18818649","doi":""},{"reference":"Shrum CK, Defrancisco D, Meffert MK. 2009. Stimulated nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB and shuttling differentially depend on dynein and the dynactin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(8): 2647-52.
","pubmedId":"19196984","doi":""},{"reference":"Behar M, Hoffmann A. 2010. Understanding the temporal codes of intra-cellular signals. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20(6): 684-93.
","pubmedId":"20956081","doi":""},{"reference":"Gregor T, Fujimoto K, Masaki N, Sawai S. 2010. The onset of collective behavior in social amoebae. Science 328(5981): 1021-5.
","pubmedId":"20413456","doi":""},{"reference":"Purvis JE, Lahav G. 2013. Encoding and decoding cellular information through signaling dynamics. Cell 152(5): 945-56.
","pubmedId":"23452846","doi":""},{"reference":"Westendorf C, Negrete J Jr, Bae AJ, Sandmann R, Bodenschatz E, Beta C. 2013. Actin cytoskeleton of chemotactic amoebae operates close to the onset of oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(10): 3853-8.
","pubmedId":"23431176","doi":""},{"reference":"Cai H, Katoh-Kurasawa M, Muramoto T, Santhanam B, Long Y, Li L, et al., Devreotes PN. 2014. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of a GATA transcription factor functions as a development timer. Science 343(6177): 1249531.
","pubmedId":"24653039","doi":""},{"reference":"Nakajima A, Ishihara S, Imoto D, Sawai S. 2014. Rectified directional sensing in long-range cell migration. Nat Commun 5: 5367.
","pubmedId":"25373620","doi":""},{"reference":"Regot S, Hughey JJ, Bajar BT, Carrasco S, Covert MW. 2014. High-sensitivity measurements of multiple kinase activities in live single cells. Cell 157(7): 1724-34.
","pubmedId":"24949979","doi":""},{"reference":"Micali G, Aquino G, Richards DM, Endres RG. 2015. Accurate encoding and decoding by single cells: amplitude versus frequency modulation. PLoS Comput Biol 11(6): e1004222.
","pubmedId":"26030820","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryu H, Chung M, Dobrzyński M, Fey D, Blum Y, Lee SS, et al., Pertz O. 2015. Frequency modulation of ERK activation dynamics rewires cell fate. Mol Syst Biol 11(11): 838.
","pubmedId":"26613961","doi":""},{"reference":"Kamino K, Kondo Y, Nakajima A, Honda-Kitahara M, Kaneko K, Sawai S. 2017. Fold-change detection and scale invariance of cell-cell signaling in social amoeba. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(21): E4149-E4157.
","pubmedId":"28495969","doi":""},{"reference":"Wilson MZ, Ravindran PT, Lim WA, Toettcher JE. 2017. Tracing Information Flow from Erk to Target Gene Induction Reveals Mechanisms of Dynamic and Combinatorial Control. Mol Cell 67(5): 757-769.e5.
","pubmedId":"28826673","doi":""},{"reference":"Hashimura H, Morimoto YV, Yasui M, Ueda M. 2019. Collective cell migration of Dictyostelium without cAMP oscillations at multicellular stages. Commun Biol 2: 34.
","pubmedId":"30701199","doi":""},{"reference":"Singer G, Araki T, Weijer CJ. 2019. Oscillatory cAMP cell-cell signalling persists during multicellular Dictyostelium development. Commun Biol 2: 139.
","pubmedId":"31044164","doi":""},{"reference":"Maity A, Wollman R. 2020. Information transmission from NFkB signaling dynamics to gene expression. PLoS Comput Biol 16(8): e1008011.
","pubmedId":"32797040","doi":""},{"reference":"Martin EW, Pacholewska A, Patel H, Dashora H, Sung MH. 2020. Integrative analysis suggests cell type-specific decoding of NF-κB dynamics. Sci Signal 13(620): 10.1126/scisignal.aax7195.
","pubmedId":"32098801","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Iriki H, Kamimura Y, Muramoto T. 2021. CRISPR Toolbox for Genome Editing in Dictyostelium. Front Cell Dev Biol 9: 721630.
