Caenorhabditis elegans naturally inhabits low-oxygen environments but is typically studied at 21% oxygen. We cultured adult C. elegans at 2.5%, 5%, and 21% oxygen during the fertile period, quantifying daily output of hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny (unhatched embryos, dead or deformed larvae). While we found no evidence for increased fertility at low oxygen levels compared to 21%, we observed a trend towards fewer unfertilized oocytes after peak fertility at 5% oxygen and significantly fewer at 2.5%. Our results indicate that reproductive output differs between laboratory conditions (high oxygen) and moderately low oxygen levels (closer to natural environments).
","acknowledgements":"The authors are grateful to Anastasia Nathania Widjaja, Fredrik Forsberg, and Johanna Farley for laboratory assistance and useful discussion. The N2 strain and OP50 were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC, University of Minnesota), which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","project"],"email":"emma.haxen@med.lu.se","firstName":"Emma R.","lastName":"Haxen","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-0309-1329"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","investigation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"mazharul.islam@med.lu.se","firstName":"Mazharul ","lastName":"Islam","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-8574-2465"},{"affiliations":["College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States","McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada"],"departments":["Lyman Briggs College and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences","School of Earth, Environment, and Society and the Origins Institute"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"grabowa@mcmaster.ca","firstName":"Alexandra ","lastName":"Grabowski","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0004-6294-9227"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center","Division of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sofie.mohlin@med.lu.se","firstName":"Sofie","lastName":"Mohlin","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-2458-3963"},{"affiliations":["University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark"],"departments":["Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"nrep@ign.ku.dk","firstName":"Nicole R.","lastName":"Posth","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6695-6115"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","resources","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sandeep.gopal@med.lu.se","firstName":"Sandeep","lastName":"Gopal","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6706-6747"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","resources","fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","project"],"email":"emma.hammarlund@med.lu.se","firstName":"Emma U.","lastName":"Hammarlund","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-7625-4793"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
","dataTable":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/ed54d995394775c0d3bb290ab68a1082.csv"},"extendedData":[],"funding":"This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [grant agreement No 949538]; the Swedish Research Council [2019-02020 and 2023-01941]; Cancerfonden [22 2125 P j and 25 4675 Pj]; Stiftelsen Konsul Thure Carlssons Minne; Franke och Margareta Bergqvists Stiftelse; The Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund; and The Swedish Cancer Society. EUH and NRP also thank the Novo Nordisk Foundation [Grant NNF23OC0086712] for their support.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/cc27e04d0cba21a944fe9f4e2f75993c.png"},"imageCaption":"Figure: Panels A–D illustrate results from the experiment comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen. Panels E–H illustrate results from the experiment comparing reproductive output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen. Each data point represents one C. elegans hermaphrodite. For the experiment comparing 5% and 21% oxygen, total counts (A, C) quantify reproductive output during the first five days of adulthood. For the experiment comparing 2.5% and 21% oxygen, total counts (E, G) quantify reproductive output during the first six days of adulthood. For each experiment, data was pooled from three replicates (see Methods). A: Total counts of hatched, viable larvae per hermaphrodite at 5% and 21% oxygen. B: Daily production of hatched, viable larvae at 5% and 21% oxygen. C: Total counts of unfertilized oocytes output per hermaphrodite at 5% and 21% oxygen. D: Daily output of unfertilized oocytes at 5% and 21% oxygen. E: Total counts of hatched, viable larvae at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. F: Daily counts of hatched, viable larvae at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. G: Total counts of unfertilized oocytes at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. H: Daily output of unfertilized oocytes at 2.5% and 21% oxygen.
Table 1: Summary statistics and test results for the comparison of reproductive output between oxygen levels. PS is the Mann–Whitney estimate (probability of superiority). Note, that the data represent pooling of multiple replicates (see Methods).
","imageTitle":"Counts of hatched larvae and unfertilized oocytes at different oxygen levels
","methods":"C. elegans maintenance
The laboratory reference strain (Wild-type, Bristol) was cultured on nematode growth medium (NGM) in 60 mm vented petri dishes seeded with Escherichia coli (OP50 strain) bacterial lawns. The NGM was prepared as detailed in Brenner (1974). Animals were maintained at 20°C for at least two weeks without starvation or overcrowding before being used for experiments.
Controlling oxygen tensions
During experiments, animals were cultured in a temperature-controlled laboratory under different oxygen pressures within custom-built hypoxia boxes. At the front, the boxes had a hinged door with magnet strips glued along the edges, connecting to magnet strips around the box opening. At the back, holes were drilled and fitted tightly with connectors to gas tubes and oxygen sensors. In the hypoxia boxes, oxygen levels were maintained using ProOx 110 Compact oxygen Controllers (BioSpherix, Ltd., RRID: SCR_021129), which kept oxygen concentrations at the set low levels by infusing the semi-sealed boxes with a gas mix consisting of 420 ppm CO2 in N2. In the otherwise identical control chamber (21% oxygen), the sensor hole at the back of the box was left open to ambient air. Each box contained a fan to avoid oxygen gradients, as well as a beaker of Milli-Q water to ensure comparable humidity levels between the hypoxia and control boxes. Temperature and relative humidity levels were monitored using data loggers (HOBO® MX1101 Temp/RH Data Logger and HOBO® Pendant® MX Temp/Light (MX2202) Logger).
Quantifying daily reproductive output
Experiments quantifying reproductive output were initiated using animals at larval stage L4. Each experimental replicate was initiated by picking 10–20 L4 larvae into an empty NGM plate. These L4 larvae were then distributed through blinded randomization between an equal number of NGM plates, half of which (for the low-oxygen group) had been left to degas oxygen in the hypoxia box overnight. After picking one L4 larva into each NGM plate for the experiment, the plates were returned to the hypoxia and control boxes.
The initial experiment comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen was conducted over days 1–5 of adulthood. The subsequent experiment to compare reproductive output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen was conducted over days 1–6 of adulthood. Daily transfers to fresh NGM plates necessitated brief (10–15 minutes) exposure to ambient conditions (21% oxygen), resulting in oxygen fluctuations similar to variability in the natural habitats of C. elegans. Every day during the study period, the animals were transferred to new NGM plates seeded with 100 µl OP50 lawns (the low-oxygen plates having been left to degas oxygen overnight). Blinded, randomized counting of hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny began on the third day of the experiments (counting reproductive output in the “Day one” plates) and ended on the seventh or eighth day (counting the “Day five” and “Day six” plates, respectively). Any egg that had not hatched after 48 hours was counted as unhatched. These were included in counts of abnormal progeny along with larvae with obvious morphological and locomotory defects (e.g., partial paralysis, large kinks or lumps). Unfertilized oocytes were identified based on their characteristic morphology, namely the lack of an eggshell, their brownish color, and their soft, disk-like shape (see Ward and Carrel, 1979; images in Kern et al., 2021). Reproductive output from hermaphrodites that died during the course of the experiment were excluded from the analyses, leading to different sample sizes between oxygen levels in some replicates (see Statistics).
Statistics
Effects of low oxygen levels on reproductive output were investigated via two separate experiments, one comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen, the other comparing output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen. Three experimental replicates were conducted for each comparison. Reproductive output was compared between low-oxygen (2.5% or 5% oxygen) and standard laboratory conditions (21% oxygen; control level) using Mann Whitney U testing. A non-parametric test was chosen due to the small sample size and different distributions of discrete count data between oxygen levels. In the initial comparison between 5% and 21% oxygen, two replicates had n = 5 hermaphrodites for each oxygen level, whereas the third replicate had n = 6 in the control group (21% oxygen) and n = 9 in the low-oxygen group (5% oxygen). In the subsequent comparison between 2.5% and 21% oxygen, n ranged from 3–6 in the control group and from 5–6 in the low-oxygen group. The uneven number of animals between oxygen levels was due to some hermaphrodites dying during the course of the experiments. After pooling the replicate data, we computed exact p-values, effect size estimates (probability of superiority, PS), and associated confidence intervals using the wmwTest() function from the asht package (version 1.0.1) in R (version 4.5.0). A fixed random seed was set to ensure reproducibility (set.seed(123)). We applied Holm–Bonferroni correction to control family-wise error rate over three pairwise comparisons (hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny), reporting 98.33% CIs for effect sizes.
","reagents":"Strain | Genotype | Source |
N2 | Caenorhabditis elegans, wild type, Bristol. | CGC |
OP50 | Erischerichia coli OP 50 | CGC |
Critical developmental processes are associated with low tissue oxygen levels in many animal taxa (Simon and Keith, 2008; Mohyeldin et al., 2010; Carreau et al., 2011; Baccino-Calace et al., 2020; Brouillet et al., 2021; Carroll et al., 2021). However, less is known about tissue oxygen gradients and sensitivity in microscopic invertebrates that lack respiratory and circulatory systems. Many microscopic invertebrate species take up oxygen via simple diffusion across the body surface (Graham, 1988), meaning that their tissue oxygen gradients are directly coupled to ambient oxygen concentrations. Such animals are typically found in low-oxygen environments like sediment, soil, and compost (Jørgensen and Revsbech, 1985; Sexstone et al., 1985; Schratzberger et al., 2019; van den Hoogen et al., 2020), which are likely to result in low tissue oxygen levels. For example, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans naturally inhabits rotting fruits and vegetation (Schulenburg and Félix, 2017), and this popular model organism has been shown to display a behavioral preference for 5–12% oxygen in laboratory studies (Gray et al., 2004). Yet, whether this preference for low oxygen levels is linked to oxygen sensitivity during reproduction and early development remains poorly understood.
The reproductive system of adult C. elegans hermaphrodites is known as “the germ line” and consists of two U-shaped gonadal arms connected by a common uterus (Hirsh et al., 1976). Each gonadal arm contains a pool of germline stem cells at its distal tip. As these germline stem cells proliferate, cells are pushed away from the stem cell niche in the proximal direction and begin to differentiate, eventually forming the oocytes that are passed through the spermatheca and fertilized (Hirsh et al., 1976; Albert Hubbard and Schedl, 2019). The spermatheca contains the adult hermaphrodites’ supply of sperm cells (“self-sperm”) produced during the late larval stages (Hirsh et al., 1976). After peak fertility during days 1–3 of adulthood, the store of self-sperm is nearly depleted, and reduced sperm signaling leads to decreased rates of oocyte maturation and ovulation, although unfertilized oocytes are expelled at a reduced rate (Ward and Carrel, 1979; Riddle et al., 1997; McCarter et al., 1999; Scharf et al., 2021). The current study aims to explore the effects of moderately low oxygen levels on the reproductive output of C. elegans, including whether low oxygen levels lead to increased production of hatched, viable larvae throughout the entire fertile period (see Huang et al., 2004).
We cultured adult C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5%, 5%, and 21% oxygen and compared reproductive output between oxygen levels. Reproductive output was quantified as daily counts of (1) viable larvae; (2) unfertilized oocytes; and (3) abnormal progeny (unhatched embryos and dead or visibly deformed larvae, see Methods). We selected 5% oxygen because it falls within the range preferred by C. elegans (Gray et al., 2004) while approximating oxygen levels in mammalian stem cell niches (Mohyeldin et al., 2010, and references therein). We also quantified reproductive output at 2.5% oxygen, which is closer to tissue oxygen levels in many insect species (Birrell et al., 2024) and during mammalian embryonic development (Brouillet et al., 2021).
First, we compared reproductive output between adult hermaphrodites cultured at 5% and 21% oxygen over days 1–5 of adulthood to test whether more hatched, viable larvae would be produced at 5% oxygen. Median production of hatched, viable larvae was essentially identical between 5% and 21% oxygen, but statistical comparison was inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (probability of superiority, PS = 0.508; 98.33% CI = 0.305–1.000; one-sided exact p = 0.475; Fig. 1A; Table 1). This reflected variability between replicates (PS per replicate: 0.680, 0.640, 0.389; see Methods). The observed daily distributions of larval counts appeared similar between oxygen levels, suggesting no major shift in the timing of peak fertility and generally similar daily fecundity between conditions (Fig. 1B). We found no significant difference in the production of abnormal progeny between 5% and 21% oxygen, but results were inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (PS = 0.569; 98.33% CI = 0.329–0.782; two-sided exact p = 0.503; Table 1).
To explore the effects of 5% oxygen on C. elegans germline function after peak fertility, we counted daily output of unfertilized oocytes over days 1–5 of adulthood. We observed a trend towards reduced total output of unfertilized oocytes at 5% oxygen (PS = 0.308; 98.33% CI = 0.083–0.547; two-sided exact p = 0.053; Fig. 1C, Table 1). This trend was consistent between replicates (PS per replicate: 0.160, 0.280, 0.352). No unfertilized oocytes were observed during the first two days of adulthood at either oxygen level, and output of unfertilized oocytes generally began on day three and increased on day four (Fig. 1D).
Next, we cultured C. elegans at 2.5% and 21% oxygen during days 1–6 of adulthood to test whether more hatched, viable larvae would be produced at 2.5% oxygen. We did not observe increased production of viable larvae at 2.5% oxygen (PS = 0.333; 98.33% CI = 0.136–1.000; one-sided exact p = 0.941; Table 1). Rather, median larval counts were reduced compared to 21% oxygen (Fig. 1E; PS per replicate: 0.278, 0.267, 0.460). As in the initial experiment, the daily distributions of larval counts appeared similar between 2.5% and 21% oxygen, suggesting no major shift in peak fertility timing (Fig. 1F). We observed no significant difference in the production of abnormal progeny between oxygen levels, but results were inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (PS = 0.408; 98.33% CI = 0.189–0.664; two-sided exact p = 0.393; Table 1).
Given the observed trend towards a reduced number of unfertilized oocytes at 5% oxygen, we investigated whether unfertilized oocyte output would be reduced at 2.5% compared to 21% oxygen. We observed a significant reduction in the total output of unfertilized oocytes when culturing C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5% oxygen during days 1–6 of adulthood (PS = 0.254; 98.33% CI = 0.000–0.481; one-sided exact p = 0.011; Table 1; Fig. 1G). Again, output of unfertilized oocytes began on day three of adulthood and daily output after peak fertility was generally higher under 21% oxygen (Fig. 1H). Median output of unfertilized oocytes was lower at 2.5% oxygen in all replicates (PS per replicate: 0.375, 0.133, 0.080). Thus, our results indicate a reduction in unfertilized oocyte output at 2.5% compared to 21% oxygen.
To summarize, we did not find evidence to support increased fecundity of C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5% and 5% oxygen. Statistical comparisons of viable progeny production between oxygen levels were inconclusive but observed medians and effect size estimates suggested broadly similar fertility between 5% and 21% oxygen. Our findings complement the results of Freyth et al. (2010), who reported that C. elegans fertility is largely unchanged between ~10% and 21% oxygen, increased at 3.6% oxygen, and reduced at <3.6% oxygen. However, whereas Freyth et al. (2010) reported the total number of larvae counted after the first three days of adulthood, our daily counting protocol necessitated brief (10–15 min) daily exposures to 21% oxygen, which may have obscured any small fertility increase at 5% oxygen. Conversely, at 2.5% oxygen, we observed a trend towards reduced median production of hatched, viable larvae in all replicates, consistent with the results of Freyth et al. (2010). Decreased production of hatched larvae at 2.5% oxygen may reflect metabolic effects, as C. elegans has been shown to maintain stable respiration between ~4% oxygen and atmospheric levels (Anderson and Dusenbery, 1977; Van Voorhies and Ward, 2000).
