Myosin 3A is an unconventional myosin that contains a kinase domain, and is involved in the formation of hair-cell stereocilia. To investigate its regulatory roles, we mimicked phosphorylation in mchr-MYO3AΔK constructs and assayed their ability to influence filopodial properties in COS7 cells. The phosphomimics generated fewer filopodia. Coexpression of mchr-MYO3AΔK with a GFP-construct containing only the kinase domain also resulted in generation of fewer filopodia. Structural predictions suggest that the phosphorylation sites inhibit actin/MYO3A interactions. Taken together, these analyses link MYO3A phosphorylation with the regulation of its ability to create actin protrusions such as filopodia and stereocilia.
","acknowledgements":"Thank you to the University of Richmond School of Arts & Science for funding and support, as without this, I do not think I would have been able to pursue this passion for science. Thank you to all the Q-Lab members, Chase Cristella, Anna Lozano, Joanna Mas, and Lillie Wendt whom I’ve had the honor of being a Q-labby with. Inside and outside of the lab, you guys have shown me how wonderful and whimsical life can be and I will truly miss seeing you guys around. Special shoutout to Lillie specifically for her immense artistic abilities and drawing Panel K. I would also like to thank Dr. Stacey Criswell for her never-ending patience and wonderful mentoring while teaching me how to use basically every microscope in Gottwald. You have allowed me to see the world in an entirely different way, and for that I am forever grateful. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Omar Quintero-Carmona, for without his influence and unconditional support, I don’t think I would have been able to find the same joy and fulfillment in science. In my time at University of Richmond, no words brought me greater joy than you asking me, “do you want to see some cells?”, and I will miss that dearly as I try to make you proud on this path you have helped set me on.
An extended preprint version of this study can be found on bioRXiv.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"vu.phan@richmond.edu","firstName":"Vu M.N.","lastName":"Phan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"oquinter@richmond.edu","firstName":"Omar Alberto","lastName":"Quintero-Carmona","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9314-1704"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"The University of Richmond School of Arts & Sciences funded VMNP's summer research through “The Richmond Guarantee.” The University of Richmond Department of Biology funded academic-year independent research for VMNP. OAQ-C was funded by a University of Richmond Arts & Sciences Faculty Summer Research Fellowship.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/59394015196a4b2ec08e0ea567ab69b2.png"},"imageCaption":"(A) A domain schematic of the constructs used in this study. (B) Representative image of a range of filopodial tip-to-cell-body ratios (TCBR) in a cell expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. Image is shown using the “Fire” lookup table in FIJI. (C) While coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK displayed decreased TCBR, mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D did not show a decreased TCBR. (D) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D also displayed decreased TCBR. (E) Expression of either GFP-MYO3AFL or GFP-MYO3AKIN with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in a decreased TCBR. (F) Examples of cells displaying a higher (mchr-MYO3AΔK) and lower (mchr-MYO3AΔK coexpressed with GFP-MYO3AFL) filopodia edge density. (G) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density, as did mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D expression, compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. (H) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density, as did mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D expression, compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. (I) Expression of either GFP-MYO3AFL or GFP-MYO3AKIN with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. (J) Phyre2 modeling of the MYO3A/actin interface predicts that T908 and T919 (yellow) residues are in close proximity to D24 and D25 on actin (green). Addition of negative charges to T908 or T919 via phosphorylation would lead to weakened actin affinity and decreased MYO3A motor activity. (K) We propose a model where MYO3A kinase autophosphorylation modulates MYO3A-mediated filopodia filopodial initiation. Asterisks indicate p<0.05, Tukey analysis.
","imageTitle":"Mimicking MYO3A motor phosphorylation alters COS7 cell filopodia properties
","methods":"Expression Plasmids
mchr-MYO3ADK, GFP-MYO3AFL plasmids had been generated previously (Quintero et al., 2010). The phosphomimic mchr-MYO3ADKT908D and mchr-MYO3ADKT919D constructs were generated by performing site-directed mutagenesis on the mchr-MYO3ADK construct. The GFP-MYO3AKIN construct was generated using megaprimer PCR mutagenesis (Attwell et al., 2003) to move the human MYO3A kinase domain (amino acids 1-351) into pEGFP-N1 (Clontech). All expression plasmids were sequence-verified. A schematic of these constructs can be found in Figure 2.
COS7 cell culture and transient transfection
COS7 (Gluzman, 1981) cells were cultured in growth media: DMEM high glucose (Gibco) that was supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Benchmark FBS, GeminiBio), and antibiotics (50U/mL penicillin, 50µg/mL streptomycin, Gibco). Cells were kept in a humidified incubator at 37°C, with a concentration of 5% CO2, and passaged using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco). In preparation for transfection, cells were plated onto acid-washed, 22mm2, #1.5 coverslips at a concentration of ~30,000 cells/coverslip (one coverslip per well in a six well dish) and then allowed to adhere overnight. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 3000, according to manufacturer’s protocol. For each sample well, 0.3µg of plasmid DNA was diluted into 125mL of Opti-MEM media (Invitrogen) without serum or antibiotics and mixed with 3mL of P3000 reagent. In a separate tube, 4mL of L3000 reagent was diluted into 125mL Opti-MEM. The two tubes were then combined, vortexed and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes prior to dropwise addition to the sample well. Following transfection, the cells were allowed to grow overnight (16-24h) prior to fixation and counterstaining. For co-transfections, a total of 0.6µg of plasmid DNA is used instead.
Fixed cell sample preparation and imaging
Samples were fixed for 20 minutes in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized for 5 mins in PBS containing 0.5% Trition X-100, and counterstained in PBS containing 6.6nM ALEXA647 phalloidin and 10nM DAPI for 30 minutes. The samples were then washed four times for 5 minutes with PBS. Coverslips were mounted onto slides with ProLong Glass Antifade and allowed to dry. Images were obtained using an Olympus IX-83 microscope with a 60x/1.4NA objective, Sutter shutters & filter wheels, Sedat quad filter set (Chroma), and a Hamamatsu ORCA Flash 4v2 camera. The microscopy hardware and image acquisition settings were controlled by Metamorph software. Typical exposures times were 200ms for ALEXA647 phalloidin and 300ms for GFP or mcherry fluorescence channels. Exposures ranged between 2-10ms. Images were collected in all four channels for all treatment groups.
Tip to Cell Body Ratio and Filopodia Density Quantification and Analysis
FIJI was used for image analysis (Schindelin et al., 2012). The ratio of tip intensity to cell body intensity (TCBR) was calculated by using 4x4 pixel regions-of-interest to determine the intensity of the background (Ib), the filopodial tip (It), and the cell body (Icb). The ratio of the It to Icb was calculated after subtracting Ib from those measurements using the equation TCBR = (It-Ib)/(Icb-Ib).
Filopodia edge density was calculated from regions transfected cell periphery not in contact with other cells (free cell edge). Lengths of free cell edge were measured and the number of filopodia along those lengths were counted manually. Filopodia edge density is then calculated as the number of filopodia divided by the length of the measured free cell edge. TCBR and filopodial edge density for each experimental condition were averaged for each day with each day serving as a biological replicate. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA followed by a Tukey test based on the set of daily averages for each condition. Mean cell brightness was not significantly different between any of the mchr-tagged constructs, nor was mean cell brightness significantly different between any of the GFP-tagged constructs used in this study.
Phyre Modeling and Protein Sequencing
To predict the tertiary structure of MYO3A, amino acids 316-1616 of the human MYO3A sequence were submitted into the Protein Homology/analogy Recognition Engine (Phyre2.2) web server. Given the sequence, the engine uses homology identification and secondary structure prediction to determine structural homologues by a profile-profile alignment algorithm (Powell et al., 2025). High scoring alignments are then used to construct a proposed tertiary structure of the submitted sequence by comparison to structural databases. Alternatively, unknown structures can be fit directly to a specific, known structure, which was our approach. As the regions of myosins directly involved in the actin-binding interface were not well characterized in structures generated by X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy at the time that these studies were initially undertaken (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010), Phyre2 was used to predict the structure of the actin-interface of MYO3A through aligning the sequence of human MYO3A directly to the model of the actomyosin interface generated by Lorenz and Holmes (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010).
Quantification and statistics
Each condition of each cell-based assay was repeated independently 5 to 8 times (a biological replicate). For TCBR, each biological replicate consisted of at least 10 cells with no more than 5 filopodia assayed per cell. At least 7 cells were measured for each biological replicate for filopodia edge density. Kaleidagraph 4.5 was used to calculate descriptive statistics and carry out the ANOVA with Tukey analysis. Quantification presented in the text are written as mean ± standard error of the mean.
Selection and preparation of sample images for publication
Sample images chosen for the figure were chosen as representations of the patterns observed in the quantified data. The software packages Metamorph, and FIJI were used to generate the pseudo-colored images included in the figures.
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Class III myosins are a key component of actin-based protrusions known as stereocilia. These structures are found in sensory epithelia, such as the inner ear. Initially characterized in Drosophila melanogaster and named NINAC (Montell & Rubin, 1988), class III myosins contain a conserved N-terminal kinase domain (Dosé et al., 2007) proposed to regulate the protein through autophosphorylation (Ng et al., 1996; Quintero et al., 2010, 2013). Two vertebrate isoforms (MYO3A and MYO3B) both localize to the tips of stereocilia (Dosé et al., 2003), and contain functional domains in their tails that mediate binding to different subsets stereocilia resident proteins like the ESPN1 (Merritt et al., 2012; Salles et al., 2009), MORN4 (Mecklenburg et al., 2015), and actin itself (Les Erickson et al., 2003). MYO3A is hypothesized to transport proteins along stereocilia and regulate stereocilia lengths (Dosé et al., 2003). Inactivating mutations in the MYO3A gene have been linked to nonsyndromic deafness DFNB30 (T. Walsh et al., 2002). Mouse lines modeling the DFNB30 mutation display age-dependent hearing loss due to degeneration of hair cell stereocilia (V. L. Walsh et al., 2011).
Immunostaining of MYO3A shows strong labeling of the tips of stereocilia and GFP-MYO3A constructs also show strong tip-localization (Schneider et al., 2006). Fluorescently-tagged MYO3A constructs localize to the tips of other actin-based protrusions such as filopodia (Les Erickson et al., 2003; Schneider et al., 2006) and microvilli (An et al., 2014; Raval et al., 2016) in multiple cultured cell types. Kinase domain deletion (MYO3AΔK) led to enhanced tip-localization of GFP-MYO3AΔK constructs in both hair cell stereocilia (Schneider et al., 2006) and COS7 cell filopodia (Salles et al., 2009). Additionally, introducing a kinase-inactivating mutation into full length GFP-MYO3A also led to enhanced tip localization in hair cell stereocilia and COS7 cell filopodia (Quintero et al., 2010). Ectopic expression of fluorescently-tagged MYO3AΔK constructs in COS7 cells results in an increase in the number of filopodia extending from the edge of the cell (Quintero et al., 2010). The MYO3A kinase domain is capable of intermolecular autophosphorylation in vitro (Komaba et al., 2003, 2010) and in cultured cells (Quintero et al., 2010). When kinase-functional GFP-MYO3AFL constructs are coexpressed with kinase-deleted mchr-MYO3AΔK constructs, the filopodial initiation phenotype is minimized (Quintero et al., 2010). One current model for MYO3A function imagines that autophosphorylation of the kinase domain happens at the tips of actin protrusions and controls the available concentration of MYO3A in that compartment by negatively influencing motor activity via autophosphorylation of the additional sequences in the MYO3A protein (Quintero et al., 2013).
Phosphoproteomic analysis of in vitro phosphorylated human MYO3A identified a number of putative phosphorylation sites—T184 in the kinase domain, and T908 & T919 in the motor domain (Quintero et al., 2013). The web resource, Phosphosite Plus, lists 18 additional putative phosphorylation sites spread across the entirety of the protein (Hornbeck et al., 2015). Although the consequences of phosphorylation of the MYO3A motor domain have been studied using in vitro steady-state assays and cell-based assays (Komaba et al., 2010; Quintero et al., 2013), the potential biological function of specific phosphorylation of T908 or T919 phosphorylation has yet to be investigated. To do so, we generated point mutations in mchr-MYO3AΔK construct to mimic phosphorylation, replacing threonine with aspartic acid (mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D and mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D, Figure A), and applied quantitative imaging techniques to elucidate the biological significance of such posttranslational modifications on actin protrusion-related functions of MYO3A.
We assayed phosphomimic constructs for their ability to tip-localize in COS7 cell filopodia (Figure B), which do not express MYO3A endogenously and do not generate many filopodia. There was no difference in the tip to cell body ratio (TCBR) between cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (3.6±0.3, n=8) compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK (4.2±0.3, n=8, Figure C). Cotransfection of the mchr-constructs with GFP-MYO3AFL decreased the TCBR for cells coexpressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (2.4±0.4, n=7, p<0.001, Tukey analysis vs WT single-expressor) but not for cells coexpressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (3.1±0.3, n=8, p=0.06, Tukey analysis vs T908D single-expressor, Figure C). However, cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D in combination with GFP-MYO3AFL (2.2±0.3, n=8) showed a decrease in TCBR compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D alone (3.7±0.3, n=8, p<0.01, Tukey analysis, Figure D).