","pubmedId":"34485304","doi":""},{"reference":"Hadwiger JA, Cai H, Aranda RG, Fatima S. 2022. An atypical MAPK regulates translocation of a GATA transcription factor in response to chemoattractant stimulation. J Cell Sci 135(16): 10.1242/jcs.260148.
","pubmedId":"35916164","doi":""},{"reference":"Schmal C, Mönke G, Granada AE. 2022. Analysis of Complex Circadian Time Series Data Using Wavelets. Methods Mol Biol 2482: 35-54.
","pubmedId":"35610418","doi":""},{"reference":"Wibisana JN, Okada M. 2022. Encoding and decoding NF-κB nuclear dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol 77: 102103.
","pubmedId":"35636375","doi":""},{"reference":"Ford HZ, Manhart A, Chubb JR. 2023. Controlling periodic long-range signalling to drive a morphogenetic transition. Elife 12: 10.7554/eLife.83796.
","pubmedId":"36856269","doi":""},{"reference":"Ram A, Murphy D, DeCuzzi N, Patankar M, Hu J, Pargett M, Albeck JG. 2023. A guide to ERK dynamics, part 2: downstream decoding. Biochem J 480(23): 1909-1928.
","pubmedId":"38038975","doi":""},{"reference":"Bennett JJR, Stern AD, Zhang X, Birtwistle MR, Pandey G. 2024. Low-frequency ERK and Akt activity dynamics are predictive of stochastic cell division events. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 10(1): 65.
","pubmedId":"38834572","doi":""},{"reference":"Hao Y, Yang Y, Tu H, Guo Z, Chen P, Chao X, et al., Cai H. 2024. A transcription factor complex in Dictyostelium enables adaptive changes in macropinocytosis during the growth-to-development transition. Dev Cell 59(5): 645-660.e8.
","pubmedId":"38325371","doi":""},{"reference":"Bonsignore F, Pozzi S, Aloi E, Mazza D, Zambrano S. 2025. Linking signaling dynamics and cell fate decisions through single-cell imaging: evidence and challenges. Front Cell Dev Biol 13: 1656051.
","pubmedId":"41210254","doi":""},{"reference":"Brimson CA, Baines R, Sams-Dodd E, Stefanescu I, Evans B, Kuwana S, et al., Thompson CRL. 2025. Collective oscillatory signaling in Dictyostelium discoideum acts as a developmental timer initiated by weak coupling of a noisy pulsatile signal. Dev Cell 60(6): 918-933.e4.
","pubmedId":"39672161","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Muramoto T. 2025. Efficient endogenous protein labelling in Dictyostelium using CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in and split fluorescent proteins. PLoS One 20(6): e0326577.
","pubmedId":"40540504","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Shimane K, Muramoto T. 2025. Optogenetic control of cAMP oscillations reveals frequency-selective transcription factor dynamics in Dictyostelium. Development 152(1): 10.1242/dev.204403.
","pubmedId":"39775856","doi":""},{"reference":"Rosen SJ, Witteveen O, Baxter N, Lach RS, Hopkins E, Bauer M, Wilson MZ. 2026. Anti-resonance in developmental signaling regulates cell fate decisions. Elife 14: 10.7554/eLife.107794.
","pubmedId":"41562431","doi":""}],"title":"Long-term quantification and brief-pulse optogenetic perturbation of nucleocytoplasmic GtaC dynamics during Dictyostelium development
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"13dca909-f1a0-4448-a97d-35d07d28f89d","decision":"publish","abstract":"Transcription factor nucleocytoplasmic dynamics play a key role in developmental gene regulation. In Dictyostelium, the transcription factor GtaC exhibits nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, but its shuttling trajectory across multicellular aggregation has not been systematically quantified. Using a knock-in strain, we tracked GtaC dynamics from starvation through aggregation and quantified developmental changes in shuttling period, amplitude, and synchrony. Notably, brief-pulse optogenetic activation of cAMP at higher input frequencies reproduced the reported attenuation of GtaC shuttling amplitude with high temporal precision and minimal phototoxicity. Together, long-term quantification and brief-pulse optogenetic cAMP perturbation show that GtaC nucleocytoplasmic shuttling is developmentally tuned in a frequency-dependent manner.