In contrast to the inconclusive effects on fertility, lower oxygen levels consistently led to reduced output of unfertilized oocytes. Such a reduction would be expected if lowering ambient oxygen levels resulted in reduced rates of oocyte production. Oxygen-sensitive gamete differentiation rates would be consistent with the observation that mammalian cell differentiation is affected by oxygen levels (Ezashi et al., 2005; Berniakovich and Giorgio, 2013; Drela et al., 2014), and with the role of mitochondrial maturation and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in driving C. elegans oocyte differentiation (Charmpilas and Tavernarakis, 2020). However, reduced overall rates of oocyte production would lead to shifts in the timing of peak fertility under 2.5% and 5% oxygen compared to 21%, which we did not consistently observe (Figs. 1B,F). Thus, our results indicate that moderately low oxygen levels lead to reduced output of unfertilized oocytes after peak fertility, compared to standard laboratory conditions. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of oxygen on different germline functions in C. elegans.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert Hubbard EJ, Schedl T. 2019. Biology of the Caenorhabditis elegans Germline Stem Cell System. Genetics. 213: 1145.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1534/genetics.119.300238"},{"reference":"Anderson GL, Dusenbery DB. 1977. Critical-Oxygen Tension of Caenorhabdiltis elegans. Journal of Nematology. 9: 253.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Baccino Calace M, Prieto D, Cantera R, Egger B. 2020. Compartment and cell-type specific hypoxia responses in the developing Drosophila brain. Biology Open. 9: bio053629.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/bio.053629"},{"reference":"Berniakovich I, Giorgio M. 2013. Low oxygen tension maintains multipotency, whereas normoxia increases differentiation of mouse bone marrow stromal cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 14: 2119.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/ijms14012119"},{"reference":"Birrell JH, Verberk WCEP, Woods HA. 2024. Consistent differences in tissue oxygen levels across 15 insect species reflect a balance between oxygen supply and demand and highlight a hitherto unknown adaptation for extracting sufficient oxygen from water. Current Research in Insect Science. 6: 100095.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cris.2024.100095"},{"reference":"Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 77: 71.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/77.1.71"},{"reference":"Brouillet S, Baron C, Barry F, Andreeva A, Haouzi D, Gala A, et al., Hamamah S. 2021. Biphasic (5–2%) oxygen concentration strategy significantly improves the usable blastocyst and cumulative live birth rates in in vitro fertilization. Scientific Reports. 11: 22461.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41598-021-01782-6"},{"reference":"Carreau A, Hafny Rahbi BE, Matejuk A, Grillon C, Kieda C. 2011. Why is the partial oxygen pressure of human tissues a crucial parameter? Small molecules and hypoxia. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 15: 1239.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01258.x"},{"reference":"Carroll C, Engstrom N, Nilsson PF, Haxen ER, Mohlin S, Berg P, Glud RN, Hammarlund EU. 2021. Hypoxia Generated by Avian Embryo Growth Induces the HIF-α Response and Critical Vascularization. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 9","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fevo.2021.675800"},{"reference":"Charmpilas N, Tavernarakis N. 2020. Mitochondrial maturation drives germline stem cell differentiation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death and Differentiation. 27: 601.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41418-019-0375-9"},{"reference":"Drela K, Sarnowska A, Siedlecka P, Szablowska Gadomska I, Wielgos M, Jurga M, Lukomska B, Domanska Janik K. 2014. Low oxygen atmosphere facilitates proliferation and maintains undifferentiated state of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in an hypoxia inducible factor-dependent manner. Cytotherapy. 16: 881.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.02.009"},{"reference":"Ezashi T, Das P, Roberts RM. 2005. Low O2 tensions and the prevention of differentiation of hES cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102: 4783.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0501283102"},{"reference":"Freyth K, Janowitz T, Nunes F, Voss M, Heinick A, Bertaux J, Scheu S, Paul RJ. 2010. Reproductive Fitness and Dietary Choice Behavior of the Genetic Model Organism Caenorhabditis elegans under Semi-Natural Conditions. Molecules and Cells. 30: 347.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s10059-010-0125-9"},{"reference":"Graham JB. 1988. Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects of Integumentary Respiration: Body Size, Diffusion, and the Invertebrata1. American Zoologist. 28: 1031.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/icb/28.3.1031"},{"reference":"Gray J, Karow D, Lu H, Chang A, Chang J, Ellis R, Marletta M, Bargmann C. 2004. Oxygen sensation and social feeding mediated by a C-elegans guanylate cyclase homologue. NATURE. 430: 317.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature02714"},{"reference":"Hirsh D, Oppenheim D, Klass M. 1976. Development of the reproductive system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 49: 200.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0012-1606(76)90267-0"},{"reference":"Huang C, Xiong C, Kornfeld K. 2004. Measurements of age-related changes of physiological processes that predict lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101: 8084.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0400848101"},{"reference":"Jørgensen BB, Revsbech NP. 1985. Diffusive boundary layers and the oxygen uptake of sediments and detritus. Limnology and Oceanography. 30: 111.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.4319/lo.1985.30.1.0111"},{"reference":"Kern CC, Townsend S, Salzmann A, Rendell NB, Taylor GW, Comisel RM, et al., Gems D. 2021. C. elegans feed yolk to their young in a form of primitive lactation. Nature Communications. 12: 5801.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41467-021-25821-y"},{"reference":"McCarter J, Bartlett B, Dang T, Schedl T. 1999. On the Control of Oocyte Meiotic Maturation and Ovulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 205: 111.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1006/dbio.1998.9109"},{"reference":"Mohyeldin A, Garzon Muvdi T, Quinones Hinojosa A. 2010. Oxygen in Stem Cell Biology: A Critical Component of the Stem Cell Niche. Cell Stem Cell. 7: 150.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.007"},{"reference":"Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, et al., editors. C. elegans II. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1997. Section IX, Oocyte Development, Maturation, and Ovulation. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20108/
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Scharf A, Pohl F, Egan BM, Kocsisova Z, Kornfeld K. 2021. Reproductive Aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: From Molecules to Ecology. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 9: 718522.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcell.2021.718522"},{"reference":"Schratzberger M, Holterman M, Van Oevelen D, Helder J. 2019. A Worm's World: Ecological Flexibility Pays Off for Free-Living Nematodes in Sediments and Soils. BioScience. 69: 867.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/biosci/biz086"},{"reference":"Schulenburg H, Felix MA. 2017. The Natural Biotic Environment of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 206: 55.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1534/genetics.116.195511"},{"reference":"Sexstone AJ, Revsbech NP, Parkin TB, Tiedje JM. 1985. Direct Measurement of Oxygen Profiles and Denitrification Rates in Soil Aggregates. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 49: 645.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900030024x"},{"reference":"Simon MC, Keith B. 2008. The role of oxygen availability in embryonic development and stem cell function. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 9: 285.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nrm2354"},{"reference":"Van Den Hoogen J, Geisen S, Wall DH, Wardle DA, Traunspurger W, De Goede RGM, et al., Crowther TW. 2020. A global database of soil nematode abundance and functional group composition. Scientific Data. 7: 103.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41597-020-0437-3"},{"reference":"Van Voorhies WA, Ward S. 2000. Broad oxygen tolerance in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 203: 2467.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/jeb.203.16.2467"},{"reference":"Ward S, Carrel JS. 1979. Fertilization and sperm competition in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 73: 304.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0012-1606(79)90069-1"}],"title":"Ecologically relevant low oxygen levels reduce unfertilized oocyte output in Caenorhabditis elegans
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Andrea Scharf"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"Gary Craig Schindelman"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"b6bb6487-6085-4c53-8756-e702d1484edb","decision":"edit","abstract":"Caenorhabditis elegans naturally inhabits low-oxygen environments but is typically studied at 21% oxygen. We cultured adult C. elegans at 2.5%, 5%, and 21% oxygen during the fertile period, quantifying daily output of hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny (unhatched embryos, dead or deformed larvae). While we found no evidence for increased fertility at low oxygen levels compared to 21%, we observed a trend towards fewer unfertilized oocytes after peak fertility at 5% oxygen and significantly fewer at 2.5%. Our results indicate that reproductive output differs between laboratory conditions (high oxygen) and moderately low oxygen levels (closer to natural environments).
","acknowledgements":"The authors are grateful to Anastasia Nathania Widjaja, Fredrik Forsberg, and Johanna Farley for laboratory assistance and useful discussion. The N2 strain and OP50 were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC, University of Minnesota), which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","project"],"email":"emma.haxen@med.lu.se","firstName":"Emma R.","lastName":"Haxen","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-0309-1329"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","investigation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"mazharul.islam@med.lu.se","firstName":"Mazharul ","lastName":"Islam","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-8574-2465"},{"affiliations":["College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States","McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada"],"departments":["Lyman Briggs College and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences","School of Earth, Environment, and Society and the Origins Institute"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"grabowa@mcmaster.ca","firstName":"Alexandra ","lastName":"Grabowski","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0004-6294-9227"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center","Division of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sofie.mohlin@med.lu.se","firstName":"Sofie","lastName":"Mohlin","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-2458-3963"},{"affiliations":["University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark"],"departments":["Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"nrep@ign.ku.dk","firstName":"Nicole R.","lastName":"Posth","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6695-6115"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","resources","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sandeep.gopal@med.lu.se","firstName":"Sandeep","lastName":"Gopal","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6706-6747"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","resources","fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","project"],"email":"emma.hammarlund@med.lu.se","firstName":"Emma U.","lastName":"Hammarlund","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-7625-4793"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
","dataTable":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/f2075d73449b32fd82aeb023f4da82d7.csv"},"extendedData":[],"funding":"This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [grant agreement No 949538]; the Swedish Research Council [2019-02020 and 2023-01941]; Cancerfonden [22 2125 P j and 25 4675 Pj]; Stiftelsen Konsul Thure Carlssons Minne; Franke och Margareta Bergqvists Stiftelse; The Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund; and The Swedish Cancer Society. EUH and NRP also thank the Novo Nordisk Foundation [Grant NNF23OC0086712] for their support.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/5061e7cbf8f681a85e60dac81a6cbdfa.png"},"imageCaption":"Figure: Panels A, B, E, and F illustrate results from the experiment comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen. Panels C, D, G, and H illustrate results from the experiment comparing reproductive output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen. Each data point represents one C. elegans hermaphrodite. For the experiment comparing 5% and 21% oxygen, total counts (A, E) quantify reproductive output during the first five days of adulthood. For the experiment comparing 2.5% and 21% oxygen, total counts (C, G) quantify reproductive output during the first six days of adulthood. For each experiment, data was pooled from three replicates (see Methods). A: Total counts of hatched, viable larvae per hermaphrodite at 5% and 21% oxygen. B: Daily production of hatched, viable larvae at 5% and 21% oxygen. C: Total counts of hatched, viable larvae at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. D: Daily counts of hatched, viable larvae at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. E: Total counts of unfertilized oocytes output per hermaphrodite at 5% and 21% oxygen. F: Daily output of unfertilized oocytes at 5% and 21% oxygen. G: Total counts of unfertilized oocytes at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. H: Daily output of unfertilized oocytes at 2.5% and 21% oxygen.
Table 1: Summary statistics and test results for the comparison of reproductive output between oxygen levels. PS is the Mann–Whitney estimate (probability of superiority). Note, that the data represent pooling of multiple replicates (see Methods).
","imageTitle":"Counts of hatched larvae and unfertilized oocytes at different oxygen levels
","methods":"C. elegans maintenance
The laboratory reference strain (Wild-type, Bristol) was cultured on nematode growth medium (NGM) in 60 mm vented petri dishes seeded with Escherichia coli (OP50 strain) bacterial lawns. The NGM was prepared as detailed in Brenner (1974). Animals were maintained at 20°C for at least two weeks without starvation or overcrowding before being used for experiments.
Controlling oxygen tensions
During experiments, animals were cultured in a temperature-controlled laboratory under different oxygen pressures within custom-built hypoxia boxes. At the front, the boxes had a hinged door with magnet strips glued along the edges, connecting to magnet strips around the box opening. At the back, holes were drilled and fitted tightly with connectors to gas tubes and oxygen sensors. In the hypoxia boxes, oxygen levels were maintained using ProOx 110 Compact oxygen Controllers (BioSpherix, Ltd., RRID: SCR_021129), which kept oxygen concentrations at the set low levels by infusing the semi-sealed boxes with a gas mix consisting of 420 ppm CO2 in N2. In the otherwise identical control chamber (21% oxygen), the sensor hole at the back of the box was left open to ambient air. Each box contained a fan to avoid oxygen gradients, as well as a beaker of Milli-Q water to ensure comparable humidity levels between the hypoxia and control boxes. Temperature and relative humidity levels were monitored using data loggers (HOBO® MX1101 Temp/RH Data Logger and HOBO® Pendant® MX Temp/Light (MX2202) Logger).
Quantifying daily reproductive output
Experiments quantifying reproductive output were initiated using animals at larval stage L4. Each experimental replicate was initiated by picking 10–20 L4 larvae onto an empty NGM plate. These L4 larvae were then distributed through blinded randomization between an equal number of NGM plates, half of which (for the low-oxygen group) had been left to degas oxygen in the hypoxia box overnight. After picking one L4 larva onto each NGM plate for the experiment, the plates were returned to the hypoxia and control boxes.
The initial experiment comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen was conducted over days 1–5 of adulthood. The subsequent experiment to compare reproductive output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen was conducted over days 1–6 of adulthood. Daily transfers to fresh NGM plates necessitated brief (10–15 minutes) exposure to ambient conditions (21% oxygen), resulting in oxygen fluctuations similar to variability in the natural habitats of C. elegans. Every day during the study period, the animals were transferred to new NGM plates seeded with 100 µl OP50 lawns (the low-oxygen plates having been left to degas oxygen overnight). Blinded, randomized counting of hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny began on the third day of the experiments (counting reproductive output in the “Day one” plates) and ended on the seventh or eighth day (counting the “Day five” and “Day six” plates, respectively). Any egg that had not hatched after 48 hours was counted as unhatched. These were included in counts of abnormal progeny along with larvae with obvious morphological and locomotory defects (e.g., partial paralysis, large kinks or lumps). Unfertilized oocytes were identified based on their characteristic morphology, namely the lack of an eggshell, their brownish color, and their soft, disk-like shape (see Ward and Carrel, 1979; images in Kern et al., 2021). Reproductive output from hermaphrodites that died during the course of the experiment were excluded from the analyses, leading to different sample sizes between oxygen levels in some replicates (see Statistics).