We then assayed the phosphomimic constructs for their ability to influence filopodial edge density (Figure F). There was a significant decrease in the filopodia edge density for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (0.012±0.0008 filopodia/mm, n=8) compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.018±0.002 filopodia/mm, n=8, p<0.04, Tukey analysis, Figure G). Coexpression of the mchr-constructs with kinase-functional GFP-MYO3AFL resulted in a statistically significant decrease in filopodial edge density for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.010± 0.001 filopodia/mm, n=8, p<0.003, Tukey analysis vs WT single-expressor) but not for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (0.008±0.001 filopodia/mm, n=8, p=0.1, Tukey analysis vs T908D single-expressor, Figure G). The same pattern was observed when comparing cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.020±0.002 filopodia/mm, n=8), mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D (0.015±0.0008 filopodia/mm, n=8, p<0.05, Tukey analysis vs WT), and mchr-MYO3AΔK coexpressed with GFP-MYO3AFL(0.008±0.0004 filopodia/mm, n=7, p<0.0001, Tukey analysis vs WT single-expressor, Figure H). Coexpression of mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D with GFP-MYO3AFL did not significantly decrease filopodial edge density compared to mchr-MYO3ADKT919D single-expressors (0.011±0.001 filopodia/mm, n=7, p=0.3, Tukey analysis, Figure H). Taken together, these data suggest that phosphoregulation of the MYO3A motor domain influences the ability of MYO3A-expressing cells to support the existence of actin protrusions by either stabilizing already-formed protrusions, or by stimulating protrusion initiation.
If MYO3A autophosphorylation is negatively-regulating protrusion-formation activity, then autophosphoregulation might be occurring at filopodial initiation sites on the inner surface of the plasma membrane. Such phosphorylation would not require MYO3A localization to tips of existing filopodia in order to autophosphorylate MYO3A molecules, and MYO3A kinase-alone truncations are capable of phosphorylating MYO3AΔK constructs in in vitro assays (Komaba et al., 2010; Quintero et al., 2010). To test the hypothesis that MYO3A phosphoregulation does not require motor activity to influence protrusion-initiation, we transfected COS7 cells with mchr-MYO3AΔK in combination with a kinase-domain-only truncation of MYO3A (GFP-MYO3AKIN). Unlike MYO3A constructs that contain an active motor domain (Quintero et al., 2010), GFP-MYO3AKIN does not concentrate at filopodial tips. Cotransfection of either GFP-MYO3AFL (2.5±0.4, n=5, p<0.002, Tukey analysis) or GFP-MYO3AKIN (3.1±0.1, n=5, p<0.02, Tukey analysis) with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in significant decrease in TCBR compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK alone (4.4±0.2, n=5, Figure E). Cotransfection of either GFP-MYO3AFL (0.017±0.005 filopodia/mm, n=5, p<0.007, Tukey analysis) or GFP-MYO3AKIN (0.021±0.003 filopodia/mm, n=5, p<0.02, Tukey analysis) with mchr-MYO3AΔK also resulted in significant decrease in filopodia edge density compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.042±0.005 filopodia/mm, n=5, Figure I). This implies that intermolecular phosphorylation can occur in cells independently of motor function, and in other compartments besides the tips of actin protrusions. Such phosphoregulation could control the density of actin protrusion initiation events by regulating the amount of active MYO3A at filopodial initiation patches on the inner surface of the plasma membrane.
To better understand the impact that T908 and T919 phosphorylation on actin/MYO3A interactions, we threaded the human MYO3A sequence to a model structure for the actomyosin interface (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010). Actomyosin interactions are partially dependent on electrostatic interactions between the two molecules, and this model predicted that both phosphorylation sites are likely positioned within the MYO3A/actin interface in close proximity to acidic patches containing aspartic acid residues D24 and D25 on actin (Figure J). Phosphorylation would then introduce negative charge near acidic residues, decreasing MYO3A’s affinity for actin, negatively influencing motor activity, and negatively impacting actin protrusion initiation. Previous in vitro studies of the MYO3A motor revealed that phosphorylation decreased steady-state actin affinity (Kactin), decreased maximal ATPase rate (kcat) and increased actin concentration required for half-maximal ATPase rate (KATPase), all indicators of decreased myosin function (Dosé et al., 2008; Komaba et al., 2010).
So far, we have only determined the individual effects of phosphorylation at T908 and T919 regions within the motor, and accumulation of phosphorylations could have additive effects. Future assays could determine whether double phosphorylation results in stronger inactivation of MYO3A filopodial initiation activity. Additionally, the generation of individual phosphonulls (T908A, T919A, and the double-phosphonull) could reveal whether these or other sites are responsible for regulating various MYO3A activities.
Since intermolecular autophosphorylation can occur in the absence of MYO3A motor activity, MYO3A kinase activity could regulate actin-based protrusion initiation by MYO3A at nascent filopodial initiation sites along the plasma membrane. We propose a new model for MYO3A-mediated protrusion initiation where the amount of MYO3A present at protrusion initiation sites is determined by concentration-dependent MYO3A autophosphorylation (Figure K). The higher the local MYO3A concentration, the more likely that the MYO3A in that cellular environment will phosphorylate each other. Active, unphosphorylated MYO3A collecting in patches at the membrane would induce actin protrusions, and as the local MYO3A concentration increased, MYO3A kinase activity would limit the concentration of active MYO3A available at the membrane to initiate a protrusion. Such a mechanism could regulate the size of protrusion initiation assemblies, influencing the density of actin-based protrusion at the periphery. Overexpression of human MYO3AΔK elongated hair cell stereocilia, and displayed atypical “floppiness” (Schneider et al., 2006), and elimination of kianse activity resulted in increased actin protrusions in cells that generate filopodia (Quintero et al., 2010, 2013) and microvilli (Raval et al., 2016). In this way, the presence of kinase activity could tune the motor domain’s activity, and control actin-protrusion initiation activity.
","references":[{"reference":"An BC, Sakai T, Komaba S, Kishi H, Kobayashi S, Kim JY, Ikebe R, Ikebe M. 2014. Phosphorylation of the Kinase Domain Regulates Autophosphorylation of Myosin IIIA and Its Translocation in Microvilli. Biochemistry. 53: 7835-7845. 14.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi501247z"},{"reference":"Attwell S, Mills J, Troussard A, Wu C, Dedhar S. 2003. Integration of Cell Attachment, Cytoskeletal Localization, and Signali ng by Integrin-linked Kinase (ILK), CH-ILKBP, and the Tumor Suppressor PTEN. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 4813-4825. 21.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.e03-05-0308"},{"reference":"Dose A, Lin Jones J, Burnside B. 2007. Class III Myosins. Myosins. 7: 265-287. 2.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Dose AC, Ananthanarayanan S, Moore JE, Corsa AC, Burnside B, Yengo CM. 2008. The kinase domain alters the kinetic properties of the myosin IIIA mot or. Biochemistry. 47: 2485-2496. 20.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi7021574"},{"reference":"Dose AC, Burnside B. 2000. Cloning and chromosomal localization of a human class III myosin. Genomics. 67: 333-342. 16.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1006/geno.2000.6256"},{"reference":"Dose AC, Hillman DW, Wong C, Sohlberg L, Lin Jones J, Burnside B. 2003. Myo3A, one of two class III myosin genes expressed in vertebrate retin a, is localized to the calycal processes of rod and cone photoreceptor s and is expressed in the sacculus. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 1058-1073. 6.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.e02-06-0317"},{"reference":"Gluzman Y. 1981. SV40-transformed simian cells support the replication of early SV40 mu tants. Cell. 23: 175-182. 22.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0092-8674(81)90282-8"},{"reference":"Hornbeck PV, Zhang B, Murray B, Kornhauser JM, Latham V, Skrzypek E. 2015. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Research. 43: D512-520. 17.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gku1267"},{"reference":"Komaba S, Watanabe S, Umeki N, Sato O, Ikebe M. 2010. Effect of Phosphorylation in the Motor Domain of Human Myosin IIIA on Its ATP Hydrolysis Cycle. Biochemistry. 49: 3695-3702. 18.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi902211w"},{"reference":"Les Erickson F, Corsa AC, Dose AC, Burnside B. 2003. Localization of a Class III Myosin to Filopodia Tips in Transfected He La Cells Requires an Actin-binding Site in its Tail Domain. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 4173-4180. 10.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.E02-10-0656"},{"reference":"Lorenz M, Holmes KC. 2010. The actin-myosin interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States o f America. 107: 12529-12534. 19.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1003604107"},{"reference":"Mecklenburg KL, Freed SA, Raval M, Quintero OA, Yengo CM, O Tousa JE. 2015. Invertebrate and vertebrate class III myosins interact with MORN repea t-containing adaptor proteins. PloS One. 10: e0122502. 9.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0122502"},{"reference":"Merritt RC, Manor U, Salles FT, Grati M, Dose AC, Unrath WC, et al., Kachar B. 2012. Myosin IIIB uses an actin-binding motif in its espin-1 cargo to reach the tips of actin protrusions. Current biology: CB. 22: 320-325. 7.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.053"},{"reference":"Montell C, Rubin GM. 1988. The Drosophila ninaC locus encodes two photoreceptor cell specific pro teins with domains homologous to protein kinases and the myosin heavy chain head. Cell. 52: 757-772. 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0092-8674(88)90413-8"},{"reference":"Ng KP, Kambara T, Matsuura M, Burke M, Ikebe M. 1996. Identification of myosin III as a protein kinase. Biochemistry. 35: 9392-9399. 3.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi960181a"},{"reference":"Powell HR, Islam SA, David A, Sternberg MJE. 2025. Phyre2.2: A Community Resource for Template-based Protein Structure Pr ediction. Journal of Molecular Biology. 437: 168960. 24.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmb.2025.168960"},{"reference":"Quintero OA, Moore JE, Unrath WC, Manor U, Salles FT, Grati M, Kachar B, Yengo CM. 2010. Intermolecular autophosphorylation regulates myosin IIIa activity and localization in parallel actin bundles. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 285: 35770-35782. 4.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M110.144360"},{"reference":"Quintero OA, Unrath WC, Stevens SM, Manor U, Kachar B, Yengo CM. 2013. Myosin 3A Kinase Activity Is Regulated by Phosphorylation of the Kinas e Domain Activation Loop. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 288: 37126-37137. 5.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M113.511014"},{"reference":"Raval MH, Quintero OA, Weck ML, Unrath WC, Gallagher JW, Cui R, et al., Yengo CM. 2016. Impact of the Motor and Tail Domains of Class III Myosins on Regulatin g the Formation and Elongation of Actin Protrusions. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 291: 22781-22792. 15.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M116.733741"},{"reference":"Salles FT, Merritt RC, Manor U, Dougherty GW, Sousa AD, Moore JE, et al., Kachar B. 2009. Myosin IIIa boosts elongation of stereocilia by transporting espin 1 t o the plus ends of actin filaments. Nature Cell Biology. 11: 443-450. 8.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1851"},{"reference":"Schindelin J, Arganda Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al., Cardona A. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 9: 676-682. 23.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nmeth.2019"},{"reference":"Schneider ME, Dose AC, Salles FT, Chang W, Erickson FL, Burnside B, Kachar B. 2006. A New Compartment at Stereocilia Tips Defined by Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Myosin IIIa Expression. The Journal of Neuroscience. 26: 10243-10252. 13.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2812-06.2006"},{"reference":"Walsh T, Walsh V, Vreugde S, Hertzano R, Shahin H, Haika S, et al., Avraham KB. 2002. From flies' eyes to our ears: Mutations in a human class III myosin ca use progressive nonsyndromic hearing loss DFNB30. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States o f America. 99: 7518-7523. 11.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.102091699"},{"reference":"Walsh VL, Raviv D, Dror AA, Shahin H, Walsh T, Kanaan MN, Avraham KB, King MC. 2011. A mouse model for human hearing loss DFNB30 due to loss of function of myosin IIIA. Mammalian Genome: Official Journal of the International Mammalian Geno me Society. 22: 170-177. 12.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00335-010-9310-6"}],"title":"Exploring phosphoregulation of MYO3A using quantitative fluorescence image analysis in COS7 cells
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Christopher Yengo"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"f8dffba5-3483-48a7-b12c-92bf492b5437","decision":"accept","abstract":"Myosin 3A is an unconventional myosin that contains a kinase domain, and is involved in the formation of hair-cell stereocilia. To investigate its regulatory roles, we mimicked phosphorylation in mchr-MYO3AΔK constructs and assayed their ability to influence filopodial properties in COS7 cells. The phosphomimics generated fewer filopodia. Coexpression of mchr-MYO3AΔK with a GFP-construct containing only the kinase domain also resulted in generation of fewer filopodia. Structural predictions suggest that the phosphorylation sites inhibit actin/MYO3A interactions. Taken together, these analyses link MYO3A phosphorylation with the regulation of its ability to create actin protrusions such as filopodia and stereocilia.
","acknowledgements":"(From VHMP) Thank you to the University of Richmond School of Arts & Science for funding and support, as without this, I do not think I would have been able to pursue this passion for science. Thank you to all the Q-Lab members, Chase Cristella, Anna Lozano, Joanna Mas, and Lillie Wendt whom I’ve had the honor of being a Q-labby with. Inside and outside of the lab, you guys have shown me how wonderful and whimsical life can be and I will truly miss seeing you guys around. Special shoutout to Lillie specifically for her immense artistic abilities and drawing Panel K. I would also like to thank Dr. Stacey Criswell for her never-ending patience and wonderful mentoring while teaching me how to use basically every microscope in Gottwald. You have allowed me to see the world in an entirely different way, and for that I am forever grateful. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Omar Quintero-Carmona, for without his influence and unconditional support, I don’t think I would have been able to find the same joy and fulfillment in science. In my time at University of Richmond, no words brought me greater joy than you asking me, “do you want to see some cells?”, and I will miss that dearly as I try to make you proud on this path you have helped set me on.