","acknowledgements":"We thank the NBRP-Nenkin and the Dicty Stock Center for providing various resources.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Toho University"],"departments":["Department of Biology, Faculty of Science"],"credit":["conceptualization","investigation","fundingAcquisition","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"7223002y@st.toho-u.ac.jp","firstName":"Kensuke","lastName":"Yamashita","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0005-4711-0500"},{"affiliations":["Toho University"],"departments":["Department of Biology, Faculty of Science"],"credit":["conceptualization","fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"tetsuya.muramoto@sci.toho-u.ac.jp","firstName":"Tetsuya","lastName":"Muramoto","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-9624-8577"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[{"description":"Time-lapse movie of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic shuttling dynamics from early starvation responses through the streaming stage. Images were acquired every 30 s for 30 min at each developmental time point. Scale bars: 50 µm.
","doi":"10.22002/yag9s-rjd92","resourceType":"Audiovisual","name":"20260127Yamashita_et_al_microPub_ExtendedData.mp4","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/d625860499c9ed5c3dac14990bc70874.mp4"}],"funding":"This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [23K05785 to T.M.]; and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science DC1 [23KJ1977 to K.Y.].
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/dc6ddbc3496695f7308e89e642937c9e.png"},"imageCaption":"A) Subcellular localization of endogenously tagged mNG-GtaC during early developmental stages. Developmental time after starvation is indicated above each image. Representative images are shown. Scale bars: 50 µm. See Movie 1 for time-lapse imaging. B) Time-series analysis of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic dynamics. The nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) fluorescence ratio was quantified for individual cells aligned according to developmental time. Solid lines represent the mean N/C ratios across cells within the representative field of view shown, and the shaded areas indicate ± SD (n = 60–85 cells). In total, 12–16 fields of view from at least three independent experiments were analyzed for each developmental time point. C) Quantification of oscillatory properties of endogenous GtaC dynamics during development. Period and amplitude were calculated from time-series data of the N/C ratio using wavelet-based analysis, and a synchrony index was quantified using the Kuramoto order parameter. Box plots show the distribution of per-field means at each developmental time point, with individual fields overlaid as colored points. Data were obtained from 12–16 fields of view per time point. D) Modulation of GtaC shuttling dynamics by optogenetic control of the cAMP oscillation frequency. Cells expressing endogenously tagged mScarlet-I-GtaC and the photoactivated adenylyl cyclase mPAC were stimulated with brief 8-s pulses of blue light at 3–4 h of development. The stimulation period was modulated from 5 min to 2 min in 1-min increments, and N/C dynamics were quantified. Solid red lines represent mean N/C ratios and error bars indicate ± SD. Data were collected from 128–144 cells under constant 5-min stimulation and from 154–317 cells under frequency-modulated stimulation conditions. For each condition, three independent experiments were performed, and a representative dataset is shown.
","imageTitle":"Developmental dynamics of endogenous GtaC nucleocytoplasmic shuttling
","methods":"Cell lines and growth conditions
Dictyostelium discoideum AX3–derived knock-in (KI) strains were maintained at 22°C in HL5 medium (Formedium) supplemented with streptomycin. mNeonGreen-tagged GtaC knock-in cells (mNG-GtaC KI; dTM1588) were used for live imaging (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025). For optogenetic experiments, the photoactivatable adenylyl cyclase mPAC was introduced into mScarlet-I-tagged GtaC knock-in cells (mScaI-GtaC KI; dTM2135) to generate mScaI-GtaC KI/mPAC cells (dTM2151) (Yamashita et al. 2025). To minimize physiological variability, cultures were used within 2 weeks after thawing from frozen stocks.