Statistics
Effects of low oxygen levels on reproductive output were investigated via two separate experiments, one comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen, the other comparing output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen. Three experimental replicates were conducted for each comparison. Reproductive output was compared between low-oxygen (2.5% or 5% oxygen) and standard laboratory conditions (21% oxygen; control level) using Mann Whitney U testing. A non-parametric test was chosen due to the small sample size and different distributions of discrete count data between oxygen levels. In the initial comparison between 5% and 21% oxygen, two replicates had n = 5 hermaphrodites for each oxygen level, whereas the third replicate had n = 6 in the control group (21% oxygen) and n = 9 in the low-oxygen group (5% oxygen). In the subsequent comparison between 2.5% and 21% oxygen, n ranged from 3–6 in the control group and from 5–6 in the low-oxygen group. The uneven number of animals between oxygen levels was due to some hermaphrodites dying during the course of the experiments. After pooling the replicate data, we computed exact p-values, effect size estimates (probability of superiority, PS), and associated confidence intervals using the wmwTest() function from the asht package (version 1.0.1) in R (version 4.5.0). A fixed random seed was set to ensure reproducibility (set.seed(123)). We applied Holm–Bonferroni correction to control family-wise error rate over three pairwise comparisons (hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny), reporting 98.33% CIs for effect sizes.
","reagents":"Strain | Genotype | Source |
Caenorhabditis elegans, wild type, Bristol. | CGC | |
Erischerichia coli OP 50 | CGC |
Critical developmental processes are associated with low tissue oxygen levels in many animal taxa (Simon and Keith, 2008; Mohyeldin et al., 2010; Carreau et al., 2011; Baccino-Calace et al., 2020; Brouillet et al., 2021; Carroll et al., 2021). However, less is known about tissue oxygen gradients and sensitivity in microscopic invertebrates that lack respiratory and circulatory systems. Many microscopic invertebrate species take up oxygen via simple diffusion across the body surface (Graham, 1988), meaning that their tissue oxygen gradients are directly coupled to ambient oxygen concentrations. Such animals are typically found in low-oxygen environments like sediment, soil, and compost (Jørgensen and Revsbech, 1985; Sexstone et al., 1985; Schratzberger et al., 2019; van den Hoogen et al., 2020), which are likely to result in low tissue oxygen levels. For example, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans naturally inhabits rotting fruits and vegetation (Schulenburg and Félix, 2017), and this popular model organism has been shown to display a behavioral preference for 5–12% oxygen in laboratory studies (Gray et al., 2004). Yet, whether this preference for low oxygen levels is linked to oxygen sensitivity during reproduction and early development remains poorly understood.
The reproductive system of adult C. elegans hermaphrodites is known as “the germ line” and consists of two U-shaped gonadal arms connected by a common uterus (Hirsh et al., 1976). Each gonadal arm contains a pool of germline stem cells at its distal tip. As these germline stem cells proliferate, cells are pushed away from the stem cell niche in the proximal direction and begin to differentiate, eventually forming the oocytes that are passed through the spermatheca and fertilized (Hirsh et al., 1976; Albert Hubbard and Schedl, 2019). The spermatheca contains the adult hermaphrodites' supply of sperm cells (“self-sperm”) produced during the late larval stages (Hirsh et al., 1976). After peak fertility during days 1–3 of adulthood, the store of self-sperm is nearly depleted, and reduced sperm signaling leads to decreased rates of oocyte maturation and ovulation, although unfertilized oocytes are expelled at a reduced rate (Ward and Carrel, 1979; Riddle et al., 1997; McCarter et al., 1999; Scharf et al., 2021). The current study aims to explore the effects of moderately low oxygen levels on the reproductive output of C. elegans, including whether low oxygen levels lead to increased production of hatched, viable larvae throughout the entire fertile period (see Huang et al., 2004).
We cultured adult C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5%, 5%, and 21% oxygen and compared reproductive output between oxygen levels. Reproductive output was quantified as daily counts of (1) viable larvae; (2) unfertilized oocytes; and (3) abnormal progeny (unhatched embryos and dead or visibly deformed larvae, see Methods). We selected 5% oxygen because it falls within the range preferred by C. elegans (Gray et al., 2004) while approximating oxygen levels in mammalian stem cell niches (Mohyeldin et al., 2010, and references therein). We also quantified reproductive output at 2.5% oxygen, which is closer to tissue oxygen levels in many insect species (Birrell et al., 2024) and during mammalian embryonic development (Brouillet et al., 2021).
First, we compared reproductive output between adult hermaphrodites cultured at 5% and 21% oxygen over days 1–5 of adulthood to test whether more hatched, viable larvae would be produced at 5% oxygen. Median production of hatched, viable larvae was essentially identical between 5% and 21% oxygen, but statistical comparison was inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (probability of superiority, PS = 0.508; 98.33% CI = 0.305–1.000; one-sided exact p = 0.475; Fig. 1A; Table 1). This reflected variability between replicates (PS per replicate: 0.680, 0.640, 0.389; see Methods). The observed daily distributions of larval counts appeared similar between oxygen levels, suggesting no major shift in the timing of peak fertility and generally similar daily fecundity between conditions (Fig. 1B). We found no significant difference in the production of abnormal progeny between 5% and 21% oxygen, but results were inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (PS = 0.569; 98.33% CI = 0.329–0.782; two-sided exact p = 0.503; Table 1).
To explore the effects of 5% oxygen on C. elegans germline function after peak fertility, we counted daily output of unfertilized oocytes over days 1–5 of adulthood. We observed a trend towards reduced total output of unfertilized oocytes at 5% oxygen (PS = 0.308; 98.33% CI = 0.083–0.547; two-sided exact p = 0.053; Fig. 1E, Table 1). This trend was consistent between replicates (PS per replicate: 0.160, 0.280, 0.352). No unfertilized oocytes were observed during the first two days of adulthood at either oxygen level, and output of unfertilized oocytes generally began on day three and increased on day four (Fig. 1F).
Next, we cultured C. elegans at 2.5% and 21% oxygen during days 1–6 of adulthood to test whether more hatched, viable larvae would be produced at 2.5% oxygen. We did not observe increased production of viable larvae at 2.5% oxygen (PS = 0.333; 98.33% CI = 0.136–1.000; one-sided exact p = 0.941; Table 1). Rather, median larval counts were reduced compared to 21% oxygen (Fig. 1C; PS per replicate: 0.278, 0.267, 0.460). As in the initial experiment, the daily distributions of larval counts appeared similar between 2.5% and 21% oxygen, suggesting no major shift in peak fertility timing (Fig. 1D). We observed no significant difference in the production of abnormal progeny between oxygen levels, but results were inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (PS = 0.408; 98.33% CI = 0.189–0.664; two-sided exact p = 0.393; Table 1).
Given the observed trend towards a reduced number of unfertilized oocytes at 5% oxygen, we investigated whether unfertilized oocyte output would be reduced at 2.5% compared to 21% oxygen. We observed a significant reduction in the total output of unfertilized oocytes when culturing C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5% oxygen during days 1–6 of adulthood (PS = 0.254; 98.33% CI = 0.000–0.481; one-sided exact p = 0.011; Table 1; Fig. 1G). Again, output of unfertilized oocytes began on day three of adulthood and daily output after peak fertility was generally higher under 21% oxygen (Fig. 1H). Median output of unfertilized oocytes was lower at 2.5% oxygen in all replicates (PS per replicate: 0.375, 0.133, 0.080). Thus, our results indicate a reduction in unfertilized oocyte output at 2.5% compared to 21% oxygen.
To summarize, we did not find evidence to support increased fecundity of C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5% and 5% oxygen. Statistical comparisons of viable progeny production between oxygen levels were inconclusive but observed medians and effect size estimates suggested broadly similar fertility between 5% and 21% oxygen. Our findings complement the results of Freyth et al. (2010), who reported that C. elegans fertility is largely unchanged between ~10% and 21% oxygen, increased at 3.6% oxygen, and reduced at <3.6% oxygen. However, whereas Freyth et al. (2010) reported the total number of larvae counted after the first three days of adulthood, our daily counting protocol necessitated brief (10–15 min) daily exposures to 21% oxygen, which may have obscured any small fertility increase at 5% oxygen. Conversely, at 2.5% oxygen, we observed a trend towards reduced median production of hatched, viable larvae in all replicates, consistent with the results of Freyth et al. (2010). Decreased production of hatched larvae at 2.5% oxygen may reflect metabolic effects, as C. elegans has been shown to maintain stable respiration between ~4% oxygen and atmospheric levels (Anderson and Dusenbery, 1977; Van Voorhies and Ward, 2000).
In contrast to the inconclusive effects on fertility, lower oxygen levels consistently led to reduced output of unfertilized oocytes. Such a reduction would be expected if lowering ambient oxygen levels resulted in reduced rates of oocyte production. Oxygen-sensitive gamete differentiation rates would be consistent with the observation that mammalian cell differentiation is affected by oxygen levels (Ezashi et al., 2005; Berniakovich and Giorgio, 2013; Drela et al., 2014), and with the role of mitochondrial maturation and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in driving C. elegans oocyte differentiation (Charmpilas and Tavernarakis, 2020). However, reduced overall rates of oocyte production would lead to shifts in the timing of peak fertility under 2.5% and 5% oxygen compared to 21%, which we did not consistently observe (Figs. 1B,F). Thus, our results indicate that moderately low oxygen levels lead to reduced output of unfertilized oocytes after peak fertility, compared to standard laboratory conditions. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of oxygen on different germline functions in C. elegans.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert Hubbard EJ, Schedl T. 2019. Biology of the Caenorhabditis elegans Germline Stem Cell System. Genetics. 213: 1145.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1534/genetics.119.300238"},{"reference":"Anderson GL, Dusenbery DB. 1977. Critical-Oxygen Tension of Caenorhabdiltis elegans. Journal of Nematology. 9: 253.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Baccino Calace M, Prieto D, Cantera R, Egger B. 2020. Compartment and cell-type specific hypoxia responses in the developing Drosophila brain. Biology Open. 9: bio053629.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/bio.053629"},{"reference":"Berniakovich I, Giorgio M. 2013. Low oxygen tension maintains multipotency, whereas normoxia increases differentiation of mouse bone marrow stromal cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 14: 2119.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/ijms14012119"},{"reference":"Birrell JH, Verberk WCEP, Woods HA. 2024. Consistent differences in tissue oxygen levels across 15 insect species reflect a balance between oxygen supply and demand and highlight a hitherto unknown adaptation for extracting sufficient oxygen from water. Current Research in Insect Science. 6: 100095.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cris.2024.100095"},{"reference":"Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 77: 71.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/77.1.71"},{"reference":"Brouillet S, Baron C, Barry F, Andreeva A, Haouzi D, Gala A, et al., Hamamah S. 2021. Biphasic (5–2%) oxygen concentration strategy significantly improves the usable blastocyst and cumulative live birth rates in in vitro fertilization. Scientific Reports. 11: 22461.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41598-021-01782-6"},{"reference":"Carreau A, Hafny Rahbi BE, Matejuk A, Grillon C, Kieda C. 2011. Why is the partial oxygen pressure of human tissues a crucial parameter? Small molecules and hypoxia. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 15: 1239.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01258.x"},{"reference":"Carroll C, Engstrom N, Nilsson PF, Haxen ER, Mohlin S, Berg P, Glud RN, Hammarlund EU. 2021. Hypoxia Generated by Avian Embryo Growth Induces the HIF-α Response and Critical Vascularization. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 9","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fevo.2021.675800"},{"reference":"Charmpilas N, Tavernarakis N. 2020. Mitochondrial maturation drives germline stem cell differentiation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death and Differentiation. 27: 601.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41418-019-0375-9"},{"reference":"Drela K, Sarnowska A, Siedlecka P, Szablowska Gadomska I, Wielgos M, Jurga M, Lukomska B, Domanska Janik K. 2014. Low oxygen atmosphere facilitates proliferation and maintains undifferentiated state of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in an hypoxia inducible factor-dependent manner. Cytotherapy. 16: 881.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.02.009"},{"reference":"Ezashi T, Das P, Roberts RM. 2005. Low O2 tensions and the prevention of differentiation of hES cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102: 4783.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0501283102"},{"reference":"Freyth K, Janowitz T, Nunes F, Voss M, Heinick A, Bertaux J, Scheu S, Paul RJ. 2010. Reproductive Fitness and Dietary Choice Behavior of the Genetic Model Organism Caenorhabditis elegans under Semi-Natural Conditions. Molecules and Cells. 30: 347.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s10059-010-0125-9"},{"reference":"Graham JB. 1988. Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects of Integumentary Respiration: Body Size, Diffusion, and the Invertebrata1. American Zoologist. 28: 1031.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/icb/28.3.1031"},{"reference":"Gray J, Karow D, Lu H, Chang A, Chang J, Ellis R, Marletta M, Bargmann C. 2004. Oxygen sensation and social feeding mediated by a C-elegans guanylate cyclase homologue. NATURE. 430: 317.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature02714"},{"reference":"Hirsh D, Oppenheim D, Klass M. 1976. Development of the reproductive system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 49: 200.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0012-1606(76)90267-0"},{"reference":"Huang C, Xiong C, Kornfeld K. 2004. Measurements of age-related changes of physiological processes that predict lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101: 8084.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0400848101"},{"reference":"Jørgensen BB, Revsbech NP. 1985. Diffusive boundary layers and the oxygen uptake of sediments and detritus. Limnology and Oceanography. 30: 111.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.4319/lo.1985.30.1.0111"},{"reference":"Kern CC, Townsend S, Salzmann A, Rendell NB, Taylor GW, Comisel RM, et al., Gems D. 2021. C. elegans feed yolk to their young in a form of primitive lactation. Nature Communications. 12: 5801.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41467-021-25821-y"},{"reference":"McCarter J, Bartlett B, Dang T, Schedl T. 1999. On the Control of Oocyte Meiotic Maturation and Ovulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 205: 111.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1006/dbio.1998.9109"},{"reference":"Mohyeldin A, Garzon Muvdi T, Quinones Hinojosa A. 2010. Oxygen in Stem Cell Biology: A Critical Component of the Stem Cell Niche. Cell Stem Cell. 7: 150.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.007"},{"reference":"Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, et al., editors. C. elegans II. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1997. Section IX, Oocyte Development, Maturation, and Ovulation. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20108/
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Scharf A, Pohl F, Egan BM, Kocsisova Z, Kornfeld K. 2021. Reproductive Aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: From Molecules to Ecology. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 9: 718522.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcell.2021.718522"},{"reference":"Schratzberger M, Holterman M, Van Oevelen D, Helder J. 2019. A Worm's World: Ecological Flexibility Pays Off for Free-Living Nematodes in Sediments and Soils. BioScience. 69: 867.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/biosci/biz086"},{"reference":"Schulenburg H, Felix MA. 2017. The Natural Biotic Environment of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 206: 55.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1534/genetics.116.195511"},{"reference":"Sexstone AJ, Revsbech NP, Parkin TB, Tiedje JM. 1985. Direct Measurement of Oxygen Profiles and Denitrification Rates in Soil Aggregates. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 49: 645.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900030024x"},{"reference":"Simon MC, Keith B. 2008. The role of oxygen availability in embryonic development and stem cell function. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 9: 285.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nrm2354"},{"reference":"Van Den Hoogen J, Geisen S, Wall DH, Wardle DA, Traunspurger W, De Goede RGM, et al., Crowther TW. 2020. A global database of soil nematode abundance and functional group composition. Scientific Data. 7: 103.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41597-020-0437-3"},{"reference":"Van Voorhies WA, Ward S. 2000. Broad oxygen tolerance in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 203: 2467.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/jeb.203.16.2467"},{"reference":"Ward S, Carrel JS. 1979. Fertilization and sperm competition in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 73: 304.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0012-1606(79)90069-1"}],"title":"Ecologically relevant low oxygen levels reduce unfertilized oocyte output in Caenorhabditis elegans
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"Gary Craig Schindelman"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":"1785892642746"}]},{"id":"e82941a1-ed18-4211-bd27-c8348cf587c1","decision":"accept","abstract":"Caenorhabditis elegans naturally inhabits low-oxygen environments but is typically studied at 21% oxygen. We cultured adult C. elegans at 2.5%, 5%, and 21% oxygen during the fertile period, quantifying daily output of hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny (unhatched embryos, dead or deformed larvae). While we found no evidence for increased fertility at low oxygen levels compared to 21%, we observed a trend towards fewer unfertilized oocytes after peak fertility at 5% oxygen and significantly fewer at 2.5%. Our results indicate that reproductive output differs between laboratory conditions (high oxygen) and moderately low oxygen levels (closer to natural environments).