An extended preprint version of this study can be found on bioRXiv (Phan and Quintero-Carmona, 2026).
","authors":[{"affiliations":["University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"vu.phan@richmond.edu","firstName":"Vu M.N.","lastName":"Phan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"oquinter@richmond.edu","firstName":"Omar Alberto","lastName":"Quintero-Carmona","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9314-1704"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"The University of Richmond School of Arts & Sciences funded VMNP's summer research through “The Richmond Guarantee.” The University of Richmond Department of Biology funded academic-year independent research for VMNP. OAQ-C was funded by a University of Richmond Arts & Sciences Faculty Summer Research Fellowship.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/d7924ad345f4b43799b7005683524c82.png"},"imageCaption":"(A) A domain schematic of the constructs used in this study, where the size of the represented MYO3A domains is proportional to the number of amino acids in each region. Human MYO3A consists of a kinase domain (aa1-340), motor domain (aa352-1041), IQ motifs (aa1055-1375), tail homology domain I (THDI, aa1492-1553) and tail homology domain II (THDII, aa1595-1616). (B) Representative image of a range of filopodial tip-to-cell-body ratios (TCBR) in a cell expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. Image is shown using the “Fire” lookup table in FIJI. (C) While coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK displayed decreased TCBR, mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D did not show a decreased TCBR. (D) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D also displayed decreased TCBR. (E) Expression of either GFP-MYO3AFL or GFP-MYO3AKIN with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in a decreased TCBR. (F) Examples of cells displaying a higher (mchr-MYO3AΔK) and lower (mchr-MYO3AΔK coexpressed with GFP-MYO3AFL) filopodia edge density. (G) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density, as did mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D expression, compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. (H) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density, as did mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D expression, compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. (I) Expression of either GFP-MYO3AFL or GFP-MYO3AKIN with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. (J) Phyre2 modeling of the MYO3A/actin interface predicts that T908 and T919 (yellow) residues are in close proximity to D24 and D25 on actin (green). Addition of negative charges to T908 or T919 via phosphorylation would lead to weakened actin affinity and decreased MYO3A motor activity. (K) We propose a model where MYO3A kinase autophosphorylation modulates MYO3A-mediated filopodia filopodial initiation. Asterisks indicate p<0.05, Tukey analysis. In the graphs, each marker represents a \"biological replicate\" consisting of multiple cells, as defined in the \"Quantification and statistics\" section of the Methods.
","imageTitle":"Mimicking MYO3A motor phosphorylation alters COS7 cell filopodia properties
","methods":"Expression Plasmids
mchr-MYO3AΔK, GFP-MYO3AFL plasmids had been generated previously (Quintero et al., 2010). The phosphomimic mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D and mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D constructs were generated by performing site-directed mutagenesis on the mchr-MYO3AΔDK construct. The GFP-MYO3AKIN construct was generated using megaprimer PCR mutagenesis (Attwell et al., 2003) to move the human MYO3A kinase domain (amino acids 1-351) into pEGFP-N1 (Clontech). All expression plasmids were sequence-verified. A schematic of these constructs can be found in Figure 1A.
COS7 cell culture and transient transfection
COS7 (Gluzman, 1981) cells were cultured in growth media: DMEM high glucose (Gibco) that was supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Benchmark FBS, GeminiBio), and antibiotics (50U/mL penicillin, 50µg/mL streptomycin, Gibco). Cells were kept in a humidified incubator at 37°C, with a concentration of 5% CO2, and passaged using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco). In preparation for transfection, cells were plated onto acid-washed, 22mm2, #1.5 coverslips at a concentration of ~30,000 cells/coverslip (one coverslip per well in a six well dish) and then allowed to adhere overnight. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 3000, according to manufacturer’s protocol. For each sample well, 0.3µg of plasmid DNA was diluted into 125µL of Opti-MEM media (Invitrogen) without serum or antibiotics and mixed with 3µL of P3000 reagent. In a separate tube, 4µL of L3000 reagent was diluted into 125µL Opti-MEM. The two tubes were then combined, vortexed and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes prior to dropwise addition to the sample well. Following transfection, the cells were allowed to grow overnight (16-24h) prior to fixation and counterstaining. For co-transfections, a total of 0.6µg of plasmid DNA is used instead.
Fixed cell sample preparation and imaging
Samples were fixed for 20 minutes in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized for 5 mins in PBS containing 0.5% Trition X-100, and counterstained in PBS containing 6.6nM ALEXA647 phalloidin and 10nM DAPI for 30 minutes. The samples were then washed four times for 5 minutes with PBS. Coverslips were mounted onto slides with ProLong Glass Antifade and allowed to dry. Images were obtained using an Olympus IX-83 microscope with a 60x/1.4NA objective, Sutter shutters & filter wheels, Sedat quad filter set (Chroma), and a Hamamatsu ORCA Flash 4v2 camera. The microscopy hardware and image acquisition settings were controlled by Metamorph software. Typical exposures times were 200ms for ALEXA647 phalloidin and 300ms for GFP or mcherry fluorescence channels. Exposures ranged between 2-10ms for DAPI. Images were collected in all four channels for all treatment groups.
Tip to cell body ratio, filopodia density quantification, and analysis
FIJI was used for image analysis (Schindelin et al., 2012). The ratio of tip intensity to cell body intensity (TCBR) was calculated by using 4x4 pixel regions-of-interest to determine the intensity of the background (Ib), the filopodial tip (It), and the cell body (Icb). The ratio of the It to Icb was calculated after subtracting Ib from those measurements using the equation TCBR = (It-Ib)/(Icb-Ib).
Filopodia edge density was calculated from regions transfected cell periphery not in contact with other cells (free cell edge). Lengths of free cell edge were measured and the number of filopodia along those lengths were counted manually. Filopodia edge density is then calculated as the number of filopodia divided by the length of the measured free cell edge. TCBR and filopodial edge density for each experimental condition were averaged for each day with each day serving as a biological replicate. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA followed by a Tukey test based on the set of daily averages for each condition. Mean cell brightness was not significantly different between any of the mchr-tagged constructs, nor was mean cell brightness significantly different between any of the GFP-tagged constructs used in this study (Phan and Quintero-Carmona, 2026).
Phyre modeling
To predict the tertiary structure of MYO3A, amino acids 316-1616 of the human MYO3A sequence were submitted into the Protein Homology/analogy Recognition Engine (Phyre2.2) web server. Given the sequence, the engine uses homology identification and secondary structure prediction to determine structural homologues by a profile-profile alignment algorithm (Powell et al., 2025). High scoring alignments are then used to construct a proposed tertiary structure of the submitted sequence by comparison to structural databases. Alternatively, unknown structures can be fit directly to a specific, known structure, which was our approach. As the regions of myosins directly involved in the actin-binding interface were not well characterized in structures generated by X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy at the time that these studies were initially undertaken (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010), Phyre2 was used to predict the structure of the actin-interface of MYO3A through aligning the sequence of human MYO3A directly to the model of the actomyosin interface generated by Lorenz and Holmes (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010).
Quantification and statistics
Each condition of each cell-based assay was repeated independently 5 to 8 times--a biological replicate represented as \"n\". For TCBR, each biological replicate consisted of at least 10 cells with no more than 5 filopodia assayed per cell. At least 7 cells were measured for each biological replicate for filopodia edge density. Kaleidagraph 4.5 was used to calculate descriptive statistics and carry out the ANOVA with Tukey analysis. Quantification presented in the text are written as mean ± standard error of the mean.
Selection and preparation of sample images for publication
Sample images chosen for the figure were chosen as representations of the patterns observed in the quantified data. The software packages Metamorph, and FIJI were used to generate the pseudo-colored images included in the figures.
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Class III myosins are a key component of actin-based protrusions known as stereocilia. These structures are found in sensory epithelia, such as the inner ear. Initially characterized in Drosophila melanogaster and named NINAC (Montell & Rubin, 1988), class III myosins contain a conserved N-terminal kinase domain (Dosé et al., 2007) proposed to regulate the protein through autophosphorylation (Ng et al., 1996; Quintero et al., 2010, 2013). Two vertebrate isoforms (MYO3A and MYO3B) both localize to the tips of stereocilia (Dosé et al., 2003), and bind to stereocilia resident proteins like the ESPN1 (Merritt et al., 2012; Salles et al., 2009), MORN4 (Mecklenburg et al., 2015), and actin itself (Les Erickson et al., 2003). MYO3A is hypothesized to transport proteins along stereocilia and regulate stereocilia lengths (Dosé et al., 2003). Function-altering mutations in the MYO3A gene have been linked to nonsyndromic deafness DFNB30 (T. Walsh et al., 2002; Cirilo et al., 2024). Mouse lines modeling the DFNB30 mutation display age-dependent hearing loss due to degeneration of hair cell stereocilia (V. L. Walsh et al., 2011).
Immunostaining of MYO3A shows strong labeling of the tips of stereocilia and GFP-MYO3A constructs also show strong tip-localization (Schneider et al., 2006). Fluorescently-tagged MYO3A constructs localize to the tips of other actin-based protrusions such as filopodia (Les Erickson et al., 2003; Schneider et al., 2006) and microvilli (An et al., 2014; Raval et al., 2016) in multiple cultured cell types. Kinase domain deletion (MYO3AΔK) led to enhanced tip-localization of GFP-MYO3AΔK constructs in both hair cell stereocilia (Schneider et al., 2006) and COS7 cell filopodia (Salles et al., 2009). Additionally, introducing a kinase-inactivating mutation into full length GFP-MYO3A still led to tip localization in stereocilia and also led to enhanced tip localization in COS7 cell filopodia (Quintero et al., 2010). Ectopic expression of fluorescently-tagged MYO3AΔK constructs in COS7 cells results in an increase in the number of filopodia extending from the edge of the cell (Quintero et al., 2010). The MYO3A kinase domain is capable of intermolecular autophosphorylation in vitro (Komaba et al., 2003, 2010) and in cultured cells (Quintero et al., 2010). When kinase-functional GFP-MYO3AFL constructs are coexpressed with kinase-deleted mchr-MYO3AΔK constructs, the filopodial initiation phenotype is minimized (Quintero et al., 2010). One current model for MYO3A function imagines that autophosphorylation of the kinase domain happens at the tips of actin protrusions and controls the available concentration of MYO3A in that compartment by negatively influencing motor activity via autophosphorylation of the additional sequences in the MYO3A protein (Quintero et al., 2013).
Phosphoproteomic analysis of in vitro phosphorylated human MYO3A identified a number of putative phosphorylation sites—T184 in the kinase domain, and T908 & T919 in the motor domain (Quintero et al., 2013). The web resource, Phosphosite Plus, lists 18 additional putative phosphorylation sites spread across the entirety of the protein (Hornbeck et al., 2015). Although the consequences of phosphorylation of the MYO3A motor domain have been studied using in vitro steady-state assays and cell-based assays (Komaba et al., 2010; Quintero et al., 2013), the potential biological function of specific phosphorylation of T908 or T919 phosphorylation has yet to be investigated. To do so, we generated point mutations in mchr-MYO3AΔK construct to mimic phosphorylation, replacing threonine with aspartic acid (mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D and mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D, Figure 1A), and applied quantitative imaging techniques to elucidate the biological significance of such posttranslational modifications on actin protrusion-related functions of MYO3A. For the following experiments, the data represent multiple biological replicates or \"n.\" The number of cells and filopodia described by a replicate vary by experimental approach and are defined in the \"Quantification and statistics\" section of the Methods.
We assayed phosphomimic constructs for their ability to tip-localize in COS7 cell filopodia (Figure 1B), which do not express MYO3A endogenously and do not generate many filopodia. There was no difference in the tip to cell body ratio (TCBR) between cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (3.6±0.3, n=8) compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK (4.2±0.3, n=8, Figure 1C). Cotransfection of the mchr-constructs with GFP-MYO3AFL decreased the TCBR for cells coexpressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (2.4±0.4, n=7, p<0.001, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone) but not for cells coexpressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (3.1±0.3, n=8, p=0.06, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D alone, Figure 1C). However, cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D in combination with GFP-MYO3AFL (2.2±0.3, n=8) showed a decrease in TCBR compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D alone (3.7±0.3, n=8, p<0.01, Tukey analysis, Figure 1D). The differential behavior of the two phosphomimics could be due to biologically relevant differences in the impact of T908 phosphorylation versus T919 phosphorylation on MYO3A motor activity. Alternatively, the T to D substitution may be a poorer mimic of phosphorylation at T908 than at T919. It is also possible that, similar to actin polymerization, MYO3A-mediated filopodia initiation requires MYO3A concentrations above a critical concentration, so impacts on the amount of MYO3A at filopodia tips would be difficult to visualize in existing filopodia. In this instance, the impacts of phosphomimicry might be visible by measuring the number of filopodia generated by the cell.