Cell preparation for live imaging and optogenetic manipulation
Cells were harvested during log-phase growth (1–4×106 cells/mL), washed in KK2 phosphate buffer (16.5 mM KH2PO4, 3.9 mM K2HPO4), and starved to initiate development. The time of washing was defined as 0 h of development. Cells were plated on agar at a density of 2.6×105 cells/cm2 in plastic dishes containing 1.5% agar (Difco Bacto-agar) prepared in KK2 buffer. After 10 min of incubation, excess KK2 buffer was carefully removed, and dishes were incubated at 22°C until the desired developmental time point. Approximately 30 min prior to imaging, agar was cut into 1-cm squares, and the agar surface with adherent cells was placed face down in glass-bottomed dishes (Delta T Culture Dishes, Bioptechs). Mineral oil (M8410, Sigma-Aldrich) was layered over the agar to prevent drying.
Imaging and optogenetic conditions
Live-cell imaging was performed on an inverted confocal microscope (Eclipse Ti-A1R, Nikon) equipped with a Plan Apo λ 60×/1.40 NA oil-immersion objective. Fluorescent tags were excited using solid-state lasers at 488 nm (mNeonGreen), 561 nm (mScarlet-I and mCherry), and 640 nm (miRFP670). mCherry- and miRFP670-tagged H2Bv3 signals were acquired for nuclear segmentation and cell tracking. To visualize GtaC shuttling, time-lapse images were acquired every 30 s as Z-stacks of 7 planes spaced 2 µm apart to capture nuclear and cytoplasmic signals, using the resonant scanner and a piezo Z stage (Nano-Drive, Mad City Labs). Each 30-min session included four fields of view per agar square. During optogenetic experiments, imaging was performed with a galvanometric scanner, and 488-nm light pulses were delivered between image acquisitions. A square region covering the entire field (0.21 mm × 0.21 mm) was illuminated at an intensity of 36.3 µW/µm2, and each light pulse lasted 8 s. For frequency-modulation experiments, the stimulation period was stepped from 5 to 2 min in 1-min increments, whereas control experiments used 8-s pulses at a constant 5-min period.
Imaging analysis
Time-lapse images were analyzed in Volocity (version 6.3, PerkinElmer) to quantify single-cell GtaC localization dynamics. Nuclear masks were segmented from the nuclear-marker channel, and the cytoplasmic regions were defined by isotropic expansion of each nuclear mask followed by subtraction of the nuclear region. Nuclear and cytoplasmic fluorescence intensities were measured over time to compute N/C ratio traces, and cells that left the field of view or could not be reliably tracked were excluded. Instantaneous period, amplitude, and phase were extracted by wavelet analysis using pyBOAT v0.9.8 (Schmal et al. 2022) running in Anaconda Navigator v2.2.0, enabling analysis of non-stationary oscillatory dynamics. Before the wavelet transform, trends were removed using a sinc filter implemented in pyBOAT. Because wavelet estimates near the edges of the time series are unreliable, time points overlapping the cone of influence (COI) were excluded from downstream quantification. Accordingly, the first and last 7.5 min (15 frames each) of each 30-min time-lapse were discarded from quantitative analyses. To quantify synchrony across cells within each field of view, a synchrony index was calculated based on the Kuramoto order parameter, which ranges from 0 (no synchrony) to 1 (perfect synchrony), using instantaneous phase information (Acebrón et al. 2005). Calculations were performed in R (v4.3.0) with the circular package by computing the mean resultant length at each time point with rho.circular function, followed by time-averaging across the imaging period.