","acknowledgements":"The authors are grateful to Anastasia Nathania Widjaja, Fredrik Forsberg, and Johanna Farley for laboratory assistance and useful discussion. The N2 strain and OP50 were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC, University of Minnesota), which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","project"],"email":"emma.haxen@med.lu.se","firstName":"Emma R.","lastName":"Haxen","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-0309-1329"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","investigation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"mazharul.islam@med.lu.se","firstName":"Mazharul ","lastName":"Islam","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-8574-2465"},{"affiliations":["College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States","McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada"],"departments":["Lyman Briggs College and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences","School of Earth, Environment, and Society and the Origins Institute"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"grabowa@mcmaster.ca","firstName":"Alexandra ","lastName":"Grabowski","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0004-6294-9227"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center","Division of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sofie.mohlin@med.lu.se","firstName":"Sofie","lastName":"Mohlin","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-2458-3963"},{"affiliations":["University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark"],"departments":["Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"nrep@ign.ku.dk","firstName":"Nicole R.","lastName":"Posth","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6695-6115"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","resources","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sandeep.gopal@med.lu.se","firstName":"Sandeep","lastName":"Gopal","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6706-6747"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","resources","fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","project"],"email":"emma.hammarlund@med.lu.se","firstName":"Emma U.","lastName":"Hammarlund","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-7625-4793"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
","dataTable":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/f2075d73449b32fd82aeb023f4da82d7.csv"},"extendedData":[],"funding":"This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [grant agreement No 949538]; the Swedish Research Council [2019-02020 and 2023-01941]; Cancerfonden [22 2125 P j and 25 4675 Pj]; Stiftelsen Konsul Thure Carlssons Minne; Franke och Margareta Bergqvists Stiftelse; The Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund; and The Swedish Cancer Society. EUH and NRP also thank the Novo Nordisk Foundation [Grant NNF23OC0086712] for their support.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/5061e7cbf8f681a85e60dac81a6cbdfa.png"},"imageCaption":"Figure: Panels A, B, E, and F illustrate results from the experiment comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen. Panels C, D, G, and H illustrate results from the experiment comparing reproductive output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen. Each data point represents one C. elegans hermaphrodite. For the experiment comparing 5% and 21% oxygen, total counts (A, E) quantify reproductive output during the first five days of adulthood. For the experiment comparing 2.5% and 21% oxygen, total counts (C, G) quantify reproductive output during the first six days of adulthood. For each experiment, data was pooled from three replicates (see Methods). A: Total counts of hatched, viable larvae per hermaphrodite at 5% and 21% oxygen. B: Daily production of hatched, viable larvae at 5% and 21% oxygen. C: Total counts of hatched, viable larvae at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. D: Daily counts of hatched, viable larvae at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. E: Total counts of unfertilized oocytes output per hermaphrodite at 5% and 21% oxygen. F: Daily output of unfertilized oocytes at 5% and 21% oxygen. G: Total counts of unfertilized oocytes at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. H: Daily output of unfertilized oocytes at 2.5% and 21% oxygen.
Table 1: Summary statistics and test results for the comparison of reproductive output between oxygen levels. PS is the Mann–Whitney estimate (probability of superiority). Note, that the data represent pooling of multiple replicates (see Methods).
","imageTitle":"Counts of hatched larvae and unfertilized oocytes at different oxygen levels
","methods":"C. elegans maintenance
The laboratory reference strain (Wild-type, Bristol) was cultured on nematode growth medium (NGM) in 60 mm vented petri dishes seeded with Escherichia coli (OP50 strain) bacterial lawns. The NGM was prepared as detailed in Brenner (1974). Animals were maintained at 20°C for at least two weeks without starvation or overcrowding before being used for experiments.
Controlling oxygen tensions
During experiments, animals were cultured in a temperature-controlled laboratory under different oxygen pressures within custom-built hypoxia boxes. At the front, the boxes had a hinged door with magnet strips glued along the edges, connecting to magnet strips around the box opening. At the back, holes were drilled and fitted tightly with connectors to gas tubes and oxygen sensors. In the hypoxia boxes, oxygen levels were maintained using ProOx 110 Compact oxygen Controllers (BioSpherix, Ltd., RRID: SCR_021129), which kept oxygen concentrations at the set low levels by infusing the semi-sealed boxes with a gas mix consisting of 420 ppm CO2 in N2. In the otherwise identical control chamber (21% oxygen), the sensor hole at the back of the box was left open to ambient air. Each box contained a fan to avoid oxygen gradients, as well as a beaker of Milli-Q water to ensure comparable humidity levels between the hypoxia and control boxes. Temperature and relative humidity levels were monitored using data loggers (HOBO® MX1101 Temp/RH Data Logger and HOBO® Pendant® MX Temp/Light (MX2202) Logger).
Quantifying daily reproductive output
Experiments quantifying reproductive output were initiated using animals at larval stage L4. Each experimental replicate was initiated by picking 10–20 L4 larvae onto an empty NGM plate. These L4 larvae were then distributed through blinded randomization between an equal number of NGM plates, half of which (for the low-oxygen group) had been left to degas oxygen in the hypoxia box overnight. After picking one L4 larva onto each NGM plate for the experiment, the plates were returned to the hypoxia and control boxes.
The initial experiment comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen was conducted over days 1–5 of adulthood. The subsequent experiment to compare reproductive output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen was conducted over days 1–6 of adulthood. Daily transfers to fresh NGM plates necessitated brief (10–15 minutes) exposure to ambient conditions (21% oxygen), resulting in oxygen fluctuations similar to variability in the natural habitats of C. elegans. Every day during the study period, the animals were transferred to new NGM plates seeded with 100 µl OP50 lawns (the low-oxygen plates having been left to degas oxygen overnight). Blinded, randomized counting of hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny began on the third day of the experiments (counting reproductive output in the “Day one” plates) and ended on the seventh or eighth day (counting the “Day five” and “Day six” plates, respectively). Any egg that had not hatched after 48 hours was counted as unhatched. These were included in counts of abnormal progeny along with larvae with obvious morphological and locomotory defects (e.g., partial paralysis, large kinks or lumps). Unfertilized oocytes were identified based on their characteristic morphology, namely the lack of an eggshell, their brownish color, and their soft, disk-like shape (see Ward and Carrel, 1979; images in Kern et al., 2021). Reproductive output from hermaphrodites that died during the course of the experiment were excluded from the analyses, leading to different sample sizes between oxygen levels in some replicates (see Statistics).
Statistics
Effects of low oxygen levels on reproductive output were investigated via two separate experiments, one comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen, the other comparing output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen. Three experimental replicates were conducted for each comparison. Reproductive output was compared between low-oxygen (2.5% or 5% oxygen) and standard laboratory conditions (21% oxygen; control level) using Mann Whitney U testing. A non-parametric test was chosen due to the small sample size and different distributions of discrete count data between oxygen levels. In the initial comparison between 5% and 21% oxygen, two replicates had n = 5 hermaphrodites for each oxygen level, whereas the third replicate had n = 6 in the control group (21% oxygen) and n = 9 in the low-oxygen group (5% oxygen). In the subsequent comparison between 2.5% and 21% oxygen, n ranged from 3–6 in the control group and from 5–6 in the low-oxygen group. The uneven number of animals between oxygen levels was due to some hermaphrodites dying during the course of the experiments. After pooling the replicate data, we computed exact p-values, effect size estimates (probability of superiority, PS), and associated confidence intervals using the wmwTest() function from the asht package (version 1.0.1) in R (version 4.5.0). A fixed random seed was set to ensure reproducibility (set.seed(123)). We applied Holm–Bonferroni correction to control family-wise error rate over three pairwise comparisons (hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny), reporting 98.33% CIs for effect sizes.
","reagents":"Strain | Genotype | Source |
Caenorhabditis elegans, wild type, Bristol. | CGC | |
Erischerichia coli OP 50 | CGC |
Critical developmental processes are associated with low tissue oxygen levels in many animal taxa (Simon and Keith, 2008; Mohyeldin et al., 2010; Carreau et al., 2011; Baccino-Calace et al., 2020; Brouillet et al., 2021; Carroll et al., 2021). However, less is known about tissue oxygen gradients and sensitivity in microscopic invertebrates that lack respiratory and circulatory systems. Many microscopic invertebrate species take up oxygen via simple diffusion across the body surface (Graham, 1988), meaning that their tissue oxygen gradients are directly coupled to ambient oxygen concentrations. Such animals are typically found in low-oxygen environments like sediment, soil, and compost (Jørgensen and Revsbech, 1985; Sexstone et al., 1985; Schratzberger et al., 2019; van den Hoogen et al., 2020), which are likely to result in low tissue oxygen levels. For example, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans naturally inhabits rotting fruits and vegetation (Schulenburg and Félix, 2017), and this popular model organism has been shown to display a behavioral preference for 5–12% oxygen in laboratory studies (Gray et al., 2004). Yet, whether this preference for low oxygen levels is linked to oxygen sensitivity during reproduction and early development remains poorly understood.
The reproductive system of adult C. elegans hermaphrodites is known as “the germ line” and consists of two U-shaped gonadal arms connected by a common uterus (Hirsh et al., 1976). Each gonadal arm contains a pool of germline stem cells at its distal tip. As these germline stem cells proliferate, cells are pushed away from the stem cell niche in the proximal direction and begin to differentiate, eventually forming the oocytes that are passed through the spermatheca and fertilized (Hirsh et al., 1976; Albert Hubbard and Schedl, 2019). The spermatheca contains the adult hermaphrodites' supply of sperm cells (“self-sperm”) produced during the late larval stages (Hirsh et al., 1976). After peak fertility during days 1–3 of adulthood, the store of self-sperm is nearly depleted, and reduced sperm signaling leads to decreased rates of oocyte maturation and ovulation, although unfertilized oocytes are expelled at a reduced rate (Ward and Carrel, 1979; Riddle et al., 1997; McCarter et al., 1999; Scharf et al., 2021). The current study aims to explore the effects of moderately low oxygen levels on the reproductive output of C. elegans, including whether low oxygen levels lead to increased production of hatched, viable larvae throughout the entire fertile period (see Huang et al., 2004).
We cultured adult C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5%, 5%, and 21% oxygen and compared reproductive output between oxygen levels. Reproductive output was quantified as daily counts of (1) viable larvae; (2) unfertilized oocytes; and (3) abnormal progeny (unhatched embryos and dead or visibly deformed larvae, see Methods). We selected 5% oxygen because it falls within the range preferred by C. elegans (Gray et al., 2004) while approximating oxygen levels in mammalian stem cell niches (Mohyeldin et al., 2010, and references therein). We also quantified reproductive output at 2.5% oxygen, which is closer to tissue oxygen levels in many insect species (Birrell et al., 2024) and during mammalian embryonic development (Brouillet et al., 2021).
First, we compared reproductive output between adult hermaphrodites cultured at 5% and 21% oxygen over days 1–5 of adulthood to test whether more hatched, viable larvae would be produced at 5% oxygen. Median production of hatched, viable larvae was essentially identical between 5% and 21% oxygen, but statistical comparison was inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (probability of superiority, PS = 0.508; 98.33% CI = 0.305–1.000; one-sided exact p = 0.475; Fig. 1A; Table 1). This reflected variability between replicates (PS per replicate: 0.680, 0.640, 0.389; see Methods). The observed daily distributions of larval counts appeared similar between oxygen levels, suggesting no major shift in the timing of peak fertility and generally similar daily fecundity between conditions (Fig. 1B). We found no significant difference in the production of abnormal progeny between 5% and 21% oxygen, but results were inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (PS = 0.569; 98.33% CI = 0.329–0.782; two-sided exact p = 0.503; Table 1).
To explore the effects of 5% oxygen on C. elegans germline function after peak fertility, we counted daily output of unfertilized oocytes over days 1–5 of adulthood. We observed a trend towards reduced total output of unfertilized oocytes at 5% oxygen (PS = 0.308; 98.33% CI = 0.083–0.547; two-sided exact p = 0.053; Fig. 1E, Table 1). This trend was consistent between replicates (PS per replicate: 0.160, 0.280, 0.352). No unfertilized oocytes were observed during the first two days of adulthood at either oxygen level, and output of unfertilized oocytes generally began on day three and increased on day four (Fig. 1F).
Next, we cultured C. elegans at 2.5% and 21% oxygen during days 1–6 of adulthood to test whether more hatched, viable larvae would be produced at 2.5% oxygen. We did not observe increased production of viable larvae at 2.5% oxygen (PS = 0.333; 98.33% CI = 0.136–1.000; one-sided exact p = 0.941; Table 1). Rather, median larval counts were reduced compared to 21% oxygen (Fig. 1C; PS per replicate: 0.278, 0.267, 0.460). As in the initial experiment, the daily distributions of larval counts appeared similar between 2.5% and 21% oxygen, suggesting no major shift in peak fertility timing (Fig. 1D). We observed no significant difference in the production of abnormal progeny between oxygen levels, but results were inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (PS = 0.408; 98.33% CI = 0.189–0.664; two-sided exact p = 0.393; Table 1).
Given the observed trend towards a reduced number of unfertilized oocytes at 5% oxygen, we investigated whether unfertilized oocyte output would be reduced at 2.5% compared to 21% oxygen. We observed a significant reduction in the total output of unfertilized oocytes when culturing C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5% oxygen during days 1–6 of adulthood (PS = 0.254; 98.33% CI = 0.000–0.481; one-sided exact p = 0.011; Table 1; Fig. 1G). Again, output of unfertilized oocytes began on day three of adulthood and daily output after peak fertility was generally higher under 21% oxygen (Fig. 1H). Median output of unfertilized oocytes was lower at 2.5% oxygen in all replicates (PS per replicate: 0.375, 0.133, 0.080). Thus, our results indicate a reduction in unfertilized oocyte output at 2.5% compared to 21% oxygen.