We then assayed the phosphomimic constructs for their ability to influence filopodial edge density (Figure 1F). There was a significant decrease in the filopodia edge density for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (0.012±0.0008 filopodia/μm, n=8) compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.018±0.002 filopodia/μm, n=8, p<0.04, Tukey analysis, Figure 1G). Coexpression of the mchr-constructs with kinase-functional GFP-MYO3AFL resulted in a statistically significant decrease in filopodial edge density for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.010± 0.001 filopodia/μm, n=8, p<0.003, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone) but not for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (0.008±0.001 filopodia/μm, n=8, p=0.1, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D alone, Figure 1G). The same pattern was observed when comparing cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.020±0.002 filopodia/μm, n=8), mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D (0.015±0.0008 filopodia/μm, n=8, p<0.05, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone), and mchr-MYO3AΔK coexpressed with GFP-MYO3AFL (0.008±0.0004 filopodia/μm, n=7, p<0.0001, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone, Figure 1H). Coexpression of mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D with GFP-MYO3AFL did not significantly decrease filopodial edge density compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D alone (0.011±0.001 filopodia/μm, n=7, p=0.3, Tukey analysis, Figure 1H). Taken together, these data suggest that phosphoregulation may have related-but-distinct impacts depending on the specific residue. Overall, phosphorylation of the MYO3A motor domain influences the ability of MYO3A-expressing cells to support the existence of actin protrusions by either stabilizing already-formed protrusions, or by stimulating protrusion initiation.
If MYO3A autophosphorylation is negatively-regulating protrusion formation activity, then autophosphoregulation might be occurring at filopodial initiation sites on the inner surface of the plasma membrane. Such phosphorylation would not require MYO3A localization to tips of existing filopodia in order to autophosphorylate MYO3A molecules, and MYO3A kinase-alone truncations are capable of phosphorylating MYO3AΔK constructs in in vitro assays (Komaba et al., 2010; Quintero et al., 2010). To test the hypothesis that MYO3A phosphoregulation does not require motor activity to influence protrusion initiation, we transfected COS7 cells with mchr-MYO3AΔK in combination with a kinase-domain-only truncation of MYO3A (GFP-MYO3AKIN). Unlike MYO3A constructs that contain an active motor domain (Quintero et al., 2010), GFP-MYO3AKIN does not concentrate at filopodial tips. Cotransfection of either GFP-MYO3AFL (2.5±0.4, n=5, p<0.002, Tukey analysis) or GFP-MYO3AKIN (3.1±0.1, n=5, p<0.02, Tukey analysis) with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in significant decrease in TCBR compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK alone (4.4±0.2, n=5, Figure 1E). Cotransfection of either GFP-MYO3AFL (0.017±0.005 filopodia/μm, n=5, p<0.007, Tukey analysis) or GFP-MYO3AKIN (0.021±0.003 filopodia/μm, n=5, p<0.02, Tukey analysis) with mchr-MYO3AΔK also resulted in significant decrease in filopodia edge density compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.042±0.005 filopodia/μm, n=5, Figure 1I). This implies that intermolecular phosphorylation can occur in cells independently of motor function, and in other compartments besides the tips of actin protrusions. Such phosphoregulation could control the density of actin protrusion initiation events by regulating the amount of active MYO3A at filopodial initiation patches on the inner surface of the plasma membrane.
To better understand the impact that T908 and T919 phosphorylation on actin/MYO3A interactions, we threaded the human MYO3A sequence to a model structure for the actomyosin interface (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010). Actomyosin interactions are partially dependent on electrostatic interactions between the two molecules, and this model predicted that both phosphorylation sites are likely positioned within the MYO3A/actin interface in close proximity to acidic patches containing aspartic acid residues D24 and D25 on actin (Figure 1J). Phosphorylation would then introduce negative charge near acidic residues, decreasing MYO3A’s affinity for actin, negatively influencing motor activity, and negatively impacting actin protrusion initiation. Previous in vitro studies of the MYO3A motor revealed that phosphorylation decreased steady-state actin affinity (Kactin), decreased maximal ATPase rate (kcat) and increased actin concentration required for half-maximal ATPase rate (KATPase), all indicators of decreased myosin function (Dosé et al., 2008; Komaba et al., 2010).
So far, we have only determined the individual effects of phosphorylation at T908 and T919 regions within the motor, and accumulation of phosphorylations could have additive effects. Future assays could determine whether double phosphorylation results in stronger inactivation of MYO3A filopodial initiation activity. Additionally, the generation of individual phosphonulls (T908A, T919A, and the double-phosphonull) could reveal whether these or other sites are responsible for regulating various MYO3A activities.
Since intermolecular autophosphorylation can occur in the absence of MYO3A motor activity, MYO3A kinase activity could regulate actin-based protrusion initiation by MYO3A at nascent filopodial initiation sites along the plasma membrane. Where initial models of MYO3A phosphoregulation described activity at the tips of existing actin protrusions, we propose a refinement of the model where the amount of MYO3A available at protrusion initiation sites is determined by concentration-dependent MYO3A autophosphorylation prior to establishment of a protrusion and its corresponding tip (Figure 1K). As active, unphosphorylated MYO3A collecting in patches at the membrane would induce actin protrusions, and as the local MYO3A concentration increased, MYO3A kinase activity would limit the concentration of active MYO3A available at the membrane to initiate a protrusion. Such a mechanism could regulate the size of protrusion initiation assemblies, influencing the density of actin-based protrusion at the periphery. Overexpression of human MYO3AΔK elongated hair cell stereocilia, and displayed atypical “floppiness” (Schneider et al., 2006). Elimination of kinase activity resulted in increased actin protrusions in cells that generate filopodia (Quintero et al., 2010, 2013) and microvilli (Raval et al., 2016). In this way, the presence of kinase activity could tune the motor domain’s activity, controlling the cell's ability to generate actin protrusions.
","references":[{"reference":"An BC, Sakai T, Komaba S, Kishi H, Kobayashi S, Kim JY, Ikebe R, Ikebe M. 2014. Phosphorylation of the Kinase Domain Regulates Autophosphorylation of Myosin IIIA and Its Translocation in Microvilli. Biochemistry. 53: 7835-7845. 14.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi501247z"},{"reference":"Attwell S, Mills J, Troussard A, Wu C, Dedhar S. 2003. Integration of Cell Attachment, Cytoskeletal Localization, and Signaling by Integrin-linked Kinase (ILK), CH-ILKBP, and the Tumor Suppressor PTEN. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 4813-4825. 21.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.e03-05-0308"},{"reference":"Cirilo JA, Liao X, Perrin BJ, Yengo CM. 2024. The dynamics of actin protrusions can be controlled by tip-localized myosin motors. Journal of Biological Chemistry 300: 105516.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105516"},{"reference":"Dose A, Lin Jones J, Burnside B. 2007. Class III Myosins. Myosins. 7: 265-287. 2.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Dose AC, Ananthanarayanan S, Moore JE, Corsa AC, Burnside B, Yengo CM. 2008. The kinase domain alters the kinetic properties of the myosin IIIA motor. Biochemistry. 47: 2485-2496. 20.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi7021574"},{"reference":"Dose AC, Burnside B. 2000. Cloning and chromosomal localization of a human class III myosin. Genomics. 67: 333-342. 16.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1006/geno.2000.6256"},{"reference":"Dose AC, Hillman DW, Wong C, Sohlberg L, Lin Jones J, Burnside B. 2003. Myo3A, one of two class III myosin genes expressed in vertebrate retina, is localized to the calycal processes of rod and cone photoreceptor s and is expressed in the sacculus. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 1058-1073. 6.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.e02-06-0317"},{"reference":"Gluzman Y. 1981. SV40-transformed simian cells support the replication of early SV40 mutants. Cell. 23: 175-182. 22.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0092-8674(81)90282-8"},{"reference":"Hornbeck PV, Zhang B, Murray B, Kornhauser JM, Latham V, Skrzypek E. 2015. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Research. 43: D512-520. 17.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gku1267"},{"reference":"Komaba S, Watanabe S, Umeki N, Sato O, Ikebe M. 2010. Effect of Phosphorylation in the Motor Domain of Human Myosin IIIA on Its ATP Hydrolysis Cycle. Biochemistry. 49: 3695-3702. 18.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi902211w"},{"reference":"Les Erickson F, Corsa AC, Dose AC, Burnside B. 2003. Localization of a Class III Myosin to Filopodia Tips in Transfected HeLa Cells Requires an Actin-binding Site in its Tail Domain. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 4173-4180. 10.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.E02-10-0656"},{"reference":"Lorenz M, Holmes KC. 2010. The actin-myosin interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107: 12529-12534. 19.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1003604107"},{"reference":"Mecklenburg KL, Freed SA, Raval M, Quintero OA, Yengo CM, O Tousa JE. 2015. Invertebrate and vertebrate class III myosins interact with MORN repeat-containing adaptor proteins. PloS One. 10: e0122502. 9.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0122502"},{"reference":"Merritt RC, Manor U, Salles FT, Grati M, Dose AC, Unrath WC, et al., Kachar B. 2012. Myosin IIIB uses an actin-binding motif in its espin-1 cargo to reach the tips of actin protrusions. Current Biology: CB. 22: 320-325. 7.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.053"},{"reference":"Montell C, Rubin GM. 1988. The Drosophila ninaC locus encodes two photoreceptor cell specific proteins with domains homologous to protein kinases and the myosin heavy chain head. Cell. 52: 757-772. 1.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0092-8674(88)90413-8"},{"reference":"Ng KP, Kambara T, Matsuura M, Burke M, Ikebe M. 1996. Identification of myosin III as a protein kinase. Biochemistry. 35: 9392-9399. 3.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi960181a"},{"reference":"Phan VHMN, Quintero-Carmona OA. 2026. Exploring phosphoregulation of MYO3A using quantitative fluorescence image analysis in COS7 cells. BioRxiv : 10.64898/2026.05.05.723000.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.64898/2026.05.05.723000"},{"reference":"Powell HR, Islam SA, David A, Sternberg MJE. 2025. Phyre2.2: A Community Resource for Template-based Protein Structure Prediction. Journal of Molecular Biology. 437: 168960. 24.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmb.2025.168960"},{"reference":"Quintero OA, Moore JE, Unrath WC, Manor U, Salles FT, Grati M, Kachar B, Yengo CM. 2010. Intermolecular autophosphorylation regulates myosin IIIa activity and localization in parallel actin bundles. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 285: 35770-35782. 4.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M110.144360"},{"reference":"Quintero OA, Unrath WC, Stevens SM, Manor U, Kachar B, Yengo CM. 2013. Myosin 3A Kinase Activity Is Regulated by Phosphorylation of the Kinase Domain Activation Loop. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 288: 37126-37137. 5.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M113.511014"},{"reference":"Raval MH, Quintero OA, Weck ML, Unrath WC, Gallagher JW, Cui R, et al., Yengo CM. 2016. Impact of the Motor and Tail Domains of Class III Myosins on Regulating the Formation and Elongation of Actin Protrusions. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 291: 22781-22792. 15.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M116.733741"},{"reference":"Salles FT, Merritt RC, Manor U, Dougherty GW, Sousa AD, Moore JE, et al., Kachar B. 2009. Myosin IIIa boosts elongation of stereocilia by transporting espin1 to the plus ends of actin filaments. Nature Cell Biology. 11: 443-450. 8.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1851"},{"reference":"Schindelin J, Arganda Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al., Cardona A. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 9: 676-682. 23.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nmeth.2019"},{"reference":"Schneider ME, Dose AC, Salles FT, Chang W, Erickson FL, Burnside B, Kachar B. 2006. A New Compartment at Stereocilia Tips Defined by Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Myosin IIIa Expression. The Journal of Neuroscience. 26: 10243-10252. 13.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2812-06.2006"},{"reference":"Walsh T, Walsh V, Vreugde S, Hertzano R, Shahin H, Haika S, et al., Avraham KB. 2002. From flies' eyes to our ears: Mutations in a human class III myosin cause progressive nonsyndromic hearing loss DFNB30. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States o f America. 99: 7518-7523. 11.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.102091699"},{"reference":"Walsh VL, Raviv D, Dror AA, Shahin H, Walsh T, Kanaan MN, Avraham KB, King MC. 2011. A mouse model for human hearing loss DFNB30 due to loss of function of myosin IIIA. Mammalian Genome: Official Journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society. 22: 170-177. 12.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00335-010-9310-6"}],"title":"Exploring phosphoregulation of MYO3A using quantitative fluorescence image analysis in COS7 cells
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"d236dfd3-ebac-4c54-b04a-d17c7b4a60d9","decision":"edit","abstract":"Myosin IIIA is an unconventional myosin that contains a kinase domain, and is involved in the formation of hair-cell stereocilia. To investigate its regulatory roles, we mimicked phosphorylation in mchr-MYO3AΔK constructs and assayed their ability to influence filopodial properties in COS7 cells. The phosphomimics generated fewer filopodia. Coexpression of mchr-MYO3AΔK with a GFP-construct containing only the MYO3A kinase domain also resulted in generation of fewer filopodia. Structural predictions suggest that the phosphorylation sites inhibit actin/MYO3A interactions. Taken together, these analyses link MYO3A phosphorylation with the regulation of its ability to create actin protrusions such as filopodia and stereocilia.