","reagents":"Plasmids
Plasmid ID | Plasmid name | Description | Drug Resistance | Reference |
pTM2559 | [coaA]: mPAC | Extrachromosomal vector for mPAC expression under the coaA promoter | Hygromycin B | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
Cell lines
Strain ID | Description | Parental Strain | Reference |
dTM1482 | mCherry-H2B Knock-in | Ax3 | (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025) |
dTM1588 | mNeonGreen-GtaC Knock-in | dTM1482 | (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025) |
dTM2015 | miRFP670-H2B Knock-in | Ax3 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
dTM2135 | mScarlet-I-GtaC Knock-in | dTM2015 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
dTM2151 | mScarlet-I-GtaC Knock-in/mPAC | dTM2135 | (Yamashita et al. 2025) |
Cells can encode extracellular cues as temporal patterns of signaling activity that downstream effectors decode through time-varying dynamics to guide cellular decision-making (Behar and Hoffmann 2010; Bonsignore et al. 2025; Purvis and Lahav 2013). Stimulus identity and context can be embedded in these dynamics and mapped to distinct outcomes, as shown for ERK/MAPK activity patterns (Ram et al. 2023; Ryu et al. 2015; Wilson et al. 2017) and for NF-κB nuclear localization programs that shape gene regulation (Maity and Wollman 2020; Martin et al. 2020; Wibisana and Okada 2022). Such dynamics are commonly quantified by tracking post-translationally regulated changes in subcellular localization and summarizing trajectories with features such as duration, frequency, amplitude, and delay (Cai et al. 2008; Regot et al. 2014; Shrum et al. 2009). Combined measurements and targeted perturbations, together with quantitative and computational frameworks, enable systematic extraction, comparison, and interpretation of dynamic features across signaling conditions (Bennett et al. 2024; Kamino et al. 2017; Micali et al. 2015; Rosen et al. 2026).
In Dictyostelium discoideum, the transition from unicellular to multicellular development following nutrient deprivation involves the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the transcription factor GtaC, which plays a role in developmental gene expression (Cai et al. 2014). The shuttling of GtaC is responsive to the temporal structure of cAMP signaling, including pulsatile inputs, and is driven by phosphorylation of GtaC by the atypical MAPK Erk2 (Hadwiger et al. 2022). Furthermore, live imaging has quantified developmental changes in cAMP wave dynamics, particularly shifts in wave frequency and propagation patterns (Ford et al. 2023; Gregor et al. 2010; Hashimura et al. 2019; Singer et al. 2019). However, corresponding changes in the quantitative features of GtaC shuttling, such as period, amplitude, and synchrony, have not been systematically measured. A significant challenge has been the reliance on overexpression-based reporters, which can disrupt development and introduce localization artifacts, thereby obscuring endogenous GtaC dynamics over extended time periods. Recent advancements in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing now facilitate knock-in strategies to visualize endogenous GtaC (Yamashita et al. 2021; Yamashita and Muramoto 2025). Despite these advances, previous analyses of endogenous GtaC focused on developmental stages when shuttling is prominent (Yamashita and Muramoto 2025), and therefore did not systematically define its onset. Meanwhile, attenuation during later stages was measured (Yamashita et al. 2025), but a unified quantification of the GtaC shuttling trajectory during multicellular aggregation using the same experimental and analytical framework has not been reported. In this study, we perform long-term measurements of GtaC dynamics from early starvation responses through streaming to map the onset-to-termination trajectory of shuttling and quantify how its dynamics evolve over time. Utilizing these shuttling dynamics as a quantitative readout, we optimized stimulation conditions for our established optogenetic perturbation (Yamashita et al. 2025), enabling more precise, stepwise tuning of cAMP oscillation frequency while minimizing cellular phototoxicity.
To extend the developmental time course examined for GtaC localization, we performed time-lapse imaging of endogenously expressed, fluorescently tagged GtaC in knock-in cells from 2 to 7 hours post-starvation (Fig. 1A). This imaging period encompasses early development through the initiation of collective migration and subsequent streaming, allowing for direct comparison of GtaC localization states across distinct developmental stages under consistent imaging conditions. We quantified GtaC nuclear localization using the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio and observed a developmental shift in population-level coordination (Fig. 1B). At 2 hours, only a few cells exhibited sustained nuclear GtaC, and coherent periodic shuttling was not evident. In contrast, beginning at 3 hours, synchronized oscillatory shuttling emerged across the population, indicating the onset of coordinated, collective GtaC dynamics. The characteristics of these oscillations were strongly stage-dependent (Fig. 1C). Oscillatory behavior became most prominent at 5 hours, when shuttling amplitude and synchrony were maximal. As development progressed to 6 hours, coinciding with the onset of collective migration, oscillation amplitude decreased markedly. By 7 hours, when cell–cell adhesion increased and streaming structures formed, GtaC localization dynamics were significantly reduced and became biased toward the cytoplasmic state. These stage-dependent changes were consistently supported by quantitative analysis of oscillation period, amplitude, and synchrony across independent observations (Fig. 1C).