To summarize, we did not find evidence to support increased fecundity of C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5% and 5% oxygen. Statistical comparisons of viable progeny production between oxygen levels were inconclusive but observed medians and effect size estimates suggested broadly similar fertility between 5% and 21% oxygen. Our findings complement the results of Freyth et al. (2010), who reported that C. elegans fertility is largely unchanged between ~10% and 21% oxygen, increased at 3.6% oxygen, and reduced at <3.6% oxygen. However, whereas Freyth et al. (2010) reported the total number of larvae counted after the first three days of adulthood, our daily counting protocol necessitated brief (10–15 min) daily exposures to 21% oxygen, which may have obscured any small fertility increase at 5% oxygen. Conversely, at 2.5% oxygen, we observed a trend towards reduced median production of hatched, viable larvae in all replicates, consistent with the results of Freyth et al. (2010). Decreased production of hatched larvae at 2.5% oxygen may reflect metabolic effects, as C. elegans has been shown to maintain stable respiration between ~4% oxygen and atmospheric levels (Anderson and Dusenbery, 1977; Van Voorhies and Ward, 2000).
In contrast to the inconclusive effects on fertility, lower oxygen levels consistently led to reduced output of unfertilized oocytes. Such a reduction would be expected if lowering ambient oxygen levels resulted in reduced rates of oocyte production. Oxygen-sensitive gamete differentiation rates would be consistent with the observation that mammalian cell differentiation is affected by oxygen levels (Ezashi et al., 2005; Berniakovich and Giorgio, 2013; Drela et al., 2014), and with the role of mitochondrial maturation and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in driving C. elegans oocyte differentiation (Charmpilas and Tavernarakis, 2020). However, reduced overall rates of oocyte production would lead to shifts in the timing of peak fertility under 2.5% and 5% oxygen compared to 21%, which we did not consistently observe (Figs. 1B,F). Thus, our results indicate that moderately low oxygen levels lead to reduced output of unfertilized oocytes after peak fertility, compared to standard laboratory conditions. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of oxygen on different germline functions in C. elegans.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert Hubbard EJ, Schedl T. 2019. Biology of the Caenorhabditis elegans Germline Stem Cell System. Genetics. 213: 1145.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1534/genetics.119.300238"},{"reference":"Anderson GL, Dusenbery DB. 1977. Critical-oxygen tension of Caenorhabdiltis elegans. J Nematol 9(3): 253-4.
","pubmedId":"19305606","doi":""},{"reference":"Baccino Calace M, Prieto D, Cantera R, Egger B. 2020. Compartment and cell-type specific hypoxia responses in the developing Drosophila brain. Biology Open. 9: bio053629.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/bio.053629"},{"reference":"Berniakovich I, Giorgio M. 2013. Low oxygen tension maintains multipotency, whereas normoxia increases differentiation of mouse bone marrow stromal cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 14: 2119.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/ijms14012119"},{"reference":"Birrell JH, Verberk WCEP, Woods HA. 2024. Consistent differences in tissue oxygen levels across 15 insect species reflect a balance between oxygen supply and demand and highlight a hitherto unknown adaptation for extracting sufficient oxygen from water. Current Research in Insect Science. 6: 100095.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cris.2024.100095"},{"reference":"Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 77: 71.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/77.1.71"},{"reference":"Brouillet S, Baron C, Barry F, Andreeva A, Haouzi D, Gala A, et al., Hamamah S. 2021. Biphasic (5–2%) oxygen concentration strategy significantly improves the usable blastocyst and cumulative live birth rates in in vitro fertilization. Scientific Reports. 11: 22461.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41598-021-01782-6"},{"reference":"Carreau A, Hafny Rahbi BE, Matejuk A, Grillon C, Kieda C. 2011. Why is the partial oxygen pressure of human tissues a crucial parameter? Small molecules and hypoxia. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 15: 1239.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01258.x"},{"reference":"Carroll C, Engstrom N, Nilsson PF, Haxen ER, Mohlin S, Berg P, Glud RN, Hammarlund EU. 2021. Hypoxia Generated by Avian Embryo Growth Induces the HIF-α Response and Critical Vascularization. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 9","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fevo.2021.675800"},{"reference":"Charmpilas N, Tavernarakis N. 2020. Mitochondrial maturation drives germline stem cell differentiation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death and Differentiation. 27: 601.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41418-019-0375-9"},{"reference":"Drela K, Sarnowska A, Siedlecka P, Szablowska Gadomska I, Wielgos M, Jurga M, Lukomska B, Domanska Janik K. 2014. Low oxygen atmosphere facilitates proliferation and maintains undifferentiated state of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in an hypoxia inducible factor-dependent manner. Cytotherapy. 16: 881.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.02.009"},{"reference":"Ezashi T, Das P, Roberts RM. 2005. Low O2 tensions and the prevention of differentiation of hES cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102: 4783.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0501283102"},{"reference":"Freyth K, Janowitz T, Nunes F, Voss M, Heinick A, Bertaux J, Scheu S, Paul RJ. 2010. Reproductive Fitness and Dietary Choice Behavior of the Genetic Model Organism Caenorhabditis elegans under Semi-Natural Conditions. Molecules and Cells. 30: 347.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s10059-010-0125-9"},{"reference":"Graham JB. 1988. Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects of Integumentary Respiration: Body Size, Diffusion, and the Invertebrata1. American Zoologist. 28: 1031.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/icb/28.3.1031"},{"reference":"Gray J, Karow D, Lu H, Chang A, Chang J, Ellis R, Marletta M, Bargmann C. 2004. Oxygen sensation and social feeding mediated by a C-elegans guanylate cyclase homologue. NATURE. 430: 317.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature02714"},{"reference":"Hirsh D, Oppenheim D, Klass M. 1976. Development of the reproductive system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 49: 200.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0012-1606(76)90267-0"},{"reference":"Huang C, Xiong C, Kornfeld K. 2004. Measurements of age-related changes of physiological processes that predict lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101: 8084.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0400848101"},{"reference":"Jørgensen BB, Revsbech NP. 1985. Diffusive boundary layers and the oxygen uptake of sediments and detritus. Limnology and Oceanography. 30: 111.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.4319/lo.1985.30.1.0111"},{"reference":"Kern CC, Townsend S, Salzmann A, Rendell NB, Taylor GW, Comisel RM, et al., Gems D. 2021. C. elegans feed yolk to their young in a form of primitive lactation. Nature Communications. 12: 5801.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41467-021-25821-y"},{"reference":"McCarter J, Bartlett B, Dang T, Schedl T. 1999. On the Control of Oocyte Meiotic Maturation and Ovulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 205: 111.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1006/dbio.1998.9109"},{"reference":"Mohyeldin A, Garzon Muvdi T, Quinones Hinojosa A. 2010. Oxygen in Stem Cell Biology: A Critical Component of the Stem Cell Niche. Cell Stem Cell. 7: 150.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.007"},{"reference":"Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, et al., editors. C. elegans II. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1997. Section IX, Oocyte Development, Maturation, and Ovulation. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20108/
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Scharf A, Pohl F, Egan BM, Kocsisova Z, Kornfeld K. 2021. Reproductive Aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: From Molecules to Ecology. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 9: 718522.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcell.2021.718522"},{"reference":"Schratzberger M, Holterman M, Van Oevelen D, Helder J. 2019. A Worm's World: Ecological Flexibility Pays Off for Free-Living Nematodes in Sediments and Soils. BioScience. 69: 867.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/biosci/biz086"},{"reference":"Schulenburg H, Felix MA. 2017. The Natural Biotic Environment of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 206: 55.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1534/genetics.116.195511"},{"reference":"Sexstone AJ, Revsbech NP, Parkin TB, Tiedje JM. 1985. Direct Measurement of Oxygen Profiles and Denitrification Rates in Soil Aggregates. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 49: 645.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900030024x"},{"reference":"Simon MC, Keith B. 2008. The role of oxygen availability in embryonic development and stem cell function. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 9: 285.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nrm2354"},{"reference":"Van Den Hoogen J, Geisen S, Wall DH, Wardle DA, Traunspurger W, De Goede RGM, et al., Crowther TW. 2020. A global database of soil nematode abundance and functional group composition. Scientific Data. 7: 103.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41597-020-0437-3"},{"reference":"Van Voorhies WA, Ward S. 2000. Broad oxygen tolerance in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 203: 2467.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/jeb.203.16.2467"},{"reference":"Ward S, Carrel JS. 1979. Fertilization and sperm competition in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 73: 304.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0012-1606(79)90069-1"}],"title":"Ecologically relevant low oxygen levels reduce unfertilized oocyte output in Caenorhabditis elegans
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"Gary Craig Schindelman"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"2c782c72-c6c8-4ef2-94d1-1c9f99eea64b","decision":"edit","abstract":"Caenorhabditis elegans naturally inhabits low-oxygen environments but is typically studied at 21% oxygen. We cultured adult C. elegans at 2.5%, 5%, and 21% oxygen during the fertile period, quantifying daily output of hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny (unhatched embryos, dead or deformed larvae). While we found no evidence for increased fertility at low oxygen levels compared to 21%, we observed a trend towards fewer unfertilized oocytes after peak fertility at 5% oxygen and significantly fewer at 2.5%. Our results indicate that reproductive output differs between laboratory conditions (high oxygen) and moderately low oxygen levels (closer to natural environments).
","acknowledgements":"The authors are grateful to Anastasia Nathania Widjaja, Fredrik Forsberg, and Johanna Farley for laboratory assistance and useful discussion. The N2 strain and OP50 were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC, University of Minnesota), which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","project"],"email":"emma.haxen@med.lu.se","firstName":"Emma R.","lastName":"Haxen","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-0309-1329"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","investigation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"mazharul.islam@med.lu.se","firstName":"Mazharul ","lastName":"Islam","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-8574-2465"},{"affiliations":["College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States","McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada"],"departments":["Lyman Briggs College and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences","School of Earth, Environment, and Society and the Origins Institute"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"grabowa@mcmaster.ca","firstName":"Alexandra ","lastName":"Grabowski","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0004-6294-9227"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center","Division of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sofie.mohlin@med.lu.se","firstName":"Sofie","lastName":"Mohlin","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-2458-3963"},{"affiliations":["University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark"],"departments":["Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"nrep@ign.ku.dk","firstName":"Nicole R.","lastName":"Posth","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6695-6115"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","resources","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sandeep.gopal@med.lu.se","firstName":"Sandeep","lastName":"Gopal","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6706-6747"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","resources","fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","project"],"email":"emma.hammarlund@med.lu.se","firstName":"Emma U.","lastName":"Hammarlund","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-7625-4793"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
","dataTable":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/f2075d73449b32fd82aeb023f4da82d7.csv"},"extendedData":[],"funding":"This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [grant agreement No 949538]; the Swedish Research Council [2019-02020 and 2023-01941]; Cancerfonden [22 2125 P j and 25 4675 Pj]; Stiftelsen Konsul Thure Carlssons Minne; Franke och Margareta Bergqvists Stiftelse; The Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund; and The Swedish Cancer Society. EUH and NRP also thank the Novo Nordisk Foundation [Grant NNF23OC0086712] for their support.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/5061e7cbf8f681a85e60dac81a6cbdfa.png"},"imageCaption":"Figure: Panels A, B, E, and F illustrate results from the experiment comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen. Panels C, D, G, and H illustrate results from the experiment comparing reproductive output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen. Each data point represents one C. elegans hermaphrodite. For the experiment comparing 5% and 21% oxygen, total counts (A, E) quantify reproductive output during the first five days of adulthood. For the experiment comparing 2.5% and 21% oxygen, total counts (C, G) quantify reproductive output during the first six days of adulthood. For each experiment, data was pooled from three replicates (see Methods). A: Total counts of hatched, viable larvae per hermaphrodite at 5% and 21% oxygen. B: Daily production of hatched, viable larvae at 5% and 21% oxygen. C: Total counts of hatched, viable larvae at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. D: Daily counts of hatched, viable larvae at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. E: Total counts of unfertilized oocytes output per hermaphrodite at 5% and 21% oxygen. F: Daily output of unfertilized oocytes at 5% and 21% oxygen. G: Total counts of unfertilized oocytes at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. H: Daily output of unfertilized oocytes at 2.5% and 21% oxygen.
Table 1: Summary statistics and test results for the comparison of reproductive output between oxygen levels. PS is the Mann–Whitney estimate (probability of superiority). Note, that the data represent pooling of multiple replicates (see Methods).
","imageTitle":"Counts of hatched larvae and unfertilized oocytes at different oxygen levels
","methods":"C. elegans maintenance
The laboratory reference strain (Wild-type, Bristol) was cultured on nematode growth medium (NGM) in 60 mm vented petri dishes seeded with Escherichia coli (OP50 strain) bacterial lawns. The NGM was prepared as detailed in Brenner (1974). Animals were maintained at 20°C for at least two weeks without starvation or overcrowding before being used for experiments.
Controlling oxygen tensions
During experiments, animals were cultured in a temperature-controlled laboratory under different oxygen pressures within custom-built hypoxia boxes. At the front, the boxes had a hinged door with magnet strips glued along the edges, connecting to magnet strips around the box opening. At the back, holes were drilled and fitted tightly with connectors to gas tubes and oxygen sensors. In the hypoxia boxes, oxygen levels were maintained using ProOx 110 Compact oxygen Controllers (BioSpherix, Ltd., RRID: SCR_021129), which kept oxygen concentrations at the set low levels by infusing the semi-sealed boxes with a gas mix consisting of 420 ppm CO2 in N2. In the otherwise identical control chamber (21% oxygen), the sensor hole at the back of the box was left open to ambient air. Each box contained a fan to avoid oxygen gradients, as well as a beaker of Milli-Q water to ensure comparable humidity levels between the hypoxia and control boxes. Temperature and relative humidity levels were monitored using data loggers (HOBO® MX1101 Temp/RH Data Logger and HOBO® Pendant® MX Temp/Light (MX2202) Logger).
Quantifying daily reproductive output
Experiments quantifying reproductive output were initiated using animals at larval stage L4. Each experimental replicate was initiated by picking 10–20 L4 larvae onto an empty NGM plate. These L4 larvae were then distributed through blinded randomization between an equal number of NGM plates, half of which (for the low-oxygen group) had been left to degas oxygen in the hypoxia box overnight. After picking one L4 larva onto each NGM plate for the experiment, the plates were returned to the hypoxia and control boxes.