","acknowledgements":"(From VHMP) Thank you to the University of Richmond School of Arts & Science for funding and support, as without this, I do not think I would have been able to pursue this passion for science. Thank you to all the Q-Lab members, Chase Cristella, Anna Lozano, Joanna Mas, and Lillie Wendt whom I’ve had the honor of being a Q-labby with. Inside and outside of the lab, you guys have shown me how wonderful and whimsical life can be and I will truly miss seeing you guys around. Special shoutout to Lillie specifically for her immense artistic abilities and drawing Panel K. I would also like to thank Dr. Stacey Criswell for her never-ending patience and wonderful mentoring while teaching me how to use basically every microscope in Gottwald. You have allowed me to see the world in an entirely different way, and for that I am forever grateful. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Omar Quintero-Carmona, for without his influence and unconditional support, I don’t think I would have been able to find the same joy and fulfillment in science. In my time at University of Richmond, no words brought me greater joy than you asking me, “do you want to see some cells?”, and I will miss that dearly as I try to make you proud on this path you have helped set me on.
An extended preprint version of this study can be found on bioRXiv (Phan and Quintero-Carmona, 2026).
","authors":[{"affiliations":["University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"vu.phan@richmond.edu","firstName":"Vu M.N.","lastName":"Phan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"oquinter@richmond.edu","firstName":"Omar Alberto","lastName":"Quintero-Carmona","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9314-1704"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"The University of Richmond School of Arts & Sciences funded VMNP's summer research through “The Richmond Guarantee.” The University of Richmond Department of Biology funded academic-year independent research for VMNP. OAQ-C was funded by a University of Richmond Arts & Sciences Faculty Summer Research Fellowship.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/2ab8dbce9bd9f9c03f90fe826f2d8797.png"},"imageCaption":"(A) A domain schematic of the constructs used in this study, where the size of the represented MYO3A domains is proportional to the number of amino acids in each region. Human MYO3A consists of a kinase domain (aa1-340), motor domain (aa352-1041), IQ motifs (aa1055-1375), tail homology domain I (THDI, aa1492-1553) and tail homology domain II (THDII, aa1595-1616). (B) Representative image of a range of filopodial tip-to-cell-body ratios (TCBR) in a cell expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. Image is shown using the “Fire” lookup table in FIJI. (C) While coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK displayed decreased TCBR, mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D did not show a decreased TCBR. (D) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D also displayed decreased TCBR. (E) Expression of either GFP-MYO3AFL or GFP-MYO3AKIN with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in a decreased TCBR. (F) Examples of cells displaying a higher (mchr-MYO3AΔK) and lower (mchr-MYO3AΔK coexpressed with GFP-MYO3AFL) filopodia edge density. (G) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density, as did mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D expression, compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. (H) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density, as did mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D expression, compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. (I) Expression of either GFP-MYO3AFL or GFP-MYO3AKIN with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK alone. (J) Phyre2 modeling of the MYO3A/actin interface predicts that T908 and T919 (yellow) residues are in close proximity to D24 and D25 on actin (green). Addition of negative charges to T908 or T919 via phosphorylation would lead to weakened actin affinity and decreased MYO3A motor activity. (K) We propose a model where MYO3A kinase autophosphorylation modulates MYO3A-mediated filopodia initiation. Asterisks indicate p<0.05, Tukey analysis. In the graphs, each marker represents a \"biological replicate\" consisting of multiple cells, as defined in the \"Quantification and statistics\" section of the Methods.
","imageTitle":"Mimicking MYO3A motor phosphorylation alters COS7 cell filopodia properties
","methods":"Expression Plasmids
mchr-MYO3AΔK, GFP-MYO3AFL plasmids had been generated previously (Quintero et al., 2010). The phosphomimic mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D and mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D constructs were generated by performing site-directed mutagenesis on the mchr-MYO3AΔK construct. The GFP-MYO3AKIN construct was generated using megaprimer PCR mutagenesis (Attwell et al., 2003) to move the human MYO3A kinase domain (amino acids 1-351) into pEGFP-N1 (Clontech). All expression plasmids were sequence-verified. A schematic of these constructs can be found in Figure 1A.
COS7 cell culture and transient transfection
COS7 (Gluzman, 1981) cells were cultured in growth media: DMEM high glucose (Gibco) that was supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Benchmark FBS, GeminiBio), and antibiotics (50U/mL penicillin, 50µg/mL streptomycin, Gibco). Cells were kept in a humidified incubator at 37°C, with a 5% CO2 atmosphere, and passaged using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco). In preparation for transfection, cells were plated onto acid-washed, 22mm2, #1.5 coverslips at a concentration of ~30,000 cells/coverslip (one coverslip per well in a six well dish) and then allowed to adhere overnight. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 3000, according to manufacturer’s protocol. For each sample well, 0.3µg of plasmid DNA was diluted into 125µL of Opti-MEM media (Invitrogen) without serum or antibiotics and mixed with 3µL of P3000 reagent. In a separate tube, 4µL of L3000 reagent was diluted into 125µL Opti-MEM. The two tubes were then combined, vortexed and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes prior to dropwise addition to the sample well. Following transfection, the cells were allowed to grow overnight (16-24h) prior to fixation and counterstaining. For co-transfections, a total of 0.6µg of plasmid DNA is used instead (0.3µg of each plasmid).
Fixed cell sample preparation and imaging
Samples were fixed for 20 minutes in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized for 5 mins in PBS containing 0.5% Trition X-100, and counterstained in PBS containing 6.6nM ALEXA647 phalloidin and 10nM DAPI for 30 minutes. The samples were then washed four times for 5 minutes with PBS. Coverslips were mounted onto slides with ProLong Glass Antifade and allowed to dry. Images were obtained using an Olympus IX-83 microscope with a 60x/1.4NA objective, Sutter shutters & filter wheels, Sedat quad filter set (Chroma), and a Hamamatsu ORCA Flash 4v2 camera. The microscopy hardware and image acquisition settings were controlled by Metamorph software. Typical exposures times were 200ms for ALEXA647 phalloidin and 300ms for GFP and mcherry fluorescence channels. Exposures ranged between 2-10ms for DAPI. Images were collected in all four channels for all treatment groups.
Tip to cell body ratio, filopodia density quantification, and analysis
FIJI was used for image analysis (Schindelin et al., 2012). The ratio of tip intensity to cell body intensity (TCBR) was calculated by using 4x4 pixel regions-of-interest to determine the intensity of the background adjacent to the filopodium (Ib), the filopodial tip (It), and the cell body (Icb). The ratio of the It to Icb was calculated after subtracting Ib from those measurements using the equation TCBR = (It-Ib)/(Icb-Ib).
Filopodia edge density was calculated from regions of a transfected cell's periphery not in contact with other cells (free cell edge). Lengths of free cell edge were measured and the number of filopodia along those lengths were counted manually. Filopodia edge density is then calculated as the number of filopodia divided by the length of the measured free cell edge.
Mean cell brightness was not significantly different between any of the mchr-tagged constructs, nor was mean cell brightness significantly different between any of the GFP-tagged constructs used in this study (Phan and Quintero-Carmona, 2026).
Phyre modeling
To predict the tertiary structure of MYO3A, amino acids 316-1616 of the human MYO3A sequence were submitted into the Protein Homology/analogy Recognition Engine (Phyre2.2) web server. Given the sequence, the engine uses homology identification and secondary structure prediction to determine structural homologues by a profile-profile alignment algorithm (Powell et al., 2025). High scoring alignments are then used to construct a proposed tertiary structure of the submitted sequence by comparison to structural databases. Alternatively, unknown structures can be fit directly to a specific, known structure, which was our approach. As the regions of myosins directly involved in the actin-binding interface were not well characterized in structures generated by X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy at the time that these studies were initially undertaken (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010), Phyre2 was used to predict the structure of the actin-interface of MYO3A through aligning the sequence of human MYO3A directly to the model of the actomyosin interface generated by Lorenz and Holmes (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010).
Quantification and statistics
Each condition of each cell-based assay was repeated independently 5 to 8 times--a biological replicate represented as \"n\". For each experimental condition, multiple measurements were averaged for each day with each day serving as a biological replicate. For TCBR, each biological replicate consisted of at least 10 cells with no more than 5 filopodia assayed per cell. At least 7 cells were measured for each biological replicate for filopodia edge density.
Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA followed by a Tukey test based on the set of biological replicates for each condition. Kaleidagraph 4.5 was used to calculate descriptive statistics and carry out the ANOVA with Tukey analysis. Quantification presented in the text are written as mean ± standard error of the mean.
Selection and preparation of sample images for publication
Sample images chosen for the figure were chosen as representations of the patterns observed in the quantified data. The software packages Metamorph, and FIJI were used to generate the pseudo-colored images included in the figures.
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Class III myosins are a key component of actin-based protrusions known as stereocilia. These structures are found in sensory epithelia, such as the inner ear. Initially characterized in Drosophila melanogaster and named NINAC (Montell & Rubin, 1988), class III myosins contain a conserved N-terminal kinase domain (Dosé et al., 2007) proposed to regulate the protein through autophosphorylation (Ng et al., 1996; Quintero et al., 2010, 2013). Two vertebrate isoforms (MYO3A and MYO3B) both localize to the tips of stereocilia (Dosé et al., 2003), and bind to stereocilia resident proteins like the ESPN1 (Merritt et al., 2012; Salles et al., 2009), MORN4 (Mecklenburg et al., 2015), and actin itself (Les Erickson et al., 2003). MYO3A is hypothesized to transport proteins along stereocilia and regulate stereocilia lengths (Dosé et al., 2003). Function-altering mutations in the MYO3A gene have been linked to nonsyndromic deafness DFNB30 (T. Walsh et al., 2002; Cirilo et al., 2024). Mouse lines modeling the DFNB30 mutation display age-dependent hearing loss due to degeneration of hair cell stereocilia (V. L. Walsh et al., 2011).
Immunostaining of MYO3A shows strong labeling of the tips of stereocilia and GFP-MYO3A constructs also show strong tip-localization (Schneider et al., 2006). Fluorescently-tagged MYO3A constructs localize to the tips of other actin-based protrusions such as filopodia (Les Erickson et al., 2003; Schneider et al., 2006) and microvilli (An et al., 2014; Raval et al., 2016) in multiple cultured cell types. Kinase domain deletion (MYO3AΔK) led to enhanced tip-localization of GFP-MYO3AΔK constructs in both hair cell stereocilia (Schneider et al., 2006) and COS7 cell filopodia (Salles et al., 2009). Additionally, introducing a kinase-inactivating mutation into full length GFP-MYO3A still led to tip localization in stereocilia and also led to enhanced tip localization in COS7 cell filopodia (Quintero et al., 2010). Ectopic expression of fluorescently-tagged MYO3AΔK constructs in COS7 cells results in an increase in the number of filopodia extending from the edge of the cell (Quintero et al., 2010). The MYO3A kinase domain is capable of intermolecular autophosphorylation in vitro (Komaba et al., 2003, 2010) and in cultured cells (Quintero et al., 2010). When kinase-functional GFP-MYO3AFL constructs are coexpressed with kinase-deleted mchr-MYO3AΔK constructs, the filopodial initiation phenotype is minimized (Quintero et al., 2010). One current model for MYO3A function imagines that autophosphorylation of the kinase domain happens at the tips of actin protrusions and controls the available concentration of MYO3A in that compartment by negatively influencing activity via additional autophosphorylation of the motor (Quintero et al., 2013).
Phosphoproteomic analysis of in vitro phosphorylated human MYO3A identified a number of putative phosphorylation sites—T184 in the kinase domain, and T908 & T919 in the motor domain (Quintero et al., 2013). The web resource, Phosphosite Plus, lists 18 additional putative phosphorylation sites spread across the entirety of the protein (Hornbeck et al., 2015). Although the consequences of phosphorylation of the MYO3A motor domain have been studied using in vitro steady-state assays and cell-based assays (Komaba et al., 2010; Quintero et al., 2013), the potential biological function of specific phosphorylation at T908 or T919 has yet to be investigated. To do so, we generated point mutations in mchr-MYO3AΔK construct to mimic phosphorylation, replacing threonine with aspartic acid (mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D and mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D, Figure 1A), and applied quantitative imaging techniques to elucidate the biological significance of such posttranslational modifications on actin protrusion-related functions of MYO3A. For the following experiments, the data represent multiple biological replicates or \"n.\" The number of cells and filopodia described by a replicate depend on experimental approach as defined in the Methods section, \"Quantification and statistics.\"
We assayed phosphomimic constructs for their ability to tip-localize in COS7 cell filopodia (Figure 1B), which do not express MYO3A endogenously and do not generate many filopodia. There was no difference in the tip to cell body ratio (TCBR) between cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (3.6±0.3, n=8) compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK (4.2±0.3, n=8, Figure 1C). Cotransfection of the mchr-constructs with GFP-MYO3AFL decreased the TCBR for cells coexpressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (2.4±0.4, n=7, p<0.001, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone) but not for cells coexpressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (3.1±0.3, n=8, p=0.06, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D alone, Figure 1C). However, cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D in combination with GFP-MYO3AFL (2.2±0.3, n=8) showed a decrease in TCBR compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D alone (3.7±0.3, n=8, p<0.01, Tukey analysis, Figure 1D). The differential behavior of the two phosphomimics could be due to biologically relevant differences in the impact of T908 phosphorylation versus T919 phosphorylation on MYO3A motor activity. Alternatively, the T to D substitution may be a poorer mimic of phosphorylation at T908 than at T919. It is also possible that, similar to actin polymerization, MYO3A-mediated filopodia initiation requires MYO3A concentrations above a critical concentration, so impacts on the amount of MYO3A at filopodia tips would be difficult to visualize in existing filopodia. In this instance, the impacts of phosphomimicry might be visible by measuring the number of filopodia generated by the cell.