To investigate how gradual changes in GtaC shuttling characteristics interpret the temporal structure of upstream inputs, we used optogenetic manipulation of cAMP signaling. Conventional methods for modulating cAMP signaling, such as microinjection, caged compounds, and microfluidic systems, have yielded valuable insights but offer limited flexibility for continuous, within-experiment modulation of oscillation frequency (Nakajima et al. 2014; Rietdorf et al. 1998; Westendorf et al. 2013). In prior optogenetic studies, frequency modulation was achieved only coarsely, for example by changing the stimulation period from 6 to 4 min, a limitation often associated with 50% duty-cycle square-wave protocols intended to equalize total light exposure across periods (Yamashita et al. 2025). Moreover, under a fixed 50% duty cycle, stimulation duration necessarily scales with cycle length, leading to prolonged stimulation at longer periods and deviating from pulsatile cAMP signaling observed under physiological conditions. This prolonged stimulation could also trigger excessive or sustained cAMP production via endogenous ACA activity, complicating the interpretation of frequency-dependent responses. In this study, we therefore used a pulse-like input design in which a single fixed 8 s light pulse was delivered once per cycle, enabling seamless within-experiment frequency adjustments. In our previous work, we confirmed that intracellular cAMP increased to detectable levels with a 1-s light pulse and exceeded physiological synthesis levels with a 10-s pulse (Yamashita et al. 2025). Based on these results, we adopted an 8-s brief pulse as the shortest stimulus duration that reliably elicits a sufficient cAMP response. This protocol consistently elicited a localization response across independent experiments at 3–4 h of development, while avoiding prolonged stimulation within each cycle and thereby minimizing unnecessary light exposure, phototoxicity, and baseline elevation. As a reference, under a constant 5 min stimulation period, GtaC exhibited robust, stimulus-locked periodic shuttling (Fig. 1D). Reducing the stimulation period in 1 min increments decreased shuttling amplitude at a 4 min period and disrupted shuttling at a 3 min period, consistent with our previous findings (Yamashita et al. 2025). This stepwise fine-tuning of stimulation timing enabled frequency modulation of the optogenetically driven cAMP input at higher temporal resolution and long-term quantification of GtaC responses.
A significant advance of this study is the systematic quantification of GtaC shuttling across an extensive developmental window, rather than focusing only on stages where shuttling is prominent. This approach enabled accurate and reproducible measurements of stage-dependent variations in the period, amplitude, and synchrony of endogenous GtaC shuttling, which corresponded to population states ranging from localized coordination to collective migration and streaming. Additionally, brief-pulse optogenetic perturbation, implemented with high temporal precision, confirmed the frequency-dependent decrease in GtaC shuttling amplitude with minimal phototoxicity, consistent with our previous findings (Yamashita et al. 2025). Beyond GtaC, the capacity to measure and manipulate endogenous nucleocytoplasmic dynamics over prolonged developmental timescales offers a framework for comparative analysis of multiple transcription factors, including those such as Hbx5 (Brimson et al. 2025; Hao et al. 2024) that display developmentally regulated localization dynamics. Such comparisons may elucidate how distinct transcription factors interpret temporal features of cAMP signaling and coordinate gene expression programs across successive developmental stages. Collectively, these approaches connect endogenous GtaC dynamics across an extended developmental window to defined cAMP input patterns and provide a quantitative foundation for understanding how transcription factor response trajectories evolve across collective developmental states.
","references":[{"reference":"Acebrón JA, Bonilla LL, Pérez Vicente CJ, Ritort F, Spigler R. 2005. The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Reviews of Modern Physics 77: 137-185.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1103/RevModPhys.77.137"},{"reference":"Behar M, Hoffmann A. 2010. Understanding the temporal codes of intra-cellular signals. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20(6): 684-93.