The initial experiment comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen was conducted over days 1–5 of adulthood. The subsequent experiment to compare reproductive output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen was conducted over days 1–6 of adulthood. Daily transfers to fresh NGM plates necessitated brief (10–15 minutes) exposure to ambient conditions (21% oxygen), resulting in oxygen fluctuations similar to variability in the natural habitats of C. elegans. Every day during the study period, the animals were transferred to new NGM plates seeded with 100 µl OP50 lawns (the low-oxygen plates having been left to degas oxygen overnight). Blinded, randomized counting of hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny began on the third day of the experiments (counting reproductive output in the “Day one” plates) and ended on the seventh or eighth day (counting the “Day five” and “Day six” plates, respectively). Any egg that had not hatched after 48 hours was counted as unhatched. These were included in counts of abnormal progeny along with larvae with obvious morphological and locomotory defects (e.g., partial paralysis, large kinks or lumps). Unfertilized oocytes were identified based on their characteristic morphology, namely the lack of an eggshell, their brownish color, and their soft, disk-like shape (see Ward and Carrel, 1979; images in Kern et al., 2021). Reproductive output from hermaphrodites that died during the course of the experiment were excluded from the analyses, leading to different sample sizes between oxygen levels in some replicates (see Statistics).
Statistics
Effects of low oxygen levels on reproductive output were investigated via two separate experiments, one comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen, the other comparing output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen. Three experimental replicates were conducted for each comparison. Reproductive output was compared between low-oxygen (2.5% or 5% oxygen) and standard laboratory conditions (21% oxygen; control level) using Mann Whitney U testing. A non-parametric test was chosen due to the small sample size and different distributions of discrete count data between oxygen levels. In the initial comparison between 5% and 21% oxygen, two replicates had n = 5 hermaphrodites for each oxygen level, whereas the third replicate had n = 6 in the control group (21% oxygen) and n = 9 in the low-oxygen group (5% oxygen). In the subsequent comparison between 2.5% and 21% oxygen, n ranged from 3–6 in the control group and from 5–6 in the low-oxygen group. The uneven number of animals between oxygen levels was due to some hermaphrodites dying during the course of the experiments. After pooling the replicate data, we computed exact p-values, effect size estimates (probability of superiority, PS), and associated confidence intervals using the wmwTest() function from the asht package (version 1.0.1) in R (version 4.5.0). A fixed random seed was set to ensure reproducibility (set.seed(123)). We applied Holm–Bonferroni correction to control family-wise error rate over three pairwise comparisons (hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny), reporting 98.33% CIs for effect sizes.
","reagents":"Strain | Genotype | Source |
Caenorhabditis elegans, wild type, Bristol. | CGC | |
Escherichia coli OP50 | CGC |
Critical developmental processes are associated with low tissue oxygen levels in many animal taxa (Simon and Keith, 2008; Mohyeldin et al., 2010; Carreau et al., 2011; Baccino-Calace et al., 2020; Brouillet et al., 2021; Carroll et al., 2021). However, less is known about tissue oxygen gradients and sensitivity in microscopic invertebrates that lack respiratory and circulatory systems. Many microscopic invertebrate species take up oxygen via simple diffusion across the body surface (Graham, 1988), meaning that their tissue oxygen gradients are directly coupled to ambient oxygen concentrations. Such animals are typically found in low-oxygen environments like sediment, soil, and compost (Jørgensen and Revsbech, 1985; Sexstone et al., 1985; Schratzberger et al., 2019; van den Hoogen et al., 2020), which are likely to result in low tissue oxygen levels. For example, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans naturally inhabits rotting fruits and vegetation (Schulenburg and Félix, 2017), and this popular model organism has been shown to display a behavioral preference for 5–12% oxygen in laboratory studies (Gray et al., 2004). Yet, whether this preference for low oxygen levels is linked to oxygen sensitivity during reproduction and early development remains poorly understood.
The reproductive system of adult C. elegans hermaphrodites is known as “the germ line” and consists of two U-shaped gonadal arms connected by a common uterus (Hirsh et al., 1976). Each gonadal arm contains a pool of germline stem cells at its distal tip. As these germline stem cells proliferate, cells are pushed away from the stem cell niche in the proximal direction and begin to differentiate, eventually forming the oocytes that are passed through the spermatheca and fertilized (Hirsh et al., 1976; Albert Hubbard and Schedl, 2019). The spermatheca contains the adult hermaphrodites' supply of sperm cells (“self-sperm”) produced during the late larval stages (Hirsh et al., 1976). After peak fertility during days 1–3 of adulthood, the store of self-sperm is nearly depleted, and reduced sperm signaling leads to decreased rates of oocyte maturation and ovulation, although unfertilized oocytes are expelled at a reduced rate (Ward and Carrel, 1979; Riddle et al., 1997; McCarter et al., 1999; Scharf et al., 2021). The current study aims to explore the effects of moderately low oxygen levels on the reproductive output of C. elegans, including whether low oxygen levels lead to increased production of hatched, viable larvae throughout the entire fertile period (see Huang et al., 2004).
We cultured adult C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5%, 5%, and 21% oxygen and compared reproductive output between oxygen levels. Reproductive output was quantified as daily counts of (1) viable larvae; (2) unfertilized oocytes; and (3) abnormal progeny (unhatched embryos and dead or visibly deformed larvae, see Methods). We selected 5% oxygen because it falls within the range preferred by C. elegans (Gray et al., 2004) while approximating oxygen levels in mammalian stem cell niches (Mohyeldin et al., 2010, and references therein). We also quantified reproductive output at 2.5% oxygen, which is closer to tissue oxygen levels in many insect species (Birrell et al., 2024) and during mammalian embryonic development (Brouillet et al., 2021).
First, we compared reproductive output between adult hermaphrodites cultured at 5% and 21% oxygen over days 1–5 of adulthood to test whether more hatched, viable larvae would be produced at 5% oxygen. Median production of hatched, viable larvae was essentially identical between 5% and 21% oxygen, but statistical comparison was inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (probability of superiority, PS = 0.508; 98.33% CI = 0.305–1.000; one-sided exact p = 0.475; Fig. 1A; Table 1). This reflected variability between replicates (PS per replicate: 0.680, 0.640, 0.389; see Methods). The observed daily distributions of larval counts appeared similar between oxygen levels, suggesting no major shift in the timing of peak fertility and generally similar daily fecundity between conditions (Fig. 1B). We found no significant difference in the production of abnormal progeny between 5% and 21% oxygen, but results were inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (PS = 0.569; 98.33% CI = 0.329–0.782; two-sided exact p = 0.503; Table 1).
To explore the effects of 5% oxygen on C. elegans germline function after peak fertility, we counted daily output of unfertilized oocytes over days 1–5 of adulthood. We observed a trend towards reduced total output of unfertilized oocytes at 5% oxygen (PS = 0.308; 98.33% CI = 0.083–0.547; two-sided exact p = 0.053; Fig. 1E, Table 1). This trend was consistent between replicates (PS per replicate: 0.160, 0.280, 0.352). No unfertilized oocytes were observed during the first two days of adulthood at either oxygen level, and output of unfertilized oocytes generally began on day three and increased on day four (Fig. 1F).
Next, we cultured C. elegans at 2.5% and 21% oxygen during days 1–6 of adulthood to test whether more hatched, viable larvae would be produced at 2.5% oxygen. We did not observe increased production of viable larvae at 2.5% oxygen (PS = 0.333; 98.33% CI = 0.136–1.000; one-sided exact p = 0.941; Table 1). Rather, median larval counts were reduced compared to 21% oxygen (Fig. 1C; PS per replicate: 0.278, 0.267, 0.460). As in the initial experiment, the daily distributions of larval counts appeared similar between 2.5% and 21% oxygen, suggesting no major shift in peak fertility timing (Fig. 1D). We observed no significant difference in the production of abnormal progeny between oxygen levels, but results were inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (PS = 0.408; 98.33% CI = 0.189–0.664; two-sided exact p = 0.393; Table 1).
Given the observed trend towards a reduced number of unfertilized oocytes at 5% oxygen, we investigated whether unfertilized oocyte output would be reduced at 2.5% compared to 21% oxygen. We observed a significant reduction in the total output of unfertilized oocytes when culturing C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5% oxygen during days 1–6 of adulthood (PS = 0.254; 98.33% CI = 0.000–0.481; one-sided exact p = 0.011; Table 1; Fig. 1G). Again, output of unfertilized oocytes began on day three of adulthood and daily output after peak fertility was generally higher under 21% oxygen (Fig. 1H). Median output of unfertilized oocytes was lower at 2.5% oxygen in all replicates (PS per replicate: 0.375, 0.133, 0.080). Thus, our results indicate a reduction in unfertilized oocyte output at 2.5% compared to 21% oxygen.
To summarize, we did not find evidence to support increased fecundity of C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5% and 5% oxygen. Statistical comparisons of viable progeny production between oxygen levels were inconclusive but observed medians and effect size estimates suggested broadly similar fertility between 5% and 21% oxygen. Our findings complement the results of Freyth et al. (2010), who reported that C. elegans fertility is largely unchanged between ~10% and 21% oxygen, increased at 3.6% oxygen, and reduced at <3.6% oxygen. However, whereas Freyth et al. (2010) reported the total number of larvae counted after the first three days of adulthood, our daily counting protocol necessitated brief (10–15 min) daily exposures to 21% oxygen, which may have obscured any small fertility increase at 5% oxygen. Conversely, at 2.5% oxygen, we observed a trend towards reduced median production of hatched, viable larvae in all replicates, consistent with the results of Freyth et al. (2010). Decreased production of hatched larvae at 2.5% oxygen may reflect metabolic effects, as C. elegans has been shown to maintain stable respiration between ~4% oxygen and atmospheric levels (Anderson and Dusenbery, 1977; Van Voorhies and Ward, 2000).
In contrast to the inconclusive effects on fertility, lower oxygen levels consistently led to reduced output of unfertilized oocytes. Such a reduction would be expected if lowering ambient oxygen levels resulted in reduced rates of oocyte production. Oxygen-sensitive gamete differentiation rates would be consistent with the observation that mammalian cell differentiation is affected by oxygen levels (Ezashi et al., 2005; Berniakovich and Giorgio, 2013; Drela et al., 2014), and with the role of mitochondrial maturation and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in driving C. elegans oocyte differentiation (Charmpilas and Tavernarakis, 2020). However, reduced overall rates of oocyte production would lead to shifts in the timing of peak fertility under 2.5% and 5% oxygen compared to 21%, which we did not consistently observe (Figs. 1B,F). Thus, our results indicate that moderately low oxygen levels lead to reduced output of unfertilized oocytes after peak fertility, compared to standard laboratory conditions. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of oxygen on different germline functions in C. elegans.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert Hubbard EJ, Schedl T. 2019. Biology of the Caenorhabditis elegans Germline Stem Cell System. Genetics. 213: 1145.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1534/genetics.119.300238"},{"reference":"Anderson GL, Dusenbery DB. 1977. Critical-oxygen tension of Caenorhabdiltis elegans. J Nematol 9(3): 253-4.
","pubmedId":"19305606","doi":""},{"reference":"Baccino Calace M, Prieto D, Cantera R, Egger B. 2020. Compartment and cell-type specific hypoxia responses in the developing Drosophila brain. Biology Open. 9: bio053629.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/bio.053629"},{"reference":"Berniakovich I, Giorgio M. 2013. Low oxygen tension maintains multipotency, whereas normoxia increases differentiation of mouse bone marrow stromal cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 14: 2119.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/ijms14012119"},{"reference":"Birrell JH, Verberk WCEP, Woods HA. 2024. Consistent differences in tissue oxygen levels across 15 insect species reflect a balance between oxygen supply and demand and highlight a hitherto unknown adaptation for extracting sufficient oxygen from water. Current Research in Insect Science. 6: 100095.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cris.2024.100095"},{"reference":"Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 77: 71.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/77.1.71"},{"reference":"Brouillet S, Baron C, Barry F, Andreeva A, Haouzi D, Gala A, et al., Hamamah S. 2021. Biphasic (5–2%) oxygen concentration strategy significantly improves the usable blastocyst and cumulative live birth rates in in vitro fertilization. Scientific Reports. 11: 22461.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41598-021-01782-6"},{"reference":"Carreau A, Hafny Rahbi BE, Matejuk A, Grillon C, Kieda C. 2011. Why is the partial oxygen pressure of human tissues a crucial parameter? Small molecules and hypoxia. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 15: 1239.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01258.x"},{"reference":"Carroll C, Engstrom N, Nilsson PF, Haxen ER, Mohlin S, Berg P, Glud RN, Hammarlund EU. 2021. Hypoxia Generated by Avian Embryo Growth Induces the HIF-α Response and Critical Vascularization. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 9","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fevo.2021.675800"},{"reference":"Charmpilas N, Tavernarakis N. 2020. Mitochondrial maturation drives germline stem cell differentiation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death and Differentiation. 27: 601.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41418-019-0375-9"},{"reference":"Drela K, Sarnowska A, Siedlecka P, Szablowska Gadomska I, Wielgos M, Jurga M, Lukomska B, Domanska Janik K. 2014. Low oxygen atmosphere facilitates proliferation and maintains undifferentiated state of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in an hypoxia inducible factor-dependent manner. Cytotherapy. 16: 881.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.02.009"},{"reference":"Ezashi T, Das P, Roberts RM. 2005. Low O2 tensions and the prevention of differentiation of hES cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102: 4783.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0501283102"},{"reference":"Freyth K, Janowitz T, Nunes F, Voss M, Heinick A, Bertaux J, Scheu S, Paul RJ. 2010. Reproductive Fitness and Dietary Choice Behavior of the Genetic Model Organism Caenorhabditis elegans under Semi-Natural Conditions. Molecules and Cells. 30: 347.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s10059-010-0125-9"},{"reference":"Graham JB. 1988. Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects of Integumentary Respiration: Body Size, Diffusion, and the Invertebrata1. American Zoologist. 28: 1031.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/icb/28.3.1031"},{"reference":"Gray J, Karow D, Lu H, Chang A, Chang J, Ellis R, Marletta M, Bargmann C. 2004. Oxygen sensation and social feeding mediated by a C-elegans guanylate cyclase homologue. NATURE. 430: 317.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature02714"},{"reference":"Hirsh D, Oppenheim D, Klass M. 1976. Development of the reproductive system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 49: 200.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0012-1606(76)90267-0"},{"reference":"Huang C, Xiong C, Kornfeld K. 2004. Measurements of age-related changes of physiological processes that predict lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101: 8084.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0400848101"},{"reference":"Jørgensen BB, Revsbech NP. 1985. Diffusive boundary layers and the oxygen uptake of sediments and detritus. Limnology and Oceanography. 30: 111.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.4319/lo.1985.30.1.0111"},{"reference":"Kern CC, Townsend S, Salzmann A, Rendell NB, Taylor GW, Comisel RM, et al., Gems D. 2021. C. elegans feed yolk to their young in a form of primitive lactation. Nature Communications. 12: 5801.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41467-021-25821-y"},{"reference":"McCarter J, Bartlett B, Dang T, Schedl T. 1999. On the Control of Oocyte Meiotic Maturation and Ovulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 205: 111.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1006/dbio.1998.9109"},{"reference":"Mohyeldin A, Garzon Muvdi T, Quinones Hinojosa A. 2010. Oxygen in Stem Cell Biology: A Critical Component of the Stem Cell Niche. Cell Stem Cell. 7: 150.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.007"},{"reference":"Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, et al., editors. C. elegans II. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1997. Section IX, Oocyte Development, Maturation, and Ovulation. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20108/
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Scharf A, Pohl F, Egan BM, Kocsisova Z, Kornfeld K. 2021. Reproductive Aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: From Molecules to Ecology. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 9: 718522.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcell.2021.718522"},{"reference":"Schratzberger M, Holterman M, Van Oevelen D, Helder J. 2019. A Worm's World: Ecological Flexibility Pays Off for Free-Living Nematodes in Sediments and Soils. BioScience. 69: 867.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/biosci/biz086"},{"reference":"Schulenburg H, Felix MA. 2017. The Natural Biotic Environment of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 206: 55.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1534/genetics.116.195511"},{"reference":"Sexstone AJ, Revsbech NP, Parkin TB, Tiedje JM. 1985. Direct Measurement of Oxygen Profiles and Denitrification Rates in Soil Aggregates. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 49: 645.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900030024x"},{"reference":"Simon MC, Keith B. 2008. The role of oxygen availability in embryonic development and stem cell function. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 9: 285.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nrm2354"},{"reference":"Van Den Hoogen J, Geisen S, Wall DH, Wardle DA, Traunspurger W, De Goede RGM, et al., Crowther TW. 2020. A global database of soil nematode abundance and functional group composition. Scientific Data. 7: 103.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41597-020-0437-3"},{"reference":"Van Voorhies WA, Ward S. 2000. Broad oxygen tolerance in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 203: 2467.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/jeb.203.16.2467"},{"reference":"Ward S, Carrel JS. 1979. Fertilization and sperm competition in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 73: 304.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0012-1606(79)90069-1"}],"title":"Ecologically relevant low oxygen levels reduce unfertilized oocyte output in Caenorhabditis elegans
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"Gary Craig Schindelman"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"126a73d3-4143-4bf1-b5fc-de08e7697e8b","decision":"publish","abstract":"Caenorhabditis elegans naturally inhabits low-oxygen environments but is typically studied at 21% oxygen. We cultured adult C. elegans at 2.5%, 5%, and 21% oxygen during the fertile period, quantifying daily output of hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny (unhatched embryos, dead or deformed larvae). While we found no evidence for increased fertility at low oxygen levels compared to 21%, we observed a trend towards fewer unfertilized oocytes after peak fertility at 5% oxygen and significantly fewer at 2.5%. Our results indicate that reproductive output differs between laboratory conditions (high oxygen) and moderately low oxygen levels (closer to natural environments).