We then assayed the phosphomimic constructs for their ability to influence filopodial edge density (Figure 1F). There was a significant decrease in the filopodia edge density for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (0.012±0.001 filopodia/μm, n=8) compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.018±0.002 filopodia/μm, n=8, p<0.04, Tukey analysis, Figure 1G). Coexpression of the mchr-constructs with kinase-functional GFP-MYO3AFL resulted in a statistically significant decrease in filopodial edge density for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.010± 0.001 filopodia/μm, n=8, p<0.003, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone) but not for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (0.008±0.001 filopodia/μm, n=8, p=0.1, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D alone, Figure 1G). The same pattern was observed when comparing cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.020±0.002 filopodia/μm, n=8), mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D (0.015±0.001 filopodia/μm, n=8, p<0.05, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone), and mchr-MYO3AΔK coexpressed with GFP-MYO3AFL (0.008±0.0004 filopodia/μm, n=7, p<0.0001, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone, Figure 1H). Coexpression of mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D with GFP-MYO3AFL did not significantly decrease filopodial edge density compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D alone (0.011±0.001 filopodia/μm, n=7, p=0.3, Tukey analysis, Figure 1H). Taken together, these data suggest that phosphoregulation may have related-but-distinct impacts depending on the specific residue. Overall, phosphorylation of the MYO3A motor domain influences the ability of MYO3A-expressing cells to maintain actin protrusions by either stabilizing already-formed protrusions, or by stimulating protrusion initiation.
If MYO3A autophosphorylation is negatively-regulating protrusion formation activity, then autophosphoregulation might be occurring at filopodial initiation sites on the inner surface of the plasma membrane. Such phosphorylation would not require MYO3A localization to tips of existing filopodia in order to autophosphorylate MYO3A molecules, and MYO3A kinase-alone truncations are capable of phosphorylating MYO3AΔK constructs in in vitro assays (Komaba et al., 2010; Quintero et al., 2010). To test the hypothesis that MYO3A phosphoregulation does not require motor activity to influence protrusion initiation, we transfected COS7 cells with mchr-MYO3AΔK in combination with a kinase-domain-only truncation of MYO3A (GFP-MYO3AKIN). Unlike MYO3A constructs that contain an active motor domain (Quintero et al., 2010), GFP-MYO3AKIN does not concentrate at filopodial tips. Cotransfection of either GFP-MYO3AFL (2.5±0.4, n=5, p<0.002, Tukey analysis) or GFP-MYO3AKIN (3.1±0.1, n=5, p<0.02, Tukey analysis) with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in significant decrease in TCBR compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK alone (4.4±0.2, n=5, Figure 1E). Cotransfection of either GFP-MYO3AFL (0.017±0.005 filopodia/μm, n=5, p<0.007, Tukey analysis) or GFP-MYO3AKIN (0.021±0.003 filopodia/μm, n=5, p<0.02, Tukey analysis) with mchr-MYO3AΔK also resulted in significant decrease in filopodia edge density compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.042±0.005 filopodia/μm, n=5, Figure 1I). This implies that intermolecular phosphorylation can occur in cells independently of motor function, and in other compartments besides the tips of actin protrusions. Such phosphoregulation could control the density of actin protrusion initiation events by regulating the amount of active MYO3A at filopodial initiation patches on the inner surface of the plasma membrane.
To better understand the impact of T908 and T919 phosphorylation on actin/MYO3A interactions, we threaded the human MYO3A sequence to a model structure for the actomyosin interface (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010). Actomyosin interactions are partially dependent on electrostatic interactions between the two molecules, and this model predicted that both phosphorylation sites are likely positioned in close proximity to acidic patches on actin containing aspartic acid residues D24 and D25 (Figure 1J). Phosphorylation would then introduce negative charge near acidic residues, decreasing MYO3A’s affinity for actin, negatively influencing motor activity, and negatively impacting actin protrusion initiation. Previous in vitro studies of the MYO3A motor revealed that phosphorylation decreased steady-state actin affinity (Kactin), decreased maximal ATPase rate (kcat) and increased actin concentration required for half-maximal ATPase rate (KATPase)--all indicators of decreased myosin function (Dosé et al., 2008; Komaba et al., 2010).
So far, we have only determined the individual effects of phosphorylation at T908 and T919, and accumulation of phosphorylations could have additive effects. Future assays could determine whether double phosphorylation results in stronger inactivation of MYO3A filopodial initiation activity. Additionally, the generation of individual phosphonulls (T908A, T919A, and the double-phosphonull) could reveal whether these or other sites are responsible for regulating additional MYO3A activities.
Since intermolecular autophosphorylation can occur in the absence of MYO3A motor activity, MYO3A kinase activity could regulate actin-based protrusion initiation by MYO3A at nascent filopodial initiation sites along the plasma membrane. Where initial models of MYO3A phosphoregulation described activity at the tips of existing actin protrusions, we propose a refinement of the model where the amount of MYO3A available at protrusion initiation sites is determined by concentration-dependent MYO3A autophosphorylation prior to extension of a protrusion and its corresponding tip (Figure 1K). As active, unphosphorylated MYO3A collecting in patches at the membrane would induce actin protrusions, and as the local MYO3A concentration increased, MYO3A kinase activity would limit the concentration of active MYO3A available at the membrane to initiate protrusion. Such a mechanism could regulate the size of protrusion initiation assemblies, influencing the density of actin-based protrusions at the periphery. Overexpression of human MYO3AΔK elongated hair cell stereocilia, and displayed atypical “floppiness” (Schneider et al., 2006). Elimination of kinase activity resulted in increased actin protrusions in cells that generate filopodia (Quintero et al., 2010, 2013) and microvilli (Raval et al., 2016). In this way, the presence of kinase activity could tune the motor domain’s activity, controlling the cell's ability to generate actin protrusions.
","references":[{"reference":"An BC, Sakai T, Komaba S, Kishi H, Kobayashi S, Kim JY, Ikebe R, Ikebe M. 2014. Phosphorylation of the Kinase Domain Regulates Autophosphorylation of Myosin IIIA and Its Translocation in Microvilli. Biochemistry. 53: 7835-7845. 14.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi501247z"},{"reference":"Attwell S, Mills J, Troussard A, Wu C, Dedhar S. 2003. Integration of Cell Attachment, Cytoskeletal Localization, and Signaling by Integrin-linked Kinase (ILK), CH-ILKBP, and the Tumor Suppressor PTEN. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 4813-4825. 21.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.e03-05-0308"},{"reference":"Cirilo JA, Liao X, Perrin BJ, Yengo CM. 2024. The dynamics of actin protrusions can be controlled by tip-localized myosin motors. Journal of Biological Chemistry 300: 105516.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105516"},{"reference":"Dose A, Lin Jones J, Burnside B. 2007. Class III Myosins. Myosins. 7: 265-287. 2.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Dose AC, Ananthanarayanan S, Moore JE, Corsa AC, Burnside B, Yengo CM. 2008. The kinase domain alters the kinetic properties of the myosin IIIA motor. Biochemistry. 47: 2485-2496. 20.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi7021574"},{"reference":"Dose AC, Burnside B. 2000. Cloning and chromosomal localization of a human class III myosin. Genomics. 67: 333-342. 16.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1006/geno.2000.6256"},{"reference":"Dose AC, Hillman DW, Wong C, Sohlberg L, Lin Jones J, Burnside B. 2003. Myo3A, one of two class III myosin genes expressed in vertebrate retina, is localized to the calycal processes of rod and cone photoreceptor s and is expressed in the sacculus. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 1058-1073. 6.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.e02-06-0317"},{"reference":"Gluzman Y. 1981. SV40-transformed simian cells support the replication of early SV40 mutants. Cell. 23: 175-182. 22.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0092-8674(81)90282-8"},{"reference":"Hornbeck PV, Zhang B, Murray B, Kornhauser JM, Latham V, Skrzypek E. 2015. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Research. 43: D512-520. 17.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gku1267"},{"reference":"Komaba S, Watanabe S, Umeki N, Sato O, Ikebe M. 2010. Effect of Phosphorylation in the Motor Domain of Human Myosin IIIA on Its ATP Hydrolysis Cycle. Biochemistry. 49: 3695-3702. 18.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi902211w"},{"reference":"Les Erickson F, Corsa AC, Dose AC, Burnside B. 2003. Localization of a Class III Myosin to Filopodia Tips in Transfected HeLa Cells Requires an Actin-binding Site in its Tail Domain. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 4173-4180. 10.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.E02-10-0656"},{"reference":"Lorenz M, Holmes KC. 2010. The actin-myosin interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107: 12529-12534. 19.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1003604107"},{"reference":"Mecklenburg KL, Freed SA, Raval M, Quintero OA, Yengo CM, O Tousa JE. 2015. Invertebrate and vertebrate class III myosins interact with MORN repeat-containing adaptor proteins. PloS One. 10: e0122502. 9.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0122502"},{"reference":"Merritt RC, Manor U, Salles FT, Grati M, Dose AC, Unrath WC, et al., Kachar B. 2012. Myosin IIIB uses an actin-binding motif in its espin-1 cargo to reach the tips of actin protrusions. Current Biology: CB. 22: 320-325. 7.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.053"},{"reference":"Montell C, Rubin GM. 1988. The Drosophila ninaC locus encodes two photoreceptor cell specific proteins with domains homologous to protein kinases and the myosin heavy chain head. Cell. 52: 757-772. 1.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0092-8674(88)90413-8"},{"reference":"Ng KP, Kambara T, Matsuura M, Burke M, Ikebe M. 1996. Identification of myosin III as a protein kinase. Biochemistry. 35: 9392-9399. 3.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi960181a"},{"reference":"Phan VHMN, Quintero-Carmona OA. 2026. Exploring phosphoregulation of MYO3A using quantitative fluorescence image analysis in COS7 cells. BioRxiv : 10.64898/2026.05.05.723000.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.64898/2026.05.05.723000"},{"reference":"Powell HR, Islam SA, David A, Sternberg MJE. 2025. Phyre2.2: A Community Resource for Template-based Protein Structure Prediction. Journal of Molecular Biology. 437: 168960. 24.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmb.2025.168960"},{"reference":"Quintero OA, Moore JE, Unrath WC, Manor U, Salles FT, Grati M, Kachar B, Yengo CM. 2010. Intermolecular autophosphorylation regulates myosin IIIa activity and localization in parallel actin bundles. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 285: 35770-35782. 4.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M110.144360"},{"reference":"Quintero OA, Unrath WC, Stevens SM, Manor U, Kachar B, Yengo CM. 2013. Myosin 3A Kinase Activity Is Regulated by Phosphorylation of the Kinase Domain Activation Loop. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 288: 37126-37137. 5.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M113.511014"},{"reference":"Raval MH, Quintero OA, Weck ML, Unrath WC, Gallagher JW, Cui R, et al., Yengo CM. 2016. Impact of the Motor and Tail Domains of Class III Myosins on Regulating the Formation and Elongation of Actin Protrusions. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 291: 22781-22792. 15.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M116.733741"},{"reference":"Salles FT, Merritt RC, Manor U, Dougherty GW, Sousa AD, Moore JE, et al., Kachar B. 2009. Myosin IIIa boosts elongation of stereocilia by transporting espin1 to the plus ends of actin filaments. Nature Cell Biology. 11: 443-450. 8.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1851"},{"reference":"Schindelin J, Arganda Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al., Cardona A. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 9: 676-682. 23.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nmeth.2019"},{"reference":"Schneider ME, Dose AC, Salles FT, Chang W, Erickson FL, Burnside B, Kachar B. 2006. A New Compartment at Stereocilia Tips Defined by Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Myosin IIIa Expression. The Journal of Neuroscience. 26: 10243-10252. 13.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2812-06.2006"},{"reference":"Walsh T, Walsh V, Vreugde S, Hertzano R, Shahin H, Haika S, et al., Avraham KB. 2002. From flies' eyes to our ears: Mutations in a human class III myosin cause progressive nonsyndromic hearing loss DFNB30. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States o f America. 99: 7518-7523. 11.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.102091699"},{"reference":"Walsh VL, Raviv D, Dror AA, Shahin H, Walsh T, Kanaan MN, Avraham KB, King MC. 2011. A mouse model for human hearing loss DFNB30 due to loss of function of myosin IIIA. Mammalian Genome: Official Journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society. 22: 170-177. 12.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00335-010-9310-6"}],"title":"Exploring phosphoregulation of MYO3A using quantitative fluorescence image analysis in COS7 cells
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"4ec209bb-7687-415d-b541-ed496da4e19d","decision":"publish","abstract":"Myosin IIIA is an unconventional myosin that contains a kinase domain, and is involved in the formation of hair-cell stereocilia. To investigate its regulatory roles, we mimicked phosphorylation in mchr-MYO3AΔK constructs and assayed their ability to influence filopodial properties in COS7 cells. The phosphomimics generated fewer filopodia. Coexpression of mchr-MYO3AΔK with a GFP-construct containing only the MYO3A kinase domain also resulted in generation of fewer filopodia. Structural predictions suggest that the phosphorylation sites inhibit actin/MYO3A interactions. Taken together, these analyses link MYO3A phosphorylation with the regulation of its ability to create actin protrusions such as filopodia and stereocilia.