","pubmedId":"20956081","doi":""},{"reference":"Bennett JJR, Stern AD, Zhang X, Birtwistle MR, Pandey G. 2024. Low-frequency ERK and Akt activity dynamics are predictive of stochastic cell division events. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 10(1): 65.
","pubmedId":"38834572","doi":""},{"reference":"Bonsignore F, Pozzi S, Aloi E, Mazza D, Zambrano S. 2025. Linking signaling dynamics and cell fate decisions through single-cell imaging: evidence and challenges. Front Cell Dev Biol 13: 1656051.
","pubmedId":"41210254","doi":""},{"reference":"Brimson CA, Baines R, Sams-Dodd E, Stefanescu I, Evans B, Kuwana S, et al., Thompson CRL. 2025. Collective oscillatory signaling in Dictyostelium discoideum acts as a developmental timer initiated by weak coupling of a noisy pulsatile signal. Dev Cell 60(6): 918-933.e4.
","pubmedId":"39672161","doi":""},{"reference":"Cai L, Dalal CK, Elowitz MB. 2008. Frequency-modulated nuclear localization bursts coordinate gene regulation. Nature 455(7212): 485-90.
","pubmedId":"18818649","doi":""},{"reference":"Cai H, Katoh-Kurasawa M, Muramoto T, Santhanam B, Long Y, Li L, et al., Devreotes PN. 2014. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of a GATA transcription factor functions as a development timer. Science 343(6177): 1249531.
","pubmedId":"24653039","doi":""},{"reference":"Ford HZ, Manhart A, Chubb JR. 2023. Controlling periodic long-range signalling to drive a morphogenetic transition. Elife 12: 10.7554/eLife.83796.
","pubmedId":"36856269","doi":""},{"reference":"Gregor T, Fujimoto K, Masaki N, Sawai S. 2010. The onset of collective behavior in social amoebae. Science 328(5981): 1021-5.
","pubmedId":"20413456","doi":""},{"reference":"Hadwiger JA, Cai H, Aranda RG, Fatima S. 2022. An atypical MAPK regulates translocation of a GATA transcription factor in response to chemoattractant stimulation. J Cell Sci 135(16): 10.1242/jcs.260148.
","pubmedId":"35916164","doi":""},{"reference":"Hao Y, Yang Y, Tu H, Guo Z, Chen P, Chao X, et al., Cai H. 2024. A transcription factor complex in Dictyostelium enables adaptive changes in macropinocytosis during the growth-to-development transition. Dev Cell 59(5): 645-660.e8.
","pubmedId":"38325371","doi":""},{"reference":"Hashimura H, Morimoto YV, Yasui M, Ueda M. 2019. Collective cell migration of Dictyostelium without cAMP oscillations at multicellular stages. Commun Biol 2: 34.
","pubmedId":"30701199","doi":""},{"reference":"Kamino K, Kondo Y, Nakajima A, Honda-Kitahara M, Kaneko K, Sawai S. 2017. Fold-change detection and scale invariance of cell-cell signaling in social amoeba. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(21): E4149-E4157.
","pubmedId":"28495969","doi":""},{"reference":"Maity A, Wollman R. 2020. Information transmission from NFkB signaling dynamics to gene expression. PLoS Comput Biol 16(8): e1008011.
","pubmedId":"32797040","doi":""},{"reference":"Martin EW, Pacholewska A, Patel H, Dashora H, Sung MH. 2020. Integrative analysis suggests cell type-specific decoding of NF-κB dynamics. Sci Signal 13(620): 10.1126/scisignal.aax7195.
","pubmedId":"32098801","doi":""},{"reference":"Micali G, Aquino G, Richards DM, Endres RG. 2015. Accurate encoding and decoding by single cells: amplitude versus frequency modulation. PLoS Comput Biol 11(6): e1004222.
","pubmedId":"26030820","doi":""},{"reference":"Nakajima A, Ishihara S, Imoto D, Sawai S. 2014. Rectified directional sensing in long-range cell migration. Nat Commun 5: 5367.