","acknowledgements":"The authors are grateful to Anastasia Nathania Widjaja, Fredrik Forsberg, and Johanna Farley for laboratory assistance and useful discussion. The N2 strain and OP50 were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC, University of Minnesota), which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, StemTherapy","Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","project"],"email":"emma.haxen@med.lu.se","firstName":"Emma R.","lastName":"Haxen","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-0309-1329"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, StemTherapy","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","investigation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"mazharul.islam@med.lu.se","firstName":"Mazharul ","lastName":"Islam","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-8574-2465"},{"affiliations":["College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States","McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada"],"departments":["Lyman Briggs College and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences","School of Earth, Environment, and Society and the Origins Institute"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"grabowa@mcmaster.ca","firstName":"Alexandra ","lastName":"Grabowski","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0004-6294-9227"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, StemTherapy","Lund University Cancer Center","Division of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sofie.mohlin@med.lu.se","firstName":"Sofie","lastName":"Mohlin","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-2458-3963"},{"affiliations":["University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark"],"departments":["Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"nrep@ign.ku.dk","firstName":"Nicole R.","lastName":"Posth","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6695-6115"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Lund Stem Cell Center, StemTherapy","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","resources","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sandeep.gopal@med.lu.se","firstName":"Sandeep","lastName":"Gopal","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6706-6747"},{"affiliations":["Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden","Lund University, Lund, Sweden"],"departments":["Tissue Development and Evolution (TiDE), Department of Experimental Medical Science","Lund Stem Cell Center, StemTherapy","Lund University Cancer Center"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","resources","fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","project"],"email":"emma.hammarlund@med.lu.se","firstName":"Emma U.","lastName":"Hammarlund","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-7625-4793"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
","dataTable":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/f2075d73449b32fd82aeb023f4da82d7.csv"},"extendedData":[],"funding":"This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [grant agreement No 949538]; the Swedish Research Council [2019-02020 and 2023-01941]; Cancerfonden [22 2125 P j and 25 4675 Pj]; Stiftelsen Konsul Thure Carlssons Minne; Franke och Margareta Bergqvists Stiftelse; The Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund; and The Swedish Cancer Society. EUH and NRP also thank the Novo Nordisk Foundation [Grant NNF23OC0086712] for their support.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/5061e7cbf8f681a85e60dac81a6cbdfa.png"},"imageCaption":"Figure: Panels A, B, E, and F illustrate results from the experiment comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen. Panels C, D, G, and H illustrate results from the experiment comparing reproductive output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen. Each data point represents one C. elegans hermaphrodite. For the experiment comparing 5% and 21% oxygen, total counts (A, E) quantify reproductive output during the first five days of adulthood. For the experiment comparing 2.5% and 21% oxygen, total counts (C, G) quantify reproductive output during the first six days of adulthood. For each experiment, data was pooled from three replicates (see Methods). A: Total counts of hatched, viable larvae per hermaphrodite at 5% and 21% oxygen. B: Daily production of hatched, viable larvae at 5% and 21% oxygen. C: Total counts of hatched, viable larvae at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. D: Daily counts of hatched, viable larvae at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. E: Total counts of unfertilized oocytes output per hermaphrodite at 5% and 21% oxygen. F: Daily output of unfertilized oocytes at 5% and 21% oxygen. G: Total counts of unfertilized oocytes at 2.5% and 21% oxygen. H: Daily output of unfertilized oocytes at 2.5% and 21% oxygen.
Table 1: Summary statistics and test results for the comparison of reproductive output between oxygen levels. PS is the Mann–Whitney estimate (probability of superiority). Note, that the data represent pooling of multiple replicates (see Methods).
","imageTitle":"Counts of hatched larvae and unfertilized oocytes at different oxygen levels
","methods":"C. elegans maintenance
The laboratory reference strain (Wild-type, Bristol) was cultured on nematode growth medium (NGM) in 60 mm vented petri dishes seeded with Escherichia coli (OP50 strain) bacterial lawns. The NGM was prepared as detailed in Brenner (1974). Animals were maintained at 20°C for at least two weeks without starvation or overcrowding before being used for experiments.
Controlling oxygen tensions
During experiments, animals were cultured in a temperature-controlled laboratory under different oxygen pressures within custom-built hypoxia boxes. At the front, the boxes had a hinged door with magnet strips glued along the edges, connecting to magnet strips around the box opening. At the back, holes were drilled and fitted tightly with connectors to gas tubes and oxygen sensors. In the hypoxia boxes, oxygen levels were maintained using ProOx 110 Compact oxygen Controllers (BioSpherix, Ltd., RRID: SCR_021129), which kept oxygen concentrations at the set low levels by infusing the semi-sealed boxes with a gas mix consisting of 420 ppm CO2 in N2. In the otherwise identical control chamber (21% oxygen), the sensor hole at the back of the box was left open to ambient air. Each box contained a fan to avoid oxygen gradients, as well as a beaker of Milli-Q water to ensure comparable humidity levels between the hypoxia and control boxes. Temperature and relative humidity levels were monitored using data loggers (HOBO® MX1101 Temp/RH Data Logger and HOBO® Pendant® MX Temp/Light (MX2202) Logger).
Quantifying daily reproductive output
Experiments quantifying reproductive output were initiated using animals at larval stage L4. Each experimental replicate was initiated by picking 10–20 L4 larvae onto an empty NGM plate. These L4 larvae were then distributed through blinded randomization between an equal number of NGM plates, half of which (for the low-oxygen group) had been left to degas oxygen in the hypoxia box overnight. After picking one L4 larva onto each NGM plate for the experiment, the plates were returned to the hypoxia and control boxes.
The initial experiment comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen was conducted over days 1–5 of adulthood. The subsequent experiment to compare reproductive output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen was conducted over days 1–6 of adulthood. Daily transfers to fresh NGM plates necessitated brief (10–15 minutes) exposure to ambient conditions (21% oxygen), resulting in oxygen fluctuations similar to variability in the natural habitats of C. elegans. Every day during the study period, the animals were transferred to new NGM plates seeded with 100 µl OP50 lawns (the low-oxygen plates having been left to degas oxygen overnight). Blinded, randomized counting of hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny began on the third day of the experiments (counting reproductive output in the “Day one” plates) and ended on the seventh or eighth day (counting the “Day five” and “Day six” plates, respectively). Any egg that had not hatched after 48 hours was counted as unhatched. These were included in counts of abnormal progeny along with larvae with obvious morphological and locomotory defects (e.g., partial paralysis, large kinks or lumps). Unfertilized oocytes were identified based on their characteristic morphology, namely the lack of an eggshell, their brownish color, and their soft, disk-like shape (see Ward and Carrel, 1979; images in Kern et al., 2021). Reproductive output from hermaphrodites that died during the course of the experiment were excluded from the analyses, leading to different sample sizes between oxygen levels in some replicates (see Statistics).
Statistics
Effects of low oxygen levels on reproductive output were investigated via two separate experiments, one comparing reproductive output between 5% and 21% oxygen, the other comparing output between 2.5% and 21% oxygen. Three experimental replicates were conducted for each comparison. Reproductive output was compared between low-oxygen (2.5% or 5% oxygen) and standard laboratory conditions (21% oxygen; control level) using Mann Whitney U testing. A non-parametric test was chosen due to the small sample size and different distributions of discrete count data between oxygen levels. In the initial comparison between 5% and 21% oxygen, two replicates had n = 5 hermaphrodites for each oxygen level, whereas the third replicate had n = 6 in the control group (21% oxygen) and n = 9 in the low-oxygen group (5% oxygen). In the subsequent comparison between 2.5% and 21% oxygen, n ranged from 3–6 in the control group and from 5–6 in the low-oxygen group. The uneven number of animals between oxygen levels was due to some hermaphrodites dying during the course of the experiments. After pooling the replicate data, we computed exact p-values, effect size estimates (probability of superiority, PS), and associated confidence intervals using the wmwTest() function from the asht package (version 1.0.1) in R (version 4.5.0). A fixed random seed was set to ensure reproducibility (set.seed(123)). We applied Holm–Bonferroni correction to control family-wise error rate over three pairwise comparisons (hatched larvae, unfertilized oocytes, and abnormal progeny), reporting 98.33% CIs for effect sizes.
","reagents":"Strain | Genotype | Source |
Caenorhabditis elegans, wild type, Bristol. | CGC | |
Escherichia coli OP50 | CGC |
Critical developmental processes are associated with low tissue oxygen levels in many animal taxa (Simon and Keith, 2008; Mohyeldin et al., 2010; Carreau et al., 2011; Baccino-Calace et al., 2020; Brouillet et al., 2021; Carroll et al., 2021). However, less is known about tissue oxygen gradients and sensitivity in microscopic invertebrates that lack respiratory and circulatory systems. Many microscopic invertebrate species take up oxygen via simple diffusion across the body surface (Graham, 1988), meaning that their tissue oxygen gradients are directly coupled to ambient oxygen concentrations. Such animals are typically found in low-oxygen environments like sediment, soil, and compost (Jørgensen and Revsbech, 1985; Sexstone et al., 1985; Schratzberger et al., 2019; van den Hoogen et al., 2020), which are likely to result in low tissue oxygen levels. For example, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans naturally inhabits rotting fruits and vegetation (Schulenburg and Félix, 2017), and this popular model organism has been shown to display a behavioral preference for 5–12% oxygen in laboratory studies (Gray et al., 2004). Yet, whether this preference for low oxygen levels is linked to oxygen sensitivity during reproduction and early development remains poorly understood.
The reproductive system of adult C. elegans hermaphrodites is known as “the germ line” and consists of two U-shaped gonadal arms connected by a common uterus (Hirsh et al., 1976). Each gonadal arm contains a pool of germline stem cells at its distal tip. As these germline stem cells proliferate, cells are pushed away from the stem cell niche in the proximal direction and begin to differentiate, eventually forming the oocytes that are passed through the spermatheca and fertilized (Hirsh et al., 1976; Albert Hubbard and Schedl, 2019). The spermatheca contains the adult hermaphrodites' supply of sperm cells (“self-sperm”) produced during the late larval stages (Hirsh et al., 1976). After peak fertility during days 1–3 of adulthood, the store of self-sperm is nearly depleted, and reduced sperm signaling leads to decreased rates of oocyte maturation and ovulation, although unfertilized oocytes are expelled at a reduced rate (Ward and Carrel, 1979; Riddle et al., 1997; McCarter et al., 1999; Scharf et al., 2021). The current study aims to explore the effects of moderately low oxygen levels on the reproductive output of C. elegans, including whether low oxygen levels lead to increased production of hatched, viable larvae throughout the entire fertile period (see Huang et al., 2004).
We cultured adult C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5%, 5%, and 21% oxygen and compared reproductive output between oxygen levels. Reproductive output was quantified as daily counts of (1) viable larvae; (2) unfertilized oocytes; and (3) abnormal progeny (unhatched embryos and dead or visibly deformed larvae, see Methods). We selected 5% oxygen because it falls within the range preferred by C. elegans (Gray et al., 2004) while approximating oxygen levels in mammalian stem cell niches (Mohyeldin et al., 2010, and references therein). We also quantified reproductive output at 2.5% oxygen, which is closer to tissue oxygen levels in many insect species (Birrell et al., 2024) and during mammalian embryonic development (Brouillet et al., 2021).
First, we compared reproductive output between adult hermaphrodites cultured at 5% and 21% oxygen over days 1–5 of adulthood to test whether more hatched, viable larvae would be produced at 5% oxygen. Median production of hatched, viable larvae was essentially identical between 5% and 21% oxygen, but statistical comparison was inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (probability of superiority, PS = 0.508; 98.33% CI = 0.305–1.000; one-sided exact p = 0.475; Fig. 1A; Table 1). This reflected variability between replicates (PS per replicate: 0.680, 0.640, 0.389; see Methods). The observed daily distributions of larval counts appeared similar between oxygen levels, suggesting no major shift in the timing of peak fertility and generally similar daily fecundity between conditions (Fig. 1B). We found no significant difference in the production of abnormal progeny between 5% and 21% oxygen, but results were inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (PS = 0.569; 98.33% CI = 0.329–0.782; two-sided exact p = 0.503; Table 1).