","acknowledgements":"(From VHMP) Thank you to the University of Richmond School of Arts & Science for funding and support, as without this, I do not think I would have been able to pursue this passion for science. Thank you to all the Q-Lab members, Chase Cristella, Anna Lozano, Joanna Mas, and Lillie Wendt whom I’ve had the honor of being a Q-labby with. Inside and outside of the lab, you guys have shown me how wonderful and whimsical life can be and I will truly miss seeing you guys around. Special shoutout to Lillie specifically for her immense artistic abilities and drawing Panel K. I would also like to thank Dr. Stacey Criswell for her never-ending patience and wonderful mentoring while teaching me how to use basically every microscope in Gottwald. You have allowed me to see the world in an entirely different way, and for that I am forever grateful. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Omar Quintero-Carmona, for without his influence and unconditional support, I don’t think I would have been able to find the same joy and fulfillment in science. In my time at University of Richmond, no words brought me greater joy than you asking me, “do you want to see some cells?”, and I will miss that dearly as I try to make you proud on this path you have helped set me on.
An extended preprint version of this study can be found on bioRXiv (Phan and Quintero-Carmona, 2026).
","authors":[{"affiliations":["University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"vu.phan@richmond.edu","firstName":"Vu M.N.","lastName":"Phan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, United States"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"oquinter@richmond.edu","firstName":"Omar Alberto","lastName":"Quintero-Carmona","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9314-1704"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"The University of Richmond School of Arts & Sciences funded VMNP's summer research through “The Richmond Guarantee.” The University of Richmond Department of Biology funded academic-year independent research for VMNP. OAQ-C was funded by a University of Richmond Arts & Sciences Faculty Summer Research Fellowship.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/2ab8dbce9bd9f9c03f90fe826f2d8797.png"},"imageCaption":"(A) A domain schematic of the constructs used in this study, where the size of the represented MYO3A domains is proportional to the number of amino acids in each region. Human MYO3A consists of a kinase domain (aa1-340), motor domain (aa352-1041), IQ motifs (aa1055-1375), tail homology domain I (THDI, aa1492-1553) and tail homology domain II (THDII, aa1595-1616). (B) Representative image of a range of filopodial tip-to-cell-body ratios (TCBR) in a cell expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. Image is shown using the “Fire” lookup table in FIJI. (C) While coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK displayed decreased TCBR, mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D did not show a decreased TCBR. (D) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D also displayed decreased TCBR. (E) Expression of either GFP-MYO3AFL or GFP-MYO3AKIN with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in a decreased TCBR. (F) Examples of cells displaying a higher (mchr-MYO3AΔK) and lower (mchr-MYO3AΔK coexpressed with GFP-MYO3AFL) filopodia edge density. (G) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density, as did mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D expression, compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. (H) Coexpression of GFP-MYO3AFL with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density, as did mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D expression, compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK. (I) Expression of either GFP-MYO3AFL or GFP-MYO3AKIN with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in decreased filopodia edge density compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK alone. (J) Phyre2 modeling of the MYO3A/actin interface predicts that T908 and T919 (yellow) residues are in close proximity to D24 and D25 on actin (green). Addition of negative charges to T908 or T919 via phosphorylation would lead to weakened actin affinity and decreased MYO3A motor activity. (K) We propose a model where MYO3A kinase autophosphorylation modulates MYO3A-mediated filopodia initiation. Asterisks indicate p<0.05, Tukey analysis. In the graphs, each marker represents a \"biological replicate\" consisting of multiple cells, as defined in the \"Quantification and statistics\" section of the Methods.
","imageTitle":"Mimicking MYO3A motor phosphorylation alters COS7 cell filopodia properties
","methods":"Expression Plasmids
mchr-MYO3AΔK, GFP-MYO3AFL plasmids had been generated previously (Quintero et al., 2010). The phosphomimic mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D and mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D constructs were generated by performing site-directed mutagenesis on the mchr-MYO3AΔK construct. The GFP-MYO3AKIN construct was generated using megaprimer PCR mutagenesis (Attwell et al., 2003) to move the human MYO3A kinase domain (amino acids 1-351) into pEGFP-N1 (Clontech). All expression plasmids were sequence-verified. A schematic of these constructs can be found in Figure 1A.
COS7 cell culture and transient transfection
COS7 (Gluzman, 1981) cells were cultured in growth media: DMEM high glucose (Gibco) that was supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Benchmark FBS, GeminiBio), and antibiotics (50U/mL penicillin, 50µg/mL streptomycin, Gibco). Cells were kept in a humidified incubator at 37°C, with a 5% CO2 atmosphere, and passaged using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco). In preparation for transfection, cells were plated onto acid-washed, 22mm2, #1.5 coverslips at a concentration of ~30,000 cells/coverslip (one coverslip per well in a six well dish) and then allowed to adhere overnight. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 3000, according to manufacturer’s protocol. For each sample well, 0.3µg of plasmid DNA was diluted into 125µL of Opti-MEM media (Invitrogen) without serum or antibiotics and mixed with 3µL of P3000 reagent. In a separate tube, 4µL of L3000 reagent was diluted into 125µL Opti-MEM. The two tubes were then combined, vortexed and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes prior to dropwise addition to the sample well. Following transfection, the cells were allowed to grow overnight (16-24h) prior to fixation and counterstaining. For co-transfections, a total of 0.6µg of plasmid DNA is used instead (0.3µg of each plasmid).
Fixed cell sample preparation and imaging
Samples were fixed for 20 minutes in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized for 5 mins in PBS containing 0.5% Trition X-100, and counterstained in PBS containing 6.6nM ALEXA647 phalloidin and 10nM DAPI for 30 minutes. The samples were then washed four times for 5 minutes with PBS. Coverslips were mounted onto slides with ProLong Glass Antifade and allowed to dry. Images were obtained using an Olympus IX-83 microscope with a 60x/1.4NA objective, Sutter shutters & filter wheels, Sedat quad filter set (Chroma), and a Hamamatsu ORCA Flash 4v2 camera. The microscopy hardware and image acquisition settings were controlled by Metamorph software. Typical exposures times were 200ms for ALEXA647 phalloidin and 300ms for GFP and mcherry fluorescence channels. Exposures ranged between 2-10ms for DAPI. Images were collected in all four channels for all treatment groups.
Tip to cell body ratio, filopodia density quantification, and analysis
FIJI was used for image analysis (Schindelin et al., 2012). The ratio of tip intensity to cell body intensity (TCBR) was calculated by using 4x4 pixel regions-of-interest to determine the intensity of the background adjacent to the filopodium (Ib), the filopodial tip (It), and the cell body (Icb). The ratio of the It to Icb was calculated after subtracting Ib from those measurements using the equation TCBR = (It-Ib)/(Icb-Ib).
Filopodia edge density was calculated from regions of a transfected cell's periphery not in contact with other cells (free cell edge). Lengths of free cell edge were measured and the number of filopodia along those lengths were counted manually. Filopodia edge density is then calculated as the number of filopodia divided by the length of the measured free cell edge.
Mean cell brightness was not significantly different between any of the mchr-tagged constructs, nor was mean cell brightness significantly different between any of the GFP-tagged constructs used in this study (Phan and Quintero-Carmona, 2026).
Phyre modeling
To predict the tertiary structure of MYO3A, amino acids 316-1616 of the human MYO3A sequence were submitted into the Protein Homology/analogy Recognition Engine (Phyre2.2) web server. Given the sequence, the engine uses homology identification and secondary structure prediction to determine structural homologues by a profile-profile alignment algorithm (Powell et al., 2025). High scoring alignments are then used to construct a proposed tertiary structure of the submitted sequence by comparison to structural databases. Alternatively, unknown structures can be fit directly to a specific, known structure, which was our approach. As the regions of myosins directly involved in the actin-binding interface were not well characterized in structures generated by X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy at the time that these studies were initially undertaken (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010), Phyre2 was used to predict the structure of the actin-interface of MYO3A through aligning the sequence of human MYO3A directly to the model of the actomyosin interface generated by Lorenz and Holmes (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010).
Quantification and statistics
Each condition of each cell-based assay was repeated independently 5 to 8 times--a biological replicate represented as \"n\". For each experimental condition, multiple measurements were averaged for each day with each day serving as a biological replicate. For TCBR, each biological replicate consisted of at least 10 cells with no more than 5 filopodia assayed per cell. At least 7 cells were measured for each biological replicate for filopodia edge density.
Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA followed by a Tukey test based on the set of biological replicates for each condition. Kaleidagraph 4.5 was used to calculate descriptive statistics and carry out the ANOVA with Tukey analysis. Quantification presented in the text are written as mean standard error of the mean.
Selection and preparation of sample images for publication
Sample images chosen for the figure were chosen as representations of the patterns observed in the quantified data. The software packages Metamorph, and FIJI were used to generate the pseudo-colored images included in the figures.
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Class III myosins are a key component of actin-based protrusions known as stereocilia. These structures are found in sensory epithelia, such as the inner ear. Initially characterized in Drosophila melanogaster and named NINAC (Montell & Rubin, 1988), class III myosins contain a conserved N-terminal kinase domain (Dosé et al., 2007) proposed to regulate the protein through autophosphorylation (Ng et al., 1996; Quintero et al., 2010, 2013). Two vertebrate isoforms (MYO3A and MYO3B) both localize to the tips of stereocilia (Dosé et al., 2003), and bind to stereocilia resident proteins like the ESPN1 (Merritt et al., 2012; Salles et al., 2009), MORN4 (Mecklenburg et al., 2015), and actin itself (Les Erickson et al., 2003). MYO3A is hypothesized to transport proteins along stereocilia and regulate stereocilia lengths (Dosé et al., 2003). Function-altering mutations in the MYO3A gene have been linked to nonsyndromic deafness DFNB30 (T. Walsh et al., 2002; Cirilo et al., 2024). Mouse lines modeling the DFNB30 mutation display age-dependent hearing loss due to degeneration of hair cell stereocilia (V. L. Walsh et al., 2011).
Immunostaining of MYO3A shows strong labeling of the tips of stereocilia and GFP-MYO3A constructs also show strong tip-localization (Schneider et al., 2006). Fluorescently-tagged MYO3A constructs localize to the tips of other actin-based protrusions such as filopodia (Les Erickson et al., 2003; Schneider et al., 2006) and microvilli (An et al., 2014; Raval et al., 2016) in multiple cultured cell types. Kinase domain deletion (MYO3AΔK) led to enhanced tip-localization of GFP-MYO3AΔK constructs in both hair cell stereocilia (Schneider et al., 2006) and COS7 cell filopodia (Salles et al., 2009). Additionally, introducing a kinase-inactivating mutation into full length GFP-MYO3A still led to tip localization in stereocilia and also led to enhanced tip localization in COS7 cell filopodia (Quintero et al., 2010). Ectopic expression of fluorescently-tagged MYO3AΔK constructs in COS7 cells results in an increase in the number of filopodia extending from the edge of the cell (Quintero et al., 2010). The MYO3A kinase domain is capable of intermolecular autophosphorylation in vitro(Komaba et al., 2003, 2010) and in cultured cells (Quintero et al., 2010). When kinase-functional GFP-MYO3AFL constructs are coexpressed with kinase-deleted mchr-MYO3AΔK constructs, the filopodial initiation phenotype is minimized (Quintero et al., 2010). One current model for MYO3A function imagines that autophosphorylation of the kinase domain happens at the tips of actin protrusions and controls the available concentration of MYO3A in that compartment by negatively influencing activity via additional autophosphorylation of the motor (Quintero et al., 2013).
Phosphoproteomic analysis of in vitro phosphorylated human MYO3A identified a number of putative phosphorylation sites—T184 in the kinase domain, and T908 & T919 in the motor domain (Quintero et al., 2013). The web resource, Phosphosite Plus, lists 18 additional putative phosphorylation sites spread across the entirety of the protein (Hornbeck et al., 2015). Although the consequences of phosphorylation of the MYO3A motor domain have been studied using in vitro steady-state assays and cell-based assays (Komaba et al., 2010; Quintero et al., 2013), the potential biological function of specific phosphorylation at T908 or T919 has yet to be investigated. To do so, we generated point mutations in mchr-MYO3AΔK construct to mimic phosphorylation, replacing threonine with aspartic acid (mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D and mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D, Figure 1A), and applied quantitative imaging techniques to elucidate the biological significance of such posttranslational modifications on actin protrusion-related functions of MYO3A. For the following experiments, the data represent multiple biological replicates or \"n.\" The number of cells and filopodia described by a replicate depend on experimental approach as defined in the Methods section, \"Quantification and statistics.\"
We assayed phosphomimic constructs for their ability to tip-localize in COS7 cell filopodia (Figure 1B), which do not express MYO3A endogenously and do not generate many filopodia. There was no difference in the tip to cell body ratio (TCBR) between cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (3.6±0.3, n=8) compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK (4.2±0.3, n=8, Figure 1C). Cotransfection of the mchr-constructs with GFP-MYO3AFL decreased the TCBR for cells coexpressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (2.4±0.4, n=7, p<0.001, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone) but not for cells coexpressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (3.1±0.3, n=8, p=0.06, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D alone, Figure 1C). However, cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D in combination with GFP-MYO3AFL (2.2±0.3, n=8) showed a decrease in TCBR compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D alone (3.7±0.3, n=8, p<0.01, Tukey analysis, Figure 1D). The differential behavior of the two phosphomimics could be due to biologically relevant differences in the impact of T908 phosphorylation versus T919 phosphorylation on MYO3A motor activity. Alternatively, the T to D substitution may be a poorer mimic of phosphorylation at T908 than at T919. It is also possible that, similar to actin polymerization, MYO3A-mediated filopodia initiation requires MYO3A concentrations above a critical concentration, so impacts on the amount of MYO3A at filopodia tips would be difficult to visualize in existing filopodia. In this instance, the impacts of phosphomimicry might be visible by measuring the number of filopodia generated by the cell.