","pubmedId":"25373620","doi":""},{"reference":"Purvis JE, Lahav G. 2013. Encoding and decoding cellular information through signaling dynamics. Cell 152(5): 945-56.
","pubmedId":"23452846","doi":""},{"reference":"Ram A, Murphy D, DeCuzzi N, Patankar M, Hu J, Pargett M, Albeck JG. 2023. A guide to ERK dynamics, part 2: downstream decoding. Biochem J 480(23): 1909-1928.
","pubmedId":"38038975","doi":""},{"reference":"Regot S, Hughey JJ, Bajar BT, Carrasco S, Covert MW. 2014. High-sensitivity measurements of multiple kinase activities in live single cells. Cell 157(7): 1724-34.
","pubmedId":"24949979","doi":""},{"reference":"Rietdorf J, Siegert F, Weijer CJ. 1998. Induction of optical density waves and chemotactic cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum by microinjection of cAMP pulses. Dev Biol 204(2): 525-36.
","pubmedId":"9882487","doi":""},{"reference":"Rosen SJ, Witteveen O, Baxter N, Lach RS, Hopkins E, Bauer M, Wilson MZ. 2026. Anti-resonance in developmental signaling regulates cell fate decisions. Elife 14: 10.7554/eLife.107794.
","pubmedId":"41562431","doi":""},{"reference":"Ryu H, Chung M, Dobrzyński M, Fey D, Blum Y, Lee SS, et al., Pertz O. 2015. Frequency modulation of ERK activation dynamics rewires cell fate. Mol Syst Biol 11(11): 838.
","pubmedId":"26613961","doi":""},{"reference":"Schmal C, Mönke G, Granada AE. 2022. Analysis of Complex Circadian Time Series Data Using Wavelets. Methods Mol Biol 2482: 35-54.
","pubmedId":"35610418","doi":""},{"reference":"Shrum CK, Defrancisco D, Meffert MK. 2009. Stimulated nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB and shuttling differentially depend on dynein and the dynactin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(8): 2647-52.
","pubmedId":"19196984","doi":""},{"reference":"Singer G, Araki T, Weijer CJ. 2019. Oscillatory cAMP cell-cell signalling persists during multicellular Dictyostelium development. Commun Biol 2: 139.
","pubmedId":"31044164","doi":""},{"reference":"Westendorf C, Negrete J Jr, Bae AJ, Sandmann R, Bodenschatz E, Beta C. 2013. Actin cytoskeleton of chemotactic amoebae operates close to the onset of oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(10): 3853-8.
","pubmedId":"23431176","doi":""},{"reference":"Wibisana JN, Okada M. 2022. Encoding and decoding NF-κB nuclear dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol 77: 102103.
","pubmedId":"35636375","doi":""},{"reference":"Wilson MZ, Ravindran PT, Lim WA, Toettcher JE. 2017. Tracing Information Flow from Erk to Target Gene Induction Reveals Mechanisms of Dynamic and Combinatorial Control. Mol Cell 67(5): 757-769.e5.
","pubmedId":"28826673","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Iriki H, Kamimura Y, Muramoto T. 2021. CRISPR Toolbox for Genome Editing in Dictyostelium. Front Cell Dev Biol 9: 721630.
","pubmedId":"34485304","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Muramoto T. 2025. Efficient endogenous protein labelling in Dictyostelium using CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in and split fluorescent proteins. PLoS One 20(6): e0326577.
","pubmedId":"40540504","doi":""},{"reference":"Yamashita K, Shimane K, Muramoto T. 2025. Optogenetic control of cAMP oscillations reveals frequency-selective transcription factor dynamics in Dictyostelium. Development 152(1): 10.1242/dev.204403.
","pubmedId":"39775856","doi":""}],"title":"Long-term quantification and brief-pulse optogenetic perturbation of nucleocytoplasmic GtaC dynamics during Dictyostelium development
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"c0dbe047-b7bf-490f-9a3b-d8f72e1cbf5d","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}}, "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}