To explore the effects of 5% oxygen on C. elegans germline function after peak fertility, we counted daily output of unfertilized oocytes over days 1–5 of adulthood. We observed a trend towards reduced total output of unfertilized oocytes at 5% oxygen (PS = 0.308; 98.33% CI = 0.083–0.547; two-sided exact p = 0.053; Fig. 1E, Table 1). This trend was consistent between replicates (PS per replicate: 0.160, 0.280, 0.352). No unfertilized oocytes were observed during the first two days of adulthood at either oxygen level, and output of unfertilized oocytes generally began on day three and increased on day four (Fig. 1F).
Next, we cultured C. elegans at 2.5% and 21% oxygen during days 1–6 of adulthood to test whether more hatched, viable larvae would be produced at 2.5% oxygen. We did not observe increased production of viable larvae at 2.5% oxygen (PS = 0.333; 98.33% CI = 0.136–1.000; one-sided exact p = 0.941; Table 1). Rather, median larval counts were reduced compared to 21% oxygen (Fig. 1C; PS per replicate: 0.278, 0.267, 0.460). As in the initial experiment, the daily distributions of larval counts appeared similar between 2.5% and 21% oxygen, suggesting no major shift in peak fertility timing (Fig. 1D). We observed no significant difference in the production of abnormal progeny between oxygen levels, but results were inconclusive regarding effects in the underlying population (PS = 0.408; 98.33% CI = 0.189–0.664; two-sided exact p = 0.393; Table 1).
Given the observed trend towards a reduced number of unfertilized oocytes at 5% oxygen, we investigated whether unfertilized oocyte output would be reduced at 2.5% compared to 21% oxygen. We observed a significant reduction in the total output of unfertilized oocytes when culturing C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5% oxygen during days 1–6 of adulthood (PS = 0.254; 98.33% CI = 0.000–0.481; one-sided exact p = 0.011; Table 1; Fig. 1G). Again, output of unfertilized oocytes began on day three of adulthood and daily output after peak fertility was generally higher under 21% oxygen (Fig. 1H). Median output of unfertilized oocytes was lower at 2.5% oxygen in all replicates (PS per replicate: 0.375, 0.133, 0.080). Thus, our results indicate a reduction in unfertilized oocyte output at 2.5% compared to 21% oxygen.
To summarize, we did not find evidence to support increased fecundity of C. elegans hermaphrodites at 2.5% and 5% oxygen. Statistical comparisons of viable progeny production between oxygen levels were inconclusive but observed medians and effect size estimates suggested broadly similar fertility between 5% and 21% oxygen. Our findings complement the results of Freyth et al. (2010), who reported that C. elegans fertility is largely unchanged between ~10% and 21% oxygen, increased at 3.6% oxygen, and reduced at <3.6% oxygen. However, whereas Freyth et al. (2010) reported the total number of larvae counted after the first three days of adulthood, our daily counting protocol necessitated brief (10–15 min) daily exposures to 21% oxygen, which may have obscured any small fertility increase at 5% oxygen. Conversely, at 2.5% oxygen, we observed a trend towards reduced median production of hatched, viable larvae in all replicates, consistent with the results of Freyth et al. (2010). Decreased production of hatched larvae at 2.5% oxygen may reflect metabolic effects, as C. elegans has been shown to maintain stable respiration between ~4% oxygen and atmospheric levels (Anderson and Dusenbery, 1977; Van Voorhies and Ward, 2000).
In contrast to the inconclusive effects on fertility, lower oxygen levels consistently led to reduced output of unfertilized oocytes. Such a reduction would be expected if lowering ambient oxygen levels resulted in reduced rates of oocyte production. Oxygen-sensitive gamete differentiation rates would be consistent with the observation that mammalian cell differentiation is affected by oxygen levels (Ezashi et al., 2005; Berniakovich and Giorgio, 2013; Drela et al., 2014), and with the role of mitochondrial maturation and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in driving C. elegans oocyte differentiation (Charmpilas and Tavernarakis, 2020). However, reduced overall rates of oocyte production would lead to shifts in the timing of peak fertility under 2.5% and 5% oxygen compared to 21%, which we did not consistently observe (Figs. 1B,F). Thus, our results indicate that moderately low oxygen levels lead to reduced output of unfertilized oocytes after peak fertility, compared to standard laboratory conditions. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of oxygen on different germline functions in C. elegans.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert Hubbard EJ, Schedl T. 2019. Biology of the Caenorhabditis elegans Germline Stem Cell System. Genetics. 213: 1145.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1534/genetics.119.300238"},{"reference":"Anderson GL, Dusenbery DB. 1977. Critical-oxygen tension of Caenorhabdiltis elegans. J Nematol 9(3): 253-4.
","pubmedId":"19305606","doi":""},{"reference":"Baccino Calace M, Prieto D, Cantera R, Egger B. 2020. Compartment and cell-type specific hypoxia responses in the developing Drosophila brain. Biology Open. 9: bio053629.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/bio.053629"},{"reference":"Berniakovich I, Giorgio M. 2013. Low oxygen tension maintains multipotency, whereas normoxia increases differentiation of mouse bone marrow stromal cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 14: 2119.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/ijms14012119"},{"reference":"Birrell JH, Verberk WCEP, Woods HA. 2024. Consistent differences in tissue oxygen levels across 15 insect species reflect a balance between oxygen supply and demand and highlight a hitherto unknown adaptation for extracting sufficient oxygen from water. Current Research in Insect Science. 6: 100095.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cris.2024.100095"},{"reference":"Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 77: 71.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/77.1.71"},{"reference":"Brouillet S, Baron C, Barry F, Andreeva A, Haouzi D, Gala A, et al., Hamamah S. 2021. Biphasic (5–2%) oxygen concentration strategy significantly improves the usable blastocyst and cumulative live birth rates in in vitro fertilization. Scientific Reports. 11: 22461.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41598-021-01782-6"},{"reference":"Carreau A, Hafny Rahbi BE, Matejuk A, Grillon C, Kieda C. 2011. Why is the partial oxygen pressure of human tissues a crucial parameter? Small molecules and hypoxia. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 15: 1239.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01258.x"},{"reference":"Carroll C, Engstrom N, Nilsson PF, Haxen ER, Mohlin S, Berg P, Glud RN, Hammarlund EU. 2021. Hypoxia Generated by Avian Embryo Growth Induces the HIF-α Response and Critical Vascularization. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 9","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fevo.2021.675800"},{"reference":"Charmpilas N, Tavernarakis N. 2020. Mitochondrial maturation drives germline stem cell differentiation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death and Differentiation. 27: 601.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41418-019-0375-9"},{"reference":"Drela K, Sarnowska A, Siedlecka P, Szablowska Gadomska I, Wielgos M, Jurga M, Lukomska B, Domanska Janik K. 2014. Low oxygen atmosphere facilitates proliferation and maintains undifferentiated state of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in an hypoxia inducible factor-dependent manner. Cytotherapy. 16: 881.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.02.009"},{"reference":"Ezashi T, Das P, Roberts RM. 2005. Low O2 tensions and the prevention of differentiation of hES cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102: 4783.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0501283102"},{"reference":"Freyth K, Janowitz T, Nunes F, Voss M, Heinick A, Bertaux J, Scheu S, Paul RJ. 2010. Reproductive Fitness and Dietary Choice Behavior of the Genetic Model Organism Caenorhabditis elegans under Semi-Natural Conditions. Molecules and Cells. 30: 347.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s10059-010-0125-9"},{"reference":"Graham JB. 1988. Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects of Integumentary Respiration: Body Size, Diffusion, and the Invertebrata1. American Zoologist. 28: 1031.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/icb/28.3.1031"},{"reference":"Gray J, Karow D, Lu H, Chang A, Chang J, Ellis R, Marletta M, Bargmann C. 2004. Oxygen sensation and social feeding mediated by a C-elegans guanylate cyclase homologue. NATURE. 430: 317.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature02714"},{"reference":"Hirsh D, Oppenheim D, Klass M. 1976. Development of the reproductive system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 49: 200.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0012-1606(76)90267-0"},{"reference":"Huang C, Xiong C, Kornfeld K. 2004. Measurements of age-related changes of physiological processes that predict lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101: 8084.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0400848101"},{"reference":"Jørgensen BB, Revsbech NP. 1985. Diffusive boundary layers and the oxygen uptake of sediments and detritus. Limnology and Oceanography. 30: 111.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.4319/lo.1985.30.1.0111"},{"reference":"Kern CC, Townsend S, Salzmann A, Rendell NB, Taylor GW, Comisel RM, et al., Gems D. 2021. C. elegans feed yolk to their young in a form of primitive lactation. Nature Communications. 12: 5801.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41467-021-25821-y"},{"reference":"McCarter J, Bartlett B, Dang T, Schedl T. 1999. On the Control of Oocyte Meiotic Maturation and Ovulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 205: 111.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1006/dbio.1998.9109"},{"reference":"Mohyeldin A, Garzon Muvdi T, Quinones Hinojosa A. 2010. Oxygen in Stem Cell Biology: A Critical Component of the Stem Cell Niche. Cell Stem Cell. 7: 150.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.007"},{"reference":"Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, et al., editors. C. elegans II. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1997. Section IX, Oocyte Development, Maturation, and Ovulation. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20108/
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Scharf A, Pohl F, Egan BM, Kocsisova Z, Kornfeld K. 2021. Reproductive Aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: From Molecules to Ecology. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 9: 718522.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcell.2021.718522"},{"reference":"Schratzberger M, Holterman M, Van Oevelen D, Helder J. 2019. A Worm's World: Ecological Flexibility Pays Off for Free-Living Nematodes in Sediments and Soils. BioScience. 69: 867.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/biosci/biz086"},{"reference":"Schulenburg H, Felix MA. 2017. The Natural Biotic Environment of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 206: 55.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1534/genetics.116.195511"},{"reference":"Sexstone AJ, Revsbech NP, Parkin TB, Tiedje JM. 1985. Direct Measurement of Oxygen Profiles and Denitrification Rates in Soil Aggregates. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 49: 645.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900030024x"},{"reference":"Simon MC, Keith B. 2008. The role of oxygen availability in embryonic development and stem cell function. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 9: 285.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nrm2354"},{"reference":"Van Den Hoogen J, Geisen S, Wall DH, Wardle DA, Traunspurger W, De Goede RGM, et al., Crowther TW. 2020. A global database of soil nematode abundance and functional group composition. Scientific Data. 7: 103.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/s41597-020-0437-3"},{"reference":"Van Voorhies WA, Ward S. 2000. Broad oxygen tolerance in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 203: 2467.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/jeb.203.16.2467"},{"reference":"Ward S, Carrel JS. 1979. Fertilization and sperm competition in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology. 73: 304.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0012-1606(79)90069-1"}],"title":"Ecologically relevant low oxygen levels reduce unfertilized oocyte output in Caenorhabditis elegans
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"Gary Craig Schindelman"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lontra longicaudis","label":"Lontra longicaudis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"74151715-ce89-4db0-9784-96f8b7c8eb5f","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[{"accessor":"Oxygen comparison","Header":"Oxygen comparison"},{"accessor":"Period (days)","Header":"Period (days)"},{"accessor":"Measure","Header":"Measure"},{"accessor":"Test","Header":"Test"},{"accessor":"Oxygen","Header":"Oxygen"},{"accessor":"n","Header":"n"},{"accessor":"Median (Range)","Header":"Median (Range)"},{"accessor":"IQR","Header":"IQR"},{"accessor":"PS","Header":"PS"},{"accessor":"98.33% CI","Header":"98.33% CI"},{"accessor":"p-value","Header":"p-value"}],"csvData":[{"Oxygen comparison":"5% vs 21%","Period (days)":"5","Measure":"Hatched larvae","Test":"One-sided MWU","Oxygen":"21%","n":"16","Median (Range)":"313 (232–381)","IQR":"62","PS":"0.508","98.33% CI":"0.305–1.000","p-value":"0.475"},{"Oxygen comparison":"5% vs 21%","Period (days)":"5","Measure":"Hatched larvae","Test":"One-sided MWU","Oxygen":"5%","n":"19","Median (Range)":"314 (261–385)","IQR":"39.5","PS":"","98.33% CI":"","p-value":""},{"Oxygen comparison":"5% vs 21%","Period (days)":"5","Measure":"Unfertilized oocytes","Test":"Two-sided MWU","Oxygen":"21%","n":"16","Median (Range)":"65 (24–119)","IQR":"22.8","PS":"0.308","98.33% CI":"0.083–0.547","p-value":"0.053"},{"Oxygen comparison":"5% vs 21%","Period (days)":"5","Measure":"Unfertilized oocytes","Test":"Two-sided MWU","Oxygen":"5%","n":"19","Median (Range)":"29 (0–143)","IQR":"48.5","PS":"","98.33% CI":"","p-value":""},{"Oxygen comparison":"5% vs 21%","Period (days)":"5","Measure":"Abnormal progeny","Test":"Two-sided MWU","Oxygen":"21%","n":"16","Median (Range)":"3.5 (0–9)","IQR":"4","PS":"0.569","98.33% CI":"0.329–0.782","p-value":"0.503"},{"Oxygen comparison":"5% vs 21%","Period (days)":"5","Measure":"Abnormal progeny","Test":"Two-sided MWU","Oxygen":"5%","n":"19","Median (Range)":"4 (0–12)","IQR":"3.5","PS":"","98.33% CI":"","p-value":""},{"Oxygen comparison":"2.5% vs 21% ","Period (days)":"6","Measure":"Hatched larvae","Test":"One-sided MWU","Oxygen":"21%","n":"14","Median (Range)":"357 (236–396)","IQR":"35.3","PS":"0.333","98.33% CI":"0.136–1.000","p-value":"0.941"},{"Oxygen comparison":"2.5% vs 21% ","Period (days)":"6","Measure":"Hatched larvae","Test":"One-sided MWU","Oxygen":"2.5%","n":"16","Median (Range)":"336 (293–375)","IQR":"37.5","PS":"","98.33% CI":"","p-value":""},{"Oxygen comparison":"2.5% vs 21% ","Period (days)":"6","Measure":"Unfertilized oocytes","Test":"One-sided MWU","Oxygen":"21%","n":"14","Median (Range)":"83.5 (25–171)","IQR":"57.3","PS":"0.254","98.33% CI":"0.000–0.481","p-value":"0.011"},{"Oxygen comparison":"2.5% vs 21% ","Period (days)":"6","Measure":"Unfertilized oocytes","Test":"One-sided MWU","Oxygen":"2.5%","n":"16","Median (Range)":"45 (4–113)","IQR":"55","PS":"","98.33% CI":"","p-value":""},{"Oxygen comparison":"2.5% vs 21% ","Period (days)":"6","Measure":"Abnormal progeny","Test":"Two-sided MWU","Oxygen":"21%","n":"14","Median (Range)":"3.5 (0–15)","IQR":"3.5","PS":"0.408","98.33% CI":"0.189–0.664","p-value":"0.393"},{"Oxygen comparison":"2.5% vs 21% ","Period (days)":"6","Measure":"Abnormal progeny","Test":"Two-sided MWU","Oxygen":"2.5%","n":"16","Median (Range)":"2 (0–6)","IQR":"2","PS":"","98.33% CI":"","p-value":""}]}}}, "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}