We then assayed the phosphomimic constructs for their ability to influence filopodial edge density (Figure 1F). There was a significant decrease in the filopodia edge density for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (0.012±0.001 filopodia/μm, n=8) compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.018±0.002 filopodia/μm, n=8, p<0.04, Tukey analysis, Figure 1G). Coexpression of the mchr-constructs with kinase-functional GFP-MYO3AFL resulted in a statistically significant decrease in filopodial edge density for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.010± 0.001 filopodia/μm, n=8, p<0.003, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone) but not for cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D (0.008±0.001 filopodia/μm, n=8, p=0.1, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔKT908D alone, Figure 1G). The same pattern was observed when comparing cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.020±0.002 filopodia/μm, n=8), mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D (0.015±0.001 filopodia/μm, n=8, p<0.05, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone), and mchr-MYO3AΔK coexpressed with GFP-MYO3AFL (0.008±0.0004 filopodia/μm, n=7, p<0.0001, Tukey analysis vs mchr-MYO3AΔK alone, Figure 1H). Coexpression of mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D with GFP-MYO3AFL did not significantly decrease filopodial edge density compared to cells expressing mchr-MYO3AΔKT919D alone (0.011±0.001 filopodia/μm, n=7, p=0.3, Tukey analysis, Figure 1H). Taken together, these data suggest that phosphoregulation may have related-but-distinct impacts depending on the specific residue. Overall, phosphorylation of the MYO3A motor domain influences the ability of MYO3A-expressing cells to maintain actin protrusions by either stabilizing already-formed protrusions, or by stimulating protrusion initiation.
If MYO3A autophosphorylation is negatively-regulating protrusion formation activity, then autophosphoregulation might be occurring at filopodial initiation sites on the inner surface of the plasma membrane. Such phosphorylation would not require MYO3A localization to tips of existing filopodia in order to autophosphorylate MYO3A molecules, and MYO3A kinase-alone truncations are capable of phosphorylating MYO3AΔK constructs in in vitro assays (Komaba et al., 2010; Quintero et al., 2010). To test the hypothesis that MYO3A phosphoregulation does not require motor activity to influence protrusion initiation, we transfected COS7 cells with mchr-MYO3AΔK in combination with a kinase-domain-only truncation of MYO3A (GFP-MYO3AKIN). Unlike MYO3A constructs that contain an active motor domain (Quintero et al., 2010), GFP-MYO3AKIN does not concentrate at filopodial tips. Cotransfection of either GFP-MYO3AFL (2.5±0.4, n=5, p<0.002, Tukey analysis) or GFP-MYO3AKIN (3.1±0.1, n=5, p<0.02, Tukey analysis) with mchr-MYO3AΔK resulted in significant decrease in TCBR compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK alone (4.4±0.2, n=5, Figure 1E). Cotransfection of either GFP-MYO3AFL (0.017±0.005 filopodia/μm, n=5, p<0.007, Tukey analysis) or GFP-MYO3AKIN (0.021±0.003 filopodia/μm, n=5, p<0.02, Tukey analysis) with mchr-MYO3AΔK also resulted in significant decrease in filopodia edge density compared to mchr-MYO3AΔK (0.042±0.005 filopodia/μm, n=5, Figure 1I). This implies that intermolecular phosphorylation can occur in cells independently of motor function, and in other compartments besides the tips of actin protrusions. Such phosphoregulation could control the density of actin protrusion initiation events by regulating the amount of active MYO3A at filopodial initiation patches on the inner surface of the plasma membrane.
To better understand the impact of T908 and T919 phosphorylation on actin/MYO3A interactions, we threaded the human MYO3A sequence to a model structure for the actomyosin interface (Lorenz & Holmes, 2010). Actomyosin interactions are partially dependent on electrostatic interactions between the two molecules, and this model predicted that both phosphorylation sites are likely positioned in close proximity to acidic patches on actin containing aspartic acid residues D24 and D25 (Figure 1J). Phosphorylation would then introduce negative charge near acidic residues, decreasing MYO3A’s affinity for actin, negatively influencing motor activity, and negatively impacting actin protrusion initiation. Previous in vitro studies of the MYO3A motor revealed that phosphorylation decreased steady-state actin affinity (Kactin), decreased maximal ATPase rate (kcat) and increased actin concentration required for half-maximal ATPase rate (KATPase)--all indicators of decreased myosin function (Dosé et al., 2008; Komaba et al., 2010).
So far, we have only determined the individual effects of phosphorylation at T908 and T919, and accumulation of phosphorylations could have additive effects. Future assays could determine whether double phosphorylation results in stronger inactivation of MYO3A filopodial initiation activity. Additionally, the generation of individual phosphonulls (T908A, T919A, and the double-phosphonull) could reveal whether these or other sites are responsible for regulating additional MYO3A activities.
Since intermolecular autophosphorylation can occur in the absence of MYO3A motor activity, MYO3A kinase activity could regulate actin-based protrusion initiation by MYO3A at nascent filopodial initiation sites along the plasma membrane. Where initial models of MYO3A phosphoregulation described activity at the tips of existing actin protrusions, we propose a refinement of the model where the amount of MYO3A available at protrusion initiation sites is determined by concentration-dependent MYO3A autophosphorylation prior to extension of a protrusion and its corresponding tip (Figure 1K). As active, unphosphorylated MYO3A collecting in patches at the membrane would induce actin protrusions, and as the local MYO3A concentration increased, MYO3A kinase activity would limit the concentration of active MYO3A available at the membrane to initiate protrusion. Such a mechanism could regulate the size of protrusion initiation assemblies, influencing the density of actin-based protrusions at the periphery. Overexpression of human MYO3AΔK elongated hair cell stereocilia, and displayed atypical “floppiness” (Schneider et al., 2006). Elimination of kinase activity resulted in increased actin protrusions in cells that generate filopodia (Quintero et al., 2010, 2013) and microvilli (Raval et al., 2016). In this way, the presence of kinase activity could tune the motor domain’s activity, controlling the cell's ability to generate actin protrusions.
","references":[{"reference":"An BC, Sakai T, Komaba S, Kishi H, Kobayashi S, Kim JY, Ikebe R, Ikebe M. 2014. Phosphorylation of the Kinase Domain Regulates Autophosphorylation of Myosin IIIA and Its Translocation in Microvilli. Biochemistry. 53: 7835-7845. 14.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi501247z"},{"reference":"Attwell S, Mills J, Troussard A, Wu C, Dedhar S. 2003. Integration of Cell Attachment, Cytoskeletal Localization, and Signaling by Integrin-linked Kinase (ILK), CH-ILKBP, and the Tumor Suppressor PTEN. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 4813-4825. 21.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.e03-05-0308"},{"reference":"Cirilo JA, Liao X, Perrin BJ, Yengo CM. 2024. The dynamics of actin protrusions can be controlled by tip-localized myosin motors. Journal of Biological Chemistry 300: 105516.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105516"},{"reference":"Dose A, Lin Jones J, Burnside B. 2007. Class III Myosins. Myosins. 7: 265-287. 2.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Dose AC, Ananthanarayanan S, Moore JE, Corsa AC, Burnside B, Yengo CM. 2008. The kinase domain alters the kinetic properties of the myosin IIIA motor. Biochemistry. 47: 2485-2496. 20.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi7021574"},{"reference":"Dose AC, Burnside B. 2000. Cloning and chromosomal localization of a human class III myosin. Genomics. 67: 333-342. 16.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1006/geno.2000.6256"},{"reference":"Dose AC, Hillman DW, Wong C, Sohlberg L, Lin Jones J, Burnside B. 2003. Myo3A, one of two class III myosin genes expressed in vertebrate retina, is localized to the calycal processes of rod and cone photoreceptor s and is expressed in the sacculus. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 1058-1073. 6.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.e02-06-0317"},{"reference":"Gluzman Y. 1981. SV40-transformed simian cells support the replication of early SV40 mutants. Cell. 23: 175-182. 22.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0092-8674(81)90282-8"},{"reference":"Hornbeck PV, Zhang B, Murray B, Kornhauser JM, Latham V, Skrzypek E. 2015. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Research. 43: D512-520. 17.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/nar/gku1267"},{"reference":"Komaba S, Watanabe S, Umeki N, Sato O, Ikebe M. 2010. Effect of Phosphorylation in the Motor Domain of Human Myosin IIIA on Its ATP Hydrolysis Cycle. Biochemistry. 49: 3695-3702. 18.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi902211w"},{"reference":"Les Erickson F, Corsa AC, Dose AC, Burnside B. 2003. Localization of a Class III Myosin to Filopodia Tips in Transfected HeLa Cells Requires an Actin-binding Site in its Tail Domain. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 14: 4173-4180. 10.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1091/mbc.E02-10-0656"},{"reference":"Lorenz M, Holmes KC. 2010. The actin-myosin interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107: 12529-12534. 19.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1003604107"},{"reference":"Mecklenburg KL, Freed SA, Raval M, Quintero OA, Yengo CM, O Tousa JE. 2015. Invertebrate and vertebrate class III myosins interact with MORN repeat-containing adaptor proteins. PloS One. 10: e0122502. 9.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0122502"},{"reference":"Merritt RC, Manor U, Salles FT, Grati M, Dose AC, Unrath WC, et al., Kachar B. 2012. Myosin IIIB uses an actin-binding motif in its espin-1 cargo to reach the tips of actin protrusions. Current Biology: CB. 22: 320-325. 7.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.053"},{"reference":"Montell C, Rubin GM. 1988. The Drosophila ninaC locus encodes two photoreceptor cell specific proteins with domains homologous to protein kinases and the myosin heavy chain head. Cell. 52: 757-772. 1.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0092-8674(88)90413-8"},{"reference":"Ng KP, Kambara T, Matsuura M, Burke M, Ikebe M. 1996. Identification of myosin III as a protein kinase. Biochemistry. 35: 9392-9399. 3.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/bi960181a"},{"reference":"Phan VHMN, Quintero-Carmona OA. 2026. Exploring phosphoregulation of MYO3A using quantitative fluorescence image analysis in COS7 cells. BioRxiv : 10.64898/2026.05.05.723000.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.64898/2026.05.05.723000"},{"reference":"Powell HR, Islam SA, David A, Sternberg MJE. 2025. Phyre2.2: A Community Resource for Template-based Protein Structure Prediction. Journal of Molecular Biology. 437: 168960. 24.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmb.2025.168960"},{"reference":"Quintero OA, Moore JE, Unrath WC, Manor U, Salles FT, Grati M, Kachar B, Yengo CM. 2010. Intermolecular autophosphorylation regulates myosin IIIa activity and localization in parallel actin bundles. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 285: 35770-35782. 4.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M110.144360"},{"reference":"Quintero OA, Unrath WC, Stevens SM, Manor U, Kachar B, Yengo CM. 2013. Myosin 3A Kinase Activity Is Regulated by Phosphorylation of the Kinase Domain Activation Loop. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 288: 37126-37137. 5.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M113.511014"},{"reference":"Raval MH, Quintero OA, Weck ML, Unrath WC, Gallagher JW, Cui R, et al., Yengo CM. 2016. Impact of the Motor and Tail Domains of Class III Myosins on Regulating the Formation and Elongation of Actin Protrusions. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 291: 22781-22792. 15.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1074/jbc.M116.733741"},{"reference":"Salles FT, Merritt RC, Manor U, Dougherty GW, Sousa AD, Moore JE, et al., Kachar B. 2009. Myosin IIIa boosts elongation of stereocilia by transporting espin1 to the plus ends of actin filaments. Nature Cell Biology. 11: 443-450. 8.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1851"},{"reference":"Schindelin J, Arganda Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al., Cardona A. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 9: 676-682. 23.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nmeth.2019"},{"reference":"Schneider ME, Dose AC, Salles FT, Chang W, Erickson FL, Burnside B, Kachar B. 2006. A New Compartment at Stereocilia Tips Defined by Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Myosin IIIa Expression. The Journal of Neuroscience. 26: 10243-10252. 13.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2812-06.2006"},{"reference":"Walsh T, Walsh V, Vreugde S, Hertzano R, Shahin H, Haika S, et al., Avraham KB. 2002. From flies' eyes to our ears: Mutations in a human class III myosin cause progressive nonsyndromic hearing loss DFNB30. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States o f America. 99: 7518-7523. 11.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.102091699"},{"reference":"Walsh VL, Raviv D, Dror AA, Shahin H, Walsh T, Kanaan MN, Avraham KB, King MC. 2011. A mouse model for human hearing loss DFNB30 due to loss of function of myosin IIIA. Mammalian Genome: Official Journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society. 22: 170-177. 12.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00335-010-9310-6"}],"title":"Exploring phosphoregulation of MYO3A using quantitative fluorescence image analysis in COS7 cells
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"bd3f9be2-80f7-486b-9c36-6677ea28023d","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}}, "